This paper investigates the effects of going public on firm innovation by comparing the innovation activities of firms that go public with firms that choose to not undergo an initial public offering (IPO) and remain privately held. Going public here is a transformation of a privately held firm into a public firm, i.e. the first time for the firm to publicly trade in stock markets. The combination of a propensity score matching (PSM) and a difference-in-difference (DiD) methods are adopted to measure the innovation trends in terms of patent applications. Using the patent-based metric, firm innovation increases following IPOs. Comparing to the innovation activities of privately held peers, going public can boost the patent growth rate of firms and delay the downward trend of patent growth in the two years following IPOs.

<p>IPO underpricing is a phenomenon found in all markets worldwide. Investors are always looking for a good opportunity of short-term abnormal positive returns, and the IPOs first-day trading returns have been a good investment strategy for both institutional and private investors in all markets of the world.</p><p>This study consists at an investor’s perspective analysis of the first-day returns of 59 IPOs listed on the Brazilian Stock Exchange Market from January 2004 to April 2007, where I have found a significantly mean positive underpricing of 6,60%.</p><p>I have found also some evidences of a sprouting “hot-market” period in Brazil, since the number of the IPOs in Brazil has been growing almost in an exponential speed, taking advantage of the constant growing cash inflow and liquidity of the Brazilian market, followed by the high evaluation of the Ibovespa Index, with return of 140% on the study time frame.</p><p>When categorizing the study by year, by underwriter (investment bank) and by market segment, I always have found positive adjusted initial returns, which corroborates the fact that underpricing is a constant phenomenon in the Brazilian market.</p><p>Other important facts that were identified in this study is that the average returns of the IPOs are decreasing along the years and that companies that depend to a large extent on their human capital and are in the business areas that are staff intensive have a high level of underpricing while companies that have a high level of fixed assets have a low level of underpricing.</p><p>Finally, after performing a multivariate linear regression analysis with the chosen independent variables on the full sample and some categorized samples, the results did not have enough statistical significance and consistence that could make them useful to create a statistical model to explain the underpricing level of Brazilian IPOs between January 2004 and April 2007.</p>

<p>För omvärlden kom Enrons krasch som en chock men det fanns de som visste vad som pågick inom bolaget. Bland annat var ansvarig revisor införstådd med de finansiella svårigheterna men valde ändå att inte påpeka detta i revisionsberättelsen. Flera studier indikerar att detta är fallet även för andra bolag då resultaten visade på en liten andel going-concern utlåtanden trots hotande konkurs. Det här väcker tankar om revisorns utlåtande verkligen ska ses som en garanti. Enron-skandalen väckte även frågor kring revisorns oberoende då det framkom att samma revisor reviderat bolaget i flera år. Syftet med denna uppsats är därmed att undersöka om svenska publika aktiebolag som gått i konkurs erhållit ett going-concern utlåtande från revisorn i den senaste årsredovisningen. Vi ämnar även se om det finns ett samband mellan going-concern utlåtande och konkurs samt mellan going-concern utlåtande och revisorns mandatperiod. För att uppnå syftet valde vi att utifrån den teoretiska referensramen formulera tre hypoteser som vi därefter prövade kvantitativt genom att samla in årsredovisningar och granska tillhörande revisionsberättelser för samtliga konkursdrabbade publika aktiebolag mellan år 1997-2010. För att säkerställa delar av resultatet genomförde vi även en statistisk prövning av hypotes 2 och 3 genom Cramers kontingenskoefficient V.</p><p><em>I den första </em>hypotesen undersökte vi om mindre än hälften av de svenska konkursdrabbade publika aktiebolagen erhöll ett going-concern utlåtande i den senaste årsredovisningen. Utifrån resultatet kunde vi konstatera att det var 18,2 procent av bolagen som erhöll ett goingconcern utlåtande i årsredovisningen närmast konkursen, vilket ligger i linje med tidigare studier. <em>I den andra </em>hypotesen undersökte vi om det fanns ett samband mellan going-concern utlåtande och konkurs, om andelen bolag som erhöll ett going-concern utlåtande ökade ju närmre bolagen var en konkurs. Resultatet visade att andelen going-concern utlåtanden var få för samtliga år men ökade ju närmre bolagen var en konkurs. Den statistiska analysen ger stöd till hypotesen och visar att det finns ett signifikant samband mellan utlåtande och konkurs. <em>I den tredje </em>och sista hypotesen undersökte vi om det fanns ett samband mellan going-concern utlåtande och revisorns mandatperiod, om andelen bolag som erhöll ett going-concern utlåtande ökade vid ett revisorsbyte. Resultatet visar att det inte fanns något samband mellan revisorsbyte och going-concern utlåtande då samtliga bolag som fått detta utlåtande inte bytt revisor. Detta bekräftas även av den statistiska prövningen. Bland de bolag där revisorsbyte genomfördes kunde vi däremot urskilja ett mönster som visade att endast de bolag som gjorde externa byten erhöll orena revisioner efter revisorsbytet.</p>

För omvärlden kom Enrons krasch som en chock men det fanns de som visste vad som pågick inom bolaget. Bland annat var ansvarig revisor införstådd med de finansiella svårigheterna men valde ändå att inte påpeka detta i revisionsberättelsen. Flera studier indikerar att detta är fallet även för andra bolag då resultaten visade på en liten andel going-concern utlåtanden trots hotande konkurs. Det här väcker tankar om revisorns utlåtande verkligen ska ses som en garanti. Enron-skandalen väckte även frågor kring revisorns oberoende då det framkom att samma revisor reviderat bolaget i flera år. Syftet med denna uppsats är därmed att undersöka om svenska publika aktiebolag som gått i konkurs erhållit ett going-concern utlåtande från revisorn i den senaste årsredovisningen. Vi ämnar även se om det finns ett samband mellan going-concern utlåtande och konkurs samt mellan going-concern utlåtande och revisorns mandatperiod. För att uppnå syftet valde vi att utifrån den teoretiska referensramen formulera tre hypoteser som vi därefter prövade kvantitativt genom att samla in årsredovisningar och granska tillhörande revisionsberättelser för samtliga konkursdrabbade publika aktiebolag mellan år 1997-2010. För att säkerställa delar av resultatet genomförde vi även en statistisk prövning av hypotes 2 och 3 genom Cramers kontingenskoefficient V. I den första hypotesen undersökte vi om mindre än hälften av de svenska konkursdrabbade publika aktiebolagen erhöll ett going-concern utlåtande i den senaste årsredovisningen. Utifrån resultatet kunde vi konstatera att det var 18,2 procent av bolagen som erhöll ett goingconcern utlåtande i årsredovisningen närmast konkursen, vilket ligger i linje med tidigare studier. I den andra hypotesen undersökte vi om det fanns ett samband mellan going-concern utlåtande och konkurs, om andelen bolag som erhöll ett going-concern utlåtande ökade ju närmre bolagen var en konkurs. Resultatet visade att andelen going-concern utlåtanden var få för samtliga år men ökade ju närmre bolagen var en konkurs. Den statistiska analysen ger stöd till hypotesen och visar att det finns ett signifikant samband mellan utlåtande och konkurs. I den tredje och sista hypotesen undersökte vi om det fanns ett samband mellan going-concern utlåtande och revisorns mandatperiod, om andelen bolag som erhöll ett going-concern utlåtande ökade vid ett revisorsbyte. Resultatet visar att det inte fanns något samband mellan revisorsbyte och going-concern utlåtande då samtliga bolag som fått detta utlåtande inte bytt revisor. Detta bekräftas även av den statistiska prövningen. Bland de bolag där revisorsbyte genomfördes kunde vi däremot urskilja ett mönster som visade att endast de bolag som gjorde externa byten erhöll orena revisioner efter revisorsbytet.

IPO underpricing is a phenomenon found in all markets worldwide. Investors are always looking for a good opportunity of short-term abnormal positive returns, and the IPOs first-day trading returns have been a good investment strategy for both institutional and private investors in all markets of the world. This study consists at an investor’s perspective analysis of the first-day returns of 59 IPOs listed on the Brazilian Stock Exchange Market from January 2004 to April 2007, where I have found a significantly mean positive underpricing of 6,60%. I have found also some evidences of a sprouting “hot-market” period in Brazil, since the number of the IPOs in Brazil has been growing almost in an exponential speed, taking advantage of the constant growing cash inflow and liquidity of the Brazilian market, followed by the high evaluation of the Ibovespa Index, with return of 140% on the study time frame. When categorizing the study by year, by underwriter (investment bank) and by market segment, I always have found positive adjusted initial returns, which corroborates the fact that underpricing is a constant phenomenon in the Brazilian market. Other important facts that were identified in this study is that the average returns of the IPOs are decreasing along the years and that companies that depend to a large extent on their human capital and are in the business areas that are staff intensive have a high level of underpricing while companies that have a high level of fixed assets have a low level of underpricing. Finally, after performing a multivariate linear regression analysis with the chosen independent variables on the full sample and some categorized samples, the results did not have enough statistical significance and consistence that could make them useful to create a statistical model to explain the underpricing level of Brazilian IPOs between January 2004 and April 2007.

For the past half a century, there has been progressive development in corporate finance theories, and among these, corporate financial decisions have been attracting the attention of outsiders. As the outsiders¡¦ learning process of the firm¡¦s private information determines the firm¡¦s value, managers who are concerned with outsiders¡¦ perceptions of their firms try to enhance their firms¡¦ short-term reputation through their financial decisions. However, up to this date, few reputation models have been applied to predict these financial decisions. Three corporate finance issues are involved to identify the reputation effects on corporate finance: (1) convertible bond call policies, (2) IPO decisions and activities, and (3) corporate financing policies. As for the first issue, this study constructs a two-period reputation model of a convertible bond call policy. This model concludes that in equilibrium, a firm with bad management quality and a bad reputation chooses to call, while a firm with good management quality or of a good reputation builds up it reputation by not calling the convertible bonds. This is consistent with the signaling theory proposed by Harris and Raviv (1985). However, the reputation model here identifies the call policy as a reputation-building mechanism rather than being only a signaling role, and suggests that the reputation rents resolve the discrepancies of the stock¡¦s post-call price performance. As for the IPO decisions and activities, this study performs another reputation model to analyze a firm¡¦s reputation effects on IPO activities, especially on the decision to go public. The results yield that a firm¡¦s reputation does affect its decision to go public. By listing equities publicly, firms with good management quality and a solid past would anticipate enhancing their reputations, and those with a poor past would anticipate building up good names. Furthermore, good reputation firms with bad management quality would anticipate maintaining their reputations by going public. On the other hand, it is found that good firms over-invest in building up their reputations and bad firms take advantage of their reputations to go public. Both result in firms¡¦ over-going public and IPO mispricing. This constitutes an alternative interpretation on IPOs¡¦ long-run underperformance and the sharp decline of the survival rate. As for the corporate financing policies, the other reputation model is constructed by taking both determinants, the costs of financial distress as well as the firm¡¦s reputation into consideration. The results show that good management quality firms with good reputations enjoy their financial flexibility between debt and equity. Bad management quality firms take advantage of their good names to issue equities, which leads to over investment. Good management firms lose their financial accesses due to bad reputations, which lead to under investment. Reputations would screen the bad management quality firms with bad reputations off the market. This dissertation concludes that reputations indeed affect the three selected corporate financial decisions and suggests further plow on more corporate finance issues.

Aktualumas. Susidomėjimą agresijos tyrimais galima paaiškinti kaip reakciją į agresijos, smurto ir prievartos didėjimą šiuolaikiniame, civilizuotame pasaulyje. Nors agresijos rūšys, įvairios agresyvumo apraiškos gana plačiai aprašomos literatūroje, tačiau duomenų apie paauglių – studentų agresyvumą dar stokojama. Hipotezė: sportuojančių studentų požiūris į agresiją yra palankesnis nei nesportuojančių studentų. Tyrimo objektas – sportuojančių ir nesportuojančių studentų požiūris į agresiją ir raiškos formos. Tyrimo tikslas – atskleisti sportuojančių ir nesportuojančių studentų požiūrį į agresiją ir agresijos raiškos formas. Tyrimo uždaviniai: 1. Atskleisti sportuojančių ir nesportuojančių studentų požiūrį į agresiją. 2. Ištirti sportuojančių ir nesportuojančių studentų agresijos raiškos formas: fizinę, netiesioginę ir verbalinę. Ištyrus sportuojančius ir nesportuojančius studentus A. Asingerio metodika, matome, kad 82 procentų sportuojančių ir 72 procentų nesportuojančių studentų požiūris į agresiją yra neutralus (p>0,05). Ištyrus sportuojančius ir nesportuojančius studentus A. Basso ir A. Darki metodika paaiškėjo, kad sportuojančių studentų agresyvumas yra vidutinis, o nesportuojančių studentų agresyvumas yra žemas (p<0,05). Sportuojančių studentų didesnė yra fizinė, netiesioginė ir verbalinė agresijos, susierzinimas ir kaltės jausmas. Skirtumas tarp sportuojančių ir nesportuojančių studentų, pagal fizinę ir verbalinę agresijas, susierzinimą yra patikimas (p<0,05)... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / Topicality. The interest in the research of aggression may be explained as a reaction to the increment of aggression, violence, and compulsion in a contemporary civilized world. Types of aggression and various manifestations of aggressiveness are widely portrayed in literature, however, the data on the adolescents - students’ aggressiveness is still insufficient. Hypothesis: the attitude towards the aggression is more favorable among the students who are going in for sports, than of those who are not. Object of research: students’ going in for sports and not going in for sports attitude towards aggression and forms of its expression. Aim of research: to reveal students’ going in for sports and not going in for sports attitude towards aggression and forms of its expression. Goals of research: 1. to reveal students’ going in for sports and not going in for sports attitude towards aggression. 2. To examine how students going in for sports and not going in for sports express aggressiveness. After examining the students going in for sports and not going in for sports according to A. Asinger methodology we can see that the majority of students from both groups have a neutral attitude towards the aggression (p> 0.05). After examining the students who go in for sports and do not go in for sports according to A. Basso and A. Darki methodology it turned out that the aggressiveness of going in for sports students is medium, and of those not going in for sports the aggressiveness is... [to full text]

In March 2003, the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) released new corporate governance guidelines, which included debatable “best practice” recommendations such as the adoption of an independent board and separation of the roles of chairperson and CEO. Given the premise that strong corporate governance enhances shareholder value and, by extension, increases initial public offering (IPO) issuers’ appeal to investors, this thesis assesses the level of conformity by a sample of Australian firms, which made an IPO between 1994 and 1999, with the best practice recommendations. We also examine the relationship between firm outcomes (including IPO underpricing, post-IPO long-run performance, and the likelihood of a SEO) and board governance quality, captured by board composition, board leadership, board size and share ownership of directors. These outcomes are addressed as they are important dimensions of firm performance that may be reasonably assumed to be associated with the quality of corporate governance, and these tests can provide an insight into the preference of investors who arguably are best placed to assess the appropriateness of the recommendations promoted by the ASX. Further, we analyse changes in IPO firms’ board structures from the time of listing to five years later to determine if IPO firms adopt governance structures that are more in line with the best practice recommendations after listing and if the changes are related to IPO firms’ long-run performance. Overall, we find that IPO firms that arguably have the strongest incentive to adopt the “optimal” board structures diverge substantially from ASX’s recommendations both at the time of IPO and five years later. IPO firms’ board structures are found to be unrelated with the level of IPO underpricing and board size, after controlling for the size of the firm, is significant in explaining both long-run aftermarket performance and the probability of a SEO. IPO firms with larger boards and those that increase the board size after listing are found to perform better in the long-run. However, contrary to expectation, smaller boards are associated with a higher likelihood of equity reissuance. Overall, the results lead us to question the role played by the board of directors in signalling firm quality. Our findings also suggest that ASX’s best practice recommendations are likely to distort the market-driven practices already in place.

Univ., Diss.--St. Gallen, 1999.

Thesis (doctoral)--Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1997. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 187-193) and index.