Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-05T17:20:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 27 / Nenhuma / O presente trabalho pretende desenvolver a idéia de um Direito Eco-Evolutivo baseado em níveis de observação/percepção capazes de possibilitar decisões em conflitos ambientais hipercomplexos. A comunicação ecológica provoca relações de complementaridade, concorrência e antagonismo no seio das instituições jurídicas, promovendo interações de desorganização/reorganização permanentes, similares a de um ecossistema. Através da transposição de categorias originárias da biologia (heterotrofia, parasitismo, mutações), física (termodinâmica) e química (entropia), bem como da utilização de metáforas do Sistema da Arte, linguagem e Semiótica possibilitar-se-á compreensões aprimoradas do fenômeno social no que tange a alta complexidade dos problemas ambientais postos à decisão junto ao Direito. Para tanto, propõem-se a construção de sete níveis de observação, sete tipos de lentes microscópicas, das quais se utilizarão os órgãos jurídicos responsáveis por dirimir/decidir acerca destas situações. Desta forma, busca-se a / The present work intends to develop the idea of an Eco-Evolution Right based on levels of perceptions capable to make possible decisions in Hyper-Complexity ambient conflicts. The ecological communication provokes relations of complementarities, competition and antagonism in the role of the legal institutions, promoting permanent, similar interactions of reorganization of an ecosystem. Through the transposition of originary categories of biology (heterotrophy, parasitism, mutations), physics (thermodynamic) and chemistry (entropy), as well as of the use of metaphors of the System of the Art, language and Semiotics improved understandings of the social phenomenon will be made possible in that it refers to the high complexity of the ambient problems ranks to the together decision to the Right. For in such a way, they consider it construction of seven levels of comment, seven types of microscopically lenses, which will use the responsible legal agencies for decisions about of these situations. Of this form, it p

Face à l’évolution sinueuse de l’intégration européenne, notre objectif est d’analyser, depuis la perspective de la théorie des systèmes de Niklas Luhmann, le processus suivi par le système politique en Europe. Si Luhmann n’a jamais réalisé une observation ponctuelle de la question, sa théorie nous apporte un cadre pluridisciplinaire à la capacité d’innovation remarquable au regard de la complexité de la société moderne, des relations post-nationales et de la reconfiguration du politique. Cette approche est notamment prometteuse dans un contexte de décentration du politique par rapport à la société européenne, et de décentration des Etats nationaux par rapport au système politique. Ce contexte provoque une incertitude face au futur, qui fait à la fois écho à un moment de transition dans la réalité et dans notre formulation théorique de cette réalité. Notre recherche vise donc à une reformulation de la structure conceptuelle systémique dont l’actualisation nous semble nécessaire. Par delà le caractère fécond des observations, descriptions et concepts de la théorie des systèmes tels que l’anti-régionalisme, le post-humanisme, le constructivisme ou la spécificité du politique, nous défendons l’introduction et l’application d’un schéma conceptuel qui cible l’analyse du social dans ses aspects complexes, multi-niveaux, « polycontexturels » et polycentriques, et dans ses temporalités multiples. L’Europe prend une référence particulière, au croisement d’une complexité globale (la « société-monde ») et d’une complexité héritée de la différenciation territoriale (Etats-nations et régions); ce travail se propose de trouver une perspective qui permettra d’observer ce phénomène. / Facing to the winding evolution of European integration, our aim is to analyze the process followed by the political system in Europe, from the perspective of Niklas Luhmann’s System Theory. Although Luhmann has never made a punctual observation about this question, his theory gives us a pluridisciplinary framework with a remarkable innovative ability in order to think modern society’s complexity, post-national relations and political reconfigurations. This is an auspicious approach in a context of political decentralization with regard to the European society, and a context of decentralization of the National-State with regard to the political system. This original situation provokes an uncertainty face to the future which shows a transitional moment in reality as well as in theoretical formulation on this reality. Our research focuses on reformulating the system’s structure of concepts; we consider its renewal necessary. Despites the fructiferous nature of system theory’s observations, descriptions and concepts: anti-regionalism, post-humanism, constructivism or the specificity of politics for instance; we propose the introduction and application of a renewed conceptual schema that focuses on the analysis of society in its complexity, multi-level, “policontextural”, polycentric aspects as well as multiple temporalities. Europe itself takes a particular reference in the intertwined theoretical space of a global complexity (“World-Society”) and of a complexity inherited from territorial differentiation (Nation- States and regions); our research tries to find out the best possible perspective from which we could observe this phenomenon.