The term incident management system (IMS) denotes a particular approach employed by many fire departments. The IMS aims to manage diverse resources at a wide variety of emergency scenes. Due to the barrier of culture, different task grouping and etc... , Taipei Fire Department Rescue Team is the only fire fighting unit implementing IMS in Taiwan for the time being. This research aims to find out the important factors for fire departments in Taiwan if they want to implement IMS. Our inductive study conducted 23 experts to explore the factors. Based on progressive discussions with the experts group, we summarized and clarified the key points and identify 22 factors of IMS. Furthermore, a five perspectives and 22-factors questionnaire was prepared to conduct a quantitative method. This research applied the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to facilitate the decision of CSF. In general, this research suggests ¡§resource management¡¨ should be viewed as the most important factors among the five perspectives. While within the five perspectives, there are five critical success factors, which are ¡§formulate SOP¡¨, ¡§clear group and division¡¨, ¡§set up resource management unit¡¨, ¡§recruit more firefighters¡¨ and ¡§improving incident commander abilities¡¨, for the fire departments in Taiwan as a reference to implement IMS.

The diploma thesis focuses on information systems analysis and assessment of a chosen company. After results evaluation based on this analysis, a proposal will be made on how to convert the former information system into a new one. This proposal will be described from an economic point of view at the end of the thesis as well.

This essay deal with implementation of the Incident management as one of the possible means to minimize risks and losses arising from failures in the organization’s infrastructure and inaccessibility of their "business-critical" applications. It focuses primarily on the organization focused on electronic commerce.

Användandet av IT relaterade tjänster har ökat kraftigt de senaste åren och visar inga tecken på att avstanna. Men i takt med att användningen ökar så ökar även riskerna, för vad händer egentligen när de IT-tjänster som så många företag och privatpersoner förlitar sig på plötsligt fallerar eller på annat sätt blir oåtkomliga? För att skydda sig mot sådana scenarier så blir det allt vanligare bland företag som driver IT-tjänster att använda sig incidenthantering, vars syfte är att genom fördefinierade processer återställa IT-tjänster till fungerande läge när en incident väl inträffar. För att implementera en incidenthanteringsprocess är det vanligt att verksamheter använder någon form av ramverk eller metod för att underlätta och effektivisera arbetet, i skrivande stund heter de mest använda ramverken ITIL och COBIT. Det är mycket vanligt att en incidenthanteringsprocess i en verksamhet bygger på någon form av system eller applikation vars syfte är att underlätta och effektivisera hanteringen av incidenter, ett sådant system benämns ofta som incidenthanteringssystemet. Trots att ramverk som ITIL och COBIT är använda i stor utsträckning världen över så uppstår det ett problem i att de båda saknar fokus på incidenthanteringssystemet och vad ett sådant system skall klara av. För när ramverken inte tar upp en sådan central del av incidenthanteringsprocessen så innebär det att den implementerande verksamheten själva måste lägga tid och resurser på att reda ut hur ett sådant system skall fungera. Denna studie adresserar problemet med att de vanligast använda ramverken för incidenthantering inte behandlar det, för processen, så centrala incidenthanteringssystemet genom att undersöka och besvara följande forskningsfrågor. Vilka implicita och explicita krav bör ett incidenthanteringssystem uppfylla?  Vilka krav på incidenthanteringssystemet går att utläsa från de mest använda ramverken för incidenthantering?  Hur matchar de framtagna kraven de krav som ställts av en verksamhet ur näringslivet? Denna studie riktar sig framförallt till de verksamheter eller individer som anser sig ha nytta av en sammanställning av de krav som ett incidenthanteringssystem bör uppfylla och kan fungera som ett stöd vid implementering eller inköp av ett nytt incidenthanteringssystem. Genom att identifiera kraven som ställs på ett incidenthanteringssystem utifrån de mest använda ramverken för incidenthantering så bidrar studien med resurser för implementationen av nämnt system drastiskt minskar. Samt genom att presentera ett konkret exempel, fallstudien, och jämföra det med kraven från ramverken bidrar studien med en referenspunkt för verksamheter att utgå ifrån när de implementerar eller köper ett nytt incidenthanteringssystem. / The use of IT-related services has increased massively over the past years and it shows no signs to stop. But alongside the usage increasing the risks also increases, because what will happen when the IT-services that so many rely upon suddenly cease to function, or in other ways become inaccessible? To protect against such scenarios it is increasingly more common for IT-service businesses to use incident management, whose purpose is to recover IT-services to their functional state, using predefined processes, should an event occur. It is common for IT-service businesses when implementing an incident management process to use some kind of framework or method to facilitate and streamline its work process, and as of writing this paper, the most used frameworks are ITIL and COBIT. It is very common for an IT-service business that in the incident management process develop a system or application whose purpose is to facilitate and streamline the incident management, and these are commonly referred to as Incident Management Systems. Even though ITIL and COBIT being widely used worldwide, there are some weaknesses in them, regarding Incident Management Systems, since both of the frameworks lack focus and depth of what an Incident Management System should manage. Such lack of focus and depth of a vital and central part of the Incident Management process, may prove expensive to IT-service businesses since the business needs to investigate what the system needs to manage, and how to manage it. This paper address the problem with ITIL and COBIT lack of focus and depth regarding the central part of the incident management process, the Incident Management System by investigating and reciprocate the following questions. Which implied and explicit requirements should an Incident Management System meet?  Which Incident Management System requirements can be found from the most used frameworks regarding Incident Management?  How well does the identified requirements match those requirements made by a real world company? The target audience for this paper is mainly IT-service business or individuals that considers themselves in need of a compilation of requirements that an Incident Management System should meet and can be used as a supporting tool when implementing or purchasing a new Incident Management System. By identifying requirements that an Incident Management Systems should meet from the most used framework regarding Incident Management, this paper will contribute with means for the implementation of the Incident Management System, reducing the costs for the investigation of demands of such a system. It will also present interested parties with a concrete example, the single case study, to compare with the requirements from the frameworks, contributing with a benchmark for IT-service business to start from when implementing or purchasing an Incident Management System.

In 2018 the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) funded a study in which data were collected to evaluate performance measures for UDOT's Incident Management Team (IMT) program. After that study was completed, UDOT received funding to expand the size of its IMT program. Additionally, TransSuite, a data source used by the UDOT Traffic Operations Center to log incident-related data, was reconfigured to provide a higher quantity of performance measure data. This study made use of the new data source, in addition to Computer Aided Dispatch logs provided by the Utah Highway Patrol that were used in the first study, to collect performance measure data of the expanded program and measure the impacts of the IMT program expansion. Using these two datasets, a reanalyzed 2018 dataset and a new 2020 dataset, a comparison of performance measures was made. Performance measures studied included those defined as important by the Federal Highway Administration's Focus States Initiative in 2009, namely Roadway Clearance Time, Incident Clearance Time, and Response Time. These performance measures were calculated for IMT responders at 320 incidents in 2018 and 289 incidents in 2020. In addition, data regarding the affected volume associated with incidents, the excess travel time accumulated due to incidents, and the excess user cost associated with incident congestion were gathered. In 2018, 188 incidents were analyzed for these user impacts, and in 2020 144 incidents were analyzed. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare IMT performance between the two years and to determine relationships between performance measures and user impacts. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic affected traffic volumes during this study, and statistical analyses were adjusted to account for volume differences between the two years. Results indicated that the expansion of the IMT program has allowed UDOT to respond faster to incidents, and respond to a larger quantity of incidents over a larger coverage area and in extended operating hours. Performance of the expanded IMT program has had significant effects in reducing incident-related congestion and its costs.

In 2009 the Federal Highway Administration published a report regarding a Focus States Initiative that had been conducted with 11 states to discuss the development of national Traffic Incident Management (TIM) standards. Performance measures were defined, and a national TIM dashboard created, but very little data has been added to the dashboard since. In this research study, performance measures of the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) TIM program were analyzed. Data availability was first assessed to determine whether these performance measures could be calculated. It was determined that crash response data available from the Utah Highway Patrol (UHP) could be used to calculate the performance measures of Incident Management Teams (IMT) and UHP units; however, roadway clearance data were missing. UHP personnel agreed to collect additional data regarding crash roadway clearance for six months of the study. Performance measures of response time (RT), roadway clearance time (RCT), and incident clearance time (ICT) were calculated for responding units at 168 crashes. Using the crash response data from UHP and traffic speed, travel time, and volume data from UDOT databases, 83 of the 163 crashes that met additional criteria were evaluated to determine the volume of traffic affected (AV) by each incident and the associated user cost (EUC). Statistical analyses to determine relationships between different measures such as RT, RCT, ICT, AV, and EUC were conducted to assist UDOT in optimizing the allocation of their IMT resources.

In 2019, the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) funded a research study evaluating the performance measures of UDOT's expanded Incident Management Team (IMT) program. The number of IMTs patrolling Utah roadways increased from 13 to 25 between 2018 and 2020. Crash data were collected from the Utah Highway Patrol's Computer Aided Dispatch database and from the UDOT TransSuite database to compare IMT performance measures between the two years and to evaluate the benefits of the expanded IMT program. However, these data were compromised due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study collected data for 2022 using the same methodology as the Phase II study to compare IMT performance measures in 2022 with those of 2018 after traffic volumes had returned to a similar level as those of pre-pandemic levels. There were 283 and 307 incidents for the years of 2018 and 2022, respectively, that were analyzed for IMT performance measures which include response time, roadway clearance time, and incident clearance time. There were 172 and 236 incidents for the years of 2018 and 2022, respectively, that were analyzed for user impacts which were affected volume, excess travel time, and excess user costs. Results of the statistical analyses conducted on the 2018 and 2022 datasets show that IMTs can respond more quickly to incidents in a larger coverage area with significantly reduced user impacts. The expanded IMT program is also able to respond to more incidents, including those of high severity, while significantly decreasing congestion.

Emergency response team (ERT) member characteristics that contribute to High Reliability performance during patient care resuscitation events or other Critical Incident Management Situations are poorly understood. Findings from this study describe individual characteristics that experienced interprofessional ERT members perceive as contributing to High Reliability performance within the critical incident management context. This study supports the need for interprofessional research about emergency response teams’ High Reliability in hospital-based settings. ERT High Reliability, or “better than expected” team performance has been linked to overall patient care and safety. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe individual team member characteristics that contribute to High Reliability performance of ERT members and the overall emergency response team in a naturalistic setting during Critical Incident Management Situations. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data collection included participant observations, field notes, and interviews. Narrative data were audio-taped, transcribed and coded using Ethnograph v6©. Data content were analyzed thematically using inductive interpretive methods. Two major domains derived from the data were Self-Regulation and Whole-Team Regulation. The overarching theme, Orchestrating High Reliability at the Edge of Chaos, encompassed characteristics contributing to High Reliability performance of the ERT during Critical Incident Management Situations.

La fréquence et la sévérité des feux de forêt de grande ampleur ont augmenté dans les vingt dernières années, par la conjonction de trois tendances lourdes : le réchauffement climatique, l’extension des interfaces périurbaines et l’augmentation de la biomasse. Par conséquent, la fiabilisation des opérations de lutte, et en particulier des équipes de commandement, devient un enjeu important. Mais les opérations de secours constituent surtout une fenêtre particulièrement intéressante sur le fait organisationnel en général et les processus de construction de sens en particulier. En effet, les pompiers sont confrontés à des exigences organisationnelles en conflit : stabiliser le sens des situations pour assurer l’efficacité de l’action collective (processus de contrôle), et le réévaluer en permanence pour détecter et s’adapter aux évolutions inattendues (processus d’écoute). Le contrôle cherche à fiabiliser les apprentissages, capitalise les succès, ignore le bruit, simplifie, privilégie l’anticipation, et oriente l’attention sur les objectifs de l’action et sur la structure. L’écoute cherche à accroitre la validité des apprentissages, valorise l’improvisation, invente, détecte les signaux faibles, complexifie, rebondit, et oriente l’attention sur les conséquences de l’action et sur les relations interpersonnelles.L’hypothèse centrale de cette recherche est que la gestion de ces exigences contradictoires est une source majeure de haute fiabilité. Son design se base sur la comparaison de deux territoires (l’Ouest américain et le sud de la France), et combine plusieurs méthodes : l’observation directe des opérations de secours, l’observation des sessions d’entrainement, et des formations, ainsi qu’une expérimentation sur la plateforme de simulation de la Sécurité Civile française / The frequency and impact of large wildland fires have been increasing for the past 20 years, due to the conjunction of three long term trends: global warming, growing wildland-urban interface and increase in biomass. As a result, enhancing organizational reliability in Incident Management Teams is becoming increasingly important. Examining how firefighters face large disasters is also relevant for organization studies because these situations offer a perspective on organizing and sensemaking. Indeed, firefighters are under conflicting organizational requirements: stabilizing the sense of situations for effective collective action (control processes) and reassessing situations to detect and adapt to unexpected changes (mindful processes). Control focuses on lessons learned, capitalizes on success, ignores noise, simplifies, values anticipation and direct attention on plans and strategies. Mindfulness focuses on improvising, detects weak signals, is reluctant to simplify, values resilience and interpersonal relationships.The central hypothesis of this research is that the successful management of these opposite requirements is an important source of operational reliability. The research is based on a comparison between two territories (the American West and Southern France) and combines several methods: direct observation of firefighting operations, direct observation of Incident Management Teams trainings, the analysis of available archival data, as well as controlled experiments on a France’s Civil Protection simulation training platform

Specialised policing of critical incidents has previously been underexplored within scholarly research. Simultaneously, this type of policing has been recognised as a highly complex endeavour which hinges on an organisationalability to make sense of uncertainty and external contingencies. To build knowledge on the subject of specialised policing, the present thesis aims to explore processes of sensemaking and organising in the work context of specialised police units dedicated to the policing of high risk incidents. Two research questions have guided the thesis project viz.: 1) what ascribed meanings are coupled to specialised police unit work practice and; 2) how can organising of specialised police units be enacted in a reliable manner. These questions are empirically addressed through four part-studies: Study A amounts to a contextual literature study of previous research on specialised police units and aims at conceptual development of anomenclature describing police specialisation as a professional context. Study B in the thesis examines symbolic meanings connected to specialised police units and how such meanings relate to constructions of occupational identity of police officers working in a specialised police unit. With these studies as a contextual frame, study C within the thesis examines how leadership, management and ICT system within a specialised police unitimpacts organisational reliability and sensemaking during incident management. Finally, study D examines organisational reliability on an interpersonal level during incident management as it entails a study of collaboration between police practitioners conducting an intervention. The thesis employs a mainly ideographic and close practice approach to researchas the empirical examinations are focused upon one specific specialised police unit, namely the Swedish police’s National Counter-Terrorist Unit (NI). Using data collected through interviews, observations and archival sources, the thesis aims to contribute both to organisational developmentand to knowledge development within the scholarly community. In overview, the results of the thesis indicate that specialised policing on a level of ascribed meaning tend to be represented as exceptional, sensational and surrounded by inferences of elitism, machismo and violence. In extent, such representations inform serving police officers occupational identity workeither by spurring identification or dis-identification with prevailing accounts of meaning. On a level of organising, resilient policing of high risk incidents is shown to be dependent on an ability to favour flexibility, both through the organisational frameworks that frames incident management and in interpersonal enactment during task execution. This conclusion challenges day-to-day conceptualisation of specialised police units’ work practice as instrumental applications of coercion.