Spelling suggestions: "subject:"instrumento dde avalia??o"" "subject:"instrumento dee avalia??o""
1 |
Consci?ncia sint?tica de crian?as de 3?, 4? e 5? anos do ensino fundamental : instrumento de avalia??oSantos, Tha?s Vargas dos 25 January 2017 (has links)
Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-06-29T14:28:05Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_THAIS_VARGAS_DOS_SANTOS_COMPLETO.pdf: 2578174 bytes, checksum: 8b56822219fd9d18b7a31c260f001aaa (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-29T14:28:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_THAIS_VARGAS_DOS_SANTOS_COMPLETO.pdf: 2578174 bytes, checksum: 8b56822219fd9d18b7a31c260f001aaa (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-01-25 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPq / This research has as theme the syntactic awareness of students of 3rd, 4th and 5th grades of Elementary School. It has as main objective construct an instrument to evaluate the syntactic awareness of students of these levels of education and a manual for its use. It is theoretically supported on Psycholinguistics and its relations with Syntax, considering studies on the use and on the awareness in the use of ten syntactic cases selected. Methodologically, the syntactic awareness instrument of evaluation, with focus on these topics, uses four operational categories, three on the phrasal plane (identification task, judgment task, correction task) and a judgment task on the textual plane. The instrument elaboration process is developed through two steps. The first one involves the examination of materials and studies on syntactic awareness, the instrument first version construction, its application and the analysis of the results achieved with this pilot application with students of the stablished grades. The second step includes the instrument reworking based on the information obtained in the pilot situation, the elaboration of a manual for the instrument use and the application of the final version of the instrument with 12 students of the 3rd grade, 13 students of the 4th grade and 15 students of the 5th grade of elementary school. The results achieved are: the syntactic awareness instrument for the investigation of the 3rd, 4th and 5th grade of Elementary School; the application manual of the instrument constructed to guide professionals on the instrument use; the students' performance on the use of syntactic cases and the syntactic awareness of their use; the reconstitution of the syntactic awareness conception based on the research developed. / Esta pesquisa tem como tema a consci?ncia sint?tica de crian?as de 3?, 4? e 5? anos do Ensino Fundamental I. ? seu objetivo central construir um instrumento de avalia??o da consci?ncia sint?tica de alunos desse n?vel do ensino e um manual para seu uso, base da reconstitui??o da concep??o do tema. Est? apoiada teoricamente na Psicolingu?stica e em suas rela??es com a Sintaxe, no que se refere aos estudos sobre o uso e a consci?ncia no uso de dez conte?dos sint?ticos selecionados. Metodologicamente, o instrumento de avalia??o da consci?ncia sint?tica, com foco nesses t?picos, utiliza quatro categorias operativas, sendo tr?s no plano frasal (tarefa de identifica??o, tarefa de julgamento, tarefa de corre??o) e uma tarefa de julgamento no plano textual. O processo de elabora??o do instrumento se desenvolve por meio de duas etapas. A primeira abrange o exame de materiais e estudos sobre consci?ncia sint?tica, a elabora??o inicial do instrumento, a sua aplica??o e a an?lise dos resultados do p?blico-alvo na primeira vers?o do instrumento. A segunda etapa contempla a reelabora??o do instrumento com base nas informa??es obtidas na coleta-piloto, a elabora??o de um manual para seu uso e a aplica??o da vers?o final do instrumento em 12 alunos do 3? ano, 13 alunos do 4? ano e 15 alunos do 5? ano. S?o resultados alcan?ados: o Instrumento de investiga??o da consci?ncia sint?tica de alunos do 3?, 4? e 5? anos do EF; o manual de aplica??o desse instrumento; o desempenho dos alunos no uso de casos sint?ticos e a consci?ncia sint?tica de seu uso; a reconstitui??o da concep??o de consci?ncia sint?tica com base na pesquisa realizada.
|
2 |
Desenvolvimento de vers?o da Escala Diagn?stica Adaptativa para Atletas (EDAO-AR-A) / Development of a version of the Adaptive Diagnostic Scale for Athletes (EDAO-AR-A)Peixoto, Evandro Morais 18 December 2012 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:28:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Evandro Morais Peixoto.pdf: 1971890 bytes, checksum: aa3ca46eafe7db3c33a633eabf6bea92 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-12-18 / Ever since the effective introduction of psychology professionals into sporting teams, they have encountered demands to evaluate the subjects involved in this area, particularly athletes. Accordingly, the need for these professionals to avail themselves of psychological evaluation tools that are capable of assisting them in this task, has become increasingly imperative. However, the lack of valid tools imposes significant limitations on these professionals. This lack is, at the same time, a challenge to psychology as well as a field of investigation that is still open to researchers in this area. In the 1970s, a scale was developed in Brazil by Ryad Simon, known as the Operational Adaptive Diagnostic Scale (EDAO), to evaluate adaptive efficiency. It is based on the concept that adaptive efficiency represents the ability of a subject to cope with life s trials and tribulations. Data on the subject are obtained by way of a clinical interview. The EDAO has already proved to be valid for different strata of the clinical and non-clinical population. A self-report version, to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptation of patients in community clinics, is under development and has been provisionally assigned the acronym EDAO-AR. This study proposes the development of a version of the EDAO-AR for the evaluation of athletes, as well as examining some of its proof of validity. The study has evolved in two stages: a) adaptation of the EDAO-AR and the construction of new items; analysis of content by (specialist) judges; and a semantic analysis of the items by athletes in different sports and with different levels of schooling; b) estimate of the internal consistency of the items, distributed by factor and for the scale as a whole, evaluated using Cronbach s alpha coefficient; the MSA and KMO indices were also evaluated and finally, the dimensionality of the scales was checked by means of exploratory factorial analysis. The sample comprised 219 athletes from the following categories of sport: Athletics, Basketball, Indoor Soccer, Swimming, Rugby and Volleyball, enrolled in their respective federations in the youth and adult categories. Assuming that the adaptation of the subjects is examined based on the suitability demonstrated in the Affection-Relation (AR) and Productivity (Pr) sectors, the items were built and evaluated separately, each set of items being regarded as a different tool. The final scale was made up of 41 items, 19 for the evaluation of the AR sector and 22 for the evaluation of Pr. The results show that the AR scale and the Pr scale both evaluate the quality of adaptation in accordance with three dimensions: Self-control, Interpersonal relationships and Coping. It is suggested that there is a need to develop new items for the AR scale in order to achieve higher indices of internal consistency for the overall scale, as well as for the respective factors. Finally, the need to use both the scales in the evaluation of the adaptive configuration of athletes should be stressed. / Desde a entrada efetiva dos profissionais da psicologia nas equipes esportivas, estes se depararam com as demandas de avalia??o dos sujeitos envolvidos neste contexto, em especial os atletas. Com isto, a necessidade de contarem com instrumentos de avalia??o psicol?gica, capazes de auxili?-los nessa tarefa, tem se mostrado cada vez mais imperativa. No entanto, a car?ncia de instrumentos v?lidos imp?e-se como importante limita??o a estes profissionais. Esta car?ncia constitui ao mesmo tempo um desafio ? psicologia, bem como um campo de investiga??o ainda em aberto para os pesquisadores da ?rea. Desde a d?cada de 70 foi desenvolvida no Brasil, por Ryad Simon, uma escala para a avalia??o da efic?cia adaptativa, conhecida como Escala Diagn?stica Adaptativa Operacionalizada (EDAO). Baseia-se na concep??o de que a efic?cia adaptativa corresponde ? capacidade do sujeito de enfrentar as vicissitudes da vida. Os dados sobre o sujeito s?o obtidos por meio de entrevista cl?nica. A EDAO j? demonstrou evid?ncias de validade para diferentes estratos da popula??o cl?nica e n?o cl?nica. Uma vers?o de autorrelato, para avaliar a efic?cia da adapta??o de pacientes de cl?nicas comunit?rias, est? em desenvolvimento e tem sido provisoriamente identificada pelo acr?nimo EDAO-AR. Prop?e-se nesta pesquisa o desenvolvimento de uma vers?o da EDAO-AR para avalia??o de atletas, bem como a verifica??o de algumas de suas evid?ncias de validade. A pesquisa se desenvolveu em duas etapas: a) adapta??o da EDAO-AR e constru??o de novos itens; an?lise de conte?do por ju?zes (especialistas); e an?lise sem?ntica dos itens por atletas de diferentes modalidades e diferentes n?veis de escolaridade; b) estimativa da consist?ncia interna dos itens distribu?dos por fator e para a escala total, avaliada por coeficientes alfa de Cronbach, foram tamb?m avaliados os ?ndices MSA e KMO, e por fim, verificadas as dimensionalidades das escalas por meio de an?lise fatorial explorat?ria. A amostra foi composta por 219 atletas das seguintes modalidades: Atletismo, Basquete, Futsal, Nata??o, Rugby e V?lei inscritos em suas respectivas institui??es federativas sob a categoria juvenil e adulta. Considerando que a adapta??o dos sujeitos ? verificada a partir da adequa??o apresentadas nos setores Afetivo Relacional (AR) e Produtividade (Pr), os itens foram constru?dos e avaliados de forma separada, tomando cada conjunto de item um como um instrumento diferente. A escala final ficou constitu?da por 41 itens divididos em 19 para avalia??o do setor AR e 22 para avalia??o da Pr. Os resultados demonstram que tanto a escala AR quanto a Pr avaliam a qualidade da adapta??o de acordo com tr?s dimens?es: Autocontrole Rela??es interpessoal e Enfrentamento. Sugere-se a necessidade de desenvolvimento de novos itens para a escala AR a fim de alcan?ar maiores ?ndices de consist?ncia interna para escala geral, bem como para os respectivos fatores. Por fim, destaca-se a necessidade de utiliza??o de ambas as escalas para avalia??o da configura??o adaptativa de atletas.
|
Page generated in 0.1054 seconds