Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1960. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 241-248).

Akademisk avhandling--Göteborgs universitet. / Without thesis statement. Summary in English. Bibliography: p. [309]-317.

Orientador: Luis Gonzaga de Mello Belluzzo / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Economia / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-03T17:57:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ferreira_AdrianaNunes_D.pdf: 549241 bytes, checksum: 646b396b8beb33475d1947eb24efc963 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003 / Doutorado

Orientador: Plinio Soares de Arruda Sampaio Junior / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Economia / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-22T10:34:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Pereira_LeandroRamos_M.pdf: 2227050 bytes, checksum: 057e084b8a04fcb0640d8a9b5d5c852a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 / Resumo: Esta dissertação compara as interpretações sobre o "novo capitalismo" que emerge a partir do final do século XIX entre Keynes e a Tradição Marxista que relaciona o capital financeiro e o Imperialismo (Lênin, Hilferding e Bukhárin), e suas implicações no que se refere às características do Estado Nacional, a natureza da ordem internacional, e as relações políticas. Procuramos demonstrar que a interpretação de Keynes diverge qualitativamente do pensamento desta Tradição Marxista. Enquanto Keynes via o capitalismo enquanto um economia monetária da produção cujo problema seria o aprofundamento do grau de incerteza e instabilidade associada à uma "hipertrofia" das finanças, esta Tradição Marxista via o capital enquanto um modo de produção e dominação específico, antagônico e transitório, no qual a categoria capital financeiro representaria a fusão entre as formas parciais de capital sobre a forma monopolista, constituindo uma oligarquia financeira, concentrando poder econômico e político. Enquanto Keynes acreditava na autonomia absoluta do Estado em resolver, sob formas persuasivas, mediante uma elite esclarecida, os problemas da época, conduzindo a sociedade ao reino da abundância, esta Tradição Marxista via uma maior aglutinação subordinada do Estado aos interesses incontroláveis de expansão do capital financeiro, fazendo com que o Imperialismo, uma relação de força e dominação exercida necessariamente pela violência, se imponha como necessidade histórica, intensificando a barbárie em escala mundial / Abstract: This work compares the interpretations of the "new capitalism" that emerges from the late nineteenth century between Keynes and the Marxist Tradition that relates the finance capital and Imperialism (Lenin, Bukharin and Hilferding), and its implications with regard to the characteristics of National State, the nature of the international order, and political relations. We demonstrated that the interpretation of Keynes differs qualitatively in relation on the Marxist Tradition's thinking. As Keynes looked for the capitalism as a monetary production economy whose problem would deepen the degree of uncertainty and instability associated with a "hypertrophy" of finance, this Marxist Tradition looked for the capital as a mode of production and domination specifically antagonist and transitory, in which the financial capital category represents the fusion between the partial forms of capital on the monopolist phase, constituting a financial oligarchy, concentrating economic and political power. While Keynes believed in the absolute autonomy of the State in solve, under persuasive forms, by an enlightened elite, the problems of the time, leading the society into the realm of abundance, this Marxist Tradition looked for a greater agglutination subordinated of the State to the uncontrollable interesting of capital financial expansion, causing Imperialism, a relation of power and domination exercised necessarily by violence, imposes itself as historical necessity, intensifying barbarism worldwide / Mestrado / Ciências Economicas / Mestre em Ciências Econômicas

As a central tenet of falsificationism, Karl Popper holds that all possible scientific theories individually have a probability equal to zero. Popper’s position rests upon the Principle of Indifference, the equiprobability of mutually exclusive outcomes, to derive this zero probability. In this paper, I will illustrate that the Principle of Indifference fails to compute objective probabilities in cases in which an epistemic agent faces ignorance. Prior to experience, there is no sufficient reason to prefer any probability distribution to any other; yet, the Principle of Indifference implies a preference for a uniform probability distribution. Distribution preference is determined by the relevant experience and rational expectations of epistemic agents. Relevant experience is defined by observations and other sense experience regarding the relevant trial. Rational expectations represents the non-arbitrarity of distribution preference. Without rational expectations, the distribution preference is arbitrary even when informed by experience. If an agent lacks relevant experience, then any distribution preference is arbitrary; however, if an agent possesses relevant experience, then the Principle of Indifference does not apply. A rejection of the Principle of Indifference undermines the necessity of zero probabilities for scientific theories in which case Popper’s conclusions of falsificationism do not follow. Objective probability, then, understood within the logical interpretation, is a problematic notion.

Orientador: Luiz Gonzaga de Mello Beluzzo / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Economia / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-13T20:09:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Schwartz_Gilson_M.pdf: 6395035 bytes, checksum: 61387e131f6385e1674a59ae1103add1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1985 / Resumo: Não informado / Abstract: Not informed. / Mestrado / Mestre em Economia

Thesis (M. Econ.)--University of Hong Kong, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (leaf 156).

No description available.

La tesi desenvolupa el mètode del valor afegit per a l'avaluació de projectes d'inversió, el qual, partint de la hipòtesi de que un negoci és una organització que afegeix valor i crea riquesa , consisteix en la elaboració de la teoria d'un projecte expressat segons el model matemàtic financer del Doctor Alfonso Rodríguez.La tesi també analitza el problema del tractament de la incertesa, aconseguint en conjunt una millor conceptualització i comprensió del problema de l'inversor que es tradueix en una separació mes nítida entre els anomenats "pricing models", o models de formació de preus, i els models fonamentats en el valor intrínsec.

Inaug.-Diss.--Münich. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references.