The purpose of this thesis is to analyze which factors that enables the implementation of UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child to differ in different places in Sweden. The aim of this study is achieved by analyzing two study objects that both have been implementing the Convention on the Rights of the Child with the help of the implementation theory. The study objects that are analyzed in this case are the municipality of Kalmar and municipality of Örebro. This study uses a deductive- and to some extent also an abductive research method and analyzes the results of the study with the help of implementation analysis. Using the theory of implementation, the author makes assumptions related to the study's empirical study. In order to later serve as explanations for why the implementation has differences in different municipalities around Sweden. The result of this study is based on the municipalities own strategy plans for implementing the Convention on the Rights of the Child, together with the Swedish law about UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child. The result of this thesis shows that the new legislation requires a joint power collection among all decision-makers. This means that municipalities must actively work to implement the legislation in their operations. The result of this study also shows that there are differences between how the investigated municipalities implemented law about UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child in their operations. This thesis shows that what separates the study objects in this case it is whether or not there is a political council decision, to which the knowledge-enhancing efforts are directed, number of employees who will work with the Convention on Rights of the child and the intensity of the work with follow-up and evaluation work. In this case, the differences in the implementation can be explained by, among other things, unclear and difficult legislation, a lack of state financial and material instruments, that the implementation has taken place in several stages and a lack of understanding of the policy to implemented. The study highlights that the deciding factor for differences in the implementation of UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child has to do with the unclear and incomprehensible legislation.

For decades, the two biggest oil producers in the Middle East have been Saudi Arabia and Iran, two autocratic states that are also rivals in the region. With time, oil revenues have lowered and public discontent has risen. Through the use of a qualitative, comparative case study, this Bachelor’s Thesis aims to examine how the economic, social and political development in these countries has been affected by the oil revenues. From the theoretical viewpoints of Rentier State Theory and Assabiyya, the study concludes that oil revenues, as a considerable source of national income, has created undiversified economies in both Saudi Arabia and Iran. This has caused demands for economic, social and political change, leading to different responses from the respective states. Saudi Arabia has begun to diversify its economy to create several sources of income. The country has also initiated to loosen up its strict religious social codes in the public sphere. This is in contrast to Iran, where the government faces significant financial deficits and has started to exploit its population to compensate for the strained public economy. Additionally, no indication of political reforms towards a more democratic system of governance is seen in any of the two states.

Syftet med denna uppsats är att identifiera möjliga utfallspåverkande faktorer som möjliggör ett framgångsrikt implementerat utfall avseende social hänsyn i offentlig upphandling i en svensk kontext. Analysen och slutsatserna bygger på en jämförelse mellan två fall där utfallet utgör den gemensamma nämnaren. Underlaget till uppsatsen bygger primärt på intervjuer med tjänstemän och politiker i Sigtuna och i Örebro. De teoretiska analysverktygen som används i denna uppsats är hämtade från Rational choice- och Normativ institutionalism. Tre temafaktorer har använts för att kategorisera likheter och skillnader mellan fallen. Dessa är spelregler, preferenser och resurser. Resultatet visar på att fallen har fler möjliga utfallspåverkande faktorer gemensamma än de har utfallspåverkande faktorer som skiljer dem åt. En troligt viktig möjlig förklarande faktor ligger i att frågan om sociala krav har hanterats på ledningsnivå som en strategisk fråga, snarare än som en juridisk eller teknisk fråga. Fallen kan även förstås som att behovet av upphandling och behovet av sociala åtgärder har växt fram oberoende av varandra innan själva upphandlingsprocesserna och att det är genom aktörernas aktioner som upphandlingsfrågan och den sociala frågan har kombinerats. Dock rör det sig inte om en institutionell förändring som katalysator för implementeringen, utan snarare om inkrementell förändring i synen på offentlig upphandling som ett verktyg för social förändring. / The purpose of this thesis is to identify probable outcome influencing factors that enable a successful implemented outcome of social considerations in public procurement in a Swedish context. The analysis and conclusions are based on a comparison between two cases where the outcome is the common denominator. The empirical material for the thesis is primarily gathered from interviews with officials and politicians in Sigtuna and in Örebro municipalities. The theoretical tools used for analysis in this thesis are taken from Rational choice and Normative institutionalism. Three thematic factors have been used to categorize the similarities and differences between the cases: these are the rules of the game, preferences and resources. The result shows that the cases have more probable outcome influencing factors in common than they exhibit outcome influencing factors that set them apart. A likely important probable explanatory factor is to be found in the fact that the subject of social considerations was handled at a management / political level as a strategic issue, rather than as a legal or technical issue. The cases can also be understood in a manner which informs us that the need for procurement and the need for social action have evolved independently of each other and before the actual procurement processes. It is through the actors’ actions that the procurement issues and the social considerations have been combined into a common issue. However, the result does not indicate an institutional change as a catalyst for the implementation, but rather that the change in the perception of public procurement as a tool with social policy implication represents an incremental change within the existing institutions.