This study explores how warmth and competence perceptions affect hireability of a female job candidate. The mixed model of stereotype content identifies warmth and competence as the two basic dimensions of person-perception, and research has shown a compensatory relationship between these two dimensions, especially for women. This study explores this compensatory effect for women in a hiring situation. Two samples, one of college students (n = 301) and another of MTurk participants (n = 256), read a description of a female job candidate of either high or low competence and either high, low, or no mention of warmth, and then rated her hireability. Candidates had the greatest hireability when high in competence, and competence had a greater effect on hireability than warmth. Warmth and competence perceptions were positively related, reflecting a halo effect, such that higher warmth was inferred from higher competence. Implications for hiring decisions of female professionals are discussed.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the personality characteristics associated with accuracy in person perception. The particular personality variables chosen (experience, intelligence, cognitive complexity, psychological mindedness, emotional stability, introversion, and empathic style) for investigation were those previously identified by Gordon Allport as being related to person perception. Both types of person perception (sensitivity to individual differences and sensitivity to group differences) were measured. The major findings of the study were the following: 1. The most capable judges of individual differences, in comparison with the least capable judges, were significantly more likely to have the following psychometric characteristics: higher IQ, more extraverted, more psychologically minded, more cognitively complex/flexible, and more empathic. Experientially, the most competent judges were likely to be older, older in age at first job, and have fewer siblings. In contrast to the least able judges, the most competent ones had resided in more different cities, traveled more, experienced more formal education, and were more likely employed in the helping professions. 2. The best judges of group differences, in comparison with the worst judges, were more likely female, older in age at first job, and higher scorers on Neuroticism. 3. Significant multiple linear regression equations were formed between the predictor variables and the two judgment tasks, suggesting that accuracy in judging others consists of many skills, not just one. 4. Those who were in the helping professions were better judges than those not in the helping professions on sensitivity to individual differences, but not sensitivity to group differences. 5. For those in the helping professions, years of experience in the helping professions were not related to success on either of the two judgment tasks.

abstract: In an affordance management approach, stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination are conceptualized as tools to manage the potential opportunities and threats afforded by others in highly interdependent social living. This approach suggests a distinction between two “kinds” of stereotypes. “Base” stereotypes are relatively factual, stable beliefs about the capacities and inclinations of groups and their members, whereas “affordance stereotypes” are beliefs about potential threats and opportunities posed by groups and their members. Two experiments test the hypothesized implications of this distinction: (1) People may hold identical base stereotypes about a target group but hold very different affordance stereotypes. (2) Affordance stereotypes, but not base stereotypes, are shaped by perceiver goals and felt vulnerabilities. (3) Prejudices and (4) discrimination are more heavily influenced by affordance stereotypes than by base stereotypes. I endeavored to manipulate participants’ felt vulnerabilities to measure the predicted corresponding shifts in affordance (but not base) stereotype endorsement, prejudices, and discriminatory inclinations toward a novel target group (Sidanians). In Study 1 (N = 600), the manipulation was unsuccessful. In Study 2 (N = 338), the manipulation had a partial effect, allowing for preliminary causal tests of the proposed model. In both studies, I predicted and found high endorsement of the base stereotypes that Sidanians try to share their values and actively participate in the community, with low variability. I also predicted and found more variation in affordance (vs. base) stereotype endorsement, which was systematically related to participants’ felt vulnerabilities in Study 2. Taken together, these findings support my hypothesized distinction between base stereotypes and affordance stereotypes. Finally, I modeled the proposed correlational relationships between felt vulnerabilities, base stereotypes, affordance stereotypes, prejudices, and discriminatory inclinations in the model. Although these relationships were predominantly significant in the predicted directions, overall fit of the model was poor. These studies further our critical understanding of the relationship between stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination. This has implications for how we devise interventions to reduce the deleterious effects of such processes on their targets, perhaps focusing on changing perceiver vulnerabilities and perceived affordance (rather than base) stereotypes to more effectively reduce prejudices and discrimination. / Dissertation/Thesis / Masters Thesis Psychology 2018

Forskning har visat att människor kan avgöra andras sexuella läggning utifrån ansiktsbilder och att homosexuella män uppfattas mer feminina än heterosexuella män och vise versa hos kvinnor. Denna studie undersökte om det går att förutsäga framtida sexuella läggning på barn och om dessa skiljer sig i egenskapsskattningar beroende på uppfattad sexuell läggning. Detta gjordes genom att använda bilder på heterosexuella och homosexuella personer från när de var 6 och 14 år. Studien använde 162 enkätsvar från blivande socionomer, beteendevetare och förskollärare, varav 133 kvinnor. Resultaten visade inget stöd för att det går att gissa rätt sexuell läggning på barn. Tjejer som uppfattades homosexuella bedömdes mindre feminina än de uppfattade heterosexuella, medan uppfattade homosexuella killar bedömdes snällare än heterosexuella killar. Slutsatser av studien är att femininitet används som ett redskap vid bedömning av sexuell läggning främst hos tjejer, medan hög självsäkerhet ses vara mer framträdande hos heterosexuella tjejer och killar.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Although research demonstrates significant stigma towards individuals with mental illness, the relative importance of observed behavior and a psychiatric diagnosis in eliciting stigma remains poorly understood. Using video vignettes, three experiments (ns = 195, 749, and 791) examined the effect of irritable (vs. calm) behavior and the presence (vs. absence) of a psychiatric diagnosis (schizophrenia in Studies 1 and 2; schizophrenia and depression in Study 3) on attitudinal, emotional, and behavioral dimensions of stigma towards a fictitious emergency room patient seeking migraine treatment. In line with labeling theory, irritable behavior resulted in greater blameworthy attributions for behavior, greater fear and anger, less caring emotions, and lower perceived warmth. Both a depression and schizophrenia diagnosis elicited stigma by leading to greater endorsements of other stigmatizing attributions (e.g., substance use) as a reason for behavior. Irritable behavior and both psychiatric diagnoses resulted in patients being rated as less predictable and more dangerous, whereas irritable behavior and schizophrenia only resulted in decreased competence. Irritable behavior and psychiatric diagnosis also interacted to predict desire for social distance. When calm, a psychiatric diagnosis predicted greater distance, such that a patient with no label was least stigmatized, one with depression was moderately stigmatized, and one with schizophrenia was most stigmatized. When irritable, the patient elicited a higher desire for distance regardless of psychiatric diagnosis. Mediational analyses show that when controlling for behavior, perceived dangerousness and fear mediate the effect of a diagnosis on desire for distance. In all, results suggest both diagnostic labels and irritable behavior result in stigma via different attitudinal and emotional mechanisms, and that individuals with psychiatric diagnoses face stigma even if behaving calmly. By enriching understanding of the relative importance of irritable behavior and a psychiatric diagnosis on multiple dimensions of mental illness stigma, this work has implications for anti-stigma interventions.

No description available.

No description available.