Thesis (Ph. D.)--York University, 1998. Graduate Programme in Sociology. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 457-499). Also available on the Internet. MODE OF ACCESS via web browser by entering the following URL: http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/yorku/fullcit?pNQ42777.

Submitted by Cláudia Bueno (claudiamoura18@gmail.com) on 2016-01-07T17:03:53Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Rodrigo França Carvalho - 2015.pdf: 1912047 bytes, checksum: 15a798b9bcdd143d1e01b4ebe0ff545f (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2016-01-08T11:26:35Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Rodrigo França Carvalho - 2015.pdf: 1912047 bytes, checksum: 15a798b9bcdd143d1e01b4ebe0ff545f (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-08T11:26:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Rodrigo França Carvalho - 2015.pdf: 1912047 bytes, checksum: 15a798b9bcdd143d1e01b4ebe0ff545f (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-10-27 / Our thesis consists in analyzing, based on theories of the American quantum physicist David Bohm (1917-1992) and the Russian physical chemist, naturalized Belgian, Ilya Prigogine (1917-2003), the science ideas of these two scientists, how they represent authentic scientific views, quite deviating from the prevailing view of science, and also how their concepts contribute to overcoming long dichotomies that have been present in the history of science since a long time, such as determinism-indeterminism antithesis. Through a critical biographical analysis, we present the main aspects of scientific research work of Bohm, his formulation of an alternative interpretation of quantum theory, which has ignited debates and controversies within the world of quanta, his several theoretical contributions, including the theory of plasma, the development of an innovative theory called implicit and explicit order and also his philosophical investigations. We also present and analyze the scientific way of Prigogine and his theoretical interest in non-equilibrium thermodynamics. We show the fundamentals of his theory of dissipative structures, his unique insight into the irreversible phenomena and the most significant implications of this new view of nature and science that led him to the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1977. Although several important differences between theoretical perspectives and Bohm and Prigogine approach, we noted some similar points that were quite significant, as a concept of science radically different from the prevailing idealized view. Among these similarities we have the search for a unity between man and nature, the importance given to the conception of science without dissociating it from the deepest philosophical questions and the concern about establishing more fruitful dialogues among areas of knowledge. / Nossa tese consiste em analisar, com base nas teorias do físico quântico estadunidense David Bohm (1917-1992) e do físico-químico russo, naturalizado belga, Ilya Prigogine (1917-2003), as ideias de ciência desses dois cientistas, como elas representam autênticas visões científicas, bastante distintas da visão predominante de ciência, e também como suas concepções contribuem para a superação de dicotomias há muito presentes na História da Ciência, como a antítese determinismo-indeterminismo. Por meio de uma análise bibliográfica crítica, apresentamos os principais aspectos do trabalho investigativo científico de Bohm, sua formulação de uma interpretação alternativa à teoria quântica, que acendeu debates e controvérsias dentro do mundo dos quanta, suas várias contribuições teóricas, entre elas a teoria do plasma, a elaboração de uma inovadora teoria denominada de ordem implícita e explícita e também as suas investigações filosóficas. Também apresentamos e analisamos o caminho científico de Prigogine e o seu interesse teórico pelos sistemas de não equilíbrio da Termodinâmica. Mostramos os fundamentos de sua teoria das estruturas dissipativas, sua original visão sobre os fenômenos irreversíveis e as implicações mais significativas dessa nova visão sobre a natureza e a ciência, que o levaram ao prêmio Nobel de Química de 1977. Apesar de diversas e importantes diferenças entre as perspectivas teóricas e de abordagem de Bohm e de Prigogine, evidenciamos pontos similares bastante significativos, como um conceito de ciência radicalmente distinto da visão idealizada predominante. Entre essas similitudes, estão a busca de uma unidade entre homem e natureza, a importância dada ao fazer ciência sem dissociá-la das questões mais profundas filosóficas e a preocupação em estabelecer diálogos mais profícuos entre as áreas do saber.

Orientador: Luiz Benedicto Lacerda Orlandi / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-27T11:01:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dunajew_TatianaSilva_M.pdf: 6388002 bytes, checksum: 380534212d2526084d503c76fae86699 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2000 / Resumo: Esta pesquisa pretende investigar ressonâncias entre os trabalhos do cientista russo Ilya Prigogine e o filósofo francês Gilles Deleuze. Ao invés de buscar modelos comparativos para este propósito, o mesmo, uma vez que tem como foco a filosofia da diferença, tem o compromisso evidente de gerar novos modos de experimentação do pensamento, longe dos critérios daquilo que Deleuze chama de imagem tradicional do pensamento. Para tanto, apesar de a noção de caos ser colocada de modo diverso em ambos domínios - filosofia e ciência - , esta aparecerá como o aspecto mais importante desta pesquisa / Abstract: This research aims to investigate ressonances between the works of the russian cientist Ilya Prigogine and the french philosopher Gilles Deleuze . lnstead of searching comparative models for this purpose, once it has the difference philosophy as focus, it. has the obvious committment of generating brand new ways of thought experimentation far away of that called by Deleuze's words as tradicional thought image. For that although the chaos notion being essentially different in both domains - philosophy and science - this will appear as the most important aspect in this research / Mestrado / Mestre em Filosofia

This essay provides a thorough reading of Gilles Deleuze’s (1925–95) philosophy of nature and the way music relates to this philosophy. It does so with regards to changes in the view of nature in 20th century science, especially in the theories of self-organisation as developed by, among others, Ilya Prigogine. Deleuze’s metaphysics is viewed in relation to these theories, and is also compared to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, which is related to classical science. The essay then investigates certain key issues in Deleuze’s philosophy concerning difference and univocity (or immanence), developed in his doctoral thesis Différence et répétition (1968). Also, certain aspects of the further evolution of this philosophy of immanence in Mille plateaux (1980), co-written with Félix Guattari, are examined. The essay then studies the role of aesthetics in Deleuze’s philosophy, and the way he transforms the aesthetics of Kant. The following chapter deals with Deleuze & Guattari’s primary text concerning music, ”De la ritournelle” in Mille plateaux. In this text, they develop a highly abstract concept of music, which, in their philosophy, is: 1) granted a cosmological reach regarding rhythms and motives; 2) made an essential aspect of the emergence of art, which they find in animals creating a territory (especially in the songbird); 3) used to discuss Baroque/Classicist, Romantic and 20th century musical styles. Apart from analysing these aspects, this chapter focuses on 20th century music, with a thorough examination of Gustav Mahler and of spectral music, demonstrating that Deleuze’s philosophy can deepen the understanding of this music. The chapter also discusses problematic tendencies in Deleuzian research on contemporary music, which does not take the entirety of Deleuze’s philosophy of nature into account. This essay argues that such knowledge is necessary to correctly examine the implications of Deleuze & Guattari’s philosophy of music. The lack of awareness of Deleuze’s philosophy of nature is also significant in the critique that Deleuze’s aesthetics has received by Jacques Rancière, which is analysed in the final chapter. This chapter also discusses Michael Gallope’s reading of Deleuze & Guattari, in which he makes a distinction between a metaphysical and an ethical-aesthetic philosophy of music. Although the relation between metaphysics, ethics, and aesthetics, is key to understanding their philosophy of music, this essay argues that Gallope’s idea of what sort of music they advocate is incorrect.