Background. As part of a longitudinal study, prevalence findings of DSM-IV disorders are presented for a random sample of 3021 respondents aged 14 to 24, with response rate 71%. Method. Assessment included various subtypes of disorders, subthreshold conditions and disorders that have only rarely been studied in other epidemiological surveys. The computer-assisted Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) was used to derive DSM-IV diagnoses. Results. Substance disorders were the most frequent (lifetime 17·7%; 12-month 11·4%), with abuse being considerably more frequent than dependence. Other mental disorders had a lifetime prevalence of 27·5% (12-month, 17·5%) with depressive disorders (16·8%) being more frequent than anxiety disorders (14·4%). Eating disorders (3·0%) and threshold somatoform disorders (1·2%) were rare disorders. Subthreshold anxiety and somatoform disorders, however, were more frequent than threshold disorders. Prevalence of disorders was equally high for males and females, although specific disorder prevalence varied significantly by gender. The co-occurrence of disorders (co-morbidity) was substantial and was significantly related to greater reductions in work productivity and increased rates of professional helpseeking behaviour. Conclusions. Findings underline that mental disorders in young adults are frequent and impairing, limiting work and education ability and social interaction. Given the fact that adolescents and young adults are in a key phase of socialization in terms of professional career and interpersonal relationships, our findings indicate a considerable risk potential for an accumulation of complicating factors and future chronicity. This paper is the first report of this ongoing longitudinal study about early developmental conditions of mental disorders.

Nach Befunden des Bundes-Gesundheitssurveys 1998/99 (Zusatzsurvey „Psychische Störungen“) litten im Jahr der Erhebung 32% (=15,6 Millionen) der erwachsenen deutschen Bevölkerung im Alter von 18–65 unter einer oder mehreren psychischen Störungen. Jeder dritte Betroffene (36%) steht oder stand im Jahr vor der Erhebung wegen der psychischen Störung in Kontakt mit ambulanten oder stationären psychiatrisch/psychotherapeutischen Diensten oder seinem Hausarzt. Der Anteil von Betroffenen, die eine im weitesten Sinne adäquate Therapie nach modernen wissenschaftlichen Kriterien erhalten, kann konservativ auf ca.10% geschätzt werden. Die niedrige Versorgungsquote betrifft dabei nicht alle spezifischen Störungsgruppen in gleichem Ausmaß; niedrige Versorgungsraten ergaben sich insbesondere für somatoforme und Suchterkrankungen. Ferner ergaben sich zum Teil markante regionale Unterschiede (z.B. besonders schlechte Versorgungslage in Regionen, die weder über eine nahe Universität noch über psychotherapeutische Weiterbildungsinstitutionen verfügen).Ungeachtet unterschiedlich weiter oder enger Definitionen des Begriffs Behandlungsbedarf, zeigt sich eine gravierende Unterversorgung von Personen mit psychischen Erkrankungen. Quantitativ bedeutsame Hinweise auf eine Fehl- oder Überversorgung von Betroffenen lassen sich nicht aufzeigen. / Data from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey, Mental Health Supplement (N=4181) reveal that 32% (15,6 million people) of the adult population between 18 and 65 years of age suffer from one or more mental disorders. Among those only 36% receive treatment which also varies in type, duration, and adequacy. The proportion of cases receiving “adequate evidence- based treatments” was estimated to be about 10%.Lowest treatment rates were found for somatoform disorders and substance abuses, highest for psychotic disorders, panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, and dysthymia. The data reveal substantial regional differences with regard to treatment rates (e.g. lower rates in regions without universities or institutions offering postgraduate mental health education).The paper concludes that, depending on the diagnosis, a considerable degree of unmet medical needs exist for the majority of people affected by mental disorders. No evidence was found for an excessive supply of health care for the patients suffering from mental disorders or for treatments without an existing clinical need.

Aus der Einleitung: "The authors of the seven meta-structure papers in this issue have to be applauded for their inspiring attempt to suggest and elaborate a new meta-structure of mental disorders consisting of five ‘ clusters ’. At first sight this proposal seems to be considerably simpler than the current diagnostic classifications structure used by DSM-IV-TR (17 categories ; APA, 2000) and, in some parts, more convergent with the ICD-10 (10 categories ; WHO, 1993). Against the background of dissatisfaction expressed with the current diagnostic classification structure for mental disorders and its principles, the authors provide a selective critical review of relevant research. In particular, evidence is examined to address the question of whether current individual mental disorders differ sufficiently from each other and whether the current more fine-graded distinction of specific mental disorders and their grouping in 10 major classes according to ICD-10 and 17 in DSM-IV-TR is justified. To help answer this question, a prioricriteria were chosen in the form of a wide range of ‘validators ’ grouped into so-called ‘causal’ risk factors (i.e. shared genetic risk factors, familiality, shared environmental risks, shared neural substrates, shared biomarkers, shared temperamental antecedents) and factors thought to be more likely to reflect the clinical picture itself (shared abnormalities of cognitive and emotional processing, symptom similarity, rates of co-morbidity, course, treatment response). The results of this impressive exploration are interpreted to suggest a substantial reduction of the current major classes to five clusters and a fairly large residual category of disorders not yet assigned. Particularly noteworthy examples for classificatory changes associated with the proposed meta-structure involve: the suggestion to group anxiety, somatoform and depressive disorders together under the term ‘emotional disorders ’ ; the allocation of bipolar disorders to the ‘psychotic cluster ’ ; and the formation of a broad externalizing cluster that comprises substance use disorders, some of the personality disorders and impulse control disorders. [...]"

This special issue was prepared within the framework of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) Task Force on “Size and Burden of Mental Disorders in Europe”. The core aim of the Task Force was to describe the prevalence and the burden of treated and untreated mental disorders in all European member states and to highlight needs for further research. Ten state-of-theart epidemiological papers summarize the outcome of this project, making an attempt to provide for the first time ever prevalence estimates for a wide range of mental disorders, as well as for dementia and Parkinson’s disease in 28 European countries. These data also provide input for the European Brain Council (EBC, http://www.ebc-eurobrain. net) Initiative “Cost of Disorders of the Brain in Europe” aiming at estimating the cost of major classes of mental, neurological and neurosurgical disorders and conditions in Europe.

Background: Although positive effects of physical activity on mental health indicators have been reported, the relationship between physical activity and the development of specific mental disorders is unclear. Method: A cross-sectional (12-month) and prospective-longitudinal epidemiological study over 4 years in a community cohort of 2548 individuals, aged 14–24 years at outset of the study. Physical activity and mental disorders were assessed by the DSM-IV Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) with an embedded physical activity module. Multiple logistic regression analyses controlling for age, gender and educational status were used to determine the cross-sectional and prospective associations of mental disorders and physical activity. Results: Cross-sectionally, regular physical activity was associated with a decreased prevalence of any and co-morbid mental disorder, due to lower rates of substance use disorders, anxiety disorders and dysthymia. Prospectively, subjects with regular physical activity had a substantially lower overall incidence of any and co-morbid mental disorder, and also a lower incidence of anxiety, somatoform and dysthymic disorder. By contrast, the incidence of bipolar disorder was increased among those with regular physical activity at baseline. In terms of the population attributable fraction (PAF), the potential for preventive effects of physical activity was considerably higher for men than for women. Conclusions: Regular physical activity is associated with a substantially reduced risk for some, but not all, mental disorders and also seems to reduce the degree of co-morbidity. Further examination of the evidently complex mechanisms and pathways underlying these associations might reveal promising new research targets and procedures for targeted prevention.

No description available.

Background. As part of a longitudinal study, prevalence findings of DSM-IV disorders are presented for a random sample of 3021 respondents aged 14 to 24, with response rate 71%. Method. Assessment included various subtypes of disorders, subthreshold conditions and disorders that have only rarely been studied in other epidemiological surveys. The computer-assisted Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) was used to derive DSM-IV diagnoses. Results. Substance disorders were the most frequent (lifetime 17·7%; 12-month 11·4%), with abuse being considerably more frequent than dependence. Other mental disorders had a lifetime prevalence of 27·5% (12-month, 17·5%) with depressive disorders (16·8%) being more frequent than anxiety disorders (14·4%). Eating disorders (3·0%) and threshold somatoform disorders (1·2%) were rare disorders. Subthreshold anxiety and somatoform disorders, however, were more frequent than threshold disorders. Prevalence of disorders was equally high for males and females, although specific disorder prevalence varied significantly by gender. The co-occurrence of disorders (co-morbidity) was substantial and was significantly related to greater reductions in work productivity and increased rates of professional helpseeking behaviour. Conclusions. Findings underline that mental disorders in young adults are frequent and impairing, limiting work and education ability and social interaction. Given the fact that adolescents and young adults are in a key phase of socialization in terms of professional career and interpersonal relationships, our findings indicate a considerable risk potential for an accumulation of complicating factors and future chronicity. This paper is the first report of this ongoing longitudinal study about early developmental conditions of mental disorders.

Nach Befunden des Bundes-Gesundheitssurveys 1998/99 (Zusatzsurvey „Psychische Störungen“) litten im Jahr der Erhebung 32% (=15,6 Millionen) der erwachsenen deutschen Bevölkerung im Alter von 18–65 unter einer oder mehreren psychischen Störungen. Jeder dritte Betroffene (36%) steht oder stand im Jahr vor der Erhebung wegen der psychischen Störung in Kontakt mit ambulanten oder stationären psychiatrisch/psychotherapeutischen Diensten oder seinem Hausarzt. Der Anteil von Betroffenen, die eine im weitesten Sinne adäquate Therapie nach modernen wissenschaftlichen Kriterien erhalten, kann konservativ auf ca.10% geschätzt werden. Die niedrige Versorgungsquote betrifft dabei nicht alle spezifischen Störungsgruppen in gleichem Ausmaß; niedrige Versorgungsraten ergaben sich insbesondere für somatoforme und Suchterkrankungen. Ferner ergaben sich zum Teil markante regionale Unterschiede (z.B. besonders schlechte Versorgungslage in Regionen, die weder über eine nahe Universität noch über psychotherapeutische Weiterbildungsinstitutionen verfügen).Ungeachtet unterschiedlich weiter oder enger Definitionen des Begriffs Behandlungsbedarf, zeigt sich eine gravierende Unterversorgung von Personen mit psychischen Erkrankungen. Quantitativ bedeutsame Hinweise auf eine Fehl- oder Überversorgung von Betroffenen lassen sich nicht aufzeigen. / Data from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey, Mental Health Supplement (N=4181) reveal that 32% (15,6 million people) of the adult population between 18 and 65 years of age suffer from one or more mental disorders. Among those only 36% receive treatment which also varies in type, duration, and adequacy. The proportion of cases receiving “adequate evidence- based treatments” was estimated to be about 10%.Lowest treatment rates were found for somatoform disorders and substance abuses, highest for psychotic disorders, panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, and dysthymia. The data reveal substantial regional differences with regard to treatment rates (e.g. lower rates in regions without universities or institutions offering postgraduate mental health education).The paper concludes that, depending on the diagnosis, a considerable degree of unmet medical needs exist for the majority of people affected by mental disorders. No evidence was found for an excessive supply of health care for the patients suffering from mental disorders or for treatments without an existing clinical need.

The CIDI is a fully standardised diagnostic interview designed for assessing mental disorders based on the definitions and criteria of ICD-1Oand DSM-IlI-R. Field trials with the CIDI have been conducted in 18 centres around the world, to test the feasibility and reliability of the CIDI in different cultures and settings, as well as to test the inter-rater agreement for the different types of questions used. Of 590 subjects interviewed across all sites and rated by an interviewer and observer, 575 were eligible for analysis. The CIDI was judged to be acceptable for most subjects and was appropriate for use in different kinds of settings. Many subjects fulfilled criteria for more than one diagnosis (lifetime and six-month). The most frequent lifetime disorders were generalised anxiety, major depression, tobacco use disorders, and agoraphobia. Percentage agreements for all diagnoses were above 90% and the kappa values were all highly significant. No significant numbers of diagnostic disconcordances were found with lifetime, six-month, and four-week time frames.

This article reports the results of a cross-national investigation of patterns of comorbidity between substance use and psychiatric disorders in six studies participating in the International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology. In general, there was a strong association between mood and anxiety disorders as well as conduct and antisocial personality disorder with substance disorders at all sites. The results also suggest that there is a continuum in the magnitude of comorbidity as a function of the spectrum of substance use category (use, problems, dependence), as well as a direct relationship between the number of comorbid disorders and increasing levels of severity of substance use disorders (which was particularly pronounced for drugs). Finally, whereas there was no specific temporal pattern of onset for mood disorders in relation to substance disorders, the onset of anxiety disorders was more likely to precede that of substance disorders in all countries. These results illustrate the contribution of cross-national data to understanding the patterns and risk factors for psychopathology and substance use disorders.