This study is a mixed methods analysis of reading processes and language experiences of deaf and hearing readers. The sample includes four groups each with fifteen adults—identified as: deaf/high-achieving readers, deaf/struggling/non-academic readers, hearing/high-achieving readers, and hearing/non-academic readers. The purpose of this study is to identify factors related to reading achievement and to explore themes that emerge in the language experience and reading behaviors. The quantitative measures of the study are: a background demographics form, reading comprehension assessment, phonological skills assessment, metacognition assessment and think-aloud discussion with a reading strategy checklist where readers are guided through the process of decoding and interpreting the scene from a play. Scores from the reading comprehension assessment are correlated with other assessments and demographic statistics to identify factors of achievement. Similarities and differences between groups of readers are tested with one-way ANOVAs to identify mean differences in scores according to achievement level (skilled/struggling) and hearing status (deaf/hearing). Qualitative data are measured by collecting, reviewing and identifying shared themes in the transcripts of reading background interview and think-aloud discussions (open coding), relating codes and categories (axial coding), and determining a central theme (selective category). Results shows that deaf high-achieving readers perform at similar levels as hearing high-achieving readers, and that for all participants, phonology and metacognition are related to reading achievement; there are similarities and differences in their conceptualization of language; and access to varied instructional strategies and meaningful language experiences is an overarching theme in effective reading.

Typescript, etc. / Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries

Thesis (D.Min.)--Liberty Theological Seminary and Graduate School, 2007.

Thesis (M.A.)--Ohio State University, 1974. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 43-45). Available online via OhioLINK's ETD Center

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 1985. / Vita. Bibliography: leaves [155]-168.

Research supports that comprehension is a vital component of reading and life-long literacy, and there are many instructional approaches for teaching reading comprehension. Literature circles are a popular approach which are widely used but have not yet been studied empirically. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of participation in literature circles on the reading comprehension of middle school students. More specifically, the study examined whether there was a difference in the reading comprehension scores of students after participating in literature circles versus after participating in directed reading activity, and whether there were interactions of type of instruction and students' overall reading achievement levels. A mixed design using split-plot ANOVA was used to examine the within-subject variable of treatment, and the between-subject variables of class period, assessments (or passages used), and overall reading achievement levels, as well as determine interactions among the variables. Eighty six eighth-grade students (65% male, 35%female) in a suburban public middle school in the southeastern United States participated in the eight-week study. By class period, students were randomly placed in literature circle groups for four weeks and also participated in whole-class directed reading activity for four weeks. Students read one short story each week and comprehension was assessed with corresponding cloze passages. The reading scores indicated there were no significant differences between the two types of instruction. However, results were statistically significant for all interactions (treatment and passages, treatment and class period, and treatment and overall reading achievement). In addition, when the data were analyzed by overall reading ability it can be argued that the findings have practical significance. Evidence suggests that students with low overall reading achievement levels may not respond to literature circles as positively as other students, and that students with high overall reading achievement may respond more favorably. Overall, literature circles appear to have promise as an instructional approach to reading, especially for non-struggling readers. The discussion expands on the limitations of this study as well as focuses on the need for further scientifically-based research on this popular reading approach.

Thesis (M.Ed.)--Regis University, Denver, Colo., 2006. / Title from PDF title page (viewed on Feb. 14, 2007). Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.Ed.)--Regis University, Denver, Colo., 2006. / Title from PDF title page (viewed on Feb. 20, 2006). Includes bibliographical references.

Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) exhibit deficits in reading comprehension. Previous research indicates that music increases attention span, as well as increases auditory discrimination, memory and verbal skills in children with ASD. This study attempts to increase the reading comprehension of three children with autism by implementing a musical modality approach to learning. To assess the effects of musical presentation on reading comprehension a multiple baseline design across children was used. In baseline each child was told to read a story silently to themselves and then answer standard reading comprehension recall questions (who, what, where, when). In treatment the children were presented stories read to them (speaking modality) or sung to them (singing modality) and again asked standard recall questions. Results found that all three participant’s reading comprehension scores increased in relation to baseline, and one out of three participants reading comprehension scores increased in the signing modality condition as compared to the baseline and speaking modality conditions.

The purpose of the study was to compare the awareness of metacognitive strategies among ineffective, average, and successful readers and between third and sixth graders.The study sample consisted of one hundred fifty-nine third grade and one hundred fifty-six sixth grade students from three city schools in a midwest community. Subjects were classified into three different performance groups designated as ineffective, average, and successful according to scores on the reading comprehension subtest of the Iowa Test of Basic Skills. The researcher developed the Instrument for Measuring Awareness of Metacognitive Strategies (IMAMS) to detect existence of metacognitive applications perceived by students in elementary school. A pilot study was conducted to refine and establish reliability of the instrument. Subjects were administered the IMAMS in their regular classroom setting by the researcher. The data were analyzed using a two-way univariate analysis of variance to test the hypotheses.Findings The data from this study indicated:1. There were significant differences among mean awareness of metacognitive strategies scores for ineffective, average, and successful readers at the third and sixth grades.2. Successful readers in third and sixth grades combined differed significantly in their mean scores for awareness of metacognitive strategies from those of ineffective and average readers.3. Mean scores for awareness of metacognitive strategies between ineffective and average readers were not found to be significantly different.4. Sixth grade readers differed significantly from third grade readers with higher mean scores in awareness of to have greater awareness of metacognitive strategies.Conclusions Based on the findings of this study the following conclusions were drawn:1. Students classified as successful readers appear to have greater metacognitive strategies than those classified as either average or ineffective. The ability to understand and express or respond to a measure of metacognition may be related to reading achievement level or may be influenced by competencies that affect both reading scores and performance on the metacognition measure.2. Students designated as average and ineffective readers at both third and sixth grades do not differ in their awareness of metacognitive strategies involved in reading. These results may possibly be due to the narrow interval between the percentile ranks utilized to classify students into average and ineffective groups. 3. Sixth grade readers demonstrated more awareness of metacognitive strategies than the third grade readers.4. The awareness of metacognitive strategies appears to increase as levels of reading performance elevate.5. There is a gradual and continuing development of the awareness of metacognitive strategies as students proceed through the grades in school.