After sixteen intensive months, I quit my employed position as a security guard at a local hospital. By drawing on my autoethnographic experiences in the form of “ethnographic fiction writing”, as well as eight interviews with my former male colleagues, I explore how the guards’ constructions of masculinity intersect with their security assessment and subsequent application of force, chemical incarceration, and other coercive security tactics on involuntarily-committed mental health patients. The narratives are framed by the available literature on gender and masculinity within the security, police, prison and military institutions, as well as the theoretical notions of gendered institutions (Acker), hegemonic masculinity (Connell & Messerschmidt), doing gender (West & Zimmerman), and Dave Holmes’s application of Foucauldian biopolitical power to forensic healthcare settings. These concepts are used in tandem with a creative methodological tool to reveal the “messy”, “bloody” and “gendered” ways in which hospital life unfolds between the guard, the nurse, and the patient prisoner. By escaping more traditional forms of academic writing, I am able to weave raw, sensitive and reflexive thoughts and emotions into the research design and analysis. The analysis is divided into two narratives: “Us” and “Them”. “Us” emphasizes the gendered ways in which the hospital guard learns, reproduces, resists, lives up, or fails to live up to the masculine codes of the profession. Here, the guard must confront cultural demands to demonstrate physical prowess, authority and heroism during a patient battle. “Them” explores how hegemonic masculinity shapes the hierarchical and coercive relations between the guard, the nurse, and the patient, and reinforces psychiatrized discourses that promote punishment, pain, bureaucracy and control. Overall, these findings call for the abolition of physical restraint, chemical incarceration and other coercive security measures within our healthcare institutions, and encourage future research to give voice to the lived experiences of women guards and security management teams.

No description available.

After sixteen intensive months, I quit my employed position as a security guard at a local hospital. By drawing on my autoethnographic experiences in the form of “ethnographic fiction writing”, as well as eight interviews with my former male colleagues, I explore how the guards’ constructions of masculinity intersect with their security assessment and subsequent application of force, chemical incarceration, and other coercive security tactics on involuntarily-committed mental health patients. The narratives are framed by the available literature on gender and masculinity within the security, police, prison and military institutions, as well as the theoretical notions of gendered institutions (Acker), hegemonic masculinity (Connell & Messerschmidt), doing gender (West & Zimmerman), and Dave Holmes’s application of Foucauldian biopolitical power to forensic healthcare settings. These concepts are used in tandem with a creative methodological tool to reveal the “messy”, “bloody” and “gendered” ways in which hospital life unfolds between the guard, the nurse, and the patient prisoner. By escaping more traditional forms of academic writing, I am able to weave raw, sensitive and reflexive thoughts and emotions into the research design and analysis. The analysis is divided into two narratives: “Us” and “Them”. “Us” emphasizes the gendered ways in which the hospital guard learns, reproduces, resists, lives up, or fails to live up to the masculine codes of the profession. Here, the guard must confront cultural demands to demonstrate physical prowess, authority and heroism during a patient battle. “Them” explores how hegemonic masculinity shapes the hierarchical and coercive relations between the guard, the nurse, and the patient, and reinforces psychiatrized discourses that promote punishment, pain, bureaucracy and control. Overall, these findings call for the abolition of physical restraint, chemical incarceration and other coercive security measures within our healthcare institutions, and encourage future research to give voice to the lived experiences of women guards and security management teams.

No description available.

No description available.

This building emerges as a solitary work from obscurity. Its form is a composition of disjointed rooms connected by common themes: frontality, obscurity, artifice, and seclusion.<br /><br />In the first part, the plan appears as a map of a promenade which is the main ordering device of the building structure.<br /><br />In the second part, the internal spaces are presented as isolated from each other as is the building from any external reference.<br /><br />In the sections, which constitute the third part, the building appears as layered facades emerging from planes of strata. / Master of Architecture

L’utilisation des mesures d’isolement et de contentions en milieu psychiatrique intrahospitalier se produit fréquemment en réponse à des comportements agressifs et continue de soulever la controverse. À cet égard, de plus en plus d’études tendent à démontrer que le personnel soignant travaillant sur ces unités est influencé par plusieurs facteurs de nature différente, notamment la perception de l’agressivité, quand vient le temps de prendre une décision quant à l’utilisation (ou non) de ces mesures coercitives. Méthodologie : Plus de trois cents membres du personnel soignant travaillant en milieu psychiatrique intrahospitalier ont été recrutés dans huit établissements psychiatriques du Québec. Dans un premier temps, un questionnaire leur a été distribué afin de mettre en relief les différents facteurs (individuels et organisationnels) ayant un impact sur l’utilisation des mesures coercitives. Simultanément, l’analyse factorielle de la version française de deux échelles permettant de mesurer la perception de l’agressivité en milieu hospitalier (le MOAS et le POAS) a été faite. Résultats : Un modèle final multivarié a démontré que le type d’unité psychiatrique, l’expression de la colère et de l’agressivité parmi les membres de l’équipe de soins, la perception de la fréquence de gestes autoagressifs et la perception de mesures de sécurité insuffisantes dans le milieu de travail étaient des prédicteurs indépendants de l’utilisation de procédures d’isolement et de contentions. L’analyse factorielle a pour sa part mis en évidence une structure à 4 facteurs pour le MOAS et à 3 facteurs pour le POAS, conformément à ce que l’on retrouvait dans la littérature scientifique. Conclusion : Ces résultats soulignent l’importance des facteurs organisationnels par rapport aux facteurs individuels dans l’utilisation des mesures coercitives en psychiatrie et la nécessité d’évaluer les perceptions quant à l’agressivité et à la sécurité chez le personnel soignant. En comprenant mieux les phénomènes qui amènent leur utilisation, il sera possible de trouver des alternatives aux mesures d’isolement et de contentions et ainsi réduire le recours à ces dernières. / Psychiatric staff can have both positive and negative attitudes towards inpatient aggression. Different attitudes towards aggression can have a substantial influence on how such behaviour is dealt with on psychiatric wards. In this manner, seclusion and restraint are frequently used measures for managing violent behaviour. However, their use raises several concerns. Method: Over three hundred staff members were recruited from eight psychiatric hospitals in the province of Quebec. First of all, an examination was conducted from the staff perspective of the organizational and staff factors that may be associated with increased recourse to seclusion and restraint in psychiatric wards. Simultaneously, factorial analysis of the French version of two scales used to measure staff attitude towards institutional violence and aggression (MOAS and POAS) was completed. Results: The final multivariate model showed that the following factors independently predict to greater use of seclusion and restraint: the type of hospital ward; greater expression of anger and aggression among staff members; perceptions of the frequency of incidents of physical aggression against the self; and the perception of insufficient protection measures in the workplace. Factor analyses revealed a four factor structure for the MOAS and a three factor structure for the 12-item POAS, which is similar to what is found in recent scientific literature in North American and European countries. Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of evaluating a variety of factors, including perceptions of safety and violence, when exploring the management of aggression and violence on psychiatric wards and the reasons seclusion and restraint measures are used. These findings represent the first stage of a research program of the multidisciplinary group to whom the author is associated, aimed at reducing recourse to seclusion and restraint in Quebec psychiatric services.

Depuis la désinstitutionalisation dans les milieux psychiatriques, il a été souvent mentionné qu’une augmentation des admissions dans les milieux carcéraux et de psychiatrie légale était en cours afin de prendre soin des personnes atteintes de troubles mentaux graves (TMG). Parallèlement, plusieurs auteurs ont rapporté que les individus ayant des troubles mentaux sévères sont plus à risque de perpétrer des gestes antisociaux ou de violence. À l’égard de cette problématique, nous soutenons le modèle de la spécificité clinique. Celui-ci précise que des profils psychopathologiques particuliers augmentent le risque de violence, conduisent à différents types de fonctionnement social et articulent la demande de soins. L’environnement a, de plus, un effet modulateur au niveau du fonctionnement distinctif de l’individu. Une relation bidirectionnelle se construit entre la spécificité psychopathologique et l’environnement, plus particulièrement en ce qui a trait aux relations interpersonnelles, au milieu socioéconomique, au patron d’utilisation des services de psychiatrie et à l’interaction avec le système de justice qui déterminent subséquemment le type de prise en charge ou le statut légal du patient. Afin d’appuyer ce modèle, les profils des patients atteints de TMG en fonction des statuts légaux, du milieu de soins (psychiatrie générale et psychiatrie légale) et de l’utilisation des mesures d’isolement et de contentions ont été examinés. Les patients ont été évalués par des mesures sociodémographiques (indicateurs du fonctionnement social, des relations interpersonnelles et du milieu socioéconomique), psychodiagnostiques (SCID-I et II) et de la psychopathie. De même, le dossier criminel, les dossiers médicaux hospitaliers et administratifs (MED-ECHO et RAMQ) ont été observés. Les devis étaient rétrospectifs. Par ailleurs, au niveau de l’interaction entre les services de psychiatrie et l’individu atteint d’un TMG, nous avons exploré la perception subjective des intervenants en santé mentale quant à l’agressivité et la violence. Nous avons considéré l’impact de cette perception sur la manière d’offrir des soins, plus particulièrement en ce qui a trait aux mesures coercitives (mesures d’isolement avec ou sans contentions), lors des hospitalisations. Les cinq études ont appuyé l’idée d’une spécificité clinique tant sur le plan des profils cliniques des individus que sur la manière d’offrir les services, spécialement au niveau des mesures de contrôles. Les caractéristiques de la personne et de l’environnement semblent de ce fait jouer un rôle important dans le type de services que recevra un individu souffrant de TMG. Ces travaux ouvrent sur la possibilité de mieux déterminer l’étiologie et la gestion de la violence de même que la manière dont le système s’occupe des patients à risque de violence. / Since deinstitutionalization in psychiatry, it has often been mentioned that individuals who in the past would have been cared for in psychiatric hospitals are today ending up in forensic hospitals or, worse, in prison. Meanwhile, several authors have reported that individuals with severe mental illness are more likely to commit antisocial acts or violence. In respect of this issue, we support the clinical specificity model. It specifies that psychopathological profiles increase the risk of violence and lead to different types of social functioning. The environment has also a modulating effect on the functioning of the individual distinctiveness. A bidirectional relationship is built between the specific psychopathology and the environment, particularly with regard to interpersonal relationships, socioeconomic background, the pattern of psychiatric services use and the interaction with the justice system that subsequently determine the type of care or patient's legal status. To support this hypothesis, we examined the profiles of patients with severe mental illness based on legal status and care setting (general psychiatry and forensic psychiatry) and the use of seclusion and restraint. Patients were evaluated by sociodemographic measures (indicators of social functioning, interpersonal relationships and socioeconomic background) and measures of psychodiagnostic (SCID-I and II) and psychopathy. In addition, criminal records, official provincial government physician-billing and hospitalization files (MED-ECHO and Medicare) were observed. The designs were retrospectives. Moreover, in order to explore the subjective perception of aggression and violence of mental health workers, the level of interaction that occurs between psychiatric services and the individual suffering from severe mental illness, were evaluated. We considered the impact of this perception on how to provide care, particularly with respect to coercive measures (measures of seclusion with or without restraints) during hospitalization. The five studies have supported the clinical specificity of both the clinical profiles of individuals and the way to deliver services, especially coercion. The characteristics of the individual and the environment seem to play an important role in the type of service received by an individual with severe mental illness. This work opens the possibility in subsequent studies to better determine the etiology of aggression, how to manage violence and to identify the care offered on the issue.

This dissertation is a collection of three separate essays on the health of women and children. In the first essay, I along with my co-authors, analyzed the impact of two large, national-level health policies (the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) and the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM)) on maternal health outcomes (proportion of institutional deliveries) in India. We used data from the India Human Development Survey (IHDS) and found that the JSY and the NRHM had a greater impact on institutional deliveries in high-focus states. We also found that the conditions of the public health facilities, did not change after the implementation of the JSY and the NRHM. Finally, we found that adequacy of health facilities was not associated with the likelihood of mothers in high-focus states having an institutional delivery. In the second essay, I examined whether a key social determinant of health in South Asia- gender inequality, is associated with physical health outcomes among Indian women. I found that the gender inequality expressed as the gendered household practice of seclusion was negatively associated with body weight of Indian women. Further, I found that participation in all household decisions by women of the household was generally not associated with body weight outcomes. The association between gendered household practices and women’s body weight outcomes was generally similar among rural and urban Indian women. In the final essay, I examined whether perinatal food environments (FE), maternal gestational weight gain (GWG) and early childhood weight (ECW) outcomes are associated. I used data on mother-children dyads from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Birth cohort (ECLS-B), Area Resource Files (ARF) and Current Business Practices (CBP). I found that maternal GWG was associated with ECW outcomes. I also found that measures of food environment were associated with ECW outcomes. Specifically, I found that having an additional full-service restaurant per one thousand population in the maternal perinatal county of residence was associated with lower Body Mass Index (BMI) among children at age two years. Finally, I found that GWG did not mediate the association between food environment and ECW outcomes.

Ce travail essaie d’identifier les enjeux rencontrés dans la pratique de la psychiatrie et de proposer des repères susceptibles d’éclairer une réflexion dans une perspective éthique. Dans une première partie, nous questionnons la démarche de la psychothérapie institutionnelle, mouvement humaniste d’ouverture des hôpitaux et de prise en considération du sujet, à la lumière des concepts de l’éthique médicale ; en retour nous tentons d’interpréter les principes éthiques dans le domaine de la psychiatrie. Cette approche met l’accent sur l’expérience vécue de la maladie, l’intersubjectivité et le contexte institutionnel. Dans un second temps, une étude par entretiens semi-directifs réalisée auprès de 12 psychiatres hospitaliers révèle que les pratiques collectives sont peu orientées vers la responsabilisation des patients. La troisième partie se situe du côté des personnes hospitalisées à travers deux enquêtes. Une étude qualitative explore la perception de l’isolement de 30 patients : prédominent des affects négatifs et un vécu de privation d’information. Ensuite, une enquête par questionnaire saisit l’opinion de 169 patients sur le déroulement et les effets du séjour hospitalier ; leur appréciation s’avère majoritairement favorable. La confrontation des points de vue des psychiatres et des personnes hospitalisées, à l’aune des trois principes fondamentaux, révèle la primauté d’une dimension bienveillante, à l’exclusion parfois de l’autonomie et de la non-malfaisance. La dimension éthique du soin doit être sans cesse interrogée et réaffirmée. A cet effet, nous discutons de la pertinence d’un outil de questionnement des pratiques qui validerait le point de vue des patients. / This work tries to identify the issues encountered in the practice of psychiatry, and to propose reference points likely to clarify thinking from an ethical perspective. We initially examined institutional psycho-therapy, an open and humanistic movement of hospitals, and deliberated the topic in light of ethical medical concepts ; in return, we hoped to interpret ethical principles in the field of psychiatry. This approach placed the accent on the experience inherent in the illness, inter-subjectivity and the institutional context. Secondly, a study conducted via semi-directed discussions among 12 hospital psychiatrists revealed that collective practices are not oriented towards the accountability of patients. The third part dealt with two surveys of hospitalized people. A qualitative study explored the perception of seclusion by 30 patients : they predominantly show negative affects and an experience of being deprived of information. Then, a questionnaire survey showed the opinion of 169 patients on the procedure and effects of a hospital stay ; their rating was over-whelmingly favourable. The confrontation of opinions by psychiatrists and hospitalized patients, compared with the three fundamental principles, revealed the primacy of a benevolent dimension, to the exclusion at times of autonomy and non-maleficence. The ethical dimension of care must continue to be queried and re-asserted unceasingly. To this end, we will continue to discuss and interrogate the pertinence of a questioning tool of practices that would validate the patient’s viewpoints.