<p>The removal of vegetation and overburden changes the naturalwater purifying processes and thus decreases the groundwaterprotection in gravel pit areas. The sand and gravel depositsusedfor aggregate extraction in Sweden are also often valuablefor extraction of groundwater as a drinking water resource. TheSwedish legislation requires that gravel pits be restored afterthe cessation of extraction, the aim being to reestablishvegetation and to reinstate groundwater purifyingprocesses.</p><p>The objective of this study was to improve our understandingof the processes governing groundwater protection andvegetation establishment so that these could be applied toimproving restoration methods for reestablishing naturalgroundwater protection. The focus was on the importance of soilphysical properties of the topsoil for vegetation establishmentand groundwater recharge.</p><p>Actual field methods for restoration were reviewed.Conflicts between aggregate extraction and groundwaterinterests were common. In many cases the actual restorationcarried out differed from pre-planned specifications in permitdocumentation.</p><p>Commonly available substrates that might be used forrestoration of gravel pits were investigated. The soils weredescribed as regards texture, organic content, porosity, waterretention and hydraulic conductivity. The way in which acombination of the water retention characteristic and theunsaturated conductivity influenced the behaviour of thesoil-plant-atmosphere system was demonstrated using aprocess-orientated simulation model. Plants with well-developedaboveground characteristics and shallow roots in particularexerted the highest requirements on the soil physicalproperties.</p><p><b>Key words:</b>groundwater protection, soil physicalproperties, CoupModel, unsaturated conductivity, waterretention, transpiration, soil evaporation</p>

The removal of vegetation and overburden changes the naturalwater purifying processes and thus decreases the groundwaterprotection in gravel pit areas. The sand and gravel depositsusedfor aggregate extraction in Sweden are also often valuablefor extraction of groundwater as a drinking water resource. TheSwedish legislation requires that gravel pits be restored afterthe cessation of extraction, the aim being to reestablishvegetation and to reinstate groundwater purifyingprocesses. The objective of this study was to improve our understandingof the processes governing groundwater protection andvegetation establishment so that these could be applied toimproving restoration methods for reestablishing naturalgroundwater protection. The focus was on the importance of soilphysical properties of the topsoil for vegetation establishmentand groundwater recharge. Actual field methods for restoration were reviewed.Conflicts between aggregate extraction and groundwaterinterests were common. In many cases the actual restorationcarried out differed from pre-planned specifications in permitdocumentation. Commonly available substrates that might be used forrestoration of gravel pits were investigated. The soils weredescribed as regards texture, organic content, porosity, waterretention and hydraulic conductivity. The way in which acombination of the water retention characteristic and theunsaturated conductivity influenced the behaviour of thesoil-plant-atmosphere system was demonstrated using aprocess-orientated simulation model. Plants with well-developedaboveground characteristics and shallow roots in particularexerted the highest requirements on the soil physicalproperties. Key words:groundwater protection, soil physicalproperties, CoupModel, unsaturated conductivity, waterretention, transpiration, soil evaporation

The impact of long term management strategies of irrigation with saline water in semi-arid region of Gordonia, South Africa is the highest interest to optimize water consumption, soil conservation, and crop yield for sustainable water allocations to human food production and ecosystem without irreversible damages to soil and water body. An integrated ecosystem assimilation, in shape of soil-water storage model based on physical approach for 30-year simulation run defined in form of digital ecosystem modelling with help of CoupModel tool to assemble together the most important underlying processes of soil hydraulics, irrigation demands, leaching fraction, evapotranspiration, salt transport. Two scenarios of water management strategy; surface as traditional and drip as subsurface irrigation considered to apply water and salt into the ecosystem model. Gaining high food production for human with respect to ecosystem sustainability, in each water management scenario studied by evaluating general and detailed result from water and salt balance for the entire simulation period plus long term nitrogen and carbon turnover as crop yield indicator. Non-productive water losses, salt accumulation in root zone, carbon and nitrogen turnover, salt transport to aquifer via deep percolation observed thoroughly. Decline in crop yield due to water and salt stress, conducted by monitoring biomass production with respect to water consumption and soil osmotic pressure in root zone. Drip scenario had better functionality to perform less water wastage by decreasing soil evaporation as non-productive water loss almost 40 %, however productive water consumption decreased 20 % due to insufficient leaching fraction and also salt accumulation increased in root zone. Precipitation had a significant role to accomplish leaching deficiency and removing salt from root zone. Salt accumulation flushed out from root zone by more leaching, though resulting more water wastage and more possibility of salinization threatening beneath aquifer. Ecosystem in terms of soil-water and plant responding differently facing salinity in different water management practices and salt as source of pollution could either stabilized in soil by accumulating in root zone causing anthropogenic soil desertification or percolate to beneath aquifer resulting aquifer salinization.

Philosophiae Doctor - PhD / Orchard evapotranspiration (ET) is a complex flux which has been the subject of many studies. It often includes transpiration from the trees, cover crops and weeds, evaporation from the soil, mulches, and other orchard artefacts. Studies of evapotranspiration in orchards often quantify tree water use and soil evaporation, treating the water use from the understorey vegetation on the orchard floor as negligible. Therefore, there is a paucity of information; first about the water use of cover crops in general, and secondly about the contribution of cover crops to whole orchard ET. This information is important, especially in semi-arid regions like South Africa where water resources are already under great strain and the situation is predicted to worsen in future due to climate change.

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / In order to overcome periods of drought and low water availability, deficit irrigation becomes an important tool as long as it is applied on the least sensitive periods of the crops development to reduce the impacts on the productivity. Furthermore, deficit irrigation can be most efficient when there is an understanding of the way plants lose water. Crop evapotranspiration (ETc) is divided into soil evaporation (Es) and crop transpiration (Tc). The objectives of this paper were, beside measuring the soil water balance for different crops (bean, soybean and maize), was to determine adequate crop base coefficients (Kcb) for southern Brazil conditions, partition ETc into Es and Tc to better evaluate and understand soil water dynamics along the crops development cycle, determine water productivity (WP) considering different levels of deficit irrigation, to compare scenarios of water consumption on main and secondary crop schedules. The soil water balance model SIMDualKc was used, after due calibration and validation, using the dual crop coefficient methodology (Kc dual). A series of experiments were done (drybeans in 2010/11; maize in secondary schedule in 2010/11; maize in 2011/12; and soybean in 2014/15), with the imposition of different irrigation deficits as treatments, using drip irrigation and mulching. The results of SIMDualKc simulations show good agreement between the observed and simulated available soil water (ASW) content, values of regression coefficients (b0) were in average 0,98 for drybeans, 0,97 for soybean, 1,0 for secondary schedule maize and 1,05 for regular maize. The adjusted Kcb values for local conditions were respectively to bean, soybean and maize, 0,15; 0,15; 0,2 for the initial period (Kcb ini), 1,03; 1,0; 1,12 for the middle season (Kcb mid); and 0,2 for the end season for all crops (Kcb end). The results of water balance for each crop show that the less water is given to the plants, the better the water use, keeping in mind that ETc have not reduced in the same proportion. Regarding main and secondary schedules for maize the results for soil water balance show that main schedule maize had an increased water consumption (higher ETc) when compared to secondary schedule. The Es component was lower than 26% of ETc, for bean and soybean, and lower than 9% of ETc for maize, indicating the positive effect of mulching. / Para contornar períodos de secas e de baixa disponibilidade hídrica, a irrigação deficitária constitui-se em uma ferramenta importante, desde que aplicada nos períodos menos sensíveis das culturas, a fim de reduzir os impactos sobre a produtividade das culturas. Além disso, a irrigação deficitária pode ser mais eficiente quando se compreende o modo como ocorre a perda de água pelas plantas, a evapotranspiração das culturas (ETc), que se divide em evaporação do solo (Es) e transpiração da cultura (Tc). Os objetivos deste trabalho consistiram em (a) realizar o balanço hídrico do solo cultivado com diferentes culturas (feijão, soja e milho) e determinar os coeficientes de cultura basal (Kcb) mais adequados para as condições do Sul do Brasil; (b) particionar a ETc em Es e Tc para melhor avaliação e entendimento da dinâmica da água no solo ao longo do ciclo das culturas; (c) avaliação da produtividade da água (WP) considerando diferentes níveis de irrigação deficitária; (d) comparação de cenários entre cultivo de safra e safrinha no que se refere ao consumo de água pelas plantas. Para isso, utilizou-se o modelo de balanço hídrico SIMDualKc, o qual foi devidamente calibrado e validado, e que utiliza a metodologia dos coeficientes culturais duais (Kc dual). Experimentos foram conduzidos (feijão em 2010/11; milho safrinha em 2010/11; milho safra em 2011/12; e soja em 2014/15), com a imposição de diferentes níveis de déficit hídrico, utilizando a irrigação por gotejamento e com presença de resíduos vegetais na superfície do solo. Os resultados obtidos com as simulações do modelo SIMDualKc apresentaram boa concordância entre os valores de água disponível no solo (ASW) observados e simulados, com valores de coeficiente de regressão (b0) de, em média, 0,98 para feijão, 0,97 para soja, 1,0 para milho safrinha e 1,05 para milho safra. Os valores de Kcb ajustados para as condições locais foram, respectivamente para feijão, soja, milho, para o período inicial (Kcb ini) 0,15; 0,15; 0,2; para o período intermediário (Kcb mid) 1,03; 1,0; 1,12; e para o período final (Kcb end) 0,2 para todas as culturas. Os resultados do balanço hídrico do solo para cada uma das culturas demonstraram que quanto menor a quantidade de água aplicada nas plantas, melhor uso foi feito desta água pelas plantas, tendo em vista que a ETc não reduziu-se na mesma proporção. No que se refere a comparação de cenários entre milho safra e safrinha, os resultados do balanço hídrico do solo também demonstraram que o milho cultivado durante a época de safra teve um maior consumo de água (maior ETc) quando comparado ao milho cultivado no período de safrinha. O componente Es foi inferior a 26% da ETc, para feijão e soja, e inferior a 9% da ETc para milho safra e safrinha, indicando assim o efeito positivo da utilização de resíduos vegetais sobre a superfície do solo.

Planting density and genotype have close relationship with the water relations in plants. The scenario of increased occurrence of extreme weather events and the change of Eucalyptus forest plantations to high water deficit regions, led us to the three key questions of this study: (1) What is the relationship between planting density and the potential water stress? (2) The planting spacing interferes the water use efficiency (WUE), i.e. the amount of biomass produced by the amount of water transpired? (3) Can the planting density change the soil water balance (BHS)? To develop this work, we settled a field trial in Mogi Guacu, SP, in February 2012. We planted four genetic material (Eucalyptus grandis x E.urophylla1 {Urograndis1}, Eucalyptus grandis x E.urophylla2, E.urophylla and E.grandis x E.camaldulensis {Grancam}) with different levels of tolerance to drought and four planting spacings (3.4, 7.0, 10.5 and 16.9 m2 plant-1, which correspond to densities of 2,949 , 1,424 and 1,028 and 591 plants ha-1). In Chapter 1, we evaluated the leaf water potential (representing potential water stress) of the four clones for 1 year, between 1.5 and 2.5 years. Regardless of the genetic material, the higher the wood productivity, the greater the leaf water potential. The denser planting (2,949 plants ha-1) stands generated 39% more wood, however, water stress potential reached up to 33% higher than the least dense planting (591 plants ha-1). In the second chapter, during the same period, we evaluated the efficiency of water use, which did not vary according to the change of planting density, but showed differences between genotypes with US 2.3, 2.2 and 1, 5 g L-1 to Urograndis, Urophylla and Grancam, respectively, at a density of 1,424 plants ha-1. Finally, the third chapter evaluated for two years, between 1.7 and 3.7 years, transpiration (T), soil evaporation (Es) and canopy interception (Ei), which together made up evapotranspiration (ET). Subtraction of precipitation (P) per ET resulted in soil water balance (SWB). The SWB was positive or near zero for the two clones evaluated (Urograndis1 and Grancam) when planting density was less than or equal to 1,028 trees ha-1. In the denser planting, the balance was -25%. These studies show that: a higher wood growth results in a higher potential drought stress, generating a clear trade-off between production and survival of trees. However, the detailed study of genetic materials fall under that there are increasing opportunities in water use efficiency, though without the increase in water use, bringing a greater share of water in the watershed scale. Finally, plantations above 1,028 ha-1 trees resulted in a negative soil water balance of -25% at the peak of growth. Together, this study reveals that spacing associated with genotypes can serve as tools in the search for balance between timber production and conservation of natural resources. / A densidade de plantio e o genótipo possuem estreita relação com as relações hídricas nas plantas. Sob um cenário de maior ocorrência de eventos climáticos extremos e do avanço dos plantios florestais de eucalipto para regiões de elevado déficit hídrico, elaboramos três perguntas-chave para esse estudo: (1) Qual a relação entre a densidade de plantio e o potencial estresse hídrico? (2) O espaçamento de plantio interfere na eficiência do uso da água (EUA), i.e., na quantidade de biomassa produzida pela quantidade de água transpirada? (3) Pode a densidade de plantio alterar o balanço hídrico do solo (BHS)? Para responder a essas questões, instalou-se um ensaio de campo em Mogi Guacu, SP, em fevereiro de 2012. Foram plantados quatro materiais genéticos (Eucalyptus grandis x E.urophylla1 {Urograndis1}, Eucalyptus grandis x E.urophylla2, E.urophylla e E.grandis x E.camaldulensis {Grancam}) com distintos níveis de tolerância à seca e quatro espaçamentos de plantio (3,4, 7,0, 10,5 e 16,9 m2 planta-1, que correspondem às densidades de 2.949, 1.424 e 1.028 e 591 plantas ha-1). No capítulo 1, avaliou-se o potencial hídrico foliar (representando o potencial estresse hídrico) dos quatro clones durante 1 ano, entre 1,5 e 2,5 anos. Independentemente do material genético, quanto maior a produtividade madeireira atingida, maior o potencial hídrico foliar. Os plantios mais adensados (2.949 plantas ha-1) geraram povoamentos 39% mais produtivos, no entanto, o potencial estresse hídrico chegou a atingir 33% acima do plantio menos adensado (591 plantas ha-1). No segundo capítulo, durante o mesmo período, avaliou-se a eficiência do uso da água, que não variou conforme a mudança de densidade de plantio, mas apresentou diferença entre os genótipos, com EUA de 2,3, 2,2 e 1,5 g L-1 para os clones Urograndis, Urophylla e Grancam, respectivamente, na densidade de 1.424 plantas ha-1. Por fim, o terceiro capítulo avaliou durante dois anos, entre 1,7 e 3,7 anos, a transpiração (T), evaporação do solo (Es) e interceptação de água pela copa (Ei), que somados compunham e evapotranspiração (ET). A subtração da precipitação (P) da ET resultou no balanço hídrico do solo (BHS). O BHS foi positivo ou próximo de zero para os dois clones avaliados (Urograndis1 e Grancam) quando a densidade de plantio foi inferior ou igual a 1.028 árvores ha-1. No plantio mais adensado, o balanço foi de -25%. Estes estudos demonstram que: a maior produtividade madeireira acarreta em maior potencial estresse hídrico, gerando um claro dilema entre a produção e a sobrevivência dos plantios. No entanto, o estudo detalhado dos materiais genéticos releva que há possibilidades de incremento na eficiência do uso da água sem que ocorra o aumento no uso da água, trazendo um maior compartilhamento da água na escala da microbacia. Por fim, plantios acima de 1.028 árvores ha-1 resultaram em um balanço hídrico do solo negativo médio de -25% no pico do crescimento. Em conjunto, o presente trabalho releva que o espaçamento associado a materiais genéticos específicos, podem servir como ferramenta na busca pelo equilíbrio entre a produção madeireira e a conservação de recursos naturais.

Planting density and genotype have close relationship with the water relations in plants. The scenario of increased occurrence of extreme weather events and the change of Eucalyptus forest plantations to high water deficit regions, led us to the three key questions of this study: (1) What is the relationship between planting density and the potential water stress? (2) The planting spacing interferes the water use efficiency (WUE), i.e. the amount of biomass produced by the amount of water transpired? (3) Can the planting density change the soil water balance (BHS)? To develop this work, we settled a field trial in Mogi Guacu, SP, in February 2012. We planted four genetic material (Eucalyptus grandis x E.urophylla1 {Urograndis1}, Eucalyptus grandis x E.urophylla2, E.urophylla and E.grandis x E.camaldulensis {Grancam}) with different levels of tolerance to drought and four planting spacings (3.4, 7.0, 10.5 and 16.9 m2 plant-1, which correspond to densities of 2,949 , 1,424 and 1,028 and 591 plants ha-1). In Chapter 1, we evaluated the leaf water potential (representing potential water stress) of the four clones for 1 year, between 1.5 and 2.5 years. Regardless of the genetic material, the higher the wood productivity, the greater the leaf water potential. The denser planting (2,949 plants ha-1) stands generated 39% more wood, however, water stress potential reached up to 33% higher than the least dense planting (591 plants ha-1). In the second chapter, during the same period, we evaluated the efficiency of water use, which did not vary according to the change of planting density, but showed differences between genotypes with US 2.3, 2.2 and 1, 5 g L-1 to Urograndis, Urophylla and Grancam, respectively, at a density of 1,424 plants ha-1. Finally, the third chapter evaluated for two years, between 1.7 and 3.7 years, transpiration (T), soil evaporation (Es) and canopy interception (Ei), which together made up evapotranspiration (ET). Subtraction of precipitation (P) per ET resulted in soil water balance (SWB). The SWB was positive or near zero for the two clones evaluated (Urograndis1 and Grancam) when planting density was less than or equal to 1,028 trees ha-1. In the denser planting, the balance was -25%. These studies show that: a higher wood growth results in a higher potential drought stress, generating a clear trade-off between production and survival of trees. However, the detailed study of genetic materials fall under that there are increasing opportunities in water use efficiency, though without the increase in water use, bringing a greater share of water in the watershed scale. Finally, plantations above 1,028 ha-1 trees resulted in a negative soil water balance of -25% at the peak of growth. Together, this study reveals that spacing associated with genotypes can serve as tools in the search for balance between timber production and conservation of natural resources. / A densidade de plantio e o genótipo possuem estreita relação com as relações hídricas nas plantas. Sob um cenário de maior ocorrência de eventos climáticos extremos e do avanço dos plantios florestais de eucalipto para regiões de elevado déficit hídrico, elaboramos três perguntas-chave para esse estudo: (1) Qual a relação entre a densidade de plantio e o potencial estresse hídrico? (2) O espaçamento de plantio interfere na eficiência do uso da água (EUA), i.e., na quantidade de biomassa produzida pela quantidade de água transpirada? (3) Pode a densidade de plantio alterar o balanço hídrico do solo (BHS)? Para responder a essas questões, instalou-se um ensaio de campo em Mogi Guacu, SP, em fevereiro de 2012. Foram plantados quatro materiais genéticos (Eucalyptus grandis x E.urophylla1 {Urograndis1}, Eucalyptus grandis x E.urophylla2, E.urophylla e E.grandis x E.camaldulensis {Grancam}) com distintos níveis de tolerância à seca e quatro espaçamentos de plantio (3,4, 7,0, 10,5 e 16,9 m2 planta-1, que correspondem às densidades de 2.949, 1.424 e 1.028 e 591 plantas ha-1). No capítulo 1, avaliou-se o potencial hídrico foliar (representando o potencial estresse hídrico) dos quatro clones durante 1 ano, entre 1,5 e 2,5 anos. Independentemente do material genético, quanto maior a produtividade madeireira atingida, maior o potencial hídrico foliar. Os plantios mais adensados (2.949 plantas ha-1) geraram povoamentos 39% mais produtivos, no entanto, o potencial estresse hídrico chegou a atingir 33% acima do plantio menos adensado (591 plantas ha-1). No segundo capítulo, durante o mesmo período, avaliou-se a eficiência do uso da água, que não variou conforme a mudança de densidade de plantio, mas apresentou diferença entre os genótipos, com EUA de 2,3, 2,2 e 1,5 g L-1 para os clones Urograndis, Urophylla e Grancam, respectivamente, na densidade de 1.424 plantas ha-1. Por fim, o terceiro capítulo avaliou durante dois anos, entre 1,7 e 3,7 anos, a transpiração (T), evaporação do solo (Es) e interceptação de água pela copa (Ei), que somados compunham e evapotranspiração (ET). A subtração da precipitação (P) da ET resultou no balanço hídrico do solo (BHS). O BHS foi positivo ou próximo de zero para os dois clones avaliados (Urograndis1 e Grancam) quando a densidade de plantio foi inferior ou igual a 1.028 árvores ha-1. No plantio mais adensado, o balanço foi de -25%. Estes estudos demonstram que: a maior produtividade madeireira acarreta em maior potencial estresse hídrico, gerando um claro dilema entre a produção e a sobrevivência dos plantios. No entanto, o estudo detalhado dos materiais genéticos releva que há possibilidades de incremento na eficiência do uso da água sem que ocorra o aumento no uso da água, trazendo um maior compartilhamento da água na escala da microbacia. Por fim, plantios acima de 1.028 árvores ha-1 resultaram em um balanço hídrico do solo negativo médio de -25% no pico do crescimento. Em conjunto, o presente trabalho releva que o espaçamento associado a materiais genéticos específicos, podem servir como ferramenta na busca pelo equilíbrio entre a produção madeireira e a conservação de recursos naturais.

The Penman-Monteith (PM) equation is a state-of-the-art modelling approach to simulate evapotranspiration (ET) at site and local scale. However, its practical application is often restricted by the availability and quality of required parameters. One of these parameters is the canopy conductance. Long term measurements of evapotranspiration by the eddy-covariance method provide an improved data basis to determine this parameter by inverse modelling. Because this approach may also include evaporation from the soil, not only the ‘actual’ canopy conductance but the whole surface conductance (gc) is addressed. Two full cycles of crop rotation with five different crop types (winter barley, winter rape seed, winter wheat, silage maize, and spring barley) have been continuously monitored for 10 years. These data form the basis for this study. As estimates of gc are obtained on basis of measurements, we investigated the impact of measurements uncertainties on obtained values of gc. Here, two different foci were inspected more in detail. Firstly, the effect of the energy balance closure gap (EBCG) on obtained values of gc was analysed. Secondly, the common hydrological practice to use vegetation height (hc) to determine the period of highest plant activity (i.e., times with maximum gc concerning CO2-exchange and transpiration) was critically reviewed. The results showed that hc and gc do only agree at the beginning of the growing season but increasingly differ during the rest of the growing season. Thus, the utilisation of hc as a proxy to assess maximum gc (gc,max) can lead to inaccurate estimates of gc,max which in turn can cause serious shortcomings in simulated ET. The light use efficiency (LUE) is superior to hc as a proxy to determine periods with maximum gc. Based on this proxy, crop specific estimates of gc,maxcould be determined for the first (and the second) cycle of crop rotation: winter barley, 19.2 mm s−1 (16.0 mm s−1); winter rape seed, 12.3 mm s−1 (13.1 mm s−1); winter wheat, 16.5 mm s−1 (11.2 mm s−1); silage maize, 7.4 mm s−1 (8.5 mm s−1); and spring barley, 7.0 mm s−1 (6.2 mm s−1).

The Penman-Monteith (PM) equation is a state-of-the-art modelling approach to simulate evapotranspiration (ET) at site and local scale. However, its practical application is often restricted by the availability and quality of required parameters. One of these parameters is the canopy conductance. Long term measurements of evapotranspiration by the eddy-covariance method provide an improved data basis to determine this parameter by inverse modelling. Because this approach may also include evaporation from the soil, not only the ‘actual’ canopy conductance but the whole surface conductance (gc) is addressed. Two full cycles of crop rotation with five different crop types (winter barley, winter rape seed, winter wheat, silage maize, and spring barley) have been continuously monitored for 10 years. These data form the basis for this study. As estimates of gc are obtained on basis of measurements, we investigated the impact of measurements uncertainties on obtained values of gc. Here, two different foci were inspected more in detail. Firstly, the effect of the energy balance closure gap (EBCG) on obtained values of gc was analysed. Secondly, the common hydrological practice to use vegetation height (hc) to determine the period of highest plant activity (i.e., times with maximum gc concerning CO2-exchange and transpiration) was critically reviewed. The results showed that hc and gc do only agree at the beginning of the growing season but increasingly differ during the rest of the growing season. Thus, the utilisation of hc as a proxy to assess maximum gc (gc,max) can lead to inaccurate estimates of gc,max which in turn can cause serious shortcomings in simulated ET. The light use efficiency (LUE) is superior to hc as a proxy to determine periods with maximum gc. Based on this proxy, crop specific estimates of gc,maxcould be determined for the first (and the second) cycle of crop rotation: winter barley, 19.2 mm s−1 (16.0 mm s−1); winter rape seed, 12.3 mm s−1 (13.1 mm s−1); winter wheat, 16.5 mm s−1 (11.2 mm s−1); silage maize, 7.4 mm s−1 (8.5 mm s−1); and spring barley, 7.0 mm s−1 (6.2 mm s−1).