No description available.

Bakgrund: Personer som injicerar droger har i tidigare studier visat sig ha en lägre livskvalitet än andra populationer och många lider av psykisk ohälsa. Spridning av blodsmittor som hiv och hepatiter och andra blodburna infektioner kan vara en risk vid injicering. Tillgång till sterila sprutor och kanyler genom sprututbyte är en åtgärd för att minska spridning av infektionssjukdomar. Centralt för psykiatrisk omvårdnad, i likhet med harm reduction, är att värna mänskliga rättigheter, att erbjuda vård på lika villkor och stärka förmågan till egenvård. Syfte: Syftet med denna studie var att undersöka om livskvalitet hos personer som injicerar droger förbättras över tid efter inskrivning på Stockholms sprututbyte samt om det fanns någon skillnad mellan könen. Metod: Denna studie genomfördes som en prospektiv icke-experimentell longitudinell kvantitativ studie. Urvalet bestod av besökare på Stockholms sprututbyte som valde att delta. Studiedeltagarna svarade på livskvalitetsenkäten EQ-5D vid tre mättillfällen. EQ-5D mäter graden av tillfredsställelse i fem dimensioner (indexpoäng) samt innehåller en global skattning av nuvarande hälsotillstånd (EQ VAS). Förändring över tid analyserades med hjälp av ANOVA för upprepade mätningar. Resultat: Resultatet visade på en signifikant förbättring av livskvalitet över tid avseende EQ VAS för hela gruppen. Resultatet visade vidare att kvinnor skattade sitt nuvarande hälsotillstånd EQ VAS signifikant lägre än män. Slutsats: Deltagande i sprututbyte verkar ha betydelse och inverka positivt på hälsorelaterad livskvalitet hos personer som injicerar droger men mer behöver studeras för att få en bredare kunskap om vad det är som gör att det förhåller sig så. / Background: People who inject drugs have shown in previous studies to have a lower quality of life than other populations and many suffer from mental illness. The spread of blood infections such as hiv and hepatitis and other blood borne infections can be a risk when injecting. Access to sterile syringes and needles through syringe exchange is a measure to reduce the spread of infectious diseases. Central to psychiatric care, like harm reduction, is to protect human rights, to offer care on equal terms and to strengthen the capacity for self-care. Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the quality of life of people who inject drugs improves over time after enrollment in Stockholm needle and syringe exchange program and if there were any gender differences. Method: This study was conducted as a prospective non-experimental longitudinal quantitative study. The selection consisted of visitors at the Stockholm exchange who chose to participate. The study participants answered the quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D on three occasions. EQ-5D measures the degree of satisfaction in five dimensions (index points) and contains a global estimate of the current state of health (EQ VAS). Change over time was analyzed using ANOVA for repeated measurements. Results: The results showed a significant improvement in quality of life over time with regard to EQ VAS for the entire group. The results further showed that women estimated their current state of health EQ VAS significantly lower than men. Conclusions: Participation in needle and syringe exchange programs appears to have significance and a positive impact on health-related quality of life but further studies needs to gain a broader knowledge of what it is that makes it so.

The drug treatment staff attitude towards needle exchange is what investigates in this study. The aim of this study is to see what’s affecting the standpoints in the needle exchange issue and also to investigate if the needle exchange is compatible with Swedish drug policy. The study has a qualitative approach and it’s based on eight semi-structured interviews with drug treatment staff. To analyze the empirical material we’ve used Berger and Luckmanns social construction theory, the theoretical concept profession socialization and the four ethical principles: autonomy principle, goodness maximization principle, harm minimization principle and the principle of justice. The result of this study shows that drug treatment staffs are negative to needle exchange efficacy. They don’t believe that needle exchange is compatible with Swedish drug policy which strives for a drug free society. The drug treatment staffs are worried about that harm reduction interventions, such as needle exchange, will lead to a liberalized drug policy and that drug use will be legitimized. They fear that the drug policy will be weakened with harm reduction. The results illustrate that there are numerous factors that influence staff attitudes towards needle exchange, these are profession socialization, workplace, organization, context, the current drug policy as well as knowledgeable of the needle exchange. Keywords: Needle exchange, Injection drug users, Drug treatment staff, Harm reduction and Swedish drug policy.

<p>The drug treatment staff attitude towards needle exchange is what investigates in this study. The aim of this study is to see what’s affecting the standpoints in the needle exchange issue and also to investigate if the needle exchange is compatible with Swedish drug policy. The study has a qualitative approach and it’s based on eight semi-structured interviews with drug treatment staff. To analyze the empirical material we’ve used Berger and Luckmanns social construction theory, the theoretical concept profession socialization and the four ethical principles: autonomy principle, goodness maximization principle, harm minimization principle and the principle of justice.</p><p>The result of this study shows that drug treatment staffs are negative to needle exchange efficacy. They don’t believe that needle exchange is compatible with Swedish drug policy which strives for a drug free society. The drug treatment staffs are worried about that harm reduction interventions, such as needle exchange, will lead to a liberalized drug policy and that drug use will be legitimized. They fear that the drug policy will be weakened with harm reduction. The results illustrate that there are numerous factors that influence staff attitudes towards needle exchange, these are profession socialization, workplace, organization, context, the current drug policy as well as knowledgeable of the needle exchange.</p><p>Keywords: Needle exchange, Injection drug users, Drug treatment staff, Harm reduction and Swedish drug policy.</p>