Orientador: Verônica Fabrini Machado de Almeida / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Artes / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-21T10:04:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Delduque_CarolinaMartins_M.pdf: 1510371 bytes, checksum: f1f0585f4348612b2e5ba47359197825 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 / Resumo: Esta pesquisa se insere no campo das investigações sobre o trabalho do ator e tem como tema o trabalho de criação do ator, a partir dos pressupostos do Sistema de Stanislavski. O trabalho abriu-se em duas frentes: o campo teórico e da práxis cênica, que correram em paralelo, dinamizando uma à outra. Numa delas, foi feito um reconhecimento teórico do tema, no trabalho desenvolvido por pesquisadores, atores e/ou diretores que trabalharam com o mestre russo ou tiveram suas raízes declaradamente fincadas nesse Sistema. Nesse sentido, por um lado a investigação procurou oferecer dados históricos, com referências sobre Michael Chekhov (1891-1955) e Eugênio Kusnet (1898-1975), por meio dos quais foi traçado um percurso geográfico e cronológico, entre Brasil e Rússia, e entre os séculos XX e XXI. Por outro lado, buscando rastrear e refletir sobre aspectos fundamentais de seus ensinamentos na cena russa (berço dessa tradição), apresentamos ao leitor, a análise de conferências de três nomes do teatro russo oriundos dessa tradição - Anatoli Vasiliev, Tatiana Stepatchenko e Mikhail Chumachenko. Já no campo da prática cênica, foi utilizado o texto de Anton Tchekhov As Três Irmãs, como ponto de partida e referência para criação do ator. Num processo de experimentação, a partir do texto dramático de um dramaturgo contemporâneo a Stanislavski e seu "parceiro", buscamos, na criação de cenas teatrais, experimentar os procedimentos para o trabalho do ator derivados do Sistema para compreendê-los com o próprio corpo, e não só com o intelecto, e assim, redimensionar as discussões, questões e análises teóricas / Abstract: This research falls within the field of investigations on the actor's work and has as its theme the actor's creative work, from the assumptions of the Stanislavski's System. The work was opened on two fronts: the theoretical field and practical scenic, which ran in parallel, stimulating each other. In one of them an acknowledgment was made of the subject, about the work of researchers, actors and / or directors who worked with the Russian master or had their roots in this system. In this respect, on one side the research sought to provide historical data, with references about Michael Chekhov (1891-1955) and Eugene Kusnet (1898-1975), through whom a route was traced geographically and chronologically, between Brazil and Russia and between the XX and XXI centuries. On the other hand, trying to trace and to reflect on key aspects of their teaching in the Russian current theatre (birthplace of this tradition), we present the reader with analysis of three conferences with Russian's men of theater from this tradition - Anatoli Vasiliev, Tatiana Stepatchenko and Mikhail Chumachenko. In the area of the practice, we used the Chekhov's play, The Three Sisters as a starting point and reference for creating the actor. In a process of experimentation, from the dramatic text of a contemporary playwright to Stanislavski and his "partner", we seek, in the creation of theatrical scenes, test procedures for the actor's work derived from the system to understand them with his own body, not only with the intellect, and thus to resize the discussions, questions and theoretical analysis / Mestrado / Artes da Cena / Mestra em Artes da Cena

A técnica Meisner e as sementes do Sistema stanislavskiano plantadas em solo americano. 2019. 183f. Tese (Doutorado em Artes Cênicas) - Escola de Comunicações e Artes, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2019. Esta tese propôs o estudo teórico da técnica Meisner, observando suas origens e as relações com o Sistema de Stanislavski. O objetivo dessa pesquisa foi analisar passo-apasso a técnica meisneriana para esclarecer quais são os procedimentos criados por ela e qual a sua filiação com o Sistema. O estudo questionou as possíveis origens dos seguintes procedimentos meisnerianos: o exercício da repetição, a atividade, o bater na porta, a preparação emocional, as imitações, impedimentos e o trabalho com cenas. Após esse panorama foi feita uma análise que estabelece paralelismos e distinções da técnica Meisner com alguns procedimentos do Sistema, apontando pontos de contato e inflexão entre eles, tais como: comunhão, círculo de atenção, memória afetiva, as circunstâncias propostas, o \"se mágico\" e o étude, mas constatou também diferenças significativas. Concluimos que dois elementos da técnica, apesar de inspirados em Stanislavski, foram criados por Meisner: o exercício da repetição e a preparação emocional. / The Meisner Technique and the Seeds on American Soil Planted by the Stanislavskian Sistem. 2019. 183p. Thesis (Doctorate in Theater) - School of Comunications and Arts, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 2019. This thesis proposes the theorical study of the Meisner technique, observing its origins and relations with the Stanislavski\'s Sistem. The goal of this research was to analyse step by step the meisnerian technique and clarify which are the procedures created by it, and how is it related to the Sistem. The study questioned the possible origins of the following meisnerian procedures: the repetition exercise, the activity, the knocking on the door, the emotional preparation, imitation, impediments and the work with scenes. After this panorama, was made an analysis that stablished distinctions and paralelisms between the Meisner technique and some procedures of the Sistem, pointing spots of contact and inflexion between them, such as: communion, circle of attention, affective memory, given circunstances, the \"magic if\" and the étude, but found also significative differences. This theses concludes that two elements of the Meisner technique, besides being inspired by Stanislavski, were created by Meisner: the repetition exercise and the emotional preparation.

This goal of this thesis is to examine the physical and emotional cost associated with modern and personal interpretations of Strasberg-based method acting. Although many method actors have created excellent award-winning performances, many were left with emotional and physical harm to their body. In this thesis I will argue that there are actors that can deal with the after effects however, the risks associated with Strasberg-based method often pose both mental and physical health risks to the actor that outweigh the benefit they contribute to the production. To understand what Strasberg-based method acting is I will examine the practices of Stanislavski, the founder of the original “method,” and teacher and actors Stella Adler and Sanford Meisner, and their methods to creating a character. Strasberg, Adler, and Meisner, who are believed to have created their methods based off the Stanislavski Acting System, had many disagreements about Stanislavski’s method. What many now call method acting, incorporates certain techniques created by Stanislavski that actors then use to create their own method.

This paper compares seemingly similar words from a variety of acting teachers, and shows how it is impossible to draw clear comparisons between words that are often used as synonyms. The paper is a reflection of the journey from believing in translation to recognizing its impossibility. In Chapter 1 we focus on one of the most common elements in actor training, Attention/focus/concentration, and analyze the shades of meaning in those words and the difficulty of talking about them in isolation. In Chapter 2 we look at the way in which semiotic analysis can explain the words resistance to equivalence. In Chapter 3 we look at one of the central terms in most collegiate actor training objective, and see how it reveals both the problems inherent in translation. In Chapter 4 we look at how this knowledge can influence the classroom in a positive way.

PhD / This thesis considers actors as ‘manual philosophers’; it engages the proposition that acting can reveal aspects of existence and Being. In this sense, forms of acting that analyse and engage with lived experience of the world offer a phenomenological approach to the problem of Being. But rather than arrive at abstract, general conclusions about the human subject’s relationship to the world, at least some approaches to acting investigate the structures of experience through those experiences themselves in a lived, physical way. I begin with the troubled relationship between philosophy and theatre and briefly consider the history of attacks on actors. I suggest that at the heart of antitheatricality is what Jonas Barish (1981: 3) calls ‘ontological queasiness’: theatre poses a problem in the distinction between ‘what is’ and ‘what is not’. Turning to phenomenology as a particular way of doing philosophy that challenges any dualistic understanding of subjectivity, I reflect on Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time as a lens for viewing the process of performing and preparing for a role. Heidegger emphasises the intermeshed relationship between the human subject, Dasein (Being-there), and the world to the point that it is impossible to consider one without the other. I have chosen three of the most influential theatre and acting theorists of the twentieth century and examine how each uncovers aspects of existence that are presented in Heidegger’s phenomenology. Firstly, I consider Constantin Stanislavski’s ‘system’ which emphasises action for a purpose within an environment, the individual’s relationship to objects in the world and its involvement with other people who share the same type of Being in the world. Secondly, I examine Antonin Artaud’s conception of theatre that seeks to resist the structures of Being, the way the world is interpreted by others (the ‘They’) and the way that the world gets handed over to consciousness for the most part. In many respects, Artaud’s theatre is the embodiment of Anxiety, a world-revealing state where Being becomes apparent. Thirdly, I discuss Bertolt Brecht’s theatre practice as an attestation to authenticity (a truthful engagement with human existence as possibility) through the medium of performance. Brecht seeks to engage audiences in philosophical debate and change the world. Like Heidegger, Brecht also stresses the historical and temporal constitution of the human subject, whilst emphasising practicality in theatre making. By examining these approaches to performance as case studies, this thesis rethinks the notional intersection of philosophy and theatre, concentrating on process rather than literary analysis. This application of phenomenology is new in that it does not merely consider theatre analysis from an ‘ideal’ audience point of view (i.e. provide a phenomenology of theatre). By focusing on acting, I emphasise the development of artistic creation and becoming, and show how certain types of acting are phenomenological. The bold upshot here is a conception of philosophy that acknowledges various theatre practices as embodied forms of philosophical practice. Furthermore, theatre might well be thought of as phenomenological because it can be an investigation of Being firmly entrenched in practical action and performance. Conversely, philosophy is more than just words on a page; it is a performed activity. Actors can be considered manual philosophers in so far as they engage with the problem of Being not in mere abstraction but in the practical challenges of performance.

Le but de cette recherche est de démontrer qu'en présence d'un texte contemporain où souvent le langage est déconstruit, la fable éclatée, le texte fragmenté, le personnage inexistant, les acteurs peuvent se donner des outils de création, en puisant dans l'approche des actions physiques de Stanislavski, pour investir leur interprétation d'une présence forte et constante. Pour réaliser ce mémoire-création, nous travaillerons sur un texte de Falk Richter, Electronic City, qui représente parfaitement les défis auxquels les acteurs sont confrontés avec les nouvelles formes d'écriture. Nous débuterons notre recherche par une identification plus concrète de ces nouvelles formes et des difficultés qu'elles génèrent pour la scène. Identifiée comme théâtre néodramatique, la pièce de Richter est un « théâtre des voix » constituée en majeure partie de textes narratifs divisés entre de nombreux locuteurs non-identifiés. Ce texte nous amènera à faire un travail sur la choralité, le rythme et la musicalité. Au-delà de la fonction de « porte-parole », les acteurs peuvent-ils prendre appui sur la méthode des actions physiques de Stanislavski pour donner un corps à leurs voix? Certains éléments de l'approche stanislavskienne peuvent s'appliquer à tous les genres de textes, peu en importe la nature; d'autres éléments ne fonctionnent qu'en partie ou demandent un travail d'adaptation et finalement, certains principes ne peuvent tout simplement pas se prêter à l'exercice. Nous porterons notre attention sur le superobjectif, les circonstances proposées, les explorations intelligentes, les explorations par études, les événements, l'évaluation des faits et le monologue intérieur. Grâce à des publications récentes en français, on redécouvre un aspect méconnu du travail de Stanislavski centré sur ce qu'il considère le cœur du théâtre : l'action. Cette approche rejoint les pratiques actuelles du théâtre puisque Stanislavski privilégiait la notion d'acteur-créateur et la présence vraie de l'être humain sur scène. Nous souhaitons donc travailler dans le sens de la vérité scénique, de l'effet de réel, à travers une approche qu'utilise aussi Falk Richter, l'écriture de plateau. ______________________________________________________________________________ MOTS-CLÉS DE L’AUTEUR : Stanislavski, analyse-action, dramaturgie contemporaine, acteur, jeu.

Konstantino Stanislavskio sistema remiasi daugelis režisierių, pedagogų, aktorių, dainininkų. Ši sistema labai stipriai paveikė teatro ir pedagogikos vystymąsi. Sistema sudaryta iš dviejų dalių: „Aktoriaus darbu su savimi“ ir „Aktoriaus darbu su vaidmeniu“. Įvaldžius abi sistemos dalis organiškai susijungia atlikėjas su vaidmeniu. Sistema apima didelį skaičių elementų, kurie nagrinėjami mokslo darbe. Stanislavskio sistemos elementai - dainininko - aktoriaus darbo įrankiai. Darbe siekta išskirti pagrindinius Stanislavskio sistemos elementus, atskleisti šių elementų taikymo galimybes atlikime ir atlikėjų rengime. Tyrimo objektas: Konstantino Stanislavskio sistemos elementų taikymas atlikėjų rengime. Tyrimo tikslas: atskleisti Konstantino Stanislavskio sistemos elementus, jų taikymą ir šiuolaikinį aktualumą. Tyrimo tikslui pasiekti, iškelti šie uždaviniai: • Pristatyti Konstantino Stanislavskio aktorių rengimo sistemą ir jos elementus; • Atskleisti Konstantino Stanislavskio sistemos elementų taikymo galimybes atlikėjų rengime. Tyrimo metodai: • Mokslinės literatūros analizė; • Interviu. Dainininko - aktoriaus kūrybiškumo elementai - jo vidiniai (psichiniai) ir išoriniai (fiziniai) duomenys. Valdant visus psichofizinių duomenų elementus įmanomas profesionalus sceninis veiksmas. Pagrindinis Stanislavsio sistemos principas - gyvenimiška tiesa. Visi Stanislavskio sistemos elementai, yra sceninio veiksmo sudėtines dalys. Kiekviena iš elementų reikia vystyti, tik tai padeda... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / Many of produsers, pedagogues, actors and performers bases on Stanislavski's system. The development of theater and pedagogy was strongly affected by the system. It is grounded on two parts: „Actors work with himself“ and „Actors work with role“. After getting mastered in this parts, the actor is joined with role in natural way. The system includes a big amount of elements which are investigated in this study. The elements of Stanislavski's system are the tools for actors and performers. The goal of the study is to discover the main elements of Stanislavski's system and to reveal the usibilty of this elements in action and in preparation of the performers. Study object: application of Konstantin Stanislavski's system elements in preparation of performers. Study goal: to discover the main elements of Stanislavski's system, it's usibility and modern actuality. Study objectives: • Introduce the Konstantin Stanislavski's actor preparation system and elements; • To reveal the usibilty of the elements in action and in preparation of the performers. Study methods: • Analisis of a sience literature; • Interview. Study object: application of Konstantin Stanislavski's system elements in preparation of performers. Performer - actor elements of creativity - his internal psychical and external physical qualities. In management of psychophysical qualities. The professional scene action may be achieved by managing the elements of psychophysical qualities. The main principle of... [to full text]

PhD / This thesis considers actors as ‘manual philosophers’; it engages the proposition that acting can reveal aspects of existence and Being. In this sense, forms of acting that analyse and engage with lived experience of the world offer a phenomenological approach to the problem of Being. But rather than arrive at abstract, general conclusions about the human subject’s relationship to the world, at least some approaches to acting investigate the structures of experience through those experiences themselves in a lived, physical way. I begin with the troubled relationship between philosophy and theatre and briefly consider the history of attacks on actors. I suggest that at the heart of antitheatricality is what Jonas Barish (1981: 3) calls ‘ontological queasiness’: theatre poses a problem in the distinction between ‘what is’ and ‘what is not’. Turning to phenomenology as a particular way of doing philosophy that challenges any dualistic understanding of subjectivity, I reflect on Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time as a lens for viewing the process of performing and preparing for a role. Heidegger emphasises the intermeshed relationship between the human subject, Dasein (Being-there), and the world to the point that it is impossible to consider one without the other. I have chosen three of the most influential theatre and acting theorists of the twentieth century and examine how each uncovers aspects of existence that are presented in Heidegger’s phenomenology. Firstly, I consider Constantin Stanislavski’s ‘system’ which emphasises action for a purpose within an environment, the individual’s relationship to objects in the world and its involvement with other people who share the same type of Being in the world. Secondly, I examine Antonin Artaud’s conception of theatre that seeks to resist the structures of Being, the way the world is interpreted by others (the ‘They’) and the way that the world gets handed over to consciousness for the most part. In many respects, Artaud’s theatre is the embodiment of Anxiety, a world-revealing state where Being becomes apparent. Thirdly, I discuss Bertolt Brecht’s theatre practice as an attestation to authenticity (a truthful engagement with human existence as possibility) through the medium of performance. Brecht seeks to engage audiences in philosophical debate and change the world. Like Heidegger, Brecht also stresses the historical and temporal constitution of the human subject, whilst emphasising practicality in theatre making. By examining these approaches to performance as case studies, this thesis rethinks the notional intersection of philosophy and theatre, concentrating on process rather than literary analysis. This application of phenomenology is new in that it does not merely consider theatre analysis from an ‘ideal’ audience point of view (i.e. provide a phenomenology of theatre). By focusing on acting, I emphasise the development of artistic creation and becoming, and show how certain types of acting are phenomenological. The bold upshot here is a conception of philosophy that acknowledges various theatre practices as embodied forms of philosophical practice. Furthermore, theatre might well be thought of as phenomenological because it can be an investigation of Being firmly entrenched in practical action and performance. Conversely, philosophy is more than just words on a page; it is a performed activity. Actors can be considered manual philosophers in so far as they engage with the problem of Being not in mere abstraction but in the practical challenges of performance.

No description available.

No description available.