L'éducation d'aujourd'hui en Chine est une oeuvre tant individuelle qu'étatique. Elle rattache strictement le développement de l'individu et l'avenir de l'État. Après une trentaine années du développement depuis la politique d'ouverture et de réforme en 1978, le système éducatif chinois est modernisé et complété. L'État, débiteur du droit à l'éducation, prend enfin en charge son devoir d'organiser l'enseignement public et de surveiller l'enseignement privé, ce dernier étant auparavant interdit dans l'histoire chinoise. L'enseigné chinois bénéficient alors le droit à l'éducation et la liberté d'enseignement. Pour autant, dans la notion de communauté éducative qui se construit, les enseignants-chercheurs apparaissent aussi indispensables pour réaliser les missions de l'éducation. Comment garantir leurs droits et libertés dans leurs vies professionnelles ? C'est une question aussi primordiale. L'indépendance de leur statut, par rapport à l'établissement d'enseignement et aux autres administrations est sans aucune doute une garantie importante. Les enseignants chinois, disposent-ils d'un tel statut ? Et, dans leurs activités d'enseignement et de recherche, jouissent-ils pleinement de la liberté d'expression ? Si ces droits et libertés de l'éducation ne sont pas encore protégés de manière parfaite, c'est parce que la Chine peine à construire un État de droit et une société démocratique. L'adoption d'une législation suffisante et cohérente est un atout considérable dans ce processus de développement. Quelles mesures doit-on prendre pour mettre un terme aux sources de désordre, et, trop souvent d'inégalité ? / Today's education in China is an individual as well as a State's undertaking. It combines the strictly individual development and the future of the State. After thirty years of development since the opening and reform policy in 1978, China's education system was modernized and expanded. The State, as a debtor of the right to education, finally takes charge of this duty to organize public education and supervise private education, previously banned in Chinese history. People taught in China got right to education and freedom of education. However, to achieve this notion of educational community, the teachers and/or researchers must be mainly associated in performing this broad function of education. How to ensure their rights and freedoms in their career? It is also a key issue. Undoubtedly, independence of their professional status with respect to the institution and to other jurisdictions is a fundamental guarantee. Do Chinese teachers have such a status? And, in their teaching and researching activities, have they a complete freedom of expression? If these rights and freedoms of education are not yet fully protected, China struggling to find common ground between rule of law and democratic society, adoption of an adequate and consistent legislation will be a major asset to identify a real development process. What measures need to be taken to put an end to educational disorders, and, too often, inequalities?

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Résumé : Cette recherche aborde la problématique de la relation à la formation dans un processus d’autoformation en ligne. Elle pose la question du rapport au pouvoir dans ce type de situation d’apprentissage. La médiation pédagogique humaine et la médiatisation technologique y sont au centre des préoccupations. Il s’agit d’aborder, au travers de la conception même des instruments d’investigation, les concepts: de contrôle, d’autodirection, d’autonomie, d’efficacité, de compétence, d’autodétermination en relation avec la notion de motif d’engagement. Les dispositions et les prédispositions liées à l'autoformation sont également observées. On se propose de comprendre les orientations motivationnelles et les motifs qui éclairent l’engagement au regard de la perception de soi dans un contexte d’autoformation. Nos réflexions portent également sur le concept d'alterdidaxie par opposition aux démarches autodidactes dans un contexte d'autoformation./ Summary: This research approaches the problems in relation to training in the process of e-learning. It raises the question of the self-directed learning’s power in this type of training situation. The human teaching mediation and the technological mediatization are both in the center of the concerns. This research is an approach, through the design even of instruments of investigation, to the concepts : control, autodirection, autonomy, effectiveness, competence, self-determination in relation with the engagement. Competences and readiness scales related to the adults’ self-training are also observed. One proposes to observe motivational directions and the engagement’s reasons in relation with the perception of oneself as self-directed learners in a context of self-training. Our reflections also relate to the concept of Alterdidacticism in opposition to the self-educated steps, to the Autodidacticism in a context of adults’ self-training.

The purpose of this study was to determine teachers’ perceptions of the relationship of the Katy Management of Automated Curriculum (KMAC) system developed by Katy ISD in Katy, Texas, on planning for learning, delivery of instruction and evaluation of student learning in the classroom. KMAC is a customized, proprietary networked technology curriculum management system created for online access to curriculum and the creation and sharing of lesson plans. Data was collected from 635 teachers district-wide through an online survey. This data was used to determine whether there were differences between/among teachers and teacher leaders and between/among elementary, junior high and high school teachers in their perceived impact of the KMAC on planning for learning, delivery of instruction and evaluation of student learning. Regarding planning for learning, teachers were found to have a moderately positive perception of KMAC with teacher leaders being slightly more positive. In addition, statistically significant differences were found between grade levels with elementary teachers more positive than secondary teachers. Regarding delivery of instruction, teacher leaders again perceived a more positive relationship with KMAC than the teacher non-leaders. Statistically significant differences were also found between elementary and junior high, elementary and high school and between junior high and high school teachers, with elementary teachers being the most positive. Teachers were the least positive toward KMAC and the evaluation of student learning. While a statistically significant relationship was found in relationship to the grade level taught and evaluation, this area was admittedly weaker than the other two areas in district development and teachers’ perceptions. While the position of teacher leader seemed to impact the results in all categories, the grade level taught was found to have the greatest statistical impact on the teacher perceptions.

No description available.

No description available.

Cette recherche aborde la problématique de la relation à la formation dans un processus d’autoformation en ligne. Elle pose la question du rapport au pouvoir dans ce type de situation d’apprentissage. La médiation pédagogique humaine et la médiatisation technologique y sont au centre des préoccupations. Il s’agit d’aborder, au travers de la conception même des instruments d’investigation, les concepts: de contrôle, d’autodirection, d’autonomie, d’efficacité, de compétence, d’autodétermination en relation avec la notion de motif d’engagement. Les dispositions et les prédispositions liées à l'autoformation sont également observées. On se propose de comprendre les orientations motivationnelles et les motifs qui éclairent l’engagement au regard de la perception de soi dans un contexte d’autoformation. Nos réflexions portent également sur le concept d'alterdidaxie par opposition aux démarches autodidactes dans un contexte d'autoformation./<p><p>This research approaches the problems in relation to training in the process of e-learning. It raises the question of the self-directed learning’s power in this type of training situation. The human teaching mediation and the technological mediatization are both in the center of the concerns. This research is an approach, through the design even of instruments of investigation, to the concepts :control, autodirection, autonomy, effectiveness, competence, self-determination in relation with the engagement. Competences and readiness scales related to the adults’ self-training are also observed. One proposes to observe motivational directions and the engagement’s reasons in relation with the perception of oneself as self-directed learners in a context of self-training. Our reflections also relate to the concept of Alterdidacticism in opposition to the self-educated steps, to the Autodidacticism in a context of adults’ self-training.<p><p> / Doctorat en Sciences Psychologiques et de l'éducation / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished