Die Proteinfaltung ist ein Prozess der molekularen Selbstorganisation, bei dem sich eine lineare Kette von Aminosäuren zu einer definierten, funktionellen dreidimensionalen Struktur zusammensetzt. Der Prozess der Faltung ist ein thermisch getriebener diffusiver Prozess durch eine Gibbs-Energie-Landschaft im Konformationsraum für die Struktur der minimalen Energie. Während dieses Prozesses zeigt die freie Enthalpie des Systems nicht immer eine monotone Abnahme; stattdessen führt eine suboptimale Kompensation der Enthalpie- und der Entropieänderung während jedes Faltungsschrittes zur Bildung von Freien-Enthalpie-Faltungsbarrieren. Diese Barrieren und damit verbundenen hochenergetischen Übergangszustände, die wichtige Informationen über Mechanismen der Proteinfaltung enthalten, sind jedoch kinetisch unzugänglich. Um den Prozess der Barrierebildung und die strukturellen Merkmale von Übergangszuständen aufzudecken, werden Proteine genutzt, die über barrierefreie Pfade falten – so genannte “downhill folder“. Aufgrund der geringen Faltungsbarrieren werden wichtige Interaktionen der Faltung zugänglich und erlauben Einblicke in die ratenbegrenzenden Faltungsvorgänge. In dieser Arbeit vergleichen wir die Faltungsdynamiken von drei verschiedenen Varianten eines Lambda-Repressor-Fragments, bestehend aus den Aminosäuren 6 bis 85: ein Zwei-Zustands-Falter λWT (Y22W) und zwei downhill-folder-artige Varianten, λYA (Y22W/Q33Y/ G46,48A) und λHA (Y22W/Q33H/G46,48A). Um auf die Kinetik und die strukturelle Dynamik zu greifen zu können, werden Einzelmolekülkraftspektroskopische Experimente mit optische Pinzetten mit Submillisekunden- und Nanometer-Auflösung verwendet. Ich fand, dass die niedrige denaturierende Kraft die Mikrosekunden Faltungskinetik von downhill foldern auf eine Millisekunden-Zeitskala verlangsamt, sodass das System für Einzelmolekülstudien gut zugänglich ist. Interessanterweise zeigten sich unter Krafteinwirkung die downhill-folder-artigen Varianten des Lambda-Repressors als kooperative Zwei-Zustands-Falter mit deutlich unterschiedlicher Faltungskinetik und Kraftabhängigkeit. Drei Varianten des Proteins zeigten ein hoch konformes Verhalten unter Last. Die modellfreie Rekonstruktion von Freien-Enthalpie-Landschaften ermöglichte es uns, die feinen Details der Transformation des Zwei-Zustands-Faltungspfad direkt in einen downhill-artigen Pfad aufzulösen. Die Auswirkungen von einzelnen Mutationen auf die Proteinstabilität, Bildung der Übergangszustände und die konformationelle Heterogenität der Faltungs- und Entfaltungszustände konnten beobachtet werden. Interessanterweise zeigen unsere Ergebnisse, dass sich die untersuchten Varianten trotz der ultraschnellen Faltungszeit im Bereich von 2 μs in einem kooperativen Prozess über verbleibende Energiebarrieren falten und entfalten, was darauf hindeutet, dass wesentlich schnellere Faltungsraten notwendig sind um ein downhill Limit vollständig zu erreichen. / Protein folding is a process of molecular self-assembly in which a linear chain of amino acids assembles into a defined, functional three-dimensional structure. The process of folding is a thermally driven diffusive search on a free-energy landscape in the conformational space for the minimal-energy structure. During that process, the free energy of the system does not always show a monotonic decrease; instead, sub-optimal compensation of enthalpy and entropy change during each folding step leads to formation of folding free-energy barriers. However, these barriers, and associated high-energy transition states, that contain key information about mechanisms of protein folding, are kinetically inaccessible. To reveal the barrier-formation process and structural characteristics of transition states, proteins are employed that fold via barrierless paths – so-called downhill folders. Due to the low folding barriers, the key folding interactions become accessible, yielding insights about the rate-limiting folding events. Here, I compared the folding dynamics of three different variants of a lambda repressor fragment, containing amino acids 6 to 85: a two-state folder λWT (Y22W) and two downhill-like folding variants, λYA (Y22W/Q33Y/G46,48A) and λHA (Y22W/Q33H/G46,48A). To access the kinetics and structural dynamics, single-molecule optical tweezers with submillisecond and nanometer resolution are used. I found that force perturbation slowed down the microsecond kinetics of downhill folders to a millisecond time-scale, making it accessible to single-molecule studies. Interestingly, under load, the downhill-like variants of lambda repressor appeared as cooperative two-state folders with significantly different folding kinetics and force dependence. The three protein variants displayed a highly compliant behaviour under load. Model-free reconstruction of free-energy landscapes allowed us to directly resolve the fine details of the transformation of the two-state folding path into a downhill-like path. The effect of single mutations on protein stability, transition state formation and conformational heterogeneity of folding and unfolding states was observed. Noteworthy, our results demonstrate, that despite the ultrafast folding time in a range of 2 µs, the studied variants fold and unfold in a cooperative process via residual barriers, suggesting that much faster folding rate constants are required to reach the full-downhill limit.

Orientador: Carlos Lenz Cesar / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Física Gleb Wataghin / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-22T08:41:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Thomaz_AndreAlexandrede_D.pdf: 9291787 bytes, checksum: 9554ec1cfb5b3952506ff59b61aec5f9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 / Resumo: A comunidade científica concorda que há grandes chances que a próxima revolução tecnológica virá do controle dos processos biológicos. Grandes mudanças são esperadas, desde como produzimos alimentos até como combatemos as doenças. O controle dos processos biológicos nos permitirá produzir carne sintética para alimentação, produzir biocombustíveis retirando CO2 da atmosfera, produzir órgãos inteiros para transplante e combater de forma eficiente doenças como câncer, por exemplo. Está claro para o nosso grupo que para se obter esses resultados é necessário entender a biologia na sua unidade mais básica: a célula. A partir do entendimento e domínio das reações químicas que acontecem dentro da célula, e mais especificamente do controle do DNA, é que vamos conseguir atingir essas previsões e revolucionar a maneira como vivemos hoje. Com esse pensamento em mente, o objetivo dessa tese foi desenvolver uma plataforma fotônica integrada para estudos de processos celulares. Nós acreditamos que as ferramentas fotônicas são as ferramentas que preenchem todos os requisitos para os estudos de processos celulares, pois possibilitam o acompanhamento dos processos em tempo real sem causar dano as células. As técnicas presentes são: fluorescência excitada por 1 ou 2 fotons, geração de segundo ou terceiro harmônico, pinças ópticas, imagem por tempo de vida da fluorescência e "fluorescence correlation spectroscopy" (FCS). Nesta tese demonstramos como montar essa plataforma integrada e mostramos sua versatilidade com resultados em várias áreas da biologia e também para o estudo de quantum dots. / Abstract: The scientific community believes there is a great chance that the next technological revolution is coming from the control of biological processes. Great changes are expected, from the way we produce food up to the way we fight diseases. The control of biological processes will allow us to produce synthetic meat as food, to produce biofuels extracting CO2 directly from the atmosphere, to produce whole synthetic organs for transplant and to fight diseases, like cancer, in more efficient ways. It is clear to our group that in order to obtain these results it is necessary to understand biology from its most basic unity: the cell. Only from understanding and controlling chemical reactions inside a cell, and more specifically from the DNA controlling, it will be possible to achieve these predictions and cause a revolution in the way we live nowadays. Bearing these thoughts in mind, the objective of this thesis was to develop an integrated photonic platform for study of cellular processes. We believe that photonic tools are the only tools that fulfill all the requeriments for studies of cellular processes because they are capable to follow processes in real time without any damage to the cells. The techniques integrated are: 1 or 2 photon excited fluorescence, second or third harmonic generation, optical tweezers, fluorescence lifetime imaging and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. In this thesis we demonstraded how to assemble this integrated plataform and we showed its versatility with results from different areas of biology and quantum dots. / Doutorado / Física / Doutor em Ciências

Studium chování opticky zachycených částic nám umožňuje porozumět základním fyzikálním jevům plynoucím z interakce světla a hmoty. Předkládaná práce podává vysvětlení zesílení tažné síly působící na opticky svázané částice ve strukturovaném světelném poli, tzv. tažném svazku. Ukazujeme, že pohyb dvou opticky svázaných objektů v tažném svazku je silně závislý na jejich vzájemné vzdálenosti a prostorové orientaci, což rozšiřuje možnosti manipulace hmoty pomocí světla. Následně se práce zaměřuje na levitaci opticky zachycených částic ve vakuu. Představujeme novou metodologii na charakterizaci vlastností slabě nelinearního Duffingova oscilátoru reprezentovaného opticky levitující částicí. Metoda je založena na průměrování trajektorií s určitou počáteční pozicí ve fázovém prostoru sestávajícím z polohy a rychlosti částice a poskytuje informaci o parametrech oscilátoru přímo ze zaznamenaného pohybu. Náš inovativní postup je srovnán s běžně užívanou metodou založenou na analýze spektrální hustoty polohy částice a za využití numerických simulací ukazujeme její použitelnost i v nízkých tlacích, kde nelinearita hraje významnou roli.

In the past decades, numerous single-molecule techniques have been developed to investigate individual bio-molecules and cellular machines. While a lot is known about the structure, localization, and interaction partners of such molecules, much less is known about their mechanical properties. To investigate the weak, non-covalent interactions that give rise to the mechanics of and between proteins, an instrument capable of resolving sub-nanometer displacements and piconewton forces is necessary. One of the most prominent biophysical tool with such capabilities is an optical tweezers. Optical tweezers is a non-invasive all-optical technique in which typically a dielectric microsphere is held by a tightly focused laser beam. This microsphere acts like a microscopic, three-dimensional spring and is used as a handle to study the biological molecule of interest. By interferometric detection methods, the resolution of optical tweezers can be in the picometer range on millisecond time scales. However, on a time scale of seconds—at which many biological reactions take place—instrumental noise such as thermal drift often limits the resolution to a few nanometers. Such a resolution is insufficient to resolve, for example, the ångstrom-level, stepwise translocation of DNA-binding enzymes corresponding to distances between single basepairs of their substrate. To reduce drift and noise, differential measurements, feedback-based drift stabilization techniques, and ‘levitated’ experiments have been developed. Such methods have the drawback of complicated and expensive experimental equipment often coupled to a reduced throughput of experiments due to a complex and serial assembly of the molecular components of the experiments. We developed a high-resolution optical tweezers apparatus capable of resolving distances on the ångstrom-level over a time range of milliseconds to 10s of seconds in surface-coupled assays. Surface-coupled assays allow for a higher throughput because the molecular components are assembled in a parallel fashion on many probes. The high resolution was a collective result of a number of simple, easy-to-implement, and cost-efficient noise reduction solutions. In particular, we reduced thermal drift by implementing a temperature feedback system with millikelvin precision—a convenient solution for biological experiments since it minimizes drift in addition to enabling the control and stabilization of the experiment’s temperature. Furthermore, we found that expanding the laser beam to a size smaller than the objective’s exit pupil optimized the amount of laser power utilized in generating the trapping forces. With lower powers, biological samples are less susceptible to photo-damage or, vice versa, with the same laser power, higher trapping forces can be achieved. With motorized and automated procedures, our instrument is optimized for high-resolution, high-throughput surface-coupled experiments probing the mechanics of individual biomolecules. In the future, the combination of this setup with single-molecule fluorescence, super-resolution microscopy or torque detection will open up new possibilities for investigating the nanomechanics of biomolecules.

Each organism has to maintain the integrity of its genetic code, which is stored in its DNA. This is achieved by strongly controlled and regulated cellular processes such as DNA replication, -repair and -recombination. An essential element of these processes is the unwinding of the duplex strands of the DNA helix. This biochemical reaction is catalyzed by helicases that use the energy of nucleoside triphophate (NTP) hydrolysis. Although all helicases comprise highly conserved domains in their amino acid sequence, they exhibit large variations regarding for example their structure, their function and their target nucleic acid structures. The main objective of this thesis is to obtain insight into the DNA unwinding mechanisms of three helicases from two different organisms. These helicase vary in their structures and are involved in different pathways of DNA metabolism. In particular the replicative, hexameric helicase Large Tumor-Antigen (T-Antigen) from Simian virus 40 and the DNA repair helicases RecQ2 and RecQ3 from Arabidopsis thaliana are studied. To observe DNA unwinding by these helicases in real-time on the single molecule level, a biophysical technique, called magnetic tweezers, was applied. This technique allows to stretch single DNA molecules attached to magnetic particles. Simultaneously one can measure the DNA end-to-end distance. Special DNA hairpin templates allowed to characterize different parameters of the DNA unwinding reaction such as the unwinding velocity, the length of unwound DNA (processivity) or the influence of forces. From this mechanistic models about the functions of the helicases could be obtained. T-Antigen is found to be one of the slowest and most processive helicases known so far. In contrast to prokaryotic helicases, the unwinding velocity of T-Antigen shows a weak dependence on the applied force. Since current physical models for the unwinding velocity fail to describe the data an alternative model is developed. The investigated RecQ helicases are found to unwind and close short stretches of DNA in a repetitive fashion. This activity is shown for the first time under external forces. The experiments revealed that the repetitive DNA unwinding is based on the ability of both enzymes to switch from one single DNA strand to the other. Although RecQ2 and RecQ3 perform repetitive DNA unwinding, both enzymes differ largely in the measured DNA unwinding properties. Most importantly, while RecQ2 is a classical helicase that unwinds DNA, RecQ3 mostly rewinds DNA duplexes. These different properties may reflect different specific tasks of the helicases during DNA repair processes. To obtain high spatial resolution in DNA unwinding experiments, the experimental methods were optimized. An improved and more stable magnetic tweezers setup with sub-nanometer resolution was built. Additionally, different methods to prepare various DNA templates for helicase experiments were developed. Furthermore, the torsional stability of magnetic particles within an external field was investigated. The results led to selection rules for DNA-microsphere constructs that allow high resolution measurements. / Jeder Organismus ist bestrebt, die genetischen Informationen intakt zu halten, die in seiner DNA gespeichert sind. Dies wird durch präzise gesteuerte zelluläre Prozesse wie DNA-Replikation, -Reparatur und -Rekombination verwirklicht. Ein wesentlicher Schritt ist dabei das Entwinden von DNA-Doppelsträngen zu Einzelsträngen. Diese chemische Reaktion wird von Helikasen durch die Hydrolyse von Nukleosidtriphosphaten katalysiert. Obwohl bei allen Helikasen bestimmte Aminosäuresequenzen hoch konserviert sind, können sie sich in Eigenschaften wie Struktur, Funktion oder DNA Substratspezifität stark unterscheiden. Gegenstand der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es, die Entwindungsmechanismen von drei verschieden Helikasen aus zwei unterschiedlichen Organismen zu untersuchen, die sich in ihrer Struktur sowie ihrer Funktion unterscheiden. Es handelt sich dabei um die replikative, hexamerische Helikase Large Tumor-Antigen (T-Antigen) vom Simian-Virus 40 und die DNA-Reparatur-Helikasen RecQ2 und RecQ3 der Pflanze Arabidopsis thaliana. Um DNA-Entwindung in Echtzeit zu untersuchen, wird eine biophysikalische Einzelmolekültechnik, die \"Magnetische Pinzette\", verwendet. Mit dieser Technik kann man ein DNA-Molekül, das an ein magnetisches Partikel gebunden ist, strecken und gleichzeitig dessen Gesamtlänge messen. Mit speziellen DNA-Konstrukten kann man so bestimmte Eigenschaften der Helikasen bei der DNA-Entwindung, wie z.B. Geschwindigkeit, Länge der entwundenen DNA (Prozessivität) oder den Einfluß von Kraft, ermitteln. Es wird gezeigt, dass T-Antigen eine der langsamsten und prozessivsten Helikasen ist. Im Gegensatz zu prokaryotischen Helikasen ist die Entwindungsgeschwindigkeit von T-Antigen kaum kraftabhängig. Aktuelle Modelle sagen dieses Verhalten nicht vorraus, weshalb ein alternatives Modell entwickelt wird. Die untersuchten RecQ-Helikasen zeigen ein Entwindungsverhalten bei dem permanent kurze Abschnitte von DNA entwunden und wieder zusammengeführt werden. Dieses Verhalten wird hier zum ersten Mal unter dem Einfluß externer Kräfte gemessen. Es wird gezeigt, dass die permanente Entwindung auf die Fähigkeit beider Helikasen, von einem einzelen DNA-Strang auf den anderen zu wechseln, zurückzuführen ist. Obwohl RecQ2 und RecQ3 beide das Verhalten des permanenten Entwindens aufzeigen, unterscheiden sie sich stark in anderen Eigenschaften. Der gravierendste Unterschied ist, dass RecQ2 wie eine klassische Helikase die DNA entwindet, während RecQ3 eher bestrebt ist, die DNA-Einzelstränge wieder zusammenzuführen. Die unterschiedlichen Eigenschaften könnten die verschieden Aufgaben beider Helikasen während DNA-Reparaturprozessen widerspiegeln. Weiterhin werden die experimentellen Methoden optimiert, um möglichst hohe Auflösungen der Daten zu erreichen. Dazu zählen der Aufbau einer verbesserten und stabileren \"Magnetischen Pinzette\" mit sub-nanometer Auflösung und die Entwicklung neuer Methoden, um DNA Konstrukte herzustellen. Außerdem wird die Torsions\\-steifigkeit von magnetischen Partikeln in externen magnetischen Feldern untersucht. Dabei finden sich Auswahlkriterien für DNA-gebundene magnetische Partikel, durch die eine hohe Auflösung erreicht wird.

The coiled-coil motif is present in proteins from all kingdoms of life. Its structure is based on a repeating sequence of 7 amino acids with hydrophobic residues at positions 1 and 4, which folds into an alpha-helix. Two, or more, alpha-helices wind around each other based on hydrophobic interactions forming the coiled-coil. Structural variations include length, deviations from the canonical form based on the heptad repeat, as well as the orientation and number of alpha-helices. They are involved in a wide variety of cellular processes including vesicle tethering and signal transmission along their length. In order to transmit signal, the protein must be able to dynamically rearrange its structure. An outstanding example of a coiled-coil that needs to rearrange its structure to perform its function is the early endosomal tether EEA1, which has been shown to increase its flexibility upon binding to the active form of the small GTPase Rab5. That conformational change generates an entropic collapse that brings the ends of the protein closer to each other. Nevertheless, the recycling from the more flexible state to its original extended conformation was not addressed. Herein, the entropic collapse mechanism was further studied and the full EEA1 cycle between extended and flexible states described. In addition to these studies, other coiled-coil proteins were assessed to determine if they also experience a binding-induced entropic collapse. One of the strategies to investigate the entropic collapse mechanism was to compare the adhesive forces along the two alpha-helices of the EEA1 dimer in its extended and flexible conformations. To this end, an experiment was designed to unwind the dimer using optical tweezers, a force-spectroscopy method that uses a highly focused laser beam to manipulate microscopic objects. Each EEA1 monomer was attached to a distinct DNA piece using a site-specific enzymatic reaction. The DNA pieces were linked to two optically trapped micron-sized beads. And the distance between the optical traps increased to unwind the EEA1. A second strategy to investigate the entropic collapse was to evaluate EEA1 dynamics in solution using dual color fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy (dcFCCS). EEA1 C-termini was labeled with two different fluorophores. Fluctuations on fluorescent intensities caused by the dyes crossing a confocal volume were recorded over time. Based on an analysis of these fluctuations, a conformational change in EEA1 from semi-flexible to flexible upon addition of active Rab5 was described. This is in agreement with the previously reported entropic collapse. More importantly, EEA1 was shown to cycle between semi-flexible and flexible states by adding Rab5:GTP and waiting for the GTP to hydrolyse. To determine whether other proteins experience a binding-induced entropic collapse, coiled-coil proteins that share structural and functional similarities with EEA1 were evaluated. Rotary shadowing EM images of the target protein alone and binding with its suspected allosteric effector were compared. It was found that ELKS, a coiled-coil protein involved in vesicle trafficking, undergoes an increase in flexibility upon binding with the active form of Rab6. Thus, hinting that the entropic collapse may indeed be a general mode of action for at least a sub-group of long coiled-coil proteins. Overall, the major contributions of this thesis are to describe the full entropic collapse cycle on EEA1 and to show a second example of a coiled-coil protein experiencing a binding induced flexibility increase.:List of Figures List of Tables List of Equations List of Abbreviations 1 Introduction 1.1 EEA1 as an endosomal tether 2 Materials and Methods 2.1 Materials 2.2 Methods 2.2.1 Sub-cloning 2.2.2 Protein expression and purification 2.2.3 Protein-protein binding assays 2.2.4 Electron microscopy 2.2.5 Analysis of electron microscopy 2.2.6 Generation of DNA handles for protein-DNA conjugates 2.2.7 Adding SortaseA recognition site to EEA1 2.2.8 Protein-DNA conjugation3 2.2.9 Sample preparation for optical tweezers 2.2.10 Dual color labeling of EEA1 2.2.11 Fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy 2.2.12 Generation of dsDNA for dcFCCS calibration 2.2.13 RabGTPase nucleotide loading 2.2.14 Liposome preparation 2.2.15 MCBs preparation 3 Unwinding EEA1 coiled-coil domain 3.1 Introduction 3.1.1 Optical tweezers for EEA1 unwinding 3.1.2 SortaseA-catalysed ligation 3.2 Aims 3.3 Results 3.3.1 Optimization of SortaseA-catalysed ligation 3.3.2 Formation of EEA1-DNA handle conjugate 3.3.3 EEA1 unwinding experiments 3.4 Discussion 4 EEA1 entropic collapse is recyclable 4.1 Introduction 4.1.1 Advantages of dcFCCS vs FCS 4.1.2 Requirements for dcFCCS measurements 4.1.3 dcFCCS for end polymer dynamics analysis 4.2 Aims 4.3 Results 4.3.1 System preparation and dcFCCS calibration 4.3.2 Labelling of EEA1 4.3.3 Comparing FCS vs dcFCCS 4.3.4 EEA1 entropic collapse shown by dcFCCS 4.3.5 EEA1 flexibility change is recyclable 4.4 Discussion 5 Entropic collapse as a general mechanism 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Aims 5.3 Results 5.3.1 ELKS increases its flexibility upon binding active Rab6 5.3.2 p115-GM130 complex observed by rotary shadowing EM 5.4 Discussion 6 Conclusions and outlook References

Caveolae sind charakteristische Plasmamembraneinstülpungen, die in vielen Zelltypen vorkommen und deren biologische Funktion umstritten ist. Ihre besondere Form und ihre Häu gkeit in Zellen, die stets mechanischen Belastungen ausgesetzt sind, führten zu der Annahme, dass Caveolae die Plasmamembran vor mechanischen Belastungen schützen und als Membranreservoir dienen. Dies sollte mit dieser Dissertation experimentell geprüft werden. Zunächst wurde der Ein uss der Caveolae auf die Membranspannung von Zellen im Normalzustand untersucht. Dann wurden die Zellen mechanisch belastet. Mit Fluoreszensmikroskopie wurde das Verschwinden von Caveolae nach Strecken der Zellen oder nach einem hypo-osmotischen Schock beobachtet. Messungen der Membranspannung vor und unmittelbar nach dem hypo-osmotischem Schock zeigten, dass Caveolae einen Anstieg der Membranspannung verhindern, unabhängig von ATP und dem Cytoskelett. Die Erzeugung von Membranvesikel mit Caveolae erlaubte es, diesen Effekt der Caveolae in einem vereinfachten Membransystem zu beobachten. Schliesslich wurden Muskelzellen untersucht. Zellen, die genetisch bedingt weniger Caveolae haben und mit Muskelschwundkrankheiten in Verbingung stehen, waren mechanisch weniger belastbar als gesunde Zellen. Zusammenfassend wird mit dieser Dissertation die These bestärkt, dass Caveolae einem Anstieg der Membranspannungen entgegenwirken. Dass dies in Zellen und in Vesikeln unabhängig von Energie und Cytoskelett geschieht, lässt auf einen passiven, mechanisch getriebenen Prozess schliessen. Diese Erkenntnis trägt zum Verständnis der Rolle von Caveolae in Zellen bei und kann dem besseren Verständnis von Krankheiten bedingt durch Caveolin-Mutationen, wie z.B. Muskelschwundkrankheiten, dienen.:I Introduction 9 1 Physical Description of Cellular Membranes 11 1.1 Membrane Physics at Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.1.1 Elastic Membrane Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 1.1.2 Mathematical Description of the Membrane . . . . . . 16 1.1.3 Membrane Tension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 1.2 Techniques to Measure Mechanical Properties of Membranes . 20 1.2.1 The Micropipette Aspiration Technique . . . . . . . . . 21 1.2.2 Tether Extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 1.2.3 Force and Radius of a Tether . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2 From Vesicles to Cells 30 2.1 Structure of the Cell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.2 Cytoskeleton of Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 2.2.1 Actin Filaments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 2.2.2 Actin Cortex Impairing Drugs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 2.3 Cellular Membranes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2.4 Membrane Area and Membrane Tension Regulation . . . . 39 2.5 Tether Extraction From Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3 Caveolae 44 3.1 The De nition of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.2 The Caveolin Protein Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.2.1 The Structure of Caveolin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.3 The Cavin Protein Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.3.1 Cavin1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.3.2 Cavin2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.3.3 Cavin3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3.3.4 Cavin4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 13.4 The Assembly of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54 3.4.1 Caveolin is Synthesized in the Endoplasmic Reticulum, and Assembles in The Golgi Apparatus .54 3.4.2 Cavin Enters the Stage for Caveola Formation . . . . . 56 3.4.3 The Lipid Composition of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3.5 Caveolae Are Stable Structures at the Plasma Membrane . . 60 3.6 Endocytosis of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 3.7 Caveolae/Caveolin Proteins and Signaling Processes . . . . . 62 3.7.1 Ion-pumps in Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 3.7.2 Regulation of eNOS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 3.8 Caveolae in Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 64 3.8.1 Interaction Partners of Cav3 in Myotubes . . . . . . . 64 3.8.2 Muscular Dystrophies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 4 Mechanical Role of Caveolae 74 II Materials and Methods 82 5 Cells and Reagents 84 5.1 Cell Types and Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 5.1.1 HeLa-PFPIG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 5.1.2 Mouse Lung Endothelial Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 5.1.3 Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 5.1.4 Human Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 5.2 Treatments Altering the Cell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.2.1 Expression of Proteins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.2.2 Altering Actin Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.2.3 ATP depletion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.2.4 Cholesterol Depletion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 5.3 Vesicles out of Cellular Plasma Membranes . . . . . . . . . . . 91 5.3.1 Giant Plasma Membrane Vesicles (GPMV) . . . . . . . 93 5.3.2 CytochalasinD-Blebs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 5.3.3 Plasma Membrane Spheres (PMS) . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 6 Experimental Set-Up 96 6.1 Tether Extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 6.1.1 Epi-OT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 6.1.2 Con-OT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 6.1.3 Cell Stage and Pipette Holder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 6.1.4 Hypo-osmotic Shock System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 6.1.5 Fabrication of Micropipettes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.1.6 Aspiration Control System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 6.1.7 Beads and Bead-coatings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.1.8 Online Tracking with MatLab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.1.9 Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 6.2 TIRF-microscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 6.2.1 TIRF Set-up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 III Results 115 7 Tether Extraction From Adherent Cells 117 7.1 Typical Tether Force Traces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 7.2 Preliminary Remarks and Comments on the Relation Between Tether Force and Membrane Tension on Cells . . . . . . . . 120 8 Do Caveolae Contribute to Setting the Resting Cell Tension? 123 8.1 The E ective Tension of MLEC is A ected by the Presence Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 8.2 The E ective Tension in MEFs Does not Depend on the Presence of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 8.3 Challenging the E ective Cell Tension by Chemical and Biological Treatments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 8.3.1 Alterations of the Cytoskeleton Decrease the E ective Cell Tension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 8.3.2 ATP depletion Decreases the Membrane Tension . . . . 130 8.3.3 Interaction of Cav1 with Src-kinase . . . . . . . . . . . 131 8.3.4 Cav3 Re-establishes the Cell Tension of Cav1−/− MLEC 133 8.4 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 9 Caveola-mediated Membrane Tension Bu ering Upon Acute Mechanical Stress: Experiments on Cells 137 9.1 Application of Acute Mechanical Stress and Cell Response Observed by TIRF and EM . . . . . . . . . . . 137 9.1.1 Mechanical Stress Leads to the Partial Disappearance of Caveolae from the Plasma Membrane .138 9.1.2 Partial Disappearance of Caveolae Observed by EM . 144 9.2 Membrane Tension Measurements During Hypo-osmotic Shock 147 9.2.1 Caveolae are Required for Bu ering the Tension Surge Due to Hypo-osmotic Shock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 9.2.2 Clathrin Coated Pits do not Bu er the Membrane Tension 151 9.2.3 Disassembly of Caveolae During Mechanical Stress . . . 153 9.3 Correlation Between the Observed Loss of Caveolae and the Excess of Membrane Area Required to Bu er Membrane Tension 156 10 Caveola-mediated Membrane Tension Bu ering upon Mechanical Stress: Experiments on Plasma Membrane Spheres 159 10.1 Plasma Membrane Spheres Contain Caveolae and Are Devoid of Actin Filaments . . . . . 161 10.1.1 Production of PMS from HeLa-PGFPIG . . . . . . . . 161 10.1.2 Production of PMS from MLEC . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 10.2 Micropipette Aspiration of PMS Induces Disassembly of Caveolae 166 10.2.1 Quantitative Analysis of Micropipette Aspiration of PMS 167 11 Experiments on Muscle Cells The Role of Caveolin-3 Mutations in Muscular Dystrophy 174 11.1 Tether Force of Di erentiated Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . 176 11.2 Reaction of Myotubes with Cav3-Mutations upon Acute Mechanical Stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 11.3 Contracting Myotubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .181 IV Discussion 182 12 Caveolae as a Security Device for the Cell Membrane 183 12.1 Comparison of Experimental Data with the Theoretical Model (Sens and Turner) . . . . . . . . . 186 13 Mechanical Stress and the Role of Caveolae in Signaling 189 14 Towards a Better Understanding of Muscular Dystrophies 191 15 Other Caveolin Related Diseases 194 V Appendices 196 A Cell Speci c Protocols 197 A.1 General Cell Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 A.1.1 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 A.2 Mouse Lung Endothelial Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.1 Cell Type Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.2 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.3 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.4 Transfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 A.3 HeLa and Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast Cells . . . . . . . . . . 199 A.3.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 A.3.2 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4 Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4.1 Cell Type Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4.2 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4.3 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 A.4.4 Transfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 B Cav1-Reconstitution in Lipid Vesicles 203 B.1 Puri cation of Cav1-GST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 B.1.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 B.1.2 Puri cation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 B.2 puri cation of Cav1-His . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 B.2.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 B.2.2 Puri cation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 B.3 Incorporation of Cav1 in Lipid Vesicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 B.3.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 B.3.2 Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 B.4 GUV Electro formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 B.4.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 B.4.2 Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 5 B.5 Check of Cav1 Association with Lipids . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 B.5.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 B.5.2 Cav1-SUVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 B.5.3 Run Sucrose Gradient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 B.5.4 TCA precipitation and Western Blot . . . . . . . . . . 212 B.5.5 SDS Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 B.5.6 Western Blot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 / Caveolae, the characteristic plasma membrane invaginations present in many cells, have been associated with numerous functions that still remain debated. Taking into account the particular abundance of caveolae in cells experiencing mechanical stress, it was proposed that caveolae constitute a membrane reservoir and bu er the membrane tension upon mechanical stress. The present work aimed to check this proposition experimentally. First, the in uence of caveolae on the membrane tension was studied on mouse lung endothelial cells in resting conditions using tether extraction with optically trapped beads. Second, experiments on cells upon acute mechanical stress showed that caveolae serve as a membrane reservoir bu ering surges in membrane tension in their immediate, ATP- and cytoskeleton-independent attening and disassembly. Third, caveolae incorporated in membrane vesicles also showed the tension bu ering. Finally, in a physiologically more relevant case, human muscle cells were studied, and it was shown that mutations with impaired caveolae which are described in muscular dystrophies render muscle cells less resistant to mechanical stress. In Summary the present work provides experimental evidence for the hypothesis that caveolae bu er the membrane tension upon mechanical stress. The fact that this was observed in cells and membrane vesicles in an ATP and cytoskeleton independent manner reveals a passive, mechanically driven process. This could be a leap forward in the comprehension of the role of caveolae in the cell, and in the understanding of genetic diseases like muscular dystrophies.:I Introduction 9 1 Physical Description of Cellular Membranes 11 1.1 Membrane Physics at Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.1.1 Elastic Membrane Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 1.1.2 Mathematical Description of the Membrane . . . . . . 16 1.1.3 Membrane Tension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 1.2 Techniques to Measure Mechanical Properties of Membranes . 20 1.2.1 The Micropipette Aspiration Technique . . . . . . . . . 21 1.2.2 Tether Extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 1.2.3 Force and Radius of a Tether . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2 From Vesicles to Cells 30 2.1 Structure of the Cell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.2 Cytoskeleton of Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 2.2.1 Actin Filaments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 2.2.2 Actin Cortex Impairing Drugs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 2.3 Cellular Membranes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2.4 Membrane Area and Membrane Tension Regulation . . . . 39 2.5 Tether Extraction From Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3 Caveolae 44 3.1 The De nition of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.2 The Caveolin Protein Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.2.1 The Structure of Caveolin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.3 The Cavin Protein Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.3.1 Cavin1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.3.2 Cavin2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.3.3 Cavin3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3.3.4 Cavin4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 13.4 The Assembly of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54 3.4.1 Caveolin is Synthesized in the Endoplasmic Reticulum, and Assembles in The Golgi Apparatus .54 3.4.2 Cavin Enters the Stage for Caveola Formation . . . . . 56 3.4.3 The Lipid Composition of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3.5 Caveolae Are Stable Structures at the Plasma Membrane . . 60 3.6 Endocytosis of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 3.7 Caveolae/Caveolin Proteins and Signaling Processes . . . . . 62 3.7.1 Ion-pumps in Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 3.7.2 Regulation of eNOS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 3.8 Caveolae in Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 64 3.8.1 Interaction Partners of Cav3 in Myotubes . . . . . . . 64 3.8.2 Muscular Dystrophies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 4 Mechanical Role of Caveolae 74 II Materials and Methods 82 5 Cells and Reagents 84 5.1 Cell Types and Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 5.1.1 HeLa-PFPIG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 5.1.2 Mouse Lung Endothelial Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 5.1.3 Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 5.1.4 Human Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 5.2 Treatments Altering the Cell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.2.1 Expression of Proteins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.2.2 Altering Actin Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.2.3 ATP depletion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.2.4 Cholesterol Depletion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 5.3 Vesicles out of Cellular Plasma Membranes . . . . . . . . . . . 91 5.3.1 Giant Plasma Membrane Vesicles (GPMV) . . . . . . . 93 5.3.2 CytochalasinD-Blebs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 5.3.3 Plasma Membrane Spheres (PMS) . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 6 Experimental Set-Up 96 6.1 Tether Extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 6.1.1 Epi-OT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 6.1.2 Con-OT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 6.1.3 Cell Stage and Pipette Holder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 6.1.4 Hypo-osmotic Shock System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 6.1.5 Fabrication of Micropipettes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.1.6 Aspiration Control System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 6.1.7 Beads and Bead-coatings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.1.8 Online Tracking with MatLab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.1.9 Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 6.2 TIRF-microscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 6.2.1 TIRF Set-up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 III Results 115 7 Tether Extraction From Adherent Cells 117 7.1 Typical Tether Force Traces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 7.2 Preliminary Remarks and Comments on the Relation Between Tether Force and Membrane Tension on Cells . . . . . . . . 120 8 Do Caveolae Contribute to Setting the Resting Cell Tension? 123 8.1 The E ective Tension of MLEC is A ected by the Presence Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 8.2 The E ective Tension in MEFs Does not Depend on the Presence of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 8.3 Challenging the E ective Cell Tension by Chemical and Biological Treatments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 8.3.1 Alterations of the Cytoskeleton Decrease the E ective Cell Tension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 8.3.2 ATP depletion Decreases the Membrane Tension . . . . 130 8.3.3 Interaction of Cav1 with Src-kinase . . . . . . . . . . . 131 8.3.4 Cav3 Re-establishes the Cell Tension of Cav1−/− MLEC 133 8.4 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 9 Caveola-mediated Membrane Tension Bu ering Upon Acute Mechanical Stress: Experiments on Cells 137 9.1 Application of Acute Mechanical Stress and Cell Response Observed by TIRF and EM . . . . . . . . . . . 137 9.1.1 Mechanical Stress Leads to the Partial Disappearance of Caveolae from the Plasma Membrane .138 9.1.2 Partial Disappearance of Caveolae Observed by EM . 144 9.2 Membrane Tension Measurements During Hypo-osmotic Shock 147 9.2.1 Caveolae are Required for Bu ering the Tension Surge Due to Hypo-osmotic Shock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 9.2.2 Clathrin Coated Pits do not Bu er the Membrane Tension 151 9.2.3 Disassembly of Caveolae During Mechanical Stress . . . 153 9.3 Correlation Between the Observed Loss of Caveolae and the Excess of Membrane Area Required to Bu er Membrane Tension 156 10 Caveola-mediated Membrane Tension Bu ering upon Mechanical Stress: Experiments on Plasma Membrane Spheres 159 10.1 Plasma Membrane Spheres Contain Caveolae and Are Devoid of Actin Filaments . . . . . 161 10.1.1 Production of PMS from HeLa-PGFPIG . . . . . . . . 161 10.1.2 Production of PMS from MLEC . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 10.2 Micropipette Aspiration of PMS Induces Disassembly of Caveolae 166 10.2.1 Quantitative Analysis of Micropipette Aspiration of PMS 167 11 Experiments on Muscle Cells The Role of Caveolin-3 Mutations in Muscular Dystrophy 174 11.1 Tether Force of Di erentiated Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . 176 11.2 Reaction of Myotubes with Cav3-Mutations upon Acute Mechanical Stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 11.3 Contracting Myotubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .181 IV Discussion 182 12 Caveolae as a Security Device for the Cell Membrane 183 12.1 Comparison of Experimental Data with the Theoretical Model (Sens and Turner) . . . . . . . . . 186 13 Mechanical Stress and the Role of Caveolae in Signaling 189 14 Towards a Better Understanding of Muscular Dystrophies 191 15 Other Caveolin Related Diseases 194 V Appendices 196 A Cell Speci c Protocols 197 A.1 General Cell Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 A.1.1 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 A.2 Mouse Lung Endothelial Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.1 Cell Type Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.2 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.3 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.4 Transfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 A.3 HeLa and Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast Cells . . . . . . . . . . 199 A.3.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 A.3.2 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4 Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4.1 Cell Type Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4.2 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4.3 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 A.4.4 Transfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 B Cav1-Reconstitution in Lipid Vesicles 203 B.1 Puri cation of Cav1-GST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 B.1.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 B.1.2 Puri cation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 B.2 puri cation of Cav1-His . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 B.2.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 B.2.2 Puri cation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 B.3 Incorporation of Cav1 in Lipid Vesicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 B.3.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 B.3.2 Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 B.4 GUV Electro formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 B.4.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 B.4.2 Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 5 B.5 Check of Cav1 Association with Lipids . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 B.5.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 B.5.2 Cav1-SUVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 B.5.3 Run Sucrose Gradient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 B.5.4 TCA precipitation and Western Blot . . . . . . . . . . 212 B.5.5 SDS Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 B.5.6 Western Blot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 / Cavéoles sont des invaginations caractéristiques de la membrane plas- mique présents dans beaucoup de types cellulaires. Ils sont liées à plusieurs fonctions cellulaires, ce qui sont encore débattues. Prenant compte de l importance des cavéoles dans les cellules soumises au stress mécanique, les cavéoles sont proposées de constituer un réservoir membranaire et de tamponner la tension membranaire pendant des stresses mécaniques. Cette étude a eu le but de tester cette hypothèse expérimentalement. En premier, l in uence des cavéoles sur la tension membranaire au repos a été étudiée sur des cellules endothéliales du poumon de la souris. Puis, on a montré que les cavéoles tamponnent l augmentation de la tension membranaire après l application d un stress mécanique. En suite, la réalisation des vésicules membranaires contenant des cavéoles a permit de montrer leur rôle comme réservoir membranaire dans un système simpli é. Finalement, dans un contexte physiologiquement plus relevant, l étude des cellules musculaires a montrée que les mutations du cavéolin associées aux dystrophies musculaires rendent les cellules moins résistante aux stresses mécaniques. En conclusion, cette étude supporte l\''hypothèse que les cavéoles tamponnent la tension membranaire pendant des stresses mécaniques. Le fait que cela se passe dans les cellules et les vésicules indépendamment d ATP et du cytosquelette révèlent un processus passif et mécanique. Cela pourrait servir à une meilleure compréhension du rôle des cavéoles dans la cellule et les maladies génétiques comme les dystrophies musculaires.:I Introduction 9 1 Physical Description of Cellular Membranes 11 1.1 Membrane Physics at Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.1.1 Elastic Membrane Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 1.1.2 Mathematical Description of the Membrane . . . . . . 16 1.1.3 Membrane Tension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 1.2 Techniques to Measure Mechanical Properties of Membranes . 20 1.2.1 The Micropipette Aspiration Technique . . . . . . . . . 21 1.2.2 Tether Extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 1.2.3 Force and Radius of a Tether . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2 From Vesicles to Cells 30 2.1 Structure of the Cell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.2 Cytoskeleton of Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 2.2.1 Actin Filaments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 2.2.2 Actin Cortex Impairing Drugs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 2.3 Cellular Membranes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2.4 Membrane Area and Membrane Tension Regulation . . . . 39 2.5 Tether Extraction From Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3 Caveolae 44 3.1 The De nition of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.2 The Caveolin Protein Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.2.1 The Structure of Caveolin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.3 The Cavin Protein Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.3.1 Cavin1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.3.2 Cavin2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.3.3 Cavin3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3.3.4 Cavin4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 13.4 The Assembly of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54 3.4.1 Caveolin is Synthesized in the Endoplasmic Reticulum, and Assembles in The Golgi Apparatus .54 3.4.2 Cavin Enters the Stage for Caveola Formation . . . . . 56 3.4.3 The Lipid Composition of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3.5 Caveolae Are Stable Structures at the Plasma Membrane . . 60 3.6 Endocytosis of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 3.7 Caveolae/Caveolin Proteins and Signaling Processes . . . . . 62 3.7.1 Ion-pumps in Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 3.7.2 Regulation of eNOS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 3.8 Caveolae in Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 64 3.8.1 Interaction Partners of Cav3 in Myotubes . . . . . . . 64 3.8.2 Muscular Dystrophies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 4 Mechanical Role of Caveolae 74 II Materials and Methods 82 5 Cells and Reagents 84 5.1 Cell Types and Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 5.1.1 HeLa-PFPIG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 5.1.2 Mouse Lung Endothelial Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 5.1.3 Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 5.1.4 Human Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 5.2 Treatments Altering the Cell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.2.1 Expression of Proteins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.2.2 Altering Actin Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.2.3 ATP depletion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.2.4 Cholesterol Depletion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 5.3 Vesicles out of Cellular Plasma Membranes . . . . . . . . . . . 91 5.3.1 Giant Plasma Membrane Vesicles (GPMV) . . . . . . . 93 5.3.2 CytochalasinD-Blebs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 5.3.3 Plasma Membrane Spheres (PMS) . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 6 Experimental Set-Up 96 6.1 Tether Extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 6.1.1 Epi-OT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 6.1.2 Con-OT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 6.1.3 Cell Stage and Pipette Holder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 6.1.4 Hypo-osmotic Shock System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 6.1.5 Fabrication of Micropipettes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.1.6 Aspiration Control System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 6.1.7 Beads and Bead-coatings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.1.8 Online Tracking with MatLab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.1.9 Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 6.2 TIRF-microscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 6.2.1 TIRF Set-up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 III Results 115 7 Tether Extraction From Adherent Cells 117 7.1 Typical Tether Force Traces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 7.2 Preliminary Remarks and Comments on the Relation Between Tether Force and Membrane Tension on Cells . . . . . . . . 120 8 Do Caveolae Contribute to Setting the Resting Cell Tension? 123 8.1 The E ective Tension of MLEC is A ected by the Presence Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 8.2 The E ective Tension in MEFs Does not Depend on the Presence of Caveolae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 8.3 Challenging the E ective Cell Tension by Chemical and Biological Treatments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 8.3.1 Alterations of the Cytoskeleton Decrease the E ective Cell Tension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 8.3.2 ATP depletion Decreases the Membrane Tension . . . . 130 8.3.3 Interaction of Cav1 with Src-kinase . . . . . . . . . . . 131 8.3.4 Cav3 Re-establishes the Cell Tension of Cav1−/− MLEC 133 8.4 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 9 Caveola-mediated Membrane Tension Bu ering Upon Acute Mechanical Stress: Experiments on Cells 137 9.1 Application of Acute Mechanical Stress and Cell Response Observed by TIRF and EM . . . . . . . . . . . 137 9.1.1 Mechanical Stress Leads to the Partial Disappearance of Caveolae from the Plasma Membrane .138 9.1.2 Partial Disappearance of Caveolae Observed by EM . 144 9.2 Membrane Tension Measurements During Hypo-osmotic Shock 147 9.2.1 Caveolae are Required for Bu ering the Tension Surge Due to Hypo-osmotic Shock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 9.2.2 Clathrin Coated Pits do not Bu er the Membrane Tension 151 9.2.3 Disassembly of Caveolae During Mechanical Stress . . . 153 9.3 Correlation Between the Observed Loss of Caveolae and the Excess of Membrane Area Required to Bu er Membrane Tension 156 10 Caveola-mediated Membrane Tension Bu ering upon Mechanical Stress: Experiments on Plasma Membrane Spheres 159 10.1 Plasma Membrane Spheres Contain Caveolae and Are Devoid of Actin Filaments . . . . . 161 10.1.1 Production of PMS from HeLa-PGFPIG . . . . . . . . 161 10.1.2 Production of PMS from MLEC . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 10.2 Micropipette Aspiration of PMS Induces Disassembly of Caveolae 166 10.2.1 Quantitative Analysis of Micropipette Aspiration of PMS 167 11 Experiments on Muscle Cells The Role of Caveolin-3 Mutations in Muscular Dystrophy 174 11.1 Tether Force of Di erentiated Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . 176 11.2 Reaction of Myotubes with Cav3-Mutations upon Acute Mechanical Stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 11.3 Contracting Myotubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .181 IV Discussion 182 12 Caveolae as a Security Device for the Cell Membrane 183 12.1 Comparison of Experimental Data with the Theoretical Model (Sens and Turner) . . . . . . . . . 186 13 Mechanical Stress and the Role of Caveolae in Signaling 189 14 Towards a Better Understanding of Muscular Dystrophies 191 15 Other Caveolin Related Diseases 194 V Appendices 196 A Cell Speci c Protocols 197 A.1 General Cell Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 A.1.1 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 A.2 Mouse Lung Endothelial Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.1 Cell Type Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.2 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.3 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 A.2.4 Transfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 A.3 HeLa and Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast Cells . . . . . . . . . . 199 A.3.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 A.3.2 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4 Muscle Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4.1 Cell Type Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4.2 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.4.3 Cell Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 A.4.4 Transfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 B Cav1-Reconstitution in Lipid Vesicles 203 B.1 Puri cation of Cav1-GST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 B.1.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 B.1.2 Puri cation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 B.2 puri cation of Cav1-His . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 B.2.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 B.2.2 Puri cation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 B.3 Incorporation of Cav1 in Lipid Vesicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 B.3.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 B.3.2 Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 B.4 GUV Electro formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 B.4.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 B.4.2 Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 5 B.5 Check of Cav1 Association with Lipids . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 B.5.1 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 B.5.2 Cav1-SUVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 B.5.3 Run Sucrose Gradient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 B.5.4 TCA precipitation and Western Blot . . . . . . . . . . 212 B.5.5 SDS Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 B.5.6 Western Blot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212

No description available.

No description available.

[pt] Resfriamento é o passo inicial necessário a qualquer experimento optomecânico que tenha como objetivo desbloquear o potencial das pinças ópticas, tanto para a melhoria da sensiblidade a forças em aplicações de sensoreamento quanto para estudos de física quântica fundamental na microescala. O propósito do trabalho descrito nesta dissertação foi o de melhorar a montagem de uma pinça óptica para resfriamento por retroalimentação do movimento translacional de nanopartículas levitadas. Nós implementamos a coleta de luz retroespalhada pela partícula para melhorar a eficiência de detecção do movimento ao longo do eixo óptico. Usando um ambiente de simulação numérica em Python, nós também exploramos o potencial de sistemas optomecânicos como sensores para estados de luz com intensidades muito baixas. / [en] Cooling is the necessary first step for any optomechanical experiment aiming to unleash the full potential of optical tweezers, both in the context of improving force sensitivity in sensor applications and of studying fundamental quantum physics at the microscale. The purpose of the work described in this dissertation was to improve an optical tweezer setup for electrical feedback cooling of the translational motion of levitated nanoparticles. We implement collection of backscattered light from the particle for improved detection efficiency of motion along the optical axis. Using a numerical simulation environment in Python, we also explore the potential of optomechanical systems as sensors for light states with very low intensities.