Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-10-04T20:58:53Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
JeffersonEduardoDaPazBarbosa_DISSERT.pdf: 843425 bytes, checksum: 659589e3b42f6dee429cd6493b1b9b37 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-10-11T00:29:46Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
JeffersonEduardoDaPazBarbosa_DISSERT.pdf: 843425 bytes, checksum: 659589e3b42f6dee429cd6493b1b9b37 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-11T00:29:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
JeffersonEduardoDaPazBarbosa_DISSERT.pdf: 843425 bytes, checksum: 659589e3b42f6dee429cd6493b1b9b37 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-05-05 / Esta disserta??o tem como tema a tens?o entre Maurice Blanchot e Jean-Paul Sartre quanto ao
aspecto ?tico, pol?tico e filos?fico da literatura. Entendemos que essa tens?o faz parte da
subjetividade art?stica moderna, tendida entre a liberdade de recusa soberana e a aceita??o do
compromisso com a hist?ria, de modo que ambos os autores acirram essa contradi??o da
literatura. Se, por um lado, Blanchot (2011b) afirma que a literatura ? a porta para uma
experi?ncia al?m dela mesma, experi?ncia que busca tornar a morte poss?vel, Sartre (2004)
afirma que a literatura ? o ?mbito de uma rela??o entre liberdades onde tem lugar uma
dial?tica fundamental que implica a tomada de consci?ncia. Ambos os autores concebem a
realidade humana como negatividade, por isso a import?ncia de Hegel como fundo comum de
onde a tens?o emerge. A filosofia hegeliana, atrav?s dos cursos de Alexandre Koj?ve (2012),
com sua ?nfase na ideia de morte, ter? em Blanchot uma rearticula??o sem a qual n?o
poder?amos compreender suas ideias sobre a literatura. Em Sartre, a filosofia hegeliana ?
igualmente importante, uma vez que suas ideias sobre o existencialismo articulam n?o apenas
a fenomenologia husserliana e o marxismo (posteriormente), mas a dial?tica da negatividade e
do universal concreto. Para Blanchot, a literatura manifesta uma liberdade absoluta, uma
interroga??o radical que p?e em causa todos os projetos humanos. Para Sartre, essa liberdade
absoluta, que pode ter sido o af? do surrealismo, ? concebida como tenta??o da
irresponsabilidade. A literatura permanece o lugar de uma ambiguidade que est? presente nos
dois autores. / This dissertation is about the tension between Maurice Blanchot and Jean-Paul Sartre, as to
the ethical, political and philosophical aspect of literature. We understand that this tension is
part of modern artistic subjectivity, stretched between freedom of sovereign refusal and
acceptance of commitment to history, so that both writers stir up this contradiction of
literature. If, on the one hand, Blanchot (2011b) affirms that literature is the door to an
experience beyond itself, an experience seeks to make death possible, Sartre (2004) says that
literature is the space of a relation between freedoms where a fundamental dialectic takes
place that implies an awareness. Both authors conceive the human reality as negativity, hence
the importance of Hegel as common ground from which tension emerges. The Hegelian
philosophy, through the courses of Alexandre Koj?ve (2012), with its emphasis on the idea of
death, will have in Blanchot an rearticulation without which we could not understand his
ideas about literature. In Sartre, Hegel?s philosophy is equally important, since his ideas about
existentialism articulate not only phenomenology and Marxism (later), but the dialectic of
negativity and the concrete universal. For Blanchot, literature manifests an absolute freedom,
a radical interrogation that calls into question all human projects. For Sartre, this absolute
freedom, which was the desire of surrealism, is conceived as a temptation to irresponsibility.
The literature holds the place of an ambiguity that is present in the two authors.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/24037 |
Date | 05 May 2017 |
Creators | Barbosa, Jefferson Eduardo da Paz |
Contributors | 75211262115, Penna, Jo?o Camillo Barros de Oliveira, 51045478768, Barbosa, Marcio Venicio, 52327159687, Honesko, Vin?cius Nicastro, 02822630984, Pellejero, Eduardo Anibal |
Publisher | PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM FILOSOFIA, UFRN, Brasil |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds