朝鮮半島由於地理位置特殊,在戰略上極具重要性,長久以來一直為列強覬覦爭奪之地。第二次世界大戰之後,朝鮮半島亦籠罩在兩極對峙的氣氛裡,首先是南北韓的分裂,而韓戰的發生,使美蘇在東亞地區的對抗局面更為激化,冷戰時期的朝鮮半島遂成為東亞地區內兩極對峙氣氛最為明顯的「火藥庫」,因而獲得「東方的巴爾幹」的稱號。隨著東歐變天、蘇聯瓦解,雖然冷戰時期的兩極對峙局面已不復見,國際瀰漫一片和解氣氛,然而東亞地區並未因此脫離冷戰的陰影,尤其是朝鮮半島的南北對抗依然持續、北韓引發的核武危機更使東亞地區陷入隨時可能爆發衝突的臨界點。由於朝鮮半島的局勢不僅攸關區域安全,亦與東亞列強間的權力平衡息息相關,後冷戰時期朝鮮半島已然成為國際關注的焦點,不論是區域傳統強權──美國與俄羅斯,抑或東亞新興的力量──中共與日本,皆極力爭取在朝鮮半島事務的發言權,一方面確保自身國家利益,另一方面更意圖在區域內發揮影響力,提升國際地位。
綜觀諸強權對朝鮮半島的政策,以美國最為大眾所知,各種期刊與學者論著足以證明美國影響之深度與廣度。中共與日本的參與和影響,亦有諸多學者研究,然而關於俄羅斯與朝鮮半島關係之研究卻少之又少。事實上俄羅斯在冷戰前後對於朝鮮半島的政策有相當幅度的變化,也是朝鮮半島穩定局勢的重大變數之一。從冷戰時期為與美國制衡、確保區域強權地位,極力與北韓維持密切關係,並刻意斷絕與南韓的接觸,到八0年代為求內部經濟發展,極力塑造周邊環境的穩定,開始與南韓接觸,乃至蘇聯解體後為求取經濟資源向南韓一面倒、以及1996年之後為維持在朝鮮半島的影響力而採取「等距離外交」,皆對朝鮮半島局勢產生相當程度的影響。基於意識型態與國家利益,對朝鮮半島所採取的政策因時而異,筆者欲就後冷戰時期俄羅斯的朝鮮半島政策作一番通盤整理,將莫斯科在朝鮮半島政策上的變化加以分析。
本文主要目標係探討後冷戰時期俄羅斯對朝鮮半島的政策,因此對於冷戰時期蘇聯對兩韓的政策著墨不多,僅以少部分篇幅對戈巴契夫主政前各蘇聯領導人的朝鮮半島政策作一番概述,提供讀者了解莫斯科當局在決定對兩韓政策時的歷史背景。筆者除了對葉爾欽時期俄羅斯對朝鮮半島的政策詳細加以整理與歸納之外,由於朝鮮半島的安全穩定攸關東亞區域的安全,並涉及周邊列強的國家利益,筆者認為在探究俄羅斯朝鮮半島政策時,亦須對美國、中共、日本的朝鮮半島政策有基本認知,因此亦以一個章節來討論列強在此地的競逐與制衡。俄羅斯長期以來為維持周邊環境的穩定,推動亞太安全不遺餘力,而朝鮮半島事務是當前俄羅斯最能發揮區域影響力的議題,本文亦將探討俄羅斯朝鮮半島政策對亞太安全的影響,諸如兩韓統一、核武問題皆在研究範圍之內。
本文共分七章,第一章為緒論,第二章先概述冷戰時期朝鮮半島的地緣政治與蘇聯的關係,並以蘇聯領導人作為區隔,就戈巴契夫主政前蘇聯與兩韓的關係加以探討。第三章分析戈巴契夫新思維對蘇聯亞太政策產生的衝擊,並分析朝鮮半島在戈氏新思維當中扮演的角色,此外更詳述戈巴契夫時期對朝鮮半島政策的調整。第四章為本論文的主要章節,筆者先就俄羅斯內部自蘇聯解體後持續進行的對外政策激辯過程加以概述,分析俄羅斯對外政策的重大變化,並探究朝鮮半島政策受到的影響,以及俄羅斯與南北韓關係的發展;其次筆者就俄羅斯1996年之後對朝鮮半島政策的調整過程加以分析,「等距離外交」的執行與障礙亦為研究重點。第五章係討論有關朝鮮半島周邊列強在此地的競逐與制衡,筆者分別就美國、中共與日本的朝鮮半島政策加以論述。第六章俄羅斯對兩韓統一與核武問題的立場有詳細說明,此外讀者亦可自本章得知俄羅斯朝鮮半島政策與亞太安全的關聯,第七章為結論。
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的..................................1
第二節 研究方法與限制..................................2
第三節 論文架構........................................3
第二章 冷戰時期蘇聯的朝鮮半島政策
第一節 二次大戰結束後的東亞局勢與韓國的處境...............5
第二節 蘇聯的東亞政策與朝鮮半島地緣政治...................6
第三節 第二次世界大戰結束後蘇聯與南北韓的關係............11
第三章 戈巴契夫時期蘇聯的朝鮮半島政策
第一節 戈巴契夫「新思維」與俄羅斯外交政策之轉變..........33
第二節 戈巴契夫初期蘇聯對朝鮮半島的政策..................42
第三節 蘇聯對兩韓政策之轉變..............................45
第四章 葉爾欽時期的朝鮮半島政策
第一節 蘇聯解體與俄羅斯對外政策大辯論.................69
第二節 「新東方政策」與朝鮮半島..........................74
第三節 俄國對兩韓的等距離外交............................96
第五章 朝鮮半島周邊其他列強之角逐
第一節 美國朝鮮半島政策……………………………………..131
第二節 中共朝鮮半島政策……………………………………..145
第三節 日本朝鮮半島政策……………………………………..161
第六章 俄羅斯朝鮮半島政策與亞太安全
第一節 俄羅斯對兩韓統一之看法………………………………175
第二節 俄羅斯對核武問題之立場………………………………182
第三節 俄國朝鮮半島政策對亞太安全之意義………………..192
第七章 結論…………………………………………………………..213
參考書目……………………………………………………………………217 / Summary
Based on the specialty of its location, the Korean Peninsula has been extremely important on strategy, and the surrounding major powers have fought for it for a long time. After the World War II, the Korean Peninsula was also under the atmosphere of confrontation like other regions and the Korean War made the confronting situation more irrigated. Although the international society has been filled with reconciliation since the sudden change of Eastern Europe and the disintegration of the Soviet Union, East Asia didn’t get rid of the shadow of the Cold War. The situation of confrontation between North and South on the Korean Peninsula has still existed, and the nuclear crisis caused by DPRK made the East Asia Region involved in a critical point, at which various of conflicts would burst out at any time. The situation of the Korean Peninsula not only affects the regional security, but also concerns about the balance of power among the East Asian major powers. In the post-Cold War Era the Korean Peninsula has been an international focus, concerned by both the traditional regional powers, such as U.S.A. and Russian, and the new powers, such as PRC and Japan. All the surrounding nations are trying to have the floor in the Korean Peninsula affairs, not only to secure their own national interests, but also to produce a marked effect in the region and promote national status.
The intent of the thesis is trying to study Russia’s policy toward the Korean Peninsula in the post-Cold War Era. In order to introduce the historical background of Moscow’s policy making toward Korea, the thesis is classified into several parts according to various Kremlin leaderships. After a series of arrangement and analysis, we can find that Moscow’s policy toward the Korean Peninsula since 1945 has been influenced by the changes of the international environment, but also by the development of domestic politics and economy in Russia. In addition, the latter affects Moscow’s foreign policy in the post- Cold War Era much more than the former.
Based on the need of democratic policy and economic reform after the disintegration of Soviet Union in 1991, Russia decided to approach the West to get political and economic support. Therefore, getting along with ROK, which has democratic experience and strong economic capability, while cutting original ties with DPRK gradually, is the best choice for Moscow. As for ROK, Russia’s influence on DPRK can promote direct dialog between the two sides, and then secure the peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula. Under the consideration of economy and politics, Russia and ROK accordingly established formal diplomatic relations on September 30, 1991, and the bilateral relationships has been developed smoothly. On the other hand, based on the differences of political structure and economic system, Russia and DPRK have departed for a long distance.
Although Moscow insisted to develop full-scale relations with ROK without regarding to the objection of DPRK, the achievement of developing relations with ROK couldn’t fit the expectation of Russian people. The bare economic situation hadn’t been improved, and at the same time, Russians felt be treated as a debtor by ROK. Based on the poor economy and the declining nation status in the international society, Russia had been filled with a conservative atmosphere since 1993. The extreme complaint about the domestic and external affairs provoked the Communism and Nationalism, and the foreign policy inclining to the West suffered from fierce critics. Judging from the distribution of the Duma in 1993 and 1995, we can easily find the dramatic change of Russian domestic politics. To preserve national interest and dignity, Kremlin decided to change its policy toward the Korean Peninsula in 1996. The former policy inclining to ROK has been given up, and Moscow makes efforts to regain close relationships with DPRK while developing normal ties with ROK to maintain Russia’s importance and floor not only on the Korean Peninsula, but also in East Asia affairs. In addition, keeping in touch with DPRK and providing any possible assistance will prevent the sudden collapse of Pyongyang Government, which might result in dramatic turbulent in the region. In short, maintaining close ties with North and South at the same time not only promote peace and stability in the region, but also fit Russia’s national interests.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/B2002001316 |
Creators | 熊嘉琪, Chia Chi Hsiung |
Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
Language | 中文 |
Detected Language | English |
Type | text |
Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds