Terrorist organizations have always been predominantly dominated by male members in numbers of participants, supporters, and leaders. Despite men having the majority of the roles, oftentimes the world witnesses attack executed by female terrorists which deal a substantial amount of damage to the infrastructure and the peaceful civilians surrounding them. Furthermore, the sense of unpredictability and unpreparedness from the counterterrorist forces and the general public adds up to the overall advantage women possess in the field of terrorism over men. Considering these observations, one can argue that women have grown to be far more dangerous and successful in the field of terrorism than men, who still hold the absolute majority in terrorist organizations. This thesis will investigate the phenomenon of women as nontraditional terrorists through answering the question of who deals more damage per terrorist attacks between males and females by looking at four major distinct terrorist organizations and their individual cases of attacks reported in the Global Terrorism Database. The unit of measurement for this study will be the average of death and wounded tolls, while the variables investigated will be individual male/female attacks and mixed-group/male group/female group attack to evaluate the impact of female member’s presence in group-attack settings. The goal of this thesis is to raise awareness on female lethality in terrorist organizations to the counterterrorist forces and the general public which is extremely important for domestic and foreign policy/security measures.

By discussing and comparing three transnational terrorist events - 9/11, 11-M, and July 7 - similarities and differences emerge among them, which are the focus of this study. By comparing the causes of and responses to these attacks, and postulating underlying ideologies revealed by those comparisons, findings can be applied to potential future situations involving terrorist acts or groups. Learning by self-examination is an important step in every nation's improvement of global policy, and determining possible causes of terrorism could be useful in actually preventing terrorism. I suggest causes of 9/11, 11-M, and July 7, and demonstrate that the three attacks may have actually had similar causes, regardless of apparent differences in time, place, and global climate. The conclusions from these comparisons offer potential courses of action to prevent terrorism in the future. Examining responses to terrorist actions serves to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of particular responses, thereby offering guidance as to the best courses of action to take in the instance of a new attack. The evaluation of American, Spanish, and British reactions to terrorism, both within governments and populations, shows that America had the most aggressive response in terms of military action. The response of the Spanish population was an example of the power of public wrath, in ousting the incumbent Conservative party in favor of the Socialist party. The response of the British people and government, a stoic and unwavering determination to retain normalcy, was admirable and ought to be emulated by Western nations unfortunate enough to be attacked in the future. The underlying ideologies contributing to the responses are rich in value though difficult to change. By recognizing these differences among one another, countries such as the United States, Spain, and Great Britain may be able to better cooperate in international matters in the future. After comparing the individualist nature of America to the more communal nature of Western European nations such as Spain and Great Britain, a discussion of secular theocracy follows, applying the topics discussed earlier to political figures in the War on Terror. In all of these comparisons, a framework is laid for what political behaviors should be lauded in the event of terrorism, and what behaviors should be avoided, both on the national and transnational level. Through the exploration and analysis of these three large-scale terrorist events, a broader understanding of terrorism can be gained, as well as a more cohesive view of the supposed "differences" among cultures of the West and cultures of the Middle East.

Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited / The rapidly growing threat to civilian populations from different terrorist organizations and nuclear states involved in regional conflicts require new unorthodox solutions. The purpose of this work is to analyze steps that have been taken on the European continent before and after September 11 in order to create a new, more efficient system of protection of the civilian population against CBRN terrorist attacks, and to explore NATO's role in the most problematic issues. The research examines what was done within NATO since 1998 by members of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council in the field of improving population protection against the consequences of CBRN terrorist attacks in two dimensions: national and international. This evaluation leads to the argument that supports the importance of the creation of an international system of mutual assistance in case of CBRN terrorist attacks under NATO's leading role. / Lieutenant Colonel, Ministry for Emergencies of Ukraine

Poverty, Inequality & Terrorism Relationship in TurkeyUsing empirical evidence criminological studies have identified a relationship between poverty and crime and many studies have concluded that a high crime rate is associated with a higher poverty rate. Other studies indicate that inequalities are a better determinant of crime than absolute poverty. Social disorganization theory, anomie strain theory and Marxist theory have been used to explain the phenomenon. Guided by the aforementioned theories and previous literature on crime, this study looks at the terrorism issue and explores whether a relationship exists between poverty, inequality and terrorist incidents. The main hypothesis of this study indicates that higher poverty and higher inequalities are related to higher number of terrorist incidents. This study examines Turkey's terrorism problem in depth and identifies some factors that are related to the formation of terrorism. It is believed that this may assist help policy makers to develop new policies that can eliminate fertile ground where terrorism easily finds support. The researcher uses secondary data analysis; data for number of terrorist incidents are derived from the Turkish National Police's database, and other demographic and economic variable data are derived from Turkish Statistical Institute, and Government Planning Office. A multiple regression analysis technique is used to identify the effect of independent variables on the dependent variable, number of terrorist incidents. The results of the statistical analysis show that there is a statistically significant relationship between the percentage of population living below the poverty line, unequal distribution of some government resources, such as unequal distribution of education services, and unequal distribution of public investment. Findings also show that higher populated provinces may experience greater terrorist incidents. Additionally, the percentage of young in the population is also found to be related to the number of terrorist incidents.

Title from first page of PDF document. Includes bibliographical references (p. 46-52).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2007. / Title from first page of PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. 212-230).

Although terrorism is an area that has been the subject of much research, systematic searches in databases reveal that a focus on actors and movements that find their motivation in Christian beliefs, is, by and large, lacking. Ever since the 9/11 terrorist attack, Islamist terrorism has been the major focus. The purpose of this thesis is to describe and compare Christian and Islamist acts of terrorism. This will be done by using the terrorist attack of the self-proclaimed Christian crusader Anders Behring Breivik in Norway 2011 and compare it to the terrorist attack in Paris November 2015 claimed by the terrorist organisation Islamic State (IS). A content analysis is used to explore the material. The analysis is conducted with an analytical framework created from previous research on religious terrorism to explore the similarities and differences of religiously motivated terrorist acts. The study reveals that there are a lot of similarities between Breivik and the Paris attackers. Both Breivik and IS strived to change society with violence justified by their religion. In a type of “God´s executioner” fashion. A final conclusion in this thesis is that Breivik and IS share Ideological core ideas in the form of exclusivity, however, the exclusivity is expressed differently. Breivik´s exclusiveness is linked to ethnicity and skin colour, while IS´s exclusivity is solely linked to faith.

In a time filled with concerns and threats of terrorism, Sweden faces a challenge that demands our full attention. In this critical situation, we have chosen to investigate how students perceive the threat of a potential terrorist attack. Previous research has shown that people's trust in authorities affects the extent to which they feel fear about the possibility of a terrorist attack. Prior research has further emphasized the importance of media consumption and gender in shaping the experience of fear. The purpose of this pilot study is to examine how the increased threat to Sweden influences the level of fear among students across the country regarding a potential terrorist attack in Sweden. Additionally, the aim is to investigate whether trust in the general public has any significance for fear, while controlling for the impact of media consumption and gender. The theoretical framework draws upon Beck's theory of the risk society, Giddens' concepts of ontological security, trust, and expert systems, and finally Misztal's definition of the concept of trust. Data collection involves a survey, with the sample consisting of individuals over 18 years of age residing in Sweden and studying at a university or college. Univariate analysis, as well as bivariate and multiple regression analysis, were used to analyze the collected data. The study revealed that students' experiences of fear varied, with trust in authorities and the general public having no impact on their fear levels. However, the degree of fear was significantly influenced by students' media consumption, which also affected the relationship between trust and fear. / I en tid fylld av oro och hot om terrordåd står Sverige inför en utmaning som kräver vår fulla uppmärksamhet. I detta kritiska läge har vi valt att undersöka hur studenter upplever hotet om ett eventuellt terrordåd. Tidigare forskning har visat på att människors tillit till myndigheter påverkar i vilken utsträckning de känner oro för att ett eventuellt terrordåd ska ske. Forskning har ytterligare understrukit mediekonsumtion och köns betydelse för upplevelsen av oro. Syftet med denna pilotstudie är att undersöka hur det ökade hotet mot Sverige påverkar i vilken utsträckning studenter runt om i landet känner oro för ett eventuellt terrordåd i Sverige. Vidare är syftet att undersöka om tilliten till allmänheten har någon betydelse för oron, samt kontrollera för mediekonsumtion och köns betydelse. Den teoretiska referensramen utgår ifrån Becks teori om risksamhället, Giddens begrepp ontologisk trygghet, tillit samt expertsystem och till sist Misztal definition av tillitssbegreppet. Datainsamlingen består av en enkätundersökning, där studiens urval består av personer över 18 år bosatta i Sverige som studerar på universitet eller högskola. Univariatanalys samt bivariat- och multipel regressionsanalys användes för att analysera studiens insamlade data. Studien visade att studenters upplevelser av oro är utspridd där tilliten till allmänheten inte har någon påverkan på deras oro. Graden av oro påverkas däremot till stor del av studenternas mediekonsumtion som även påverkar sambandet mellan tillit och oro.

No description available.

The purpose of this study is to overlook Nordic medias news coverage and framing of Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik. The study is based on printed editions of Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten, Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter and the Finnish newspaper Hufvudstadsbladet set on nine selected dates related to the issue between July 23th 2011 to August 25th 2012.     The study will display how Breivik was framed by each of the Nordic newspapers and even the total amount of news coverage the issue has been given. The media framing part of the study will mainly focus on the media framing of Breiviks personality and political ideology. The study will also investigate each newspapers handling of Breiviks manifesto, which he published only hours before killing 77 people on July 22th 2011.   The study is a quantitative content analysis, containing a total number of 245 articles. Aftenposten featured almost two times the total material of Dagens Nyheter and Hufvudstadsbladet combined. The study is based on news evaluation- and media framing theory.   The result shows that there are only slight differences in each newspapers framing of Breivik. The  most usual description based on our results is that Breivik is a right wing extremist, massmurder or terrorist with a deviant perception of reality. Sensationalism has put its imprint on the news coverage of Breivik by focusing on personal and psychological aspects. The result also shows that newspapers in neighboring countries Sweden and Finland put a larger emphasis on the hatred of the terrorist than domestic newspaper Aftenposten.