Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T16:44:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Andre Nardy.pdf: 1089149 bytes, checksum: bf93de2a1a852c7d9ef44cfa8f114323 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-02-12 / The dynamics of abnormal returns , volume and betas is analyzed for Bovespa s stocks included or excluded from the Ibovespa index between 2003 and 2012, in a phenomenon known in the financial literature as the index effect, one of the oldest reported anomalies. Event studies are used with different settings of estimation window to measure abnormal returns and assess its effect on the calculation of return for the market model , since the calculation of the theoretical portfolio of Bovespa is known beforehand and is based on marketability and liquidity. No abnormal return is veryfied for shares on the date of their effective entry on the index, only abnormally high volumes. On the date of the first preview of inclusions positive abnormal returns and volumes are observed, and so on for excluded stocks. However, when we exclude from the sample companies with IPOs up to 3 years of its entry into the Bovespa Index and those assets included during the crisis of the financial markets, it appears tha abnormal returns do occur on the effective date, consistent with previous literature on the theme. The betas of the stocks included tend to covariate with greater force after inclusion in the index . With the results achieved market efficiency in the semi-strong form cannot be challenged for the Brazilian stock market, but there is a possible change in the occurrence of the index effect for the period studied, compared with previous studies / Analisa-se a ocorrência para o Ibovespa de dinâmica anormal de retornos, volume e dos betas para as ações incluídas ou excluídas do índice, entre 2003 e 2012, em fenômeno conhecido dentro da literatura de finanças como Efeito índice, uma das anomalias mais antigas relatadas. Utilizam-se estudos de eventos em diferentes configurações de janela de estimação para medir os retornos anormais e avaliar o efeito da mesma na apuração de retorno pelo modelo de mercado, dado o cálculo da carteira teórica do Ibovespa ser conhecido de antemão e baseado em negociabilidade e liquidez. Não se encontram ocorrências de retorno anormal para a data de efetiva entrada das ações, apenas volumes anormalmente altos. Na data de primeira prévia das inclusões ocorrem retornos e volumes anormais positivos, o mesmo ocorrendo para exclusões. Entretanto, ao se excluir da amostra de inclusões as empresas com IPOs realizados até 3 anos de seu ingresso no Ibovespa e aqueles ativos incluídos durante a crise dos mercados financeiros, verifica-se retornos anormais na data de efetivação da nova carteira teórica, coerente com a literatura precedente. Os betas das ações incluídas tendem a covariar com maior força após a inclusão no índice. Com os resultados não é possível questionar a eficiência na forma semiforte para o mercado acionário brasileiro, porém verifica-se uma possível mudança na ocorrência do efeito índice para o período estudado, em comparação com estudos anteriores

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T18:39:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Moises Avila da Silva.pdf: 1614116 bytes, checksum: be9b6746f1f46bc76c08ed255ece8d74 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-06-03 / According to ISE (Corporate Sustainability Index), applications denominated socially responsible investment considers that sustainable companies create long term value to shareholders because they are more prepared to face environmental, social and economic risks. This demand has been strengthening over time and today is extensively attended by many financial instruments in the local and international market. In this context, this study analyzed the inclusion of companies, from 2011 to 2013, to socially responsible company s portfolio (Corporate Sustainability Index), evaluated a set of indicators of stock prices before and after the inclusion in the ISE, compared stock markets performance before and after the announcement of the inclusion. The objective, through the events study, was to evaluate if the investor had value aggregated to its equity by decision of the company s managers to enter the ISE. Inside this context, it also evaluated if the market announcement that they are socially correct companies was able to imply this perception and if stockholders had above average return because of this event. The results observed in this paper (in average) show indication that the market positively evaluates the sustainability efforts and is willing to repay for that. However, this reality doesn t hold for long. For 2013, a new fact that hadn t occurred before can be observed: the indication of a turnaround in the markets perception regarding sustainability efforts by companies. This year, the abnormal returns (WEG companies) continued after the announcement of entering the index. This fact can indicate that the announcement could have been able to increase the stockholder wealth / Segundo responsáveis pelo ISE (Índice de Sustentabilidade Empresarial), as aplicações denominadas investimentos socialmente responsáveis, consideram que empresas sustentáveis geram valor para o acionista no longo prazo, pois estão mais preparadas para enfrentar riscos econômicos, sociais e ambientais. Essa demanda veio se fortalecendo ao longo do tempo e hoje é amplamente atendida por vários instrumentos financeiros no mercado nacional e internacional. Nesse contexto, este trabalho analisou a entrada das empresas, de 2011 a 2013, na carteira de empresas responsáveis socialmente (Índice de Sustentabilidade Empresarial). Avaliou o conjunto de indicativos de preço das ações antes e depois de entrada no ISE. Comparou o desempenho do mercado de ações diretamente com período anterior e um posterior ao anúncio de entrada nesse índice. O objetivo, através do estudo de eventos, foi avaliar se o investidor agregou valor ou não ao seu patrimônio por decisão dos gestores das companhias quando da entrada no índice de sustentabilidade. Dentro desse contexto, avaliou também se o fato de comunicar ao mercado que são empresas socialmente corretas foi capaz de fazer valer essa percepção e se os acionistas dessas empresas tiverem retorno acima do normal por esse evento. Os resultados observados neste trabalho (na média) trazem indícios de que o mercado avalia positivamente os esforços de sustentabilidade e está disposto a remunerar melhor por isso, porém esse patamar não se mantém no tempo. Já para o ano de 2013 observa-se um fato novo, não ocorrido até o momento, que são indícios de uma virada na percepção do mercado quanto aos esforços de sustentabilidade das empresas. Nesse ano, os retornos anormais (para empresa WEG) continuaram após o momento do anúncio da entrada no índice. Esse fato pode indicar que o fato público teria sido capaz de maximizar a riqueza do acionista

O objetivo desse trabalho é analisar os efeitos do anúncio da dupla-listagem sobre o comportamento das ações no mercado doméstico das empresas que promoveram a listagem de ADRs. Os aspectos do comportamento analisados são os retornos anormais, os padrões de liquidez e volatilidade de preços. Foram analisados 22 programas de ADRs. Para cada uma das características analisadas foi utilizada uma diferente técnica empírica. A análise dos retornos anormais foi realizada através de um estudo de eventos para 5 diferentes janelas de estudos. A segunda técnica empírica utiliza-se do Índice de Negociabilidade, uma métrica desenvolvida pela Economática envolvendo o número de negócios diários e o volume diário transacionado da ação para medir potenciais alterações na liquidez das ações e, por fim, a terceira técnica utilizada utiliza a variância dos retornos como medida relevante de alteração de volatilidade dos mesmos. Embora com limitações, o estudo apresentou resultados em linha com parte da literatura de referência, demonstrando, excetuando-se pela janela de 5 dias pré e pós evento, que não é possível afirmar que os retornos das ações estudadas após o anúncio da emissão das ADRs são diferentes dos retornos apresentados pelas ações antes do anúncio. Com relação à análise de impacto sobre a liquidez das ações (INM 50d), foi possível rejeitar a hipótese de que o programa não causa impacto na liquidez com um nível de significância de 10% após comparar a liquidez das ações das empresas que emitiram ADRs com a liquidez das ações das empresas que compunham as carteiras dos grupos de controle. Finalmente, ao estudar a volatilidade das ações, foi possível observar que, para os testes-F realizados, das 22 ações testadas, 11 apresentaram resultados que permitem rejeitar a hipótese nula e, portanto, inferir que, para essas companhias, a variância dos retornos durante o período de 50 dias pós-evento foi diferente da variância dos retornos durante o período de 50 dias pré-evento dentro de um nível de significância de 5%. Para as outras 11 empresas testadas, não foi possível rejeitar a hipótese nula e, portanto, não foi possível concluir, para essas empresas, que o evento do anúncio da emissão de ADRs exerceu qualquer influência sobre a volatilidade dos retornos das ações subjacentes. Essa dissertação contribui para o entendimento mais aprofundado das consequências da emissão de ADRs. Tal processo, caro e demandante, expõe as companhias a diferentes níveis de regulação e exige um nível mais elevado de governança e, portanto, deve ser bem entendido por gestores, bancos e consultores. / The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effects of the cross-listing announcement on the behavior of the shares of Brazilian companies that enroll in ADR programs. The analyzed aspects of the domestic shares’ behavior are the abnormal returns, the liquidity levels and the volatility of the returns measured by their variance. 22 ADR programs were analyzed. For each of the characteristic studied, a different empirical technique was utilized. The abnormal returns analysis was conducted through an event study for 5 different study windows. The second empirical technique rely on the “Indice de Negociabilidade”, a metric developed by Economatica which involves the number of daily trades of the market and of the shares to measure potential changes in the liquidity levels of the shares. Finally, the third method used analyzes the variance of the returns of the domestic shares as relevant measure of volatility of returns. Although with limitations, the study presented results aligned with part of the reference studies and bibliography, demonstrating, except for the window of 5 days pre and post event, that it is not possible to assert that the returns of the shares analyzed after the announcement of the issuance of the ADRs are different from the returns presented by the shares before the announcement. With regard to the analysis of the impact on shares’ liquidity (INM 50d), it was possible to reject the hypothesis that the program does not impact liquidity with a significance level of 10% after comparing the liquidity of the shares of the companies that issued ADRs with the liquidity companies’ shares that composed the portfolios of the control groups. Finally, in studying volatility of the shares, it was possible to observe that for the F-tests performed, of the 22 shares tested, 11 presented results that allow the rejection of the null hypothesis and, therefore, infer that for these companies, the variance of returns during the 50-day period postevent was different from the variance of returns over the 50-day period previous to the event within a significance level of 5%. For the 11 other companies tested, it was not possible to reject the null hypothesis and therefore it was not possible to conclude, for these companies, that the event of the announcement of the issuance of ADRs had any influence on the volatility of the returns of the underlying shares. This dissertation contributes to a more in-depth understanding of the consequences of issuing ADRs. Such an expensive and demanding process exposes companies to different levels of regulation and requires a higher level of governance and therefore must be well understood by managers, banks and consultants.

近年來，我國政府大力推動海外企業來台上市，成效亮眼。在這股熱潮下，為了解海外企業第一上市新股和第二上市台灣存託憑證於我國資本市場掛牌後的表現，本研究針對2009年四月至2010年十二月間，外國與本國發行人在台灣證券交易所新上市之股票和台灣存託憑證進行實證分析。除檢定其是否存在異常報酬外，並綜合過往文獻、相關法令規範及迴歸分析結果，探討影響其異常報酬的可能原因。本研究主要發現如下： （1）國內外企業在台新上市股票及台灣存託憑證均具有顯著的期初異常報酬，其高低依序為－海外企業第一上市新股、國內企業新上市股票、海外企業第二上市台灣存託憑證。 （2）台灣存託憑證期初異常報酬的成因並非來自於承銷價格的低估，而是來自於投資人對於蜜月行情的過度反應。其主要證據為－平均達3%的發行溢價、蜜月期結束後顯著為負的累積異常報酬、及對期初異常報酬最具影響力的示範效果因子。 （3）國內企業在台新上市股票期初異常報酬的成因主要來自於承銷商與發行公司資訊不對稱所造成的承銷價格低估。其主要證據為－新股上市後穩定且接近1.5%的累積異常報酬、及對期初異常報酬最具影響力的折價幅度因子。 （4）海外企業來台第一上市新股異常報酬的成因可能部分來自於發行公司與投資人資訊不對稱所造成的承銷價格低估；部分則可能來自於投資人對蜜月行情的過度反應。其主要證據為－蜜月期結束後為負的累積異常報酬、及海外企業來台第一上市新股與國內新上市股票的合併資料迴歸中，群體效果、中籤率與海外第一上市名目變數等顯著影響因子的間接支持。 / This study attempts to investigate the different patterns of the abnormal returns of Taiwan listings by foreign issuers and IPOs by domestic issuers, for the period from April, 2009 through December, 2010. Of particular interest is to examine the determinants of the abnormal returns. The major findings of the study are as the follows: (1)Empirical results indicate that all Taiwan listing stocks, including IPOs by foreign and domestic issuers and TDRs, have significant abnormal initial returns. Among them, IPOs by foreign issuers show the highest abnormal initial returns while TDRs show the lowest. (2)Evidences like the negative CARs, the average 3% premium of TDR issuance and the demonstration effect suggest that investor overreaction could be a major factor contributing to TDRs’ significant abnormal initial returns. (3)Evidences also suggest the under-pricing by the better-informed underwriters may cause significant abnormal initial returns of IPOs by domestic issuers. The IPO discount is discussed as an in-depth demonstration. (4)The study assumes that the significant abnormal initial returns of IPOs by foreign issuers partly result from the under-pricing as a signal to attract investors, and partly result from investor overreaction.

<p>This study deals with one of the efficient market hypothesis’ anomaly. The research aims at proving the</p><p>existence of a size anomaly by answering the question: can you outperform the market by investing in</p><p>small and mid caps? It is in fact a questioning of the well-know efficient market hypothesis (EMH). We</p><p>investigate the size effect in the situation of a passive strategy with different indices (Russell Indices and</p><p>S&P Indices) from 1995 to 2005.</p><p>The introduction gives to the reader the background he needs to understand the methodology and the</p><p>approach of the issue by the authors. Key concepts are defined such as EMH, passive strategy.</p><p>The second part exposes the methodology the authors choose and the methodology of exploited indices.</p><p>The research consist on measuring the risk adjusting excess returns by comparing the market index</p><p>return (S&P 500 or Russell 3000) and the Small and Mid Caps indices (S&P Small Cap 600, S&P Mid</p><p>Cap 400, Russell Mid Cap and Russell 2000) over the period. Indeed the methodology of indices is</p><p>exposing in details to understand in which extent the study can be influence by the construction of</p><p>indices.</p><p>Then in part 3 the authors describe theories that are possible explanations for the size effect. Then it is</p><p>understandable that the size anomaly is the result of a set of factors that generate abnormal returns.</p><p>These theories help the authors to come up with a model that gives an overview of the research.</p><p>After having explained their research method and reveal their empirical findings. The authors</p><p>demonstrate that excess returns can be earned by investing in small and mid caps indices even after</p><p>controlling for risk. The risk adjusting excess returns their findings can potentially be explained by the</p><p>other factors depicted in the theoretical part. E/P ratios, Trading Costs, January effect, Overreaction are</p><p>possible reasons to explain the size anomaly. They also find an instability and/or reversal of the size</p><p>effect consistent with one of the theories. However the authors find data with non statistic significance,</p><p>so I accept the null hypothesis that the excess returns of small and mid caps indices are equal to zero.</p><p>The paper ends with a discussion about the limitations of the study and possible further researches. The</p><p>authors conclude that even if the existence of a size effect is obvious for some years and horizons of</p><p>investment, the passive strategy appears to be an unsuited method to take advantage of the small effect</p><p>since the results reject the null hypothesis. The authors clarify the fact that before investing in small and</p><p>mid caps, one has to be aware of all the factors that can influence his investment (beside risk) because</p><p>the size effect is a set of factors.</p><p>Key words: Efficient Market Hypothesis, Abnormal returns, Size effect (anomaly), Passive strategy,</p><p>Market Index, S&P indices, Russell indices</p>

Purpose: The purpose of this thesis is to investigate if abnormal patterns concerning the rates of return during specific weekdays and months are observable for the companies in the OMXS30 during the period 2003-2010. A special focus will be put on the Monday effect anomaly. Background: Investors have a tendency to search for investment opportunities. If errors exist in the pricing of stocks it indicates that anomalies are present and that the stock market is inefficient. Investors then have the possibility to utilize the anomalies in order to receive above average returns. Method: This study is using data of stock prices from Nasdaq OMX in the period of 2003-2010. The strength and existence of the Swedish stock market efficiency is measured through autocorrelation-, chi-square- and regression tests. Average monthly stock returns are calculated on daily-, monthly-, and yearly basis. The returns are compared in order to examine if day-of-the-week and turn-of-the-year anomalies exist. Conclusion: No Monday effect is found in 2003-2010. However, positive Thursday- and positive Friday effects are detected. A negative turn-of-the-year effect as well as a positive April effect is found. The investment opportunities that could be utilized in 2003-2010 due to the specific anomalies in the period do not necessarily imply that the same anomalies can be expected on the OMXS30 in the future.

This study deals with one of the efficient market hypothesis’ anomaly. The research aims at proving the existence of a size anomaly by answering the question: can you outperform the market by investing in small and mid caps? It is in fact a questioning of the well-know efficient market hypothesis (EMH). We investigate the size effect in the situation of a passive strategy with different indices (Russell Indices and S&amp;P Indices) from 1995 to 2005. The introduction gives to the reader the background he needs to understand the methodology and the approach of the issue by the authors. Key concepts are defined such as EMH, passive strategy. The second part exposes the methodology the authors choose and the methodology of exploited indices. The research consist on measuring the risk adjusting excess returns by comparing the market index return (S&amp;P 500 or Russell 3000) and the Small and Mid Caps indices (S&amp;P Small Cap 600, S&amp;P Mid Cap 400, Russell Mid Cap and Russell 2000) over the period. Indeed the methodology of indices is exposing in details to understand in which extent the study can be influence by the construction of indices. Then in part 3 the authors describe theories that are possible explanations for the size effect. Then it is understandable that the size anomaly is the result of a set of factors that generate abnormal returns. These theories help the authors to come up with a model that gives an overview of the research. After having explained their research method and reveal their empirical findings. The authors demonstrate that excess returns can be earned by investing in small and mid caps indices even after controlling for risk. The risk adjusting excess returns their findings can potentially be explained by the other factors depicted in the theoretical part. E/P ratios, Trading Costs, January effect, Overreaction are possible reasons to explain the size anomaly. They also find an instability and/or reversal of the size effect consistent with one of the theories. However the authors find data with non statistic significance, so I accept the null hypothesis that the excess returns of small and mid caps indices are equal to zero. The paper ends with a discussion about the limitations of the study and possible further researches. The authors conclude that even if the existence of a size effect is obvious for some years and horizons of investment, the passive strategy appears to be an unsuited method to take advantage of the small effect since the results reject the null hypothesis. The authors clarify the fact that before investing in small and mid caps, one has to be aware of all the factors that can influence his investment (beside risk) because the size effect is a set of factors. Key words: Efficient Market Hypothesis, Abnormal returns, Size effect (anomaly), Passive strategy, Market Index, S&amp;P indices, Russell indices

Background: The value of stock recommendations have been debated for a century andthe debate has escalated since Alfred Cowles (1933) published his research in “Can StockMarket Forecasters Forecast”? As of late, savings in stocks has increased and the householdsare managing their savings more actively. The consequence of the increased interestin stocks has resulted in a growing market for stock recommendations. Not just financialmedia but daily newspapers have embraced this new found interest, hence stock recom-mendations can be found in almost all large newspapers in Sweden. Furthermore, this phe-nomenon has also lead to intensified research within stock recommendations. Researchers have under the 20th and 21st century investigated a wide number of issues concerning stock recommendations. The most common issue with different angles has been whether stockrecommendations generate abnormal returns or not? Earlier research on this issue havehowever mostly been based on the American stock market. According to us, not enoughnational research has been done on whether stock recommendations generate abnormal returnsor not on the Swedish stock market. Further we think that there is a lack of research with regards to a short time span. Purpose: The purpose of the study is to investigate whether stock recommendations on Nasdaq OMXSLarge-Mid-Small CAP, First North and Aktietorget generate abnormal returns? Central for the study is to investigate if stock recommendation generates abnormal returns in the short-term. Secondary the study will also investigate stock recommendations effect on stock prices in the long run. Method: First step was to create databases from high frequency data, 10 minute OHLCVbars, and from closing prices. Thereafter use these as a base for statistical calculations. Conclusion: The results from this study show that analysts have succeeded with generat-ing significant abnormal returns with their recommendations. Above all it is the business journals buy recommendations that generate the highest abnormal return. Sell recommen-dations didn’t give high significant results in our measurements. Our results also show thatabnormal returns from buy recommendations are sufficiently high and the transaction costsare sufficiently low so that investors can capitalize on the analyses. We found that buy recommendations effect companies noted on Small Cap etc to a higher extent than companies noted on Large- and Mid-Cap because of the lower degree of transparency in the smaller companies. Our results also indicate that the weekly magazines generate approximatelyequal abnormal returns. The monthly generates the lowest abnormal returns in our study. In our research we also found that buy recommendations that are published when thestock market has a positive momentum perform better than when the stock market has anegative momentum. We also found that investor should closely monitor the information flow before the recommendation is published, since a positive information flow can have afavorable outcome on the size of the abnormal return. Last but not least, we observe a correlationbetween the numbers of investors the recommendation reaches and the magnitudeof the observed abnormal return. / Bakgrund: Värdet av aktierekommendationer har debatterats i snart ett sekel, och debat-ten har eskalerat ända sedan Alfred Cowles (1933) publicerade sin forskning ”Can StockMarket Forecasters Forecast?" De senaste åren har sparandet i aktier ökat och hushållenblir allt aktivare i sitt pensionssparande. Konsekvensen av det ökade intresset för sparande iaktier har resulterat i en växande marknad för aktierekommendationer. Inte bara finansiellmedia utan också dagliga tidskrifter har tagit till sig detta ökade intresse och nästan samtligastörre dagstidningar publicerar numera aktierekommendationer. Vidare har detta fenomen också lett till att forskningen kring aktierekommendationer intensifierats de senaste decennierna.Forskare har under 1900-talet och 2000-talet undersökt en mängd olika problem-ställningar kring aktierekommendationer. Varav den vanligaste problemställningen med varierandevinklar, har varit huruvida aktierekommendationer genererar överavkastning ellerej? Tidigare forskning har dock framförallt baserats på den amerikanska aktiemarknaden. I vår mening råder det brist på nationell forskning som visar huruvida aktierekommendatio-ner genererar överavkastning på bolag noterade på svenska marknadsplatser. Vidare råderdet brist på forskning som tar hänsyn till det korta tidsperspektivet. Syfte: Syftet med studien är att undersöka huruvida aktierekommendationer på Nasdaq OMXS Large-Mid-Small CAP och First North samt Aktietorget genererar överavkastning? Centralt för studien är attundersöka om aktierekommendationer är kursdrivande på kort sikt, Sekundärt kommer också studienundersöka aktierekommendationers inverkan på aktiekurser på lång sikt. Metod: Första steget var att konstruera databaser från högfrekvensdata, 10M OHLCVbars, och stängningskurser. Därefter använda dessa som grund för statistiska beräkningar. Slutsats: Resultat från vår studie visar att ekonomijournalister har lyckats med att genererasignifikant överavkastning med deras rekommendationer. Framför allt är det affärstidskrifternasköprekommendationer som genererar högst överavkastning. Säljrekommendationergav ett lägre signifikant utslag i våra mätningar. Våra resultat indikerar också på att överavkastningen från köprekommendationer är tillräckligt hög och transaktionskostnaderna tillräckligtlåga för att investerare skall kunna kapitalisera på rekommendationerna. Vi finneratt köprekommendationer är mer kursdrivande på Small Cap etc. än bolag noterade på Lar-ge- och Mid Cap på grund av den lägre graden av transparens i de mindre bolagen. Våra resultatpekar också på att Affärsvärlden, Börsveckan &amp; Veckans affärer genererar ungefärlika stor överavkastning. Aktiespararen &amp; Privata Affärer genererar den lägsta överavkastningeni våra mätningar. I våra efterforskningar ser vi också en stark tendens för att aktiersom rekommenderas när börsen har ett positivt momentum presterar bättre än aktier somrekommenderas när börsen har ett negativt momentum. Vi finner också att investerare börbeakta informationsflödet innan rekommendationstidpunkten då ett positivt informations-flöde kan får en gynnsam effekt på överavkastningens storlek. Sist men inte minst observe-rar vi en korrelation mellan antalet investerare rekommendationen når och magnituden påden observerade överavkastningen.

Purpose: The purpose of this thesis is to study the possible existence of day-of-the-week effects and month-of-the-year effects in the Singapore stock market over the period January 1st 1993 to December 31st 2011. The findings are analysed with the intention of developing investment strategies and to investigate if behavioural finance can help to explain the existence of seasonal anomalies.  Background: A number of previous studies have found evidence of seasonal anomalies in global stock markets, and by challenging the core assumptions of market efficiency, such anomalies may make it possible to predict the movement of stock prices at certain periods during the year. Consequently, there may be substantial profit-making opportunities that clever investors can benefit from, raising two important questions: (1) can such anomalies be strategically used to outperform the market and (2) why do such cyclical return patterns exist? Method: Daily closing prices from the Singapore Straits Times Index (STI) are used to compute average daily and monthly returns, which are further analysed through the use of statistical significance analysis and hypothesis testing to identify the possible existence of day-of-the-week effects and month-of-the-year effects in the Singapore stock market.  The results of the statistical investigation are used to develop investment strategies that are designed to take advantage of both positive and negative effects, and the theories of behavioural finance are applied to help explain why seasonalities occur at certain points in time. Conclusions: This study finds evidence of several seasonal anomalies in the Singapore stock market. Both day-of-the-week effects and month-of-the-year effects are present in the STI over the full sample period. Many of these effects can be explained by behavioural finance, and used to develop investment strategies that outperform the market.

Denna eventstudie syftar till att undersöka hur ett byte av noteringslista påverkar kumulativ onormal avkastning (CAR) 1 till och med 12 månader efter genomfört byte. I studien undersöks därför utförda byten av noteringsplats på den svenska aktiemarknaden under tidsperioden 1995-2009. I studien beräknas onormal avkastning delvis med marknadsmodellen (MM) som grund, men också med Fama &amp; French tre-faktormodell (FF) för att öka reliabiliteten. Vidare undersöks om skillnader i CAR föreligger under olika tidsintervall samt om olikheter förekommer efter att berörda företag delats in i undergrupper baserade på typ av byte, industri samt storlek. Slutligen testas utifall den eventuella kumulativa onormala avkastningen är signifikant skild från noll med student t-test samt om det föreligger skillnader i medelvärde i de olika undergrupperna. Resultatet visar att den genomsnittliga kumulativa onormala avkastningen (CAR) uppgår till – 4,57 % (MM), - 3,74 % (FF) en månad efter bytet, vilket är signifikant på 1 % - nivån. Denna negativa tendens håller i sig och efter 12 månader uppvisas CAR på – 20,20 % (MM), -16,99 % (FF) även dessa statistisk säkerställda på 1 % - nivån. Detta resultat är i linje med liknade studier på andra aktiemarknader. Vi kan alltså dra slutsatsen att detta fenomen även föreligger på den svenska aktiemarknaden samt konstatera att händelsen listbyte är något både företag och aktieägare bör beakta mer varsamt.