Spelling suggestions: "subject:"[een] ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING"" "subject:"[enn] ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING""
41 |
A Digital Twin for Synchronized Multi-Laser Powder Bed Fusion (M-LPBF) Additive ManufacturingPetitjean, Shayna 13 June 2022 (has links)
No description available.
|
42 |
Direct-Write of Melt-Castable Energetic and Mock materialsPatrick D Bowers (10732050) 30 April 2021 (has links)
<p>Explosives and rocket fuel are
just two prime examples of energetic materials, compounds that contain a
combustible fuel and oxidizer within the same substance. Recent advances have enabled the construction
of energetic materials through multiple variations of additive manufacturing,
principally inkjet, direct-write, fused filament fabrication, electrospray
deposition, and stereolithography. Many
of the methods used for creating multiple layered objects (three-dimensional)
from energetic materials involve the use of highly viscid materials.</p>
<p>The focus of this work was to
design a process capable of additively manufacturing three-dimensional objects
from melt-castable energetic materials, which are known for their low viscosity. An in-depth printer design and fabrication
procedure details the process requirements discovered through previous works,
and the adaptations available and used to construct an additive manufacturing
device capable of printing both energetic and non-energetic (also referred to
as inert) melt-castable materials.
Initial characterization of three proposed inert materials confirmed
their relative similarity in rheological properties to melt-castable energetic
materials and were used to test the printer’s performance.</p>
<p>Preliminary tests show the
constructed device is capable of additively manufacturing melt-castable
materials reproducibly in individual layers, with some initial successful prints
in three-dimensions, up to three layers.
An initial characterization of the printer’s deposition characteristics
additionally matches literature predictions.
With the ability to print three-dimensional objects from melt-castable
materials confirmed, future work will focus on the reproducibility of
multi-layered objects and the refined formulation of melt-castable energetic
materials.</p>
|
43 |
Design for Additive Manufacturing Based Topology Optimization and Manufacturability Algorithms for Improved Part BuildMhapsekar, Kunal Shekhar January 2018 (has links)
No description available.
|
44 |
Thermal Modeling of Coordinated Multi-Beam Additive ManufacturingEvans, Rachel Elizabeth 22 May 2020 (has links)
No description available.
|
45 |
Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing : Topology Optimised Vehicle ComponentPetersson, Malte January 2022 (has links)
Wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) is a manufacturing method using a numerical controlled motion system and a welding system to additively manufacture three dimensional components. The motion system is programmed from three dimensional computer aided design model data (3D-CAD) of the intended geometry which is then sliced in to layers and welded on additively. There are seven process categories within additive manufacturing (AM), each with their own benefits and drawbacks. One of these process categories is directed energy deposition (DED) which uses an energy source to melt material onto a build plate. Instead of filling the build plate with material and selectively melting or sintering the material, DED only deposit material which is to be melted. WAAM is a process within the DED process category. BAE Systems Hägglunds manufactures relatively large components with requirements for mass reduction. Hägglunds has therefor invested in a WAAM laboratory, for testing and investigation on how to utilize this technology to their advantage. During the master thesis a geometrical correlation between the overhang angle and the material deposition on the edges of the overhangs has been found. A slicing strategy utilising this correlation has proven useful in combatting an issue where the top surface of a parallelepiped ends up unwantedly not parallel to the substrate plate. This master thesis has also increased the capability from 30° to 45° overhang angle. A numeric simulation of cooling times in the WAAM process has been developed. The simulation had a maximum error of one minute or about 69 % longer measured than simulated cooling time at worst case.
|
46 |
Topology optimization for metal additive manufacturing considering manufacturability / 金属積層造形における製造性を考慮したトポロジー最適化Miki, Takao 24 July 2023 (has links)
京都大学 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(工学) / 甲第24849号 / 工博第5166号 / 新制||工||1987(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院工学研究科機械理工学専攻 / (主査)教授 泉井, 一浩, 教授 松原, 厚, 教授 平山, 朋子 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Philosophy (Engineering) / Kyoto University / DFAM
|
47 |
Mechanical and Thermal Characterization of Ultrasonic Additive ManufacturingFoster, Daniel 02 October 2014 (has links)
No description available.
|
48 |
Enhancing the Capabilities of Large-Format Additive Manufacturing Through Robotic Deposition and Novel ProcessesWoods, Benjamin Samuel 12 June 2020 (has links)
The overall goal of this research work is to enhance the capabilities of large-format, polymer material extrusion, additive manufacturing (AM) systems. Specifically, the aims of this research are to (1) Construct, and develop a robust workflow for, a large-format, robotic, AM system; (2) Develop an algorithm for determining and relaying proper rotation commands for 5 degree of freedom (DoF) multi-axis deposition; and (3) Create a method for printing a removable support material in large-format AM. The development and systems-integration of a large-format, pellet-fed, polymer, material extrusion (ME), AM system that leverages an industrial robotic arm is presented. The robotic arm is used instead of the conventional gantry motion stage due to its multi-axis printing ability, ease of tool changes for multi-material deposition and/or subtraction, and relatively small machine footprint. A novel workflow is presented as a method to control the robotic arm for layer-wise fabrication of parts, and several machine modifications and workflow enhancements are presented to extend the multi-axis manufacturing capabilities of the robot. This workflow utilizes existing AM slicers to simplify the motion path planning for the robotic arm, as well as allowing the workflow to not be restricted to a single robotic deposition system.
To enable multi-axis deposition, a method for generating tool orientations and resulting deposition toolpaths from a geometry's STL file was developed for 5-DoF conformal printing and validated via simulation using several different multi-DOF robotic arm platforms. Furthermore, this research proposes a novel method of depositing a secondary sacrificial support material was created for large-format AM to enable the fabrication of complex geometries with overhanging features. This method employs a simple tool change to deposit a secondary, water-soluble polymer at the interfaces between the part and supporting structures. In addition, a means to separate support material into smaller sections to extend the range of geometries able to be manufactured via large-format AM is presented. The resultant method was used to manufacture a geometry that would traditionally be considered unprintable on conventional large-format AM systems. / Master of Science / Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, is a method of manufacturing objects in a layer-by-layer technique. Large-format AM is typically defined as an AM system that can create an object larger than 1 m3. There are only a few manufacturers in the world of these systems, and all currently are built on gantry-based motion stages that only allow movement of the printer in three principal axes (X, Y, Z). The primary goal of this thesis is to construct a large-format AM system that uses a robotic arm to enable printing in any direction or orientation. The use of an industrial robotic arm enables printing in multiple planes, which can be used to print structures without support structures, print onto curved surfaces, and to purt with curved layers which produces a smoother external part surface. The design of the large-format AM system was validated through successful printing of objects as large as 1.0x0.5x1.2 m, simultaneous printing of a sacrificial support material to enable overhanging features, and through completing multi-axis printing.
To enable multi-axis printing, an algorithm was developed to determine the proper toolpath location and relative orientation to the part surface. Using a part's STL file as input, the algorithm identifies the normal vector at each movement command, which is then used to calculate the required tool orientation. The tool orientations are then assembled with the movement commands to complete the multi-axis toolpath for the robot to perform.
Finally, this research presents a method of using a second printing tool to deposit a secondary, water-soluble material to act as supporting structures for overhanging and bridging part features. While typical 3D printers can generally print sacrificial material for supporting overhangs, large-format printers produce layers up to 25 mm wide, rendering any support material impossible to remove without post-process machining. This limits the range of geometries able to be printed to just those with no steep overhangs, or those where the support material is easily reachable by a tool for removal. The solution presented in this work enables the large scale AM processes to create complex geometries.
|
49 |
Lateral Fusion Bonding of Additive Manufactured Fiber-Reinforced Polymer CompositesPasita Pibulchinda (9012281) 02 August 2023 (has links)
<p>Extrusion Deposition Additive Manufacturing (EDAM) is a process in which fiber-filled thermoplastic polymers pellets get molten in the extruder and deposited onto a build plate in a layer-by-layer basis. The use of short fiber composite for EDAM has enabled large-scale 3D printing structures and tools for traditional composite manufacturing processes. Successful EDAM production critically depends on the understanding of the process-structure-property relationship. Especially on the bonding between the beads which is of paramount importance in additive manufacturing since it affects primarily the fracture and strength characteristics of the printed part. Bonding is influenced mainly by the temperature history and the contact between the beads. Both of which is dependent on the fiber orientation within the bead induced by the flow deformation that occurs according to the printing parameters. This study aims to investigate and model the complex relationship between the printing conditions and inter-bead bonding in the lateral direction.</p>
<p>A framework was developed to facilitate this aim, and it contains a fusion bonding model that couples the time-temperature history and the bead-to-bead contact interface. Four deposition parameters were studied: the nozzle height, ratio of the print velocity to extrudate velocity, bead-to-bead spacing, and layer time. First, a deposition flow model was developed, utilizing the anisotropic viscous flow model and smooth particle hydrodynamic finite element formulation, to predict the fiber orientation state across the deposited bead and the bead-to-bead interface for the given set of deposition parameters. Next, the effect of printing conditions on the temperature history of the bead was discovered by utilizing the heat transfer process simulation in ADDITIVE3D. Third, the experimental characterization procedure for mode I fracture toughness in the lateral direction was developed, and the fracture toughness was characterized using linear elastic fracture mechanics principles. Lastly, the phenomenological model for non-isothermal lateral fusion bonding was characterized using the bead contact interface, temperature history, and fracture toughness properties. This work showed a comprehensive effort in fusion bonding modeling while also presented a valuable process-structure-property-performance relationship in EDAM. Guidance on the selection of printing conditions and strategy can be made using the developed model to print higher-strength parts. </p>
|
50 |
The fabrication of integrated strain sensors for 'smart' implants using a direct write additive manufacturing approachWei, Li-Ju January 2015 (has links)
Over the 1980’s, the introduction of Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies has provided alternative methods for the fabrication of complex three-dimensional (3D) synthetic bone tissue implant scaffolds. However, implants are still unable to provide post surgery feedback. Implants often loosen due to mismatched mechanical properties of implant material and host bone. The aim of this PhD research is to fabricate an integrated strain gauge that is able to monitor implant strain for diagnosis of the bone healing process. The research work presents a method of fabricating electrical resistance strain gauge sensors using rapid and mask-less process by experimental development (design of experiment) using the nScrypt 3Dn-300 micro dispensing direct write (MDDW) system. Silver and carbon electrical resistance strain gauges were fabricated and characterised. Carbon resistive strain gauges with gauge factor values greater than 16 were measured using a proven cantilever bending arrangement. This represented a seven to eight fold increase in sensitivity over commercial gauges that would be glued to the implant materials. The strain sensor fabrication process was specifically developed for directly fabricating resistive strain sensor structures on synthetic bone implant surface (ceramic and titanium) without the use of glue and to provide feedback for medical diagnosis. The reported novel approach employed a biocompatible parylene C as a dielectric layer between the electric conductive titanium and the strain gauge. Work also showed that parylene C could be used as an encapsulation material over strain gauges fabricated on ceramic without modifying the performance of the strain gauge. It was found that the strain gauges fabricated on titanium had a gauge factor of 10.0±0.7 with a near linear response to a maximum of 200 micro strain applied. In addition, the encapsulated ceramic strain gauge produced a gauge factor of 9.8±0.6. Both reported strain gauges had a much greater sensitivity than that of standard commercially available resistive strain gauges.
|
Page generated in 0.0605 seconds