Le cannabis est la substance illicite la plus consommée à l’adolescence et ce, mondialement. Nous savons qu’un usage problématique de cannabis est susceptible d’entraîner une multitude de conséquences sur les plans physiques, psychologiques, sociaux et économiques. Or, les consommateurs constituent un groupe au profil hétérogène et n’expérimenteront pas tous des problèmes significatifs reliés à cet usage. Il s’avère donc important d’identifier les usagers à risque élevé de conséquences et de spécifier la nature de ces problèmes afin d’intervenir de façon efficace auprès de cette clientèle. Pourtant, bien que la littérature scientifique soulève l’idée que certains types de consommateurs présentent davantage de risques, l’état des connaissances ne révèle que peu d’informations de nature empirique qui permettraient de distinguer des autres usagers les profils d’adolescents davantage à risque. À cet effet, les typologies disponibles à ce jour sont généralement théoriques ou limitées aux études cliniques, font référence à des problèmes particuliers ou se basent sur des indicateurs spécifiques de la consommation tels que la fréquence d’usage. De plus, aucune étude jusqu’à maintenant n’est en mesure de nous pister quant aux types de problèmes associés plus spécifiquement à certains profils de consommation ni de préciser quels profils sont davantage représentés pour des conséquences données. Cette étude est basée sur les classes latentes de consommation découvertes dans l’étude de Fallu, Brière et Janosz (2014) à partir de plusieurs caractéristiques de consommation et comparées sur plusieurs prédicteurs et problèmes associés à la consommation. Son échantillon est constitué de 1618 élèves consommateurs de cannabis en secondaire 4. Cette étude examine quels sont les problèmes attribués et non-attribués les plus fréquents pour chacune des classes. Elle examine également quelles sont les classes les plus représentées pour différents problèmes attribués et non-attribués. Enfin, elle compare les résultats obtenus pour les problèmes attribués et non-attribués. La stratégie analytique employée a consisté à conduire des analyses descriptives, des analyses de Chi carrés ainsi que des analyses de variance univariée, parfois suivies d’une analyse post-hoc. Les résultats ont démontré que la classe d’appartenance peut prédire la survenue des différents problèmes que rencontrent les jeunes consommateurs, que certaines classes sont plus représentées pour certains problèmes et que les adolescents aux profils les plus lourds sont à risque de sous-estimer certains problèmes liés à leur consommation. L’une des principales découvertes concerne les deux classes précoces. Il semble que la classe des consommateurs modérés précoces présente un profil de problèmes davantage intériorisé et la classe des polyconsommateurs lourds précoces, davantage extériorisé. Les implications de ces résultats sont finalement discutées. / Cannabis is the most widely used illicit substance among adolescents worldwide. We know that cannabis misuse is likely to cause a variety of effects at physical, psychological, social and economic levels. However, consumers are a heterogeneous group and not all will experience significant problems associated with such use. It is therefore important to identify high-risk users and to specify the nature of these problems in order to intervene effectively with this clientele. Yet, although the scientific literature raises the idea that certain types of consumers are at higher risk, the current state of knowledge reveals little empirical information that would distinguish adolescents with higher risk profiles. To this end, the typologies available today are generally limited to theoretical or clinical studies, refer to specific problems, or are based on specific consumption indicators such as frequency of use. Furthermore, no study has yet been able to reveal the types of problems associated specifically with certain consumer profiles or to specify which profiles are more prone to various consequences. The present study is based on a latent class consumption model developed from several consumer characteristics found in the study by Fallu, Briere and Janosz (2014). They were compared with several predictors and problems associated with the consumption. The sample comes from within the context of evaluation of the New Approaches New Solutions (NANS) dropout prevention program, and consists of 1618 students who used cannabis in 10th grade. The subjects were annually evaluated from the 7th grade until the 11th. This study examines which attributed and non-attributed problems are most common for each class. It also examines which classes are most frequently assigned to different attributed and non-attributed problems. Finally, it compares the results obtained for the attributed and non-attributed problems. The analytical strategy used was to conduct descriptive analysis, chi-square analysis and univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA), sometimes followed by post-hoc tests when relevant. The results show that the class can predict the occurrence of various problems that young people face, that some classes are more represented for some problems, and that teenagers with heavier profiles are at risk of underestimating certain problems associated with their consumption. One of the main findings regarding the two early classes. It seems that early-moderate use students have a more internalized problems profile and those with early-heavy and polydrug use, a more externalized problems profile. Finally, the implications of these results are discussed.

Bakgrund: Konsumtionen av alkohol har i stort minskat i hela västvärlden, denna nedåtgående trend är extra tydlig bland ungdomar. Fler och fler ungdomar konsumerar mindre och många väljer att helt avstå från att konsumera alkohol. Denna trend är förstås positiv på många sätt men väcker även frågor om hur och varför denna trend uppkommit. Samtidigt som konsumtionen av alkohol har minskat har studier visats att vissa former av narkotika blir vanligare och har därmed skapat teorin om ett eventuellt samband. Syfte: Syftet med denna studie är att analysera ungdomars minskade alkoholkonsumtion och koppla detta till eventuell ökning eller minskning i brukandet av narkotika bland de som inte konsumerar, konsumerar måttligt samt de som konsumerar mycket alkohol. Metod: Studiepopulationen består av 71 852 ungdomar i åldern 15-16 år från hela Sverige. Studien är en upprepad tvärsnittsstudie med data från åren 2001 till 2014. Den insamlade data analyseras med hjälp av flera logistiska regressioner. Resultat: Resultatet visar att de ungdomar som inte konsumerar alkohol inte använder narkotika eller cannabis i större utsträckning, de som konsumerar måttligt och konsumerar mycket använder dock narkotika och cannabis i större utsträckning. Slutsats: Sambandet mellan narkotika- och cannabisanvändandet och de ungdomar som konsumerar måttligt och mycket kan stärkas. Normalitetsprincipens hypotes att vid tider med låg totalkonsumtion av alkohol är det de som konsumerar mycket som använder narkotika och cannabis stärks av resultatet. / Background: Consumption of alcohol has declined substantially throughout the western world, this downward trend is extra clear among adolescents. More and more adolescents drink less and many choose to completely refrain from consuming alcohol. This trend is of course positive in many ways but also raises questions about how and why this trend has arisen. While alcohol consumption has decreased, studies have shown that certain forms of drugs are common and have thus created the theory of a possible connection. Aims: The purpose of this study is to analyze adolescents reduced alcohol consumption and link this to any increase or decrease in the use of narcotics among those who do not drink, drink moderately, and those who drink a lot. Methods: The study population consists of 71 852 adolescents aged 15-16 years from all over Sweden. The study is a repeated cross-sectional study with data from 2001 to 2014. The collected data is analyzed using multiple logistic regressions as well as an interaction regression. Results: The results show that the non-drinking adolescents do not use drugs or cannabis to a greater extent, but those who drink moderately and drink a lot, use narcotics as well as cannabis in greater extent. Conclusions: The relationship between narcotics/cannabis use and the adolescents who drink moderately and heavy can be strengthened. The results are consistent with the principle of normality which shows that at times with low total consumption of alcohol the heavy consumers of alcohol use more narcotics and cannabis.

L’objectif de ce travail de thèse est de tester l'efficacité du paradigme de la communication engageante appliqué à la prévention des conduites dopantes. Les conduites dopantes sont la consommation de substances (principalement des drogues licites ou illicites) afin d’améliorer les performances physiques et psychologiques. Dans le sport, certaines de ces substances sont interdites et les conduites dopantes sont simplement appelées "dopage". Les conduites dopantes, et bien plus encore dans le sport, sont souvent considérées comme problématiques car elles peuvent générer des risques pour la santé et également de la tricherie. Trois recherches-actions sont réalisées. La première, auprès de 52 sportifs de haut niveau volontaires, montre que l'engagement semble produire un effet allant dans le sens d’une meilleure prévention du dopage. La deuxième étude teste un dispositif de communication engageante avec 111 athlètes d’élite volontaires : les résultats montrent une diminution de la consommation des compléments alimentaires, excitants et substances contre la douleur, en condition libre choix et actes publics. La troisième recherche se déroulait dans le contexte réel d’une prévention. Les résultats des 760 élèves montrent une diminution de la consommation de tabac et de cannabis après l'action de communication engageante, et une augmentation de l'affirmation de soi. Une réflexion sur l’application et la faisabilité du paradigme de la communication engageante appliquée au domaine de la prévention est proposée en fin de thèse. / The aim of this work is to test the effectiveness of the binding communication paradigm applied to doping behavior prevention. A doping behavior is the use of a substance (mainly a licit or an illicit drug) with the aim to enhance physical or psychological performance. In sports, some of these substances are prohibited, and doping behaviors are simply named "doping". Doping behaviors, and much more doping in sport, are often regarded as problematic, because they may generate health hazards, and cheating as well. Three studies are conducted. The first one, among 52 top-level volunteers athletes, shows that commitment seems to produce an effect which is in line with a better doping prevention. The second study tests a "committing communication" device with 111 elite volunteers athletes: results show a decrease in consumption of dietary supplements, stimulating products and substances against pain, with conditions of free choice and public acts. The third search occurs in the real context of a prevention. The 760 pupils' results show a decrease of tobacco and cannabis consumption after "committing communication" action, and increasing self-affirmation. A reflexion on the application and feasibility of the binding communication paradigm applied to the field of prevention is proposed at the end of the thesis.

Background/Aims: Little research effort has so far been dedicated to the analysis of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis of aetiologically differing subgroups of patients with panic disorder (PD). The current study aimed at a deeper understanding of the cortisol stress response in cannabis-induced PD (CIPD) patients. Methods: Matched groups of 7 PD patients (mean age ± SD: 32.95 ± 9.04 years), 7 CIPD patients (31.94 ± 8.40 years), and 7 healthy controls (HC) (31.13 ± 8.57 years) were included in the study. The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) was used for stress induction. Salivary cortisol samples were collected and panic- and depression-related questionnaires were applied. Results: A stress response to the TSST was found in 28.6% of PD patients, in 51.1% of CIPD patients, and in 100% of HC subjects. Statistical analyses revealed a cortisol hyporesponsiveness in PD and CIPD patients. While cortisol values of PD patients and HC participantsdiffered significantly, CIPD patients’ cortisol courses balanced between those of PD patients and HC subjects. Conclusions: Current findings show a distinctive pattern of the stress-induced cortisol reaction in CIPD patients, which is markedly different from the hormonal response in PD patients as well as HC subjects. Previous findings of cortisol hyporesponsiveness in PD patients compared to HC subjects were confirmed.

Background. Evidence suggests that in affective, non-psychotic disorders: (i) environmental exposures increase risk of subthreshold psychotic experiences (PEs) and strengthen connectivity between domains of affective and subthreshold psychotic psychopathology; and (ii) PEs are a marker of illness severity. Method. In 3021 adolescents from the Early Developmental Stages of Psychopathology cohort, we tested whether the association between PEs and presence of DSM-IV mood disorder (MD)/obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) would be moderated by risk factors for psychosis (cannabis use, childhood trauma and urbanicity), using the interaction contrast ratio (ICR) method. Furthermore, we analysed whether the interaction between environment and PEs was mediated by non-psychotic psychopathology. Results. The association between PEs and MD/OCD was moderated by urbanicity (ICR = 2.46, p = 0.005), cannabis use (ICR = 3.76, p = 0.010) and, suggestively, trauma (ICR = 1.91, p = 0.063). Exposure to more than one environmental risk factor increased the likelihood of co-expression of PEs in a dose–response fashion. Moderating effects of environmental exposures were largely mediated by the severity of general non-psychotic psychopathology (percentage explained 56–68%, all p < 0.001). Within individuals with MD/OCD, the association between PEs and help-seeking behaviour, as an index of severity, was moderated by trauma (ICR = 1.87, p = 0.009) and urbanicity (ICR = 1.48, p = 0.005), but not by cannabis use. Conclusions. In non-psychotic disorder, environmental factors increase the likelihood of psychosis admixture and helpseeking behaviour through an increase in general psychopathology. The findings are compatible with a relational model of psychopathology in which more severe clinical states are the result of environment-induced disturbances spreading through a psychopathology network.

Regular use of illegal drugs is suspected to cause cognitive impairments. Two substances have received heightened attention: 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or ‘ecstasy’) and δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC or ‘cannabis’). Preclinical evidence, as well as human studies examining regular ecstasy consumers, indicated that ecstasy use may have negative effects on learning, verbal memory and complex attentional functions. Cannabis has also been linked to symptoms of inattention and deficits in learning and memory. Most of the published studies in this field of research recruited participants by means of newspaper advertisements or by using word-of-mouth strategies. Because participants were usually aware that their drug use was critical to the research design, this awareness may have caused selection bias or created expectation effects. Focussing on attention and memory, this study aimed to assess cognitive functioning in a community-based representative sample that was derived from a large-scale epidemiological study. Available data concerning drug use history allowed sampling of subjects with varying degrees of lifetime drug experiences. Cognitive functioning was examined in 284 young participants, between 22 and 34 years. In general, their lifetime drug experience was moderate. Participants completed a neuropsychological test battery, including measures for verbal learning, memory and various attentional functions. Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between cognitive functioning and lifetime experience of drug use. Ecstasy and cannabis use were significantly related to poorer episodic memory function in a dose-related manner. For attentional measures, decrements of small effect sizes were found. Error measures in tonic and phasic alertness tasks, selective attention task and vigilance showed small but significant effects, suggesting a stronger tendency to experience lapses of attention. No indication for differences in reaction time was found. The results are consistent with decrements of memory and attentional performance described in previous studies. These effects are relatively small; however, it must be kept in mind that this study focussed on assessing young adults with moderate drug use from a population-based study.

Objectives: To determine incidence and patterns of natural course of cannabis use and disorders as well as cohort effects in a community sample of adolescents and young adults. Method: Cumulative incidence and patterns of cannabis use and disorders were examined in a prospective longitudinal design (mean follow-up period=42 months) in a representative sample (N=2446) aged 14–24 years at the outset of the study. Patterns of cannabis use, abuse and dependence (DSM-IV) were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI). Results: (1) Cumulative lifetime incidence for cannabis use (at second follow-up): 47%; 5.5% for cannabis abuse, 2.2% for dependence. (2) Men used and abused cannabis more often than women. (3) The majority of the older participants (18–24 years at baseline) had reduced their cannabis use at follow-up, while younger participants (14–17 years at baseline) more often had increased their use and developed abuse or dependence. (4) The younger birth cohort (1977–1981) tended to start earlier with substance (ab)use compared to the older birth cohort (1970–1977). (5) Cannabis use was associated with increasing rates of concomitant use of other licit and illicit drugs. Conclusions: Cannabis use is widespread in our sample, but the probability of developing cannabis abuse or dependence is relatively low (8%). The natural course of cannabis use is quite variable: about half of all cannabis users stopped their use spontaneously in their twenties, others report occasional or more frequent use of cannabis.

Objectives: To determine risk factors of incident onset of use, abuse and dependence of cannabis in a community sample of adolescents and young adults. Methods: Risk factors were examined in a prospective longitudinal design across 4 years in a representative sample (N=2446) aged 14-24 at the outset of the study (EDSP). Patterns of DSM-IV defined cannabis use, abuse and dependence were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI). Potential risk factors were assessed at baseline. Incident cannabis use, abuse and dependence at second follow-up (on average 42 months after baseline) were the main outcome measures in this study. Associations were analyzed with logistic and negative binomial regressions. Results: Using 11 of a total of 56 variables examined, the predictive value of the final multiple logistic regression for incident cannabis use was moderately good (area under the ROC curve=0.78). Cannabis use frequency was predicted in the final model by 18 variables, cannabis abuse by two variables in the younger subsample and nine factors in the older group, and dependence by eight variables (dependence: ROC curve area=0.97). Incident cannabis use was predicted mainly by availability of drugs, peers’ drug use, a more ‘positive’ attitude towards future drug use, and regular previous use of licit drugs, while cannabis dependence was predicted primarily by parental death before age 15, deprived socio-economic status, and baseline use of other illicit drugs. Conclusion: Different factors predict the onset or severity of cannabis use and the progression to abuse and dependence. In addition to well-documented risk factors such as peer group pressure, drug availability, and low self-esteem, findings suggest that family history (e.g. parental mental disorders, early parental death), and prior experiences with legal drugs play a significant role in the initiation of cannabis consumption and the transition to cannabis use disorders in adolescents and young adults. Findings suggest that early intervention and prevention might be improved by better targeted treatment.

Background: Whereas the role of externalizing disorders is relatively well established in predicting the onset of cannabis use (CU) or cannabis use disorder (CUD), the status of anxiety and mood disorders in predicting CU and CUD remains controversial. Objective: (1) To examine cross-sectional and prospective associations of CU and CUD with a range of mental disorders and whether anxiety and mood disorders are associated with CU/CUD after adjusting for externalizing disorders. Methods: N = 1395 community subjects aged 14–17 at baseline were followed-up at three waves prospectively over 10 years. Substance use, substance disorders and mental disorders were assessed using the DSM-IV/M-CIDI. Results: (1) The baseline prevalence rates where 19.3% at t0 for CU and 2.6% for CUD. Cumulative incidence rates at t3 were 54.3% for CU and 13.7% for CUD. (2) In cross-sectional and prospective analyses other substance use disorders, mood and anxiety disorders were associated with CU and CUD. (3) Associations of panic-anxiety with CU and of depressive and bipolar disorders with CU and CUD were significant after controlling for externalizing disorders. Conclusion: A range of psychopathological conditions, including depressive, bipolar and less consistently anxiety disorders as well as the degree of their comorbidity are significantly associated with incident CU and progression to CUD, even when controlling for externalising disorders. A better understanding of this complex interplay may result in better aetiological models and intervention strategies.

Background: Cannabis use (CU) and disorders (CUD) are highly prevalent among adolescents and young adults. We aim to identify clinically meaningful latent classes of users of cannabis and other illegal substances with distinct problem profiles. Methods: N= 3021 community subjects aged 14–24 at baseline were followed-up over a period ranging up to 10 years. Substance use (SU) and disorders (SUD) were assessed with the DSM-IV/M-CIDI. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted with a subset of N= 1089 subjects with repeated illegal SU. The variables entered in the LCA were CU-related problems, CUD, other SUD, and other mental disorders. Results: Four latent classes were identified: “Unproblematic CU” (class 1: 59.2%), “Primary alcohol use disorders” (class 2: 14.4%), “Delinquent cannabis/alcohol DSM-IV-abuse” (class 3: 17.9%), “CUD with multiple problems” (class 4: 8.5%). Range and level of CU-related problems were highest in classes 3 and 4. Comorbidity with other mental disorders was highest in classes 2 and 4. The probability of alcohol disorders and unmet treatment needs was considerable in classes 2–4. Conclusion: While the majority of subjects with repeated illegal SU did not experience notable problems over the 10-year period, a large minority (40.8%) experienced problematic outcomes, distinguished by clinically meaningful profiles. The data underline the need for specifically tailored interventions for adolescents with problematic CU and highlight the potentially important role of alcohol and other mental disorders.