貿易之快速發展為我國近年經濟得以持續穩定成長之基礎。鑒於我國與世界大多數國 家均無正式外交關係，因而以半官方之民間社團組織型式來推動對外經貿實質關係即 成為一重要之模式。本文之研究目的，即以中歐貿易促進會為研究對象，針對該會之 組織結構與職能運作，以探討我國半官方經貿推廣機構於經貿發展中所扮演之角色與 功能。 全文共分五章，各章內容如下： 第一章「導論」：說明本文之題目界說及研究動機、目的、架構及限制。 第二章「中歐貿易促進會之組織結構」：本章就中歐貿易促進會成立之背景、法令依 據及組織現況，探討半官方機構之組織設計與角色地位。 第三章「中歐貿易促進會之職能分析」：本章以靜態及動態兩個層面，就中歐貿易促 進會之職能運作及運作上所可能發生之問題做一探討。 第四章「我國半官方經貿推廣機構之比較」：本章就我國現有之主要半官方經貿推廣 機構之現況做一說明，並就其組織與職能之差異做一比較。 第五章「結論」：說明本文之研究發現，並針對我國半官方經貿推廣機構之現狀做一 檢討並對未來之發展提出建議。

中國經濟現形於中歐與東歐近期備受關注。16+1合作機制在四年前開始發起，號召增進雙方經濟交流往往被視為中國藉由經濟管道，嘗試提升其在歐洲的政治力量。媒體報導，特定歐盟代表以及研究學者有意識到中國在此地區的投資計畫。然而，OFDI真正的目的是什麼? 抑或中國的動機和其他國家的投資者有所不同? 這篇研究會透過相關分析，試著分析中國決定在這個地區投資的最重要決定因素，同時解讀結果。這些結果也會和其他同行研究做深入探討，來駁斥或是證明現今中國FDI的理論；還有比較中國的投資CEE的基本原則和其投資其他地區的動機。 / Chinese economic presence in the region of Central and Eastern Europe has attracted a lot of attention recently. The establishment of the so called 16+1 initiative four years ago, calling on increase of mutual economic exchange is often believed to be a Chinese bid to increase its political power in Europe by economic means. Media coverage, certain EU representatives and researchers became rather aware of Chinese investment projects in this region. However, what are the real aims this OFDI? Does the rationale to invest in CEE differ from motivations to invest elsewhere? Or are Chinese motivations different from investors from other countries? This work will try to analyze the most important determinants of Chinese decision to invest in this region by correlation analysis and while interpreting the results, those will also be investigated along with other peer studies to dis/prove current theories on China’s FDI; and to compare China’s rationale to invest in CEE with motivations to invest elsewhere.

無 / This qualitative study provides conclusions on Impact of Belt and Road Initiative for Visegrad countries – the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. It analyses trade indicators and foreign direct investments between Visegrad countries and China for years 2012-2016. It compares results and status of relations based on Belt and Road Initiative on economical, geopolitical and political level. In the end, this study provides suggestions for Visegrad countries to be more attractive for Chinese investors or to benefit more from cooperation.