• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 3
  • 3
  • Tagged with
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

一九八○年代敘利亞外交政策之研究

孫中英, SUN, ZHONG-YING Unknown Date (has links)
No description available.
2

觀看戰爭:敘利亞內戰的難民影像分析 / Seeing war : An analysis on the Images of Syrian refugees

莊崇暉, Chuang, Chung Hui Unknown Date (has links)
敘利亞內戰的難民攝影直指當代戰爭的關鍵問題,也凸顯社群媒體使用者如何直面這些影像及採取後續行動。因此,本研究聚焦難民影像中的人道關懷有何轉變,以及社群使用者觀看戰爭影像時,如何理解戰爭影像中的人道意義,以及與社群他人共同觀看時有何倫理問題。   以庫爾迪影像為分析始點,指出庫爾迪影像及後文本展現社群人道主義,也隱含不同漠視庫爾迪的視線,包括國際政治的角力、宗教信仰的根本問題,更重要的是主流媒體與社群媒體觀者的旁觀問題。   再者,從《聖殤》的構圖傳統到現代戰爭影像,人道主義並非持守一套不變的道德倫理。儘管西方人道主義已深植於紀實戰爭影像的視覺論述,但是因指涉對象不同,人道主義的意義也隨之變動。難民影像除了悲憫與哀悼的人道傳統外,還展現出掙扎、焦慮、變動不安等意義,更隨著不同觀者而有所差異。   本文也藉由分析戰爭中的自拍以討論在社群媒體觀看的倫理問題。難民自拍連結社群他人,也跳脫主流新聞媒體的再現,展現難民的非戲劇性日常。而社群觀者便於使用社群媒體的視覺行動機制,實踐線上人道主義。然而,線上視覺人道行動也可能再次消費戰爭悲劇,與實際人道行動的意義相異。最後,觀者不僅漫遊於社群世界,尋找自我觀看的視角,更在與社群他人的互動中反覆確認、變換觀看的位置,以此理解戰爭事件與自身的關係,再採取線上視覺行動。 / The images of Syrian refugees point out key questions about modern war, also high-light how users on social media see the images and practice visual activism. Therefore, this article aims to analyze what the transformation of humanitarian images is, how to understand the humanitarian meaning when users see the images, and what the ethics of seeing is. First of all, the image of Alan Kurdi and post-text show the social humanitarianism and connote lines of vision of ignorance and, including the struggle of international political, religion conflict, and the indifferent of mainstream media and social media.   Second, from Pietas to images of modern war, the meaning of humanitarianism is not always the same. Despite the western humanitarianism being rooted in the visual discourse of documentary war images, the meaning of humanitarianism has also changed with different referents. Besides compassion and mourn, struggle, anxiety, variation and instability are included in the images of refugees.   Third, this study discusses the ethics of seeing via analyzing selfies in war. Refugees take advantage of selfies to link others on social media and get rid of representation of mainstream media to present the nondramatic everyday life of fleeing. Furthermore, spectators on social media take the visual action to practice online humanitarianism, although it may consume the tragedy again.   Conclusively, seeing is not only wandering in social media world and seeking the angles of self-seeing but confirming and changing the position of seeing among the interaction with others time and again. By seeing, people can understand the relationship between war and self, and then take visual action.
3

中國人道干預政策之研究:利比亞和敘利亞案例比較(2011-2016年) / Study on Chinese Humanitarian Intervention:Comparison of Libya and Syria 2011-2016

施珊淇, Shih, Shan Ci Unknown Date (has links)
本文研析2011年至2016年期間,中國在人道干預立場上對利比亞和敘利亞的差異比較,試圖分析中國在「國家保護責任」(Responsibility to Protect)上的態度轉變。中國於安理會1970號和1973號針對利比亞內戰所涉及的人道干預決議案,不但同意將利比亞情勢送交國際刑事法院,更間接默許西方軍事干預利比亞,此與一向不干預他國內政、尊重他國主權為外交原則的中國相違背。然而,發生於同時期、同受到阿拉伯之春影響、同為推翻獨裁政權的敘利亞內戰,中國卻多次否決對其進一步軍事干預,形成人道干預立場上的矛盾。 而本文試圖利用「國家利益」和「形象建構」兩大分析途徑,探究中國隨著負責任大國的形象建立,和在國際事務上話語權漸增的情況下,於人道干預立場的考量是否有所改變或偏向。本文認為中國在利比亞案例上突破以往不干預他國內政的立場,並不代表中國對「國家保護責任」態度的轉變。其次,中國當前在人道干預立場上,仍以國家利益為主,形象建構為輔,特別是中共政權維穩、國家安全為首要。此外,中國也正試圖擺脫俄羅斯和西方國家的單方影響,建立一套獨立自主的人道干預外交原則。

Page generated in 0.0193 seconds