有視於許多珍貴人類文化資產或因全球化導致文化均質化，或因武裝衝突、發展觀光及環境惡化等因素，面臨毀壞甚至消失的危機，聯合國教科文組織和許多國際組織透過制定及締結國際公約喚起國際社群的關注，凝聚國際間的集體力量，帶動國際文化保護保存的合作，以維護文化的多樣性、推動文化對話及族群相互尊重包容。基於全世界對於文化資產保護的文化共識，1954年《海牙公約》制定至今已逾一甲子，《保護世界文化和自然遺產公約》至今也邁向近半世紀之久，我國1982年公布實施《文化資產保存法》，至今亦已有卅餘年。 本論文研究目的在檢視國際公約有關文化保存保護的歷史發展，及我國現行文化保護保存法規與實務問題。採質性研究、個案研究法，將我國最高行政法院文化資產相關判決整理分析，期從研究發現中獲得文化保護行動的反思與我國修法的參考。 研究發現我國文化法規整體規範尚未包含無形文化遺產的保護保存，此一部分亟待未來立法。此外，現行法規內容及文物分類與國際公約所行方式不同，另一方面，我國文化事務主管機關執行政策時所遇困難，可參酌國際公約與他國現行方式，本於我國文化資產特性與文化整體特色因應調整。除立法修法建議之外，本論文亦從個案分析與比較研究發現，我國對於文化資產保存的概念採物質取向，衍生文化物私權凌駕公權之上的衝突情況，若期文化永續發展，宜將「文化資產」概念轉化為「文化遺產」觀點，從更高的文化哲學層面執行我國文化事務的全面保護保存政策。 / Regarding the destruction of many precious human culture, either due to globalization to cultural homogenization, or because of armed conflict, environmental degradation and other factors, the arouse concerns and collective strength of international cultural cooperation led to maintain cultural diversity, promoting cultural dialogue and mutual respect for ethnic coexistence. Based on the world's cultural consensus for the protection of cultural heritage, firstly the 1954 Hague Convention and consequently the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage Convention, both have built up a well-organised system for culture preservation and conservation. In Taiwan, The Culture Property Preservation Act has also been implemented in 1982. This paper explores historical development of the relevant international conventions on cultural preservation and protection as well as the existing cultural legislation and practical issues in Taiwan. Drawing upon case studies as qualitative research method, the analysis of twelve cases selected from the highest administrative court judgments illuminates currently controvercial issues and leads to make suggestions of what action of amending should be considered to empower authorities and provide more effective administration to enhance domestic culture policies. The result of analysis indicates that the intangible cultural norms and regulations have not been viewed as an important issue and legislation for intangible cultural heritage should be put on top priority in national culture development policies. The difficulties encountered while implementing policies of cultural affairs shed lights on central and local hieracheical institutions that the realm of autonomy should be distinctively clarified so that administrative agency could be helpful to solve conflicts and diversities. In addition, the case study and comparison also found that collective rights on the preservation of cultural assets were derived overriding private rights. However, if the sustainable development of culture would be expected then a balance between collective and provate rights on cultural affairs should be taken as legal norms

本篇論文以高步侗族村寨為研究地點，其位於湖南省懷化市通道侗族自治縣坪坦鄉。高步侗寨屬於通道縣坪坦鄉下轄的村組織，由高升行政村、高上行政村、克中行政村所組成，三個村底下管轄著岩寨、秧田、上寨屯、高升、龍姓、高坪六個自然村。高步侗寨四週為山地，中間有一條河流經，其中約有561戶、2410人，交通較為不便，因此少有外人進入。 　　侗族村寨整體與周遭自然環境相輔相成，進而達到巧妙的平衡；侗人家屋的空間格局，與人在其中的活動息息相關；在公共空間──鼓樓、風雨橋中，看見人群間的交際往來；村寨中的田地、道路、水塘、河流，串聯起人們的生產生活。侗寨中的每個空間，都是人與環境交互影響之下的產物，筆者欲從中探討其文化脈絡與空間建構的關係。 　　近幾年來，中國各地的少數民族村寨旅遊也如火如荼地發展著，觀光成為村寨快速發展經濟的主要途徑，但在發展觀光業的同時，卻也逐漸流失其珍貴的傳統文化而不自覺。因此，筆者欲以高步侗寨為例，探討高步侗人的空間建構文化，分析隱含於其中的文化內涵，小至家屋、大至整體村寨，觀察人與自然環境之間如何相互牽繫，相輔相成地形成獨特的居住形式，探究高步侗人在面臨劇烈的現代化變遷後，如何經過自身文化體系的調適，在傳統文化與新事物的相互調和中，發掘高步侗人的文化價值，筆者欲針對現代化之影響提出相對應的觀念與措施，進而保存傳統文化，避免文化流失於洪流中而不復返。 / The thesis mainly focuses on Kam in Gaobu village, which is located in Huaihua City, Hunan Province. Gaobu village is under the jurisdiction of Pingtan, Tongdao Dong Autonomous County and comprises three administrative villages: Gaosheng, Gaoshang, and Kezhong. Under the administrative villages, there are 6 natural villages: Yanzhai, Yangtian, Shangzhaitun, Longxing, and Gaoping. Gaobu village is surrounded by mountains. There is a river flowing through the area, which lives about 561 households and 2,410 people. Visitors are not often to see because of the inconvenient traffic. Kam villages are influenced by surrounding natural environment and reach a subtle balance. The spaces of Kam houses are highly related to their daily life. Interactions between villagers happen in public spaces, such as Gǔlóu (鼓樓) and Fēngyǔ Bridge (風雨橋); the production and life of people are composed of the fields, paths, ponds and rivers in the villages. Every space in Kam villages reflects the interaction between people and the environment. The purpose of this study is to discuss the relation between cultural context and the construction of space in Kam villages. In recent years, the rural tourism in ethnic minority areas has been fast-expanding. Tourism has become the main solution of economic development for villages. Meanwhile, people have gradually lost their traditional culture without consciousness. Therefore, this study takes Gaobu village as an example and attempts to talk about the culture of the construction of space of Kam people in Gaobu; analyze the cultural connotation within; observe how people interact with the natural environment and develop the unique way of inhabitation from houses and the whole village. In addition, this study explores that how Kam people in Gaobu bring back cultural values after the accommodation of their culture system, and the harmonizing of traditional culture and new things, when facing the drastic modernization. In response to the impact of modernization, this study aims to propose corresponding concepts and measures to preserve traditional culture instead of losing it.