Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-22T20:49:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2008-04-30. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2015-08-11T03:25:48Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 Publico-10870.pdf: 69580 bytes, checksum: 9aba33341c44980cac0fc8ab7561d008 (MD5) / Embora a análise no domínio da freqüência do sinal Eletromiográfico (EMG) seja empregada na caracterização do processo de fadiga muscular localizada, sua aplicação, especificamente a da Freqüência Mediana (Fmed), é pouco explorada no âmbito esportivo. O objetivo do presente estudo foi verificar a viabilidade da aplicação do sinal EMG, através de sua análise no domínio da freqüência, como parâmetro para determinação e diferenciação no comportamento da fadiga muscular localizada. Dois grupos de sujeitos um caracterizado como atletas (n=12) e outro como sedentários (n=12), foram submetidos a análises baseadas em procedimentos executados em três diferentes situações experimentais, todos envolvendo a modalidade de exercício isométrico: i) teste máximo para determinação da Contração Isométrica Voluntária Máxima (CIVM); ii) teste de fadiga, sustentado por 35 seg. a 80% da CIVM; iii) teste de recuperação, sustentado por 10 seg. a 80% da CIVM; neste ultimo foi monitorado o comportamento da Fmed nos três primeiros (Fmedi) e três últimos segundos (Fmedf) do sinal EMG no músculo tibial anterior durante o teste de fadiga. Durante os 10 segundos do teste de recuperação foi calculada a Fmed referente a todo o período (Fmedr).parâmetro utilizado no cálculo do Índice de Recuperação Muscular (IRM). Os resultados apontam que a Fmedf apresentou valor menor em relação à Fmedi em ambos os grupos (p<0.05). Quando comparado ao grupo de sedentários, o grupo de atletas apresentou valores maiores de Fmedi e Fmedf (p<0.05). O valor médio e desvio padrão do IRM para o grupo de atletas foi de 62.1% ±28.7 e para o grupo de sedentários foi de 55.2% ±27.8 (p>0.05). Desta forma, os resultados apresentados neste estudo permitem inferir a viabilidade na aplicação de parâmetros no domínio da freqüência do sinal EMG para a determinação e diferenciação do comportamento da fadiga muscular localizada. / Though the analysis in the frequency domain of the Electromyographic Signal (EMG) was used in the characterization of the localized muscular fatigue process their application, specifically the Median Frequency (MF), is rarely explored in the sports. The objective of this study was to verify the viability in the application of the EMG signal, through of the frequency domain analysis, as parameter for determination and differentiation of the behavior of located muscle fatigue. Two groups of subjects one characterized as athletes (n=12) and other as sedentary (n=12), were submitted to analysis based in procedures executed in three different experimental situations, all involving the isometric exercise modality: i) maximum test for determination of the Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC); ii) fatigue test, 35 sec. sustained load of 80% of MVIC; iii) recovery test, 10 sec. sustained load of 80% of MVIC; where was monitored the behavior of MF in the first three (Fmedi) and last three seconds (Fmedf) of the EMG signal of anterior tibial muscle during the fatigue test. During the 10 seconds of the recovery test MF was calculated regarding the whole period (Fmedr) this parameter was used to calculate the Recuperation Muscle Index (RMI). The results showed that Fmedf presented a low value in relation to Fmedi in both groups (p <0.05). Also the value of Fmedi and Fmedf for the athlete group presented larger higher value in comparison with the sedentary group (p <0.05). The mean value and standard deviation of RMI for the athlete group were 62.1% ±28.7 and for sedentary group was 55.2% ±27.8 (p>0.05). In general terms the results presented in this study allow inferring the viability in the application of the frequency domain parameters of the EMG signal for the determination and differentiation of the located muscle fatigue behavior. / TEDE / BV UNIFESP: Teses e dissertações

No / When descending stairs bodyweight becomes supported on a single limb while the forwards-reaching contralateral limb is lowered in order to make contact with the step below. This is associated with lowering of the centre of mass (CoM), which in order to occur in a controlled manner, requires increased ankle and knee joint torque production relative to that in overground walking. We have previously shown that when descending steps or stairs older people operate at a higher proportion of their maximum eccentric capacity and at, or in excess of the maximum passive reference joint range of motion. This suggests they have reduced and/or altered control over their CoM and we hypothesised that this would be associated with alterations in muscle activity patterns and in the CoM vertical acceleration and velocity profiles during both the lowering and landing phases of stair descent. 15 older (mean age 75 years) and 17 young (mean age 25 years) healthy adults descended a 4-step staircase, leading with the right limb on each stair, during which CoM dynamics and electromyographic activity patterns for key lower-limb muscles were assessed. Maximum voluntary eccentric torque generation ability at the knee and ankle was also assessed. Older participants compared to young participants increased muscle co-contraction relative duration at the knee and ankle of the trailing limb so that the limb was stiffened for longer during descent. As a result older participants contacted the step below with a reduced downwards CoM velocity when compared to young participants. Peak downwards and peak upwards CoM acceleration during the descent and landing phases respectively, were also reduced in older adults compared to those in young participants. In contrast, young participants descended quickly onto the step below but arrested their downward CoM velocity sooner following landing; a strategy that was associated with longer relative duration lead-limb plantar flexor activity, increased peak upwards CoM acceleration, and a reduced landing duration. These results suggest that a reduced ability to generate high eccentric torque at the ankle in the forward reaching limb is a major factor for older participants adopting a cautious movement control strategy when descending stairs. The implications of this CoM control strategy on the incidences of falling on stairs are discussed.

Pacientes portadores de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC) podem apresentar assincronia toracoabdominal (ATA). Existem diversos métodos de estimativa da ATA, porém, não há um consenso sobre qual é o mais adequado. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar dois métodos de estimativa da assincronia toracoabdominal e avaliar a ineficiência ventilatória em pacientes DPOC no repouso e durante o exercício. Foram avaliados 22 pacientes com DPOC (VEF1 40,2±10,5% predito) e 13 indivíduos controle (GC) pareados por idade, gênero e índice de massa corpórea. A cinemática toracoabdominal foi avaliada utilizando pletismografia optoeletrônica no repouso e durante o exercício leve e moderado (70% da carga máxima) no ciclo ergômetro. A ATA foi calculada entre a caixa torácica superior (CTS) e inferior (CTI) e o abdome (ABD) utilizando os métodos de ângulo de fase (AF) e relação de fase (RF). A ineficiência ventilatória foi calculada em cada compartimento como a diferença entre o volume máximo (VM) e o volume calculado (VC) de acordo com o ciclo respiratório (determinado pela soma de volume dos três compartimentos) dividida pelo volume máximo (VM-VC)/VM. Os pacientes com DPOC foram classificados como assíncronos (grupo AT) ou não assíncronos (grupo NA) utilizando como referência os valores do GC. Foi utilizado o teste qui-quadrado ou de Fisher para avaliar a discriminação de pacientes entre os métodos e o ANOVA de dois fatores para comparações entre os grupos. O nível de significância foi ajustado para 5%. O método AF determinou maior número de pacientes com ATA quando comparado com RF no repouso (respectivamente, 15 vs. 7) e no exercício leve (11 vs. 3) e moderado (14 vs. 8). Os valores de assincronia no grupo AT entre CTS-CTI e CTI-ABD foram maiores no repouso (AF: 35,7±45,4° e -42,2±42,5° e RF: 61,8±29,1° e -66,9±27,4°, respectivamente) e no exercício leve (AF: 53,3±35,6° e -55,8±40,4°; RF: 106,1±40,3° e - 124,8±17,2°) e moderado (AF: 61,6±55,1° e -75,9±44,8°; RF: 85,9±23,6° e -81,8±42,2°) quando comparados com os grupos NA (p < 0,05) e GC (p < 0,05). Na análise entre CTSABD não houve diferença entre os grupos. Observou-se que o grupo AT apresentou menor contribuição e maior ineficiência ventilatória da CTI em todos os momentos de avaliação e, durante o exercício moderado, menor volume corrente quando comparado com os grupos NA e GC. Os nossos resultados sugerem que o ângulo de fase apresenta maior detecção de ATA nos pacientes com DPOC. A presença de assincronia parece ocorrer principalmente na caixa torácica inferior e associada com menor contribuição e maior ineficiência ventilatória deste compartimento / Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients can present thoracoabdominal asynchrony (TAA). There are several TAA estimation techniques, however, there is no consensus about which is the most appropriate. The aim of this study was to compare two thoracoabdominal asynchrony quantification techniques and to assess chest wall ventilatory inefficiency in COPD patients at rest and during exercise. We evaluated 22 COPD patients (FEV1 40,2±10,5% predicted) and 13 healthy controls (CG) matched by age, gender and body mass index. Thoracoabdominal kinematics was assessed via optoelectronic plethysmography at rest and during mild and moderate exercise (70 % maximum workload) in a cycle ergometer. TAA was calculated among upper (URC) and lower ribcage (LRC) and abdomen (ABD) by using the phase angle (PA) and phase relation (PR) approaches. Ventilatory Inefficiency was estimated in each compartment as the difference between the maximal volume (VM) and the volume (VC) calculated according to respiratory timing (sum of volume in the 3 compartments) divided by the maximal volume (VM-VC)/VM. COPD patients were classified as asynchronous (AT group) or not (NA group) by using as reference the values on the controls. Chi-square or Fisher\'s exact test was used for assessing the patients differentiation between the two TAA quantification approaches and two-way ANOVA was used to compare respiratory parameters among groups (CG, AT and NA). Statistical significance was set at 5% level. PA approach determined more patients as asynchronous when compared to RF at rest (respectively, 15 vs. 7) and during mild (11 vs. 3) and moderate (14 vs. 8) exercise. Asynchrony values in AT group among URC-LRC and LRC-ABD were greater at rest (respectively, 35.7±45.4° and -42.2±42.5° with PA and 61.8±29.1° and -66.9±27.4° with PR) and during mild (PA: 53.3±35.6° and -55.8±40.4°; PR: 106.1±40.3° and -124.8±17.2°) and moderate exercise (PA: 61.6±55.1° and - 75.9±44.8°; PR: 85.9±23.6° and -81.8±42.2°) when compared to NA (p < 0.05) and CG (p < 0.05). Analysis among URC-ABD presented no difference between groups. It was observed that AT group presented a smaller LRC contribution and greater ventilatory inefficiency during all assessing moments and, during moderate exercise, had a lower tidal volume when compared to NA and CG. Our results suggest that phase angle approach presents larger TAA detection in COPD patients. This asynchrony seems to occur mainly in the lower ribcage and be associated with decreased contribution and increased ventilatory inefficiency of this compartment

Pacientes portadores de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC) podem apresentar assincronia toracoabdominal (ATA). Existem diversos métodos de estimativa da ATA, porém, não há um consenso sobre qual é o mais adequado. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar dois métodos de estimativa da assincronia toracoabdominal e avaliar a ineficiência ventilatória em pacientes DPOC no repouso e durante o exercício. Foram avaliados 22 pacientes com DPOC (VEF1 40,2±10,5% predito) e 13 indivíduos controle (GC) pareados por idade, gênero e índice de massa corpórea. A cinemática toracoabdominal foi avaliada utilizando pletismografia optoeletrônica no repouso e durante o exercício leve e moderado (70% da carga máxima) no ciclo ergômetro. A ATA foi calculada entre a caixa torácica superior (CTS) e inferior (CTI) e o abdome (ABD) utilizando os métodos de ângulo de fase (AF) e relação de fase (RF). A ineficiência ventilatória foi calculada em cada compartimento como a diferença entre o volume máximo (VM) e o volume calculado (VC) de acordo com o ciclo respiratório (determinado pela soma de volume dos três compartimentos) dividida pelo volume máximo (VM-VC)/VM. Os pacientes com DPOC foram classificados como assíncronos (grupo AT) ou não assíncronos (grupo NA) utilizando como referência os valores do GC. Foi utilizado o teste qui-quadrado ou de Fisher para avaliar a discriminação de pacientes entre os métodos e o ANOVA de dois fatores para comparações entre os grupos. O nível de significância foi ajustado para 5%. O método AF determinou maior número de pacientes com ATA quando comparado com RF no repouso (respectivamente, 15 vs. 7) e no exercício leve (11 vs. 3) e moderado (14 vs. 8). Os valores de assincronia no grupo AT entre CTS-CTI e CTI-ABD foram maiores no repouso (AF: 35,7±45,4° e -42,2±42,5° e RF: 61,8±29,1° e -66,9±27,4°, respectivamente) e no exercício leve (AF: 53,3±35,6° e -55,8±40,4°; RF: 106,1±40,3° e - 124,8±17,2°) e moderado (AF: 61,6±55,1° e -75,9±44,8°; RF: 85,9±23,6° e -81,8±42,2°) quando comparados com os grupos NA (p < 0,05) e GC (p < 0,05). Na análise entre CTSABD não houve diferença entre os grupos. Observou-se que o grupo AT apresentou menor contribuição e maior ineficiência ventilatória da CTI em todos os momentos de avaliação e, durante o exercício moderado, menor volume corrente quando comparado com os grupos NA e GC. Os nossos resultados sugerem que o ângulo de fase apresenta maior detecção de ATA nos pacientes com DPOC. A presença de assincronia parece ocorrer principalmente na caixa torácica inferior e associada com menor contribuição e maior ineficiência ventilatória deste compartimento / Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients can present thoracoabdominal asynchrony (TAA). There are several TAA estimation techniques, however, there is no consensus about which is the most appropriate. The aim of this study was to compare two thoracoabdominal asynchrony quantification techniques and to assess chest wall ventilatory inefficiency in COPD patients at rest and during exercise. We evaluated 22 COPD patients (FEV1 40,2±10,5% predicted) and 13 healthy controls (CG) matched by age, gender and body mass index. Thoracoabdominal kinematics was assessed via optoelectronic plethysmography at rest and during mild and moderate exercise (70 % maximum workload) in a cycle ergometer. TAA was calculated among upper (URC) and lower ribcage (LRC) and abdomen (ABD) by using the phase angle (PA) and phase relation (PR) approaches. Ventilatory Inefficiency was estimated in each compartment as the difference between the maximal volume (VM) and the volume (VC) calculated according to respiratory timing (sum of volume in the 3 compartments) divided by the maximal volume (VM-VC)/VM. COPD patients were classified as asynchronous (AT group) or not (NA group) by using as reference the values on the controls. Chi-square or Fisher\'s exact test was used for assessing the patients differentiation between the two TAA quantification approaches and two-way ANOVA was used to compare respiratory parameters among groups (CG, AT and NA). Statistical significance was set at 5% level. PA approach determined more patients as asynchronous when compared to RF at rest (respectively, 15 vs. 7) and during mild (11 vs. 3) and moderate (14 vs. 8) exercise. Asynchrony values in AT group among URC-LRC and LRC-ABD were greater at rest (respectively, 35.7±45.4° and -42.2±42.5° with PA and 61.8±29.1° and -66.9±27.4° with PR) and during mild (PA: 53.3±35.6° and -55.8±40.4°; PR: 106.1±40.3° and -124.8±17.2°) and moderate exercise (PA: 61.6±55.1° and - 75.9±44.8°; PR: 85.9±23.6° and -81.8±42.2°) when compared to NA (p < 0.05) and CG (p < 0.05). Analysis among URC-ABD presented no difference between groups. It was observed that AT group presented a smaller LRC contribution and greater ventilatory inefficiency during all assessing moments and, during moderate exercise, had a lower tidal volume when compared to NA and CG. Our results suggest that phase angle approach presents larger TAA detection in COPD patients. This asynchrony seems to occur mainly in the lower ribcage and be associated with decreased contribution and increased ventilatory inefficiency of this compartment