Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:25:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DIR - Daniela Tavares R Marcacini.pdf: 503925 bytes, checksum: 34d03bf9ea7abd0eeda9870d1d9f35e6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006-11-21 / This dissertation is the result of the interest in investigating the Rights Abuse conception; polemic subject, studied by several philosophic and ideologic currents which seek, with tireless devotion, the best practice in the juridical field. By means of these facts, and in order to deepen the investigation of the chosen topic, we selected the non structured research methodology of exploring character which allows the researcher obtain a better context comprehension in which is inserted the research subject. As we shall observe, through all the exposed, there is no way for us not to conclude that Rights Abuse is originated by human being s individualism - in its most selfish aspect - once its roots begin from the proper human existence. It is also not exaggerated to affirm that on the day when Rights Abuse cease to be the object of juridical controversies, humanity will have reached such a high evolutive level that the proper right will become the synonym of just, in the widest meaning of the word; justice will be the consequence of social relationship, not needing to be imposed to man by means of laws and convival rules. Therefore, taking in consideration that the sicussion of such a fascinating question will never be exhausted, we effect this investigation as a manner to specify that the Rights Abuse will always continue to be of utmost importance when related to society rights / Essa dissertação resulta do interesse em pesquisar a concepção do Abuso de Direito; tema polêmico, que tem sido estudado por diversas correntes filosófico-ideológicas que se dedicam incansavelmente a encontrar a prática mais acertada no campo jurídico. Mediante tais fatos, a fim de investigarmos mais a fundo a temática escolhida, optamos pela metodologia de pesquisa não estruturada de caráter exploratório que permite ao pesquisador obter melhor compreensão do contexto em que o tema da pesquisa encontra-se inserido. Como veremos, por tudo o que foi exposto, não há como não concluirmos que o abuso do direito não tenha origem no individualismo do ser humano no aspecto mais egoístico pois suas raízes remontam à própria existência da humanidade. Também não seria exagero afirmarmos que no dia em que o abuso do direito deixar de ser objeto de controvérsias jurídicas, a humanidade terá galgado um nível evolutivo tão elevado que o próprio direito será o sinônimo do justo, na acepção mais ampla da palavra; a justiça será conseqüência do convívio social, não necessitando mais ser imposta ao homem através de leis e regras de convivência. Portanto, levando em conta que a discussão de uma questão tão fascinante jamais poderia ser esgotada, realizamos esta investigação como forma de assinalar que o Abuso do Direito sempre será de suma importância no que se refere aos direitos da sociedade

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:24:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Renata Soltanovitch.pdf: 1167411 bytes, checksum: 97600aca8c975398180441a6394458c1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006-05-24 / Our goal in this paper is to distinguish the malicious abuse of legal process, indicating the possibility of applying both civil proceeding institutes. In specific cases we indicate responsibility checking, as well as the corresponding sanctions. We also insisted on many times comparing the lawyer s procedural liability with the definitions on the subject contained in the Statutes and the Ethics Code and their corresponding consequences. Finally one can observe in this paper the rules indicated by the procedural liability are not always applied as indicated by law, but we believe that when we present an in-depth discussion of this subject we can start a deeper reflection in the sense of preventing procedural chicaneries and collaborate to speed up proceedings with the resulting procedural effectiveness / Objetivamos neste trabalho diferenciar o abuso do direito da litigância de má-fé, indicando a possibilidade de aplicação de ambos os institutos no processo civil. Nos casos específicos, indicamos as apurações de responsabilidade, bem como suas respectivas sanções. Fizemos questão também de, muitas vezes, comparar a Responsabilidade processual do advogado, com as definições contidas a respeito do assunto no Estatuto da Advocacia e no Código de Ética, e suas respectivas conseqüências. Finalmente observar-se-á nestes escritos que nem sempre são aplicadas, na forma autorizada pela lei, as normas indicadas pela responsabilidade processual, mas acreditamos que, ao abordarmos esse assunto com profundidade, poderemos dar início a uma maior reflexão no sentido de evitar chicanas processuais e, mais ainda, colaborar para a celeridade processual com a conseqüente efetividade do processo

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:25:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 osmar.pdf: 1488169 bytes, checksum: cfb4524fa1cecbf37c422054fd404724 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-06-06 / In face of the embarrassments to the effective of provisionses judicial, of the end antecipation nature or (art. 14, V, of the CPC), as well as in the executions of extrajudicial executive headings (2ª part of § 1º of art. the 656 of CPC), mainly when the debtor commits abuse in the right of action of the corporate entity, in clear offensive attitude to the exercise of the jurisdiction (art. 14, only Paragraph, of the CPC); the present work considers the application of the penalties contained in the statement of the only paragraph, of art. 14, the CPC (criminal, courteous and procedural fine and sanctions), in the cases where the judge will have that to declare the disrespect of the corporate entity, to surpass the difficulties and embarrassments to the accomplishment of the distrainment and consequence effective of the jurisdictional guardianship / Em face dos embaraços à efetivação dos provimentos judiciais de natureza antecipatória ou final (art. 14, V, do CPC), bem como nas execuções de títulos executivos extrajudiciais (2ª parte do § 1º do art. 656 do CPC), mormente quando o devedor comete abuso no exercício do direito da personalidade jurídica, em clara atitude atentatória ao exercício da jurisdição (art. 14, Parágrafo único, do CPC); o presente trabalho propõe a aplicação das penalidades contidas no enunciado do parágrafo único, do art. 14, do CPC, (multa e sanções criminais, civis e processuais), nos casos em que o juiz tiver que declarar a desconsideração da personalidade jurídica, para superar as dificuldades e embaraços à realização da penhora e conseqüente efetivação da tutela jurisdicional

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:21:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ClaudioLevada.pdf: 1208764 bytes, checksum: e794b01a8d7d1dec6fba8d0dda6a3043 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005-10-27 / The abuse of process is a theme of great repercussion in the range of the national civil responsibility, either in the contractual or extra contractual area or Aquilian. The present thesis defends its relevant application in uncountable hypotheses, mainly after the edition of the current 2002 Civil Code that predicted it expressly on Art.187, in the following terms: Also commits an illicit act, the owner of a right that exerting it, exceeds manifestly the limits set by its economical or social purpose, by its good will or by its good customs This research makes a historic introduction to the subject and points the institute in the compared Law. It studies the abuse of process in its nature defending its occurrence even when there is no fault from the author of abusive behavior. It analyses related institutes, properly discriminated, its similar point and differences, together with concrete cases notes decided in Brazil and abroad, and following analysis of the solutions adopted. In philosophical terms, we looked forward to defend that the abuse of process is incompatible with positivist doctrines, still existing necessity of ideological analysis and value of the agent s behavior and its consequences to identify it. We noted as well the correlation between the abuse of process and several constitutional principles that expand in the range of private rights and have concrete application on it. Political questions were analyzed connected to this institute and its relation to the free choice to contract and the autonomy of the will typical of individualist doctrines from which the current Code got apart, substituting them by doctrines that value the collective interest, the social solidarity and the human dignity. The conclusions taken along this research, highlight the necessity of Judiciary intervention into the contracts and social relationships as a form of attenuate the differences between the parts and put them again into equilibrium, avoiding or reducing the damages caused to the abuse victim. Along this research, essential aspect was the demonstration that the process abuse is an illicit act, that can be characterized independently from the abuser s intentions of causing or not damage to the victim, or even with no fault in his behavior. The conclusions, in a number of 56 were general and tried to follow the order of the themes approached, at least as a rule / The abuse of process is a theme of great repercussion in the range of the national civil responsibility, either in the contractual or extra contractual area or Aquilian. The present thesis defends its relevant application in uncountable hypotheses, mainly after the edition of the current 2002 Civil Code that predicted it expressly on Art.187, in the following terms: Also commits an illicit act, the owner of a right that exerting it, exceeds manifestly the limits set by its economical or social purpose, by its good will or by its good customs This research makes a historic introduction to the subject and points the institute in the compared Law. It studies the abuse of process in its nature defending its occurrence even when there is no fault from the author of abusive behavior. It analyses related institutes, properly discriminated, its similar point and differences, together with concrete cases notes decided in Brazil and abroad, and following analysis of the solutions adopted. In philosophical terms, we looked forward to defend that the abuse of process is incompatible with positivist doctrines, still existing necessity of ideological analysis and value of the agent s behavior and its consequences to identify it. We noted as well the correlation between the abuse of process and several constitutional principles that expand in the range of private rights and have concrete application on it. Political questions were analyzed connected to this institute and its relation to the free choice to contract and the autonomy of the will typical of individualist doctrines from which the current Code got apart, substituting them by doctrines that value the collective interest, the social solidarity and the human dignity. The conclusions taken along this research, highlight the necessity of Judiciary intervention into the contracts and social relationships as a form of attenuate the differences between the parts and put them again into equilibrium, avoiding or reducing the damages caused to the abuse victim. Along this research, essential aspect was the demonstration that the process abuse is an illicit act, that can be characterized independently from the abuser s intentions of causing or not damage to the victim, or even with no fault in his behavior

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:29:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Renato Castro Teixeira Martins.pdf: 1083653 bytes, checksum: e06707211cba98c41bcc338a7c81cda7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-10-22 / The studies on the abuse of the procedures in the law process, found in the doctrine, are about punishment of the part and the indemnification of the injured part, especially in face of the malicious abuse of legal process hypotheses. The current paper aims to show that the technique of the so-called impertinence must be used as a manner to restrain the abuse of the law in the process, avoiding as much as possible injury to the parts and to Justice Administration, emphasizing its restraining role. The first part of the paper concerns the phenomena of the civil process constitutionalization, analyzing the constitutional guarantees that are directly connected to the theme of this study. On the second part, the theories of law abuse are analyzed, as well as their incidence on the material and procedural spheres concerning the law exercises of sueing and defending, including appeals and procedural incidents. The third part is dedicated to the study of many hypotheses of the so-called impertinence that are present in the Brazilian civil process system, analyzing the instructions of the doctrine and the understanding of the jurisprudence. Finally, we defend the use of the technique of the so-called impertinence in cases that are not explicitly seen in the system / Os estudos sobre o abuso do direito no plano processual, encontrados na doutrina, abordam o tema destacando a punição da parte e o ressarcimento do prejudicado, especialmente diante das hipóteses de litigância de má-fé. A presente dissertação tem o objetivo de mostrar que a técnica da manifesta improcedência deve ser utilizada como forma de coibir o abuso do direito no processo, evitando, tanto quanto possível, a ocorrência de danos às partes, ressaltando a sua característica inibitória. A primeira parte do trabalho aborda o fenômeno da constitucionalização do processo civil, analisando as garantias constitucionais que estão diretamente ligadas ao tema deste estudo. Na segunda parte, são examinadas as teorias sobre o abuso do direito, bem como a sua incidência nos planos material e processual, no que diz respeito ao exercício dos direitos de demandar e de defesa, inclusive por meio de recursos e incidentes processuais. A terceira parte é dedicada ao estudo das diversas hipóteses de manifesta improcedência que estão previstas no ordenamento processual civil brasileiro, analisando-se os ensinamentos da doutrina e os entendimentos jurisprudenciais. Ao final, defendemos a utilização da técnica da manifesta improcedência em casos que não estão previstos expressamente no sistema