No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Hintergrund: Die wachsende Anzahl älterer multimorbider Patienten und der damit zunehmende Versorgungsbedarf am Lebensende erfordern eine gut funktionierende Basisversorgung mit dem Hausarzt als zentralem Ansprechpartner. Hausärzte versorgen ihre Patienten zumeist über mehrere Jahre und bis ans Lebensende. Darüber gibt es jedoch bisher keine ausreichenden Kenntnisse. Ziel der Studie: Die Versorgungssituation und Charakteristika hausärztlich versorg-ter Patienten in der letzten Lebensphase aus hausärztlicher Sicht, durch eine retro-spektive Erhebung abzubilden. Methode: Im Raum Hannover und Göttingen wurden 30 Hausärzte (Teilnehmerrate: 19%) mittels eines selbst entwickelten standardisierten Erhebungsbogen zu ihren in den letzten 12 Monaten eines natürlichen Todes verstorbenen Patienten (n = 451) befragt. Erfasst wurden vor allem Daten zur Soziodemographie und Betreuungssituation, zu den Erkrankungen, den Symptomen und der Symptomkontrolle. Neben einer rein deskriptiven Darstellung der Ergebnisse erfolgte ein Vergleich mit Daten aus der Hospiz- und Palliativerfassung (HOPE) 2010. Ergebnisse: Im Mittel hatte jeder teilnehmende Hausarzt 15 Patienten (SD: 7,3; Me-dian: 14,5; Range: 4-36), für die er Angaben im Erhebungsbogen machte. Das durchschnittliche Sterbealter betrug 78,5 Jahren (SD: 12,9; Median: 81; Range: 19-102), 55% der Patienten waren Frauen, der Großteil der Patienten (60%) lebte zu-letzt in der eigenen Wohnung beziehungsweise im eigenen Haus. Obwohl die meisten Patienten sich ein Versterben in häuslicher Umgebung wünschen, verstarben 41% der Patienten im Krankenhaus und nur 22% zu Hause beziehungsweise in einer Alten- oder Pflegeeinrichtung. Das Krankheitsspektrum war vielfältig und zeigte eine Dominanz der chronischen Erkrankungen (beispielsweise des Herz-Kreislauf-Systems und der Psyche). Im Vergleich mit den HOPE-Daten zeigten sich im Spektrum der Erkrankungen und in der Häufigkeit der Symptome deutliche Unterschiede. Die meisten Verstorbenen wurden im Rahmen der allgemeinen hausärztlichen Basisversorgung in der letzten Lebensphase betreut. Die Häufigkeit der Arzt-Patienten-Kontakte nahm zum Lebensende zu. Bei 48% der Patienten war der Hausarzt auch in den letzten 48 Stunden vor dem Tod noch in die Versorgung involviert. Eine palliativmedizinisch spezialisierte ärztliche Betreuung erhielten in der HAVEL-Studie nur 10% der Patienten. Neben der ärztlichen Betreuung spielten Angehörige (bei 49% der Patienten), Pflegedienste (bei 29%) und Pflegeheimpersonal (bei 33%) eine bedeutende Rolle in der ambulanten Versorgung in den letzten Lebensmonaten. Schlussfolgerung: Hausärzte sind unabhängig vom Sterbeort maßgeblich in die Betreuung ihrer Patienten bis ans Lebensende involviert. Die Unterschiede in den Patientencharakteristika sowie in den Versorgungsformen zwischen hausärztlicher und spezialisierter Versorgung am Lebensende sollten in der ärztlichen Aus- und Weiterbildung stärker berücksichtigt werden. Um der aktuellen Versorgungssituation auch in der Forschung gerecht zu werden und über die Qualität der ambulanten Versorgung am Lebensende Aussagen treffen zu können, sind weitere Untersuchungen erforderlich.

Background: Home visits are part of general practice work in Germany. Within the context of an expanding elderly population and a decreasing number of general practitioner (GPs), open questions regarding the organisation and adequacy of GPs’ care in immobile patients remain. To answer these questions, we will conduct a representative primary data collection concerning contents and organisation of GPs’ home visits in 2014. Because this study will require considerable efforts for documentation and thus substantial involvement by participating GPs, we conducted a pilot study to see whether such a study design was feasible. Methods: We used a mixed methods design with two study arms in a sample of teaching GPs of the University Halle. The quantitative arm evaluates participating GPs and documentation of home visits. The qualitative arm focuses on reasons for non-participation for GPs who declined to take part in the pilot study. Results: Our study confirms previously observed reasons for non-response of GPs in the particular setting of home visits including lack of time and/or interest. In contrast to previous findings, monetary incentives were not crucial for GPs participation. Several factors influenced the documentation rate of home visits and resulted in a discrepancy between the numbers of home visits documented versus those actually conducted. The most frequently reported problem was related to obtaining patient consent, especially when patients were unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive deficits. Conclusions: The results of our feasibility study provide evidence for improvement of the study design and study instruments to effectively conduct a documentation-intensive study of GPs doing home visits. Improvement of instructions and questionnaire regarding time variables and assessment of the need for home visits will be carried out to increase the reliability of future data. One particularly important methodological issue yet to be resolved is how to increase the representativeness of home visit care by including the homebound patient population that is unable to provide informed consent.

Objective: Because of the increasing shortage of general practitioners (GPs) in many countries, this study aimed to explore factors related to GP career choice in recent medical graduates. Particular focus was placed on the impact of specific practice-orientated GP courses at different stages of the medical undergraduate curriculum. Design: Observational study. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to reveal independent associations with career choice. Setting: Leipzig Medical School, Germany. Subjects: 659 graduates (response rate = 64.2%). Main outcome measure: Choice of general practice as a career. Results: Six student-associated variables were found to be independently related to choice of general practice as a career: age, having family or friends in general practice, consideration of a GP career at matriculation, preference for subsequent work in a rural or small-town area, valuing the ability to see a broad spectrum of patients, and valuing long-term doctor – patient relationships. Regarding the curriculum, after adjustment independent associations were found with a specifi c pre-clinical GP elective (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.3 – 5.3), a four-week GP clerkship during the clinical study section (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.3 – 5.0), and a four-month GP clinical rotation during the final year (OR = 10.7, 95% CI 4.3 – 26.7). It was also found that the work-related values of the female participants were more compatible with those of physicians who opt for a GP career than was the case for their male colleagues. Conclusion: These results support the suggestion that a practice-orientated GP curriculum in both the earlier and later stages of undergraduate medical education raises medical schools’ output of future GPs. The findings are of interest for medical schools (curriculum design, admission criteria), policy-makers, and GPs involved in undergraduate medical education. More research is needed on the effectiveness of specific educational interventions in promoting interest in general practice as a career.

Zugl.: Freiburg (Breisgau), Universiẗat, Diss.

Background: Home visits are part of general practice work in Germany. Within the context of an expanding elderly population and a decreasing number of general practitioner (GPs), open questions regarding the organisation and adequacy of GPs’ care in immobile patients remain. To answer these questions, we will conduct a representative primary data collection concerning contents and organisation of GPs’ home visits in 2014. Because this study will require considerable efforts for documentation and thus substantial involvement by participating GPs, we conducted a pilot study to see whether such a study design was feasible. Methods: We used a mixed methods design with two study arms in a sample of teaching GPs of the University Halle. The quantitative arm evaluates participating GPs and documentation of home visits. The qualitative arm focuses on reasons for non-participation for GPs who declined to take part in the pilot study. Results: Our study confirms previously observed reasons for non-response of GPs in the particular setting of home visits including lack of time and/or interest. In contrast to previous findings, monetary incentives were not crucial for GPs participation. Several factors influenced the documentation rate of home visits and resulted in a discrepancy between the numbers of home visits documented versus those actually conducted. The most frequently reported problem was related to obtaining patient consent, especially when patients were unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive deficits. Conclusions: The results of our feasibility study provide evidence for improvement of the study design and study instruments to effectively conduct a documentation-intensive study of GPs doing home visits. Improvement of instructions and questionnaire regarding time variables and assessment of the need for home visits will be carried out to increase the reliability of future data. One particularly important methodological issue yet to be resolved is how to increase the representativeness of home visit care by including the homebound patient population that is unable to provide informed consent.

Background: Smartphones and related applications are increa singly gaining relevance in the healthcare domain. We previously assessed the demands and preferences of medical students towards an application accompanying them during a course on general practice. The current study aims to elucidate the factors associated with adop tion of such a technology. Therefore we provided students with a prototype of an application specifically related to their studies in general practice.