Tidigare forskning/studier om en revisors bedömningfokuserar i stor utsträckning enbart på enskildarevisorer, trots att mycket av revisionen sker i team. Teorin som finns om teamarbete inom revisioninnehåller framförallt uppfattningar kring hur arbetetska fördelas och hur teamarbetet är tänkt att fungera, samt beskriver fyra traditionella roller inomrevisionsteam. Dock förekommer det få studier om vilka olika medlemmar som finns inom ett revisionsteam i praktiken och vad dessa medlemmar faktiskt gör. Studiens syfte är att beskriva vilka roller det finns inom revisionsteam och hur arbetsdelningen ser ut mellan teammedlemmarna. Studien är kvalitativ och har en induktiv ansats med deduktiva inslag. För att besvara syftet har semistrukturerade intervjuer genomförts med respondenter från olika revisionsbyråer samt material från olika revisionsbyråers hemsidor och jobbannonser inom revision har använts. Slutsats: Antal medlemmar och roller i ett revisionsteam påverkas av byrå-, uppdrags- och kontorsstorlek, erfarenhet hos enskilda teammedlemmar samt klient. Dessa faktorer påverkar också vad respektive roll gör. Inom ett revisionsteam finns det minst en påskrivande revisor och en revisorsassistent. De traditionella rollerna som omnämns i teorin förekommer också i praktiken, men ibland med andra benämningar och ansvarsområden. Revisorsassistenter utför den största delen avgranskningen, medan de överordnade revisorerna ansvarar mer för administrativt arbete såsom att planera revisionen, fördela ut arbete eller ansvara för klientrelaterade aktiviteter. / Problem: Previous research/studies that has been done onauditor’s judgments, focuses largely on individualauditors only, despite the fact that much of the auditis done in teams. The theory about teamwork inauditing includes above all perceptions of how thework is divided in the team and how teams aresupposed to work, it also describes four traditionalroles in auditing. However, there are few studiespublished about what different kinds of membersexist in practice within audit teams and what thesemembers actually do. Aim: The aim of the study is to describe which roles existswithin the audit team and how the job splitting isdone between teammembers. Method: It is a qualitative study that has an inductiveapproach but includes some deductive elements. Tobe able to answer the aim of the study, semistructuredinterviews were conducted withrespondents from different audit firms, as well asusing materials obtained from audit firms websites’and job advertising within the audit area. Conclusion: The number of members and roles in an audit team isaffected by assignment-, firm- and office size butalso by the experience of the individual member andthe client. These factors also affect what each roledoes. In an audit team there has to be at least oneengagement leader and one junior auditor. Thetraditional roles that is known in the theory are alsopresent in the empirical data, but sometimes withdifferent titles and different fields ofresponsibility.The junior auditors are the ones that dothe biggest part of the audit, while the superiorauditors are responsible for administrative work likeplaning, job splitting, or is responsible forclientrelated activities.

The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze how auditors are affected by quality controls and if audit practice changes because of quality controls. To fulfill the purpose of this study there has been interviews made with five auditors. The conclusion by this study is that the interviewed auditors work practices are affected by quality controls and that the extent and effect depends on the auditor and the office that the auditor works in. The auditors who worked as quality reviewers at the agencies where they are employed at, we felt that they were more secured in the response towards quality controls. This may be because they are quality reviewers themselves and they know what the quality control requires and what must be met to be approved. One of the key elements of a quality control is feedback and suggestions for improving the next audit. This seems to be appreciated by all auditors and an important tool to help the auditors evolve in the profession. The majority of the auditors believe that mandatory education is one of the most important steps into keeping themselves updated on new standards. To summarize the result of the study we conclude that quality controls can affect the audit practice, but this comes to expression in different ways depending on the auditors experiences of quality control and what agency the auditor work in.

There has been a dearth of research on ‘auditors and environmental matters’ since Collison (1996) and Collison and Gray (1997) completed their study on the views of UK auditors about whether auditing is changing, or should be changing, in relation to environmental concerns. It is now more than ten years since the publication of that study. Growing international concern for environmental matters has since led to the issue of International Auditing Practice Statement (IAPS) -1010: The consideration of environmental matters in the audit of financial report in 1998 and, in New Zealand, Audit Guidance Statement (AGS) -1010: The consideration of environmental matters in the audit of a financial statement in 2001. Yet, to date, there has been no examination of the impact of IAPS-1010 or AGS-1010 on either current audit practice, or the issues raised by Collison (1996) and Collison and Gray (1997). This doctoral thesis has attempted to address the environmental impact gap in the auditing research literature. In particular, it has investigated the consideration of environmental matters in the audit of financial reports in the light of AGS-1010, with a view to understanding better the following issues: (1) how auditors generally perceive the consideration of environmental matters in the audit of financial reports; (2) the common approaches and practices auditors undertake when auditing environmental matters; (3) the challenges (if any) that auditors face in the audit of environmental matters (4) the impact (if any) of AGS 1010 on current audit practice and, finally, (5) how current practices in the audit of environmental matters may be improved and further developed to meet better the espoused aims of AGS-1010. Qualitative interviews with twenty-seven senior financial audit practitioners and others in New Zealand provided the basis for the findings. The interviews were taped, transcribed and managed with the use of computerised qualitative analysis software (NViVo7). Key findings from the research interviews were as follows: (1) the introduction of AGS-1010 had little impact on current audit practice in New Zealand; (2) environmental matters were treated no differently from any other audit issues, and auditors tended to apply common, familiar audit approaches in dealing with environmental matters; (3) auditors found the effective auditing of environmental matters challenging owing to their inability to identify such matters, and their lack of relevant expert knowledge. The most significant finding from this study is that, in general, common audit practices were riddled with issues of concern. These issues point to a broader and more significant problem. It would seem that current audit practices fail to consider many potential audit issues (including environmental matters) adequately in the audit of financial reports. For auditors to be more effective in their audit practice and in protecting the public interest, not only does audit methodology need a major review, but auditors themselves need to change their attitudes and mindsets in their approach to auditing.

There has been a dearth of research on ‘auditors and environmental matters’ since Collison (1996) and Collison and Gray (1997) completed their study on the views of UK auditors about whether auditing is changing, or should be changing, in relation to environmental concerns. It is now more than ten years since the publication of that study. Growing international concern for environmental matters has since led to the issue of International Auditing Practice Statement (IAPS) -1010: The consideration of environmental matters in the audit of financial report in 1998 and, in New Zealand, Audit Guidance Statement (AGS) -1010: The consideration of environmental matters in the audit of a financial statement in 2001. Yet, to date, there has been no examination of the impact of IAPS-1010 or AGS-1010 on either current audit practice, or the issues raised by Collison (1996) and Collison and Gray (1997). This doctoral thesis has attempted to address the environmental impact gap in the auditing research literature. In particular, it has investigated the consideration of environmental matters in the audit of financial reports in the light of AGS-1010, with a view to understanding better the following issues: (1) how auditors generally perceive the consideration of environmental matters in the audit of financial reports; (2) the common approaches and practices auditors undertake when auditing environmental matters; (3) the challenges (if any) that auditors face in the audit of environmental matters (4) the impact (if any) of AGS 1010 on current audit practice and, finally, (5) how current practices in the audit of environmental matters may be improved and further developed to meet better the espoused aims of AGS-1010. Qualitative interviews with twenty-seven senior financial audit practitioners and others in New Zealand provided the basis for the findings. The interviews were taped, transcribed and managed with the use of computerised qualitative analysis software (NViVo7). Key findings from the research interviews were as follows: (1) the introduction of AGS-1010 had little impact on current audit practice in New Zealand; (2) environmental matters were treated no differently from any other audit issues, and auditors tended to apply common, familiar audit approaches in dealing with environmental matters; (3) auditors found the effective auditing of environmental matters challenging owing to their inability to identify such matters, and their lack of relevant expert knowledge. The most significant finding from this study is that, in general, common audit practices were riddled with issues of concern. These issues point to a broader and more significant problem. It would seem that current audit practices fail to consider many potential audit issues (including environmental matters) adequately in the audit of financial reports. For auditors to be more effective in their audit practice and in protecting the public interest, not only does audit methodology need a major review, but auditors themselves need to change their attitudes and mindsets in their approach to auditing.

Currently, auditors face changes in the auditing industry, which has increased the focus on marketing activities. Despite professional ideals, an increase in the commercialization of audit firms has been observed, shaping the identity of the auditor. Auditor identity has been found to be a driver for commercialization, but certain studies find commercialization to be negative for audit practice. We argue that individual auditor attributes can explain orientations in the auditor identity, which in turn could have implications for audit practice. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze how auditor attributes are related to professional and commercial orientations, and how the various orientations are related to audit practice. The theories used in this study are agency theory, social identity theory, and the theory of professions. We employ a quantitative survey method, with a questionnaire sent out by e-mail including questions about attributes, professional and commercial orientation, and reduced audit quality acts. Our results indicate that a positive relation to professional orientation exists for attributes adaptability and marketing skills. A positive relation for commercial orientation exists for the attribute marketing skills, while a negative relation exists for communication skills. Our results suggest that commercial orientation has a positive relation to auditors’ propensity to engage in RAQ acts. We find that knowledge has a negative relation to RAQ acts. A weak positive relation exists between adaptability and RAQ acts. The degree to which these results explain professional and commercial orientation and RAQ acts is small, why more research is needed.

Bakgrund Revisionsbranschen är en mansdominerad bransch där det råder en vertikal könssegregering, kvinnor rekryteras in i revisionsbranschen men har svårt att nå ledarpositioner och andra högre befattningar. Balans senaste jämställdhetsundersökning visar att 78,9 % av alla partners i de sju största revisionsbyråerna i Sverige är män. Kvinnlig framgång vad gäller maktfulla och inflytelserika positioner i organisationer är absolut nödvändigt för att uppnå jämställdhet och lika möjligheter för kvinnor som män. Frågan som ställs är om det finns skillnader i utförandet av revisionsarbete mellan kvinnor och män och om det är det som förklarar den rådande könssegregeringen i revisionsbranschen. Syfte Syftet med denna studie är att utforska och jämföra kvinnliga respektive manliga revisorers revisionsarbete samt utforska huruvida deras karriäravancemang påverkas till störst del av deras individuella revisionsarbete eller av deras kön. Metod Studien delas upp i två delstudier, en litteraturstudie och en intervjustudie. I litteraturstudien samlas tidigare forskning in och bearbetas. I intervjustudien används en kvalitativ metod och datainsamling sker genom intervjuer. Slutsats Vårt resultat visar att det inte finns några skillnader mellan hur kvinnor och män utför en revision. Trots detta missgynnas kvinnor i revisionsbranschen och når inte lika höga positioner som män. Resultatet indikerar att det främst beror på att kvinnor blir mammor och tar mer ansvar för familjen vilket gör att de har svårare att leva upp till den övertidsnorm som finns i revisionsbranschen. Resultatet visar även att starka könsnormer fortfarande råder inom branschen, ett tecken på det är att kvinnliga revisorer bemöts sämre och ifrågasätts mer än manliga revisorer av klienter. / Background The audit industry is a male dominated industry where a vertical gender segregation exists, women are recruited into the audit industry but have difficulties in achieving leadership positions and other senior positions. Balans latest equality survey shows that 78,9 % of all partners in the seven biggest audit firms in Sweden are men. Female success regarding powerful and influential positions in organisations are absolutely necessary to achieve equality and the same possibilities for women as for men. The question being asked is if there are any differences in audit practice performance between women and men and if that can explain the current gender segregation in the audit industry. Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore and compare female respectively male auditors audit practice performance and explore whether their career advancement is mostly affected by their individual audit practice performance or their gender. Method The study is divided into two substudies, a litterature study and an interview study. In the litterature study previous research is collected and processed. In the interview study a qualitative method is used and the data collection is made through interviews. Conclusion The result shows that there are no differences in how female and male auditors perform an audit. Despite this women are disadvantaged in the audit industry and do not reach as high positions as men. The result indicates that this problem mainly exists because of the fact that women become mothers and take more responsibility of the family which makes it harder to live up to the audit industry’s overtime norm. The result also shows that strong gender norms still exist in the industry, a proof of that is that female auditors are still more mistreated and questioned than male auditors by their clients.

Revisionskvalitet är ett återkommande ämne i såväl forskning som i media. Forskare belyser olika faktorer som påverkar revisionskvalitet och den här studien fokuserar på resurser. Majoriteten av tidigare forskning om revisionskvalitet har Big 4 byråer som utgångspunkt. För att skapa bättre förståelse för hela revisionsprofessionen studeras därför en mindre byrå i den här studien. Syftet är att utforska resurser för revisorer på icke Big 4 byråer, utifrån ett revisionskvalitetsperspektiv. Studien har både deduktiva och induktiva inslag där det deduktiva inslaget utgörs av en teoretisk referensram som ligger till grund för studien. Det induktiva inslaget har gjort det möjligt att studera resurser dels utifrån tillgången till, men även bristen på och användningen av resurser i icke Big 4 byråer. Det har även gjort det möjligt att lägga till ett ytterligare perspektiv då empirin påvisade faktorer som inte identifierats innan datainsamlingen påbörjades. Studiens empiri består till stor del av primärdata från deltagande observationer, men även från semistrukturerade intervjuer. Resultatet visar att revisorerna på Revisionsbyrå A har tillgång till, och använder, samtliga resurser som tidigare forskning visat påverka revisionskvalitet positivt. Resultatet visar även tre nyfunna resurser som tillhör det nyfunna kapitalet materiellt kapital, och även de resurserna har en positiv påverkan på revisionskvalitet. Slutsatsen är att revisorerna på Revisionsbyrå A, utifrån dess tillgång till resurser, kan leverera hög revisionskvalitet. Studiens resultat är baserat på empiri från en mindre byrå och det teoretiska bidraget kompletterar tidigare forskning om revisionskvalitet i Big 4 och icke Big 4 byråer. Resultatet av studien är även ett bidrag till revision och revisionskvalitet praktiskt och empiriskt. / Audit quality is a reoccurring field in both research and media. Researchers highlight different factors that affect audit quality and this study focuses on resources. The majority of previous research of audit quality have Big 4 firms as their starting-point. In order to gain a better understanding of the entire audit profession, a smaller firm is the focus of this study. The purpose is to explore resources for auditors in non-Big 4 firms, from an audit quality perspective. The study has both deductive and inductive characteristics; the deductive characteristics are visible through a theoretical framework that functions as a foundation for the study. The inductive characteristics have made it possible to research the resources through both the access to, yet also the lack of, as well as the use of resources in non-Big 4 firms. It has, moreover, made it possible to add another perspective since the empirical data showed factors that had not been identified before the data collection was initiated. The empirical data of this study consists to a large extent of primary data from observations, but also of data from semi-structured interviews. The results show that auditors at Audit Firm A have access to, and use, all the resources that previous research had shown to affect audit quality in a positive way. Moreover, the results show two new resources that belongs to the newly found capital called material capital, and these resources does also have a positive effect on audit quality. The conclusions drawn are that auditors at Audit Firm A can, with respect to their access to resources, deliver high quality audit. The results of the study is based on empirical data from a smaller firm and the theoretical contribution complements previous research of audit quality in Big 4 and non-Big 4 firms. Moreover, the results is also a contribution to audit and audit quality both practical and empirical.