Introdução: O traumatismo cranioencefálico (TCE) é um dos principais problemas de saúde pública em todo mundo. A lesão axonial difusa (LAD) é a causa mais importante e frequente de sequelas neurológicas em indivíduos com TCE. A LAD ocorre em múltiplas localizações no encéfalo e provoca sintomas que podem ser temporários ou permanentes nos pacientes que são acompanhados em longo prazo. O objetivo do presente estudo constituiu em analisar a rede de suporte social e a funcionalidade familiar nos pacientes com TCE e LAD. Método: Realizamos um estudo transversal e comparativo sobre a funcionalidade familiar e o suporte social em pacientes seis meses após o TCE em um serviço ambulatorial de trauma. A amostra consistiu em 120 indivíduos divididos em dois grupos, 50 pacientes vítimas de TCE com lesão axonial difusa moderada e grave e 70 voluntários saudáveis constituindo o grupo controle. Utilizamos um questionário sociodemográfico, o mapa mínimo de relações - MMR e o teste APGAR familiar para comparar os dois grupos. Resultados: Em relação à funcionalidade familiar, verificamos que houve uma maior prevalência de funcionalidade moderada no grupo de estudo (77,8%), em comparação com o grupo de controle. Quanto à análise do provedor da família, houve uma maior prevalência dos genitores como chefes de família (57,5%) no grupo de estudo e maior prevalência de cônjuges, sendo os provedores no grupo de controle. Observamos uma diferença significativa nas atividades de lazer, e os indivíduos do grupo de estudo apresentaram maior comprometimento nessas atividades. Os indicadores de apoio social foram avaliados pelo mapa mínimo de relações sociais que indicam maior participação no apoio da comunidade em relação à família no grupo controle. Conclusão: Os pacientes que sofreram lesão axonial difusa apresentam funcionalidade moderada, com maior apoio da comunidade em comparação à família. Em pacientes com lesão axonial difusa, os genitores dos pacientes são os provedores da família / Introduction: Cranioencephalic trauma (TBI) is one of the major public health problems in the world. Diffuse axonal injury (LAD) is the most important and frequent cause of neurological sequelae in individuals with TBI. LAD occurs in multiple locations in the brain and causes symptoms that may be temporary or permanent in patients who are followed up in the long term. The objective of the present study was to analyze the social support network and the family functionality in patients with LAD and ADL. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional and comparative study on family functionality and social support in patients six months after TBI in an outpatient trauma service. The sample consisted of 120 individuals divided into two groups, 50 patients suffering from TBI with moderate and severe diffuse axonal injury and 70 healthy volunteers constituting the control group. We used a sociodemographic questionnaire, the minimum relation map - MMR and the APGAR family test to compare the two groups. Results: In relation to the family function, we verified that there was a higher prevalence of moderate functionality in the study group (77.8%), compared to the control group. Regarding the analysis of the family provider, there was a higher prevalence of the parents as heads of families (57.5%) in the study group and higher prevalence of spouses, with the providers in the control group. We observed a significant difference in leisure activities, and the individuals in the study group presented greater impairment in these activities. The indicators of social support were evaluated by the minimum map of social relations that indicate a greater participation in the support of the community in relation to the family in the control group. Conclusion: Patients who suffered diffuse axonal injury present moderate functionality, with greater community support compared to the family. In patients with diffuse axonal injury, the patient\'s parents are the providers of the family

Introdução: A lesão axonal traumática (LAT) ou lesão axonal difusa (LAD) esta presente em grande parte dos traumatismos crânio-encefálicos (TCE), sendo importante causa de mortalidade e morbidade das suas vítimas. A LAT dispara uma sequência de mudanças neurodegenerativas encefálicas que são, paradoxalmente, acompanhadas por recuperação cognitiva. Objetivo: Avaliar quantitativamente a LAT, através da razão de transferência de magnetização (RTM) e de medidas volumétricas para caracterizar a evolução temporoespacial das mudanças macroscópicas e microscópicas e investigar possível correlação entre elas, auxiliando no entendimento da sua fisiopatologia. Este estudo ainda investigou correlação entre atrofia e dano axonal/mielínico e a evolução funcional. Métodos: Imagens 3D-T1, 3DGE (PRESTO) e de transferência de magnetização (ITM) foram obtidas de 26 pacientes vítimas de TCE moderado e grave e de 26 controles, de idade e sexo semelhantes. Os pacientes foram submetidos a RM com 2 (fase aguda tardia/subaguda), 6 (crônica precoce) e 12 (crônica tardia) meses do TCE. A RM foi realizada nos controles em apenas uma única ocasião. Através de métodos automatizados, calculou-se o volume da substancia cinzenta (SC), da substancia branca (SB) e do encéfalo total (ET), ajustando-os pelo volume intracraniano. A partir de histogramas da RTM obtidos das mesmas regiões, calculou-se a média e os percentis 25, 50 e 75% da RTM. As imagens PRESTO foram usadas na exclusão dos focos hemorrágicos da análise da RTM, nos pacientes. A evolução funcional foi medida pela escala prognostica de Glasgow (EPG), realizada um ano após o TCE. Resultados: A RTM media e o volume foram significativamente diferentes nos pacientes e nos controles. Os pacientes apresentaram RTM media maior (p < 0,05) e volume menor na SC e ET, desde o primeiro exame (fase aguda tardia/subaguda precoce). Na SB, valores menores tanto da RTM media (p=0,02) quanto do volume (p=0,009) foram observados nos pacientes apenas no terceiro exame (fase crônica tardia). Redução progressiva da RTM media dos pacientes foi observada em todos os compartimentos, estimada em 1,14% na SC, 1,38% na SB e 1,40% no ET durante todo o estudo. Houve também redução volumétrica gradual da SB e do ET, com taxa de atrofia total de 3,20% e 1,50%, respectivamente. Não houve relação entre redução da RTM media e atrofia. Nenhum dos parâmetros mostrou valor prognostico nas fases subaguda ou crônica precoce. Conclusões: A LAT resulta numa rarefação axonal/mielínica e redução volumétrica progressiva do tecido encefálico, que se perpetua por até um ano do trauma. As mudanças são mais expressivas e prolongada na SB. A redução do volume e da RTM media se mostraram independentes na LAT. Isso sugere que os dois parâmetros reflitam aspectos complementares da fisiopatologia da LAT, em níveis micro e macroestrutural / Introduction: Traumatic axonal injury (TAI) or diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is a frequent component of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a major cause of mortality and morbidity in this population. It triggers a sequence of degenerative changes in the brain, that are paradoxically accompanied by cognitive recovery. Purposes: The present study used magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and volumetric data to appreciate the spatiotemporal evolution of macroscopic and microscopic changes and investigate possible correlation between them, enhancing the knowledge about its pathophysiology. It also investigated correlation between atrophy and axonal/myelin damage and functional outcome. Methods: Volumetric T1-weighted, 3DGE (PRESTO) and magnetization transfer images (MTI) were obtained from 26 patients who experienced moderate to severe TBI and 26 age- and sex-matched controls. Patients were scanned at 2 (late acute/subacute stage), 6 (early chronic) and 12 months (late chronic) postinjury and controls, only once. Whole brain (WB), gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes were measured using automated technique and adjusted for intracranial volume. Histogram analysis was performed in the same regions, with calculation of the mean MTR and its 25, 50 and 75% percentiles. The PRESTO images were used to exclude the small lesions from the MTR analysis in the patients. Functional outcome was assessed 12 months after injury using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Results: Mean MTR and volume were significantly different between patients and controls. Patients presented higher mean MTR values (p < 0,05) and smaller volume (p < 0,05) in the GM and WB, as of the first exam (late acute/subacute stage). In the WM, reduction of both, the mean MTR (p=.02) and volume (p=.009), was observed only in their third exam (late chronic stage). Progressive decrease of patients\' mean MTR was observed in all compartments, with rates of 1.14% for the GM, 1.38% for the WM and 1.40% for the WB across the study. Continuing reduction of the WM and WB volume was also observed, with total atrophy rate of 3.20% and 1.50%, respectively. No correlation between mean MT and the volumetric changes was found. None of the parameters showed prognostic value during the subacute and early chronic stages. Conclusions: TAI results in a progressive axonal/myelinic rarefaction and volumetric brain reduction that continues until a year postinjury. The changes are greater and lasts longer in the WM. The reduction in the volume and mean MTR were independent between them in TAI. This suggests that the two parameters reflect complementary aspects of the TAI pathologic lesion at macro and microstructural levels

<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:DocumentProperties> <o:Author>Windows User</o:Author> <o:Version>12.00</o:Version> </o:DocumentProperties></xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:DontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w:DontVertAlignCellWithSp/> <w:DontBreakConstrainedForcedTables/> <w:DontVertAlignInTxbx/> <w:Word11KerningPairs/> <w:CachedColBalance/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="&#45;-"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument></xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true" DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99" LatentStyleCount="267"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/> </w:LatentStyles></xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]><style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-priority:99;mso-style-qformat:yes;mso-style-parent:"";mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;mso-para-margin-top:0in;mso-para-margin-right:0in;mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;mso-para-margin-left:0in;line-height:115%;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}</style><![endif]-->Uvod: Traumatsko moždano o&scaron;tećenje (TMO) predstavlja globalni zdravstveni problem koji pogađa oko 10 miliona ljudi godi&scaron;nje &scaron;irom sveta. Te&scaron;ka traumatska moždana o&scaron;tećenja (TTMO) čine 10% svih TMO i imaju visoku stopu mortaliteta i neizvestan oporavak. Ranije prepoznavanje sistemskih faktora koji utiču na ishod lečenja može da ima značajan uticaj na pravovremeno započinjanje terapijskih mera i smanjivanje morbiditeta i mortaliteta. Cilj istraživanja: Identifikovati sistemske faktore koji imaju značajan uticaj na ishod lečenja povređenih sa TTMO u Jedinici intenzivnog lečenja (JIL) tokom prvog dana hospitalizacije. Metodologija: Ispitivanje je sprovedeno kao retrospektivno-prospektivna studija koja je obuhvatila 115 povređenih ispitanika sa TTMO koji su hospitalizovani u JIL Urgentnog centra Kliničkog centra Vojvodine (UC KCV) u periodu od 1.01.2014.-1.10.2017. Iz medicinske dokumentacije, za svakog ispitanika uključenog u istraživanje su uzeti u razmatranje i analizu sledeći parametri u toku prvih 24 časa od momenta prijema u JIL: demografske i op&scaron;te karakteristike ispitanika od značaja za istraživanje i sistemski prediktivni faktori (sistolni i srednji arterijski pritisak- SAP/MAP, glikemija-&Scaron;UK, telesna temperatura-TT, pH, parcijalni pritisak kiseonika-PaO2 i parcijalni pritisak ugljem dioksida- PaCO2) registrovani u pet vremenskih tačaka (0h, 6h, 12h,18h, 24h). Svi gore navedeni podaci su posmatrani i analizirani kao prediktorski faktori tj. nezavisne varijable u odnosu na zavisnu varijablu &bdquo;ishod lečenja&ldquo; definisanu kao Glazgovska skala ishoda (Glasgow outcome scale-GOS) nakon otpusta povređenih iz JIL na Kliniku za neurohirurgiju KCV i GOS nakon otpusta iz Klinike za neurohirurgiju KCV i &bdquo;tok lečenja&ldquo; definisan kroz dužinu boravka povređenih u JIL UC KCV, dužinu boravka na Klinici za neurohirurgiju KCV, odnosno ukupno trajanje hospitalizacije u KCV, kao i otpust kući ili u odgovarajući rehabilitacioni centar. Statistička analiza je izvr&scaron;ena pomoću statističkog paketa IBM SPSS 23. Podaci su predstavljeni tabelarno i grafički, a statistička značajnost određivana je na nivou p &lt; 0,05. Prikupljeni podaci su obrađeni adekvatnim statističkim metodima. Rezultati: Sistemski faktori koji su se izdvojili kao prediktori smrtnog ishoda (GOS 1) kod povređenih sa TTMO tokom prvog dana boravka u JIL su upotreba vazoaktivne potpore i glikemija. Upotreba vazoaktivne potpore povećava verovatnoću za smrtni ishod 4,7 puta (OR=0,214; 95%CI: 0,096-0,479; p&lt;0,05). i vrednosti glikemije &gt; 10 mmol/l povećavaju verovatnoću za smrtni ishod u nultom satu (OR= 0,240, 95%CI: 0,087-0,662; p=0,05) i u 24 satu (OR=0,206, 95%CI: 0,037 &ndash; 0,929; p=0,05). Sa svakim porastom telesne temperature za jednu jedinicu u posmatranom intervalu raste verovatnoća za pozitivan ishod (OR =2,118 , 95%CI: 1,097 &ndash; 4,091; p&lt;0,05) i vrednosti glikemije u intervalu od 4-8 mmol/l povećavaju verovatnoću za pozitivan ishod 2,5 puta. Sistemski faktori koji su se izdvojili u smislu predikcije ishoda lečenja ispitanika nakon otpusta iz JIL su vrednosti glikemije i telesna temperatura. Vrednost glikemije na prijemu u intervalu od 6,9 do 7,4 mmol/l povećavaju verovatnoću boljeg oporavka (GOS 4-5 vs. GOS 2-3). Niže vrednosti glikemiije u narednim vremenskim tačkama (6h, 12h, 18h) takođe povećavaju verovatnoću za bolji oporavak. Ukoliko je telesna temperatura u 6-om i 12-om satu, vi&scaron;a od 36,5 &deg;C veća je verovatnoća za bolji neurolo&scaron;ki oporavak, prilikom otpusta iz JIL, odnosno Klinike za neurohirurgiju KCV. Ispitanici koji su imali vi&scaron;e vrednosti telesne temperature su imali duže trajanje hospitalizacije (OR=4,096; 95%CI; 0,709-7,483;p&lt;0,05). Na dužinu boravka u JIL, kao i na otpust kući ili odgovarajući rehabilitacioni centar nije imao uticaj nijedan posmatrani sistemski faktor. Zaključak: Sistemski prediktivni faktori toka i ishoda lečenja povređenih sa TTMO su upotreba vazoaktivne potpore, glikemija i telesna temperatura.</p> / <p>Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health problem that affects about 10 million people worldwide annually. Severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) account for 10% of all TBI and has high morbidity and unreliable recovery. Early recognition of systemic factors that affect the treatment outcome can have a significant impact on the timely initiation of therapeutic measures and the reduction of morbidity and mortality. The objective of the research: to identify systemic factors that have a significant impact on the treatment outcome of the STBI patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) during the first day of hospitalization. Methodology: The study was conducted as a retrospective-prospective study that included 115 injured patients with STBI who were hospitalized in the ICU, Emergency Center (EC) of the Clinical Center of Vojvodina (CCV) in the period from 01.01.2014 to 1.10.2017. From the medical documentation, for each participant involved in the research, the following parameters within the first 24 hours after the admission were considered and analyzed: demographic and general characteristics of the participants of importance for research and systemic predictive factors (systolic and mean arterial pressure-SAP / MAP, glycemia, body temperature -TT, pH, partial pressure of oxygen-PaO2 and partial pressure of carbon dioxide-PaCO2) registered at five time points (0h, 6h, 12h,18h, 24h). All of the above data were observed and analyzed as predictors, ie, independent variables in relation to the dependent variable &quot;treatment outcome&quot; defined as the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after the transfer from the ICU to the Clinic of neurosurgery of the CCV and GOS after discharge from a Clinic of neurosurgery and &quot;treatment course&quot; defined by length of stay in ICU, or the total duration of hospitalization in CCV, as well as the release to the home or the appropriate rehabilitation center. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS 23 statistical package. The data are presented in tables and graphs, and the statistical significance was determined at p &lt;0.05. The collected data were processed with adequate statistical methods. Results: Systemic factors that had predictive value for the lethal outcome (GOS 1) in STBI during the first day of ICU stay were the use of vasopressors and glycemia. The use of vasopressors increases the likelihood of fatal outcome 4.7 times (OR= 0,214; 95%CI: 0,096-0,479; p&lt;0,05) and glycemic values &gt; 10 mmol/l increase the likelihood of fatal outcome on admission (OR=0,240, 95%CI: 0,087-0,662; p=0,05) and after 24 hours (OR=0,206, 95%CI: 0,037 &ndash; 0,929; p=0,05). With each increase in body temperature for one unit in the observed interval, the probability of a positive outcome increases (OR=2,118, 95%CI: 1,097 &ndash; 4,091;p&lt;0,05) and glycemic values in the range 4-8 mmol/l increase the probability of a positive outcome 2.5 times. Systemic factors that predict the treatment outcome of the patients after their discharge from ICU are glycemia and body temperature. The blood sugar on admission in the ICU in the range from 6.9 to 7.4 mmol/l increases the opportunity of a better recovery (GOS 4-5 vs. GOS 2-3). Lower glycemic values at the next time points (6h, 12h, 18h) also increase the opportunity of a better recovery. If the body temperature in the 6th and 12th-hour postadmission is higher than 36.5&deg; C, the greater opportunity for better neurological improvement when the patient is discharged from ICU, or from the Clinic of neurosurgery. Participants who had higher values of body temperature had a longer duration of hospitalization (OR 4.096; 95% CI; 0.709-7.483;p&lt;0,05). The length of the stay in ICU, as well as the release to the home or the appropriate rehabilitation center, was not affected by any observed systemic factor. Conclusion: Systemic predictive flow factors and outcome of treatment factors with STBI use of vasopressors, glycemia and body temperature.</p>

Introdução: Indivíduos vítimas de traumatismo cranioencefálico (TCE) frequentemente apresentam sintomas pós-concussionais, que são manifestações somáticas, cognitivas, sensório-perceptivas, emocionais ou comportamentais. A síndrome pós-concussional (SPC) é caracterizada pela presença de três ou mais sintomas pós-concussionais, por período mínimo de três meses ou mais. Cerca de 30% dos pacientes que apresentam TCE leve e moderado desenvolvem a SPC. No Brasil, não existem instrumentos disponíveis para avaliar os sintomas pós-concussionais e diagnosticar a SPC. Objetivos: Este estudo teve como objetivo disponibilizar uma versão do Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire e do Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory para a cultura brasileira e avaliar suas propriedades psicométricas quando aplicados em pacientes que tiveram TCE leve ou moderado. Método: O processo de adaptação transcultural foi realizado de acordo com as etapas propostas na literatura: tradução, síntese das traduções, retrotradução, comitê de especialistas e pré-teste. As análises psicométricas compreenderam a avaliação da confiabilidade e validade. Uma amostra de 276 indivíduos de 19 a 87 anos, de ambos os sexos, que tiveram TCE leve ou moderado, respondeu os seguintes instrumentos: caracterização sociodemográfica e clínica, as versões brasileiras do Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ-Br) e do Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI-Br), o Inventário de Depressão de Beck I (BDI I) e o questionário de qualidade de vida WHOQOL-bref. A confiabilidade foi verificada por meio da consistência interna, utilizando-se o alfa de Cronbach. A validade de conteúdo foi avaliada pelo grau de concordância nos comitês de especialistas, utilizando-se o Índice de validade de conteúdo e o Coeficiente de validade de conteúdo. Foi verificado a validade convergente por meio da análise de correlação dos escores dos instrumentos validados com o escore do BDI I e o WHOQOL-bref. A validade de constructo foi verificada por meio da realização da análise fatorial exploratória e semi-confirmatória. Resultados: As versões adaptadas apresentaram evidências de equivalências semântico-idiomáticas, culturais e conceituais, com elevada aceitabilidade. Os achados evidenciaram um coeficiente de alfa de Cronbach de 0,918 para o RPQ-Br e de 0,966 para o NSI-Br. Foram constatadas correlações significativas de moderada a muito forte entre os escores dos instrumentos adaptados na avaliação de sintomas depressivos e qualidade de vida. A análise fatorial exploratória demonstrou que a estrutura de fatores é diferentes do que foi encontrado nos instrumentos originais. Os instrumentos RPQ-Br e NSI-Br apresentaram estruturas compostas por dois e três fatores respectivamente, com saturações significativas ( > 0,40) e explicando respectivamente 56,5% e 65,3% da variância total do constructo. Os resultados relativos ao ajuste do modelo foram, de forma geral, satisfatórios (RPQ-Br: Goodness of Fit Index(GFI)=0,968, Adjusted for degree of Freedom(AGFI)=0,957, Root mean square error of aproximation(RMSEA) < 0,05, Bentler\'s Comparative Fit Index(CFI)=0,974; NSI-Br: GFI=0,992, AFGI=0,989, RMSEA < 0,05, CFI=1,016). Conclusão: As versões brasileiras do Questionário Rivermead de sintomas pós-concussionais e o Inventário de sintomas neuropsiquiátricos foram adaptados transculturalmente para o português brasileiro, apresentando medidas psicométricas confiáveis e válidas / Introduction: After a traumatic brain injury (TBI) post-concussion symptoms (somatic, cognitives, emotional or behavioral) are commonly reported by patients. Post-Concussion Syndrome (PCS) is the term to describe the presence of three or more post-concussion symptoms for periods of minimum three months. Around 30% of patients with mild and moderate TBI have persistent symptoms. Currently, there is no instrument that has been created, adapted or validated for the Brazilian context that evaluates post-concussion symptoms. Objective: This study aimed to tcross culturally, and assess the psychometrics properties of the Brazilian versions of Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire and Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory in patients post mild and moderate TBI. Method: The cross-cultural adaptation consisted of the following steps: translation, synthesis of translations, back translation, expert committee, pre-test. The analysis of psychometric properties were reliability and validity. A sample of 276 patients, between 19 to 87 years, from both sexes, who suffered mild or moderate TBI, answered the following instruments: sociodemographic and clinical instrument, the Brazilian version of the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ-Br) and the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI-Br), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI I) and the World Health Organization\'s quality of life questionnaire WHOQOL-bref. The reliability was verified through internal consistency, using the Cronbach\'s alpha. The content validity was evaluated by the degree of agreement of the expert committee using the Content Validity Index, and the Content Validity Coefficient. The convergent validity was verified using the analysis of scores of the translated instruments with BDI I and WHOQOL-bref score. The construct validity was verified using the exploratory factor analysis and semi-confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The brazilian versions presented evidences of semantic-idiomatic, cultural and conceptual equivalences, with high acceptability. The results showed a Cronbach\'s alpha coefficient of 0.918 (RPQ-Br) and 0.966 (NSI-Br). There were a significant moderate to very strong correlations between the scores of the adapted instruments with the evaluation of depressive symptoms and quality of life. The factor analysis showed structure of factors different from the original instruments versions. The RPQ-Br and NSI-Br instruments had structures composed of two and three factors, respectively, with significant saturations ( > 0.40) and explaining respectively 56.5% and 65.3% of the total construct variance. The results regarding the fit of the model were generally satisfactory (RPQ-Br: Goodness of Fit Index(GFI)=0.968, Adjusted for degree of Freedom(AGFI)=0.957, Root mean square error of aproximation(RMSEA) < 0,05, Bentler\'s Comparative Fit Index(CFI)=0.974; NSI-Br: GFI=0.992, AFGI=0.989, RMSEA < 0.05, CFI=1.016). Conclusion: The cross-cultural adaptation was successfully performed and the Brazilian versions of the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire and the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory presented reliable and valid psychometric measures for use in the Brazilian culture

<p>Трауматско оштећење мозга (ТОМ) настаје услед дејства спољашње мехничке силе на кранијум и ендокранијални садржај, које се карактерише привременим или трајним неуролошким оштећењем, функционалном онеспособљеношћу или психосоцијалном неприлагођеношћу. Најчешће коришћени предиктори исхода су године повређеног, иницијални Гласгов кома скор (ГКС), статус зеница на пријему, време протекло од момента повређивања до неурохируршког збрињавања, удружене повреде, хипоксија, хипертензија и налаз компјутерско-томографског снимања. Основни циљ истраживања је израда алгоритма ургентног лечења трауматског можданог оштећења и дизајн скале за рану предикцију исхода ТОМ уз додатну анализу појединих фактора на пријему (ГКС, неуролошки налаз, радиолошки налаз, клинички симптоми). Спроведено је ретроспективно и проспективно истраживање којим је обухваћено 568 испитаника који су у периоду од 1.6.2018. до 31.05.2019. лечени унутар Клиничког центра Војводине у Новом Саду због трауматске озледе мозга. Узорак је чинило 34,3% жена и 65,7 % мушкараца. Старосна структура узорка је од 18-96 године (М=56,56; SD=20,17). Свим пацијентима је по пријему начињена радиолошка дијагностика компјутеризованом томографијом (ЦТ), начињен је детаљан физикални и неуролошки преглед, те је детаљно узета анамнеза. Нотирани су следећи подаци: витални параметри (артеријски крвни притисак, сатурација крви кисеоником), статус и повреде других система органа, знаци повређивања главе и врата. За неуролошки преглед је коришћена ГКС скала. За ЦТ преглед је нотирано присуство интракранијалних трауматских лезија и прелома лобање. Резултати овог истраживања указали су на неопходност пажљивог разматрања бројних фактора (радиолошких и клиничких) који се могу испољити већ на самом пријему. Иако ЦТ има висок појединачни допринос предвиђању исхода у моделу са више варијабли није се издвојио као значајан. Пацијенти који су имали дужи период између времена протеклог од момента повређивања до неурохируршког збрињавања имали су бољи исход лечења. Предпоставља се да су пацијенти који су стизали раније у здравствену установу имали тежа трауматска оштећења мозга и самим тим исход је био лошији, док су пацијенти са благим оштећењима долазили касније управо из разлога што манифестације проблема нису биле хитне. Ротердам скала се издвојила добром дискриминативном способношћу када се користи као изолован инструмент. Као најјачи предиктори издвојили су се следећи предиктори: нису показане цистерне на ЦТ-у, присутан САХ, померање више од 5 mm, присутан мали субдурални хематом, присутна велика контузија, примена антиагрегациона тераpија. Успешност предвиђања на основу новог модела је 96%. Резултати студије се могу искористити за боље разумевање ТОМ у смислу лакшег решавања дијагностичких дилема и терапијских, креирање ефикаснијих дијагностичких протокола и прецизније процене исхода након повређивања. Предикција исхода лечења је од великог значаја како би се благовермено направио алгоритам лечења и праћења ових пацијената.</p> / <p>Traumatsko oštećenje mozga (TOM) nastaje usled dejstva spoljašnje mehničke sile na kranijum i endokranijalni sadržaj, koje se karakteriše privremenim ili trajnim neurološkim oštećenjem, funkcionalnom onesposobljenošću ili psihosocijalnom neprilagođenošću. Najčešće korišćeni prediktori ishoda su godine povređenog, inicijalni Glasgov koma skor (GKS), status zenica na prijemu, vreme proteklo od momenta povređivanja do neurohirurškog zbrinjavanja, udružene povrede, hipoksija, hipertenzija i nalaz kompjutersko-tomografskog snimanja. Osnovni cilj istraživanja je izrada algoritma urgentnog lečenja traumatskog moždanog oštećenja i dizajn skale za ranu predikciju ishoda TOM uz dodatnu analizu pojedinih faktora na prijemu (GKS, neurološki nalaz, radiološki nalaz, klinički simptomi). Sprovedeno je retrospektivno i prospektivno istraživanje kojim je obuhvaćeno 568 ispitanika koji su u periodu od 1.6.2018. do 31.05.2019. lečeni unutar Kliničkog centra Vojvodine u Novom Sadu zbog traumatske ozlede mozga. Uzorak je činilo 34,3% žena i 65,7 % muškaraca. Starosna struktura uzorka je od 18-96 godine (M=56,56; SD=20,17). Svim pacijentima je po prijemu načinjena radiološka dijagnostika kompjuterizovanom tomografijom (CT), načinjen je detaljan fizikalni i neurološki pregled, te je detaljno uzeta anamneza. Notirani su sledeći podaci: vitalni parametri (arterijski krvni pritisak, saturacija krvi kiseonikom), status i povrede drugih sistema organa, znaci povređivanja glave i vrata. Za neurološki pregled je korišćena GKS skala. Za CT pregled je notirano prisustvo intrakranijalnih traumatskih lezija i preloma lobanje. Rezultati ovog istraživanja ukazali su na neophodnost pažljivog razmatranja brojnih faktora (radioloških i kliničkih) koji se mogu ispoljiti već na samom prijemu. Iako CT ima visok pojedinačni doprinos predviđanju ishoda u modelu sa više varijabli nije se izdvojio kao značajan. Pacijenti koji su imali duži period između vremena proteklog od momenta povređivanja do neurohirurškog zbrinjavanja imali su bolji ishod lečenja. Predpostavlja se da su pacijenti koji su stizali ranije u zdravstvenu ustanovu imali teža traumatska oštećenja mozga i samim tim ishod je bio lošiji, dok su pacijenti sa blagim oštećenjima dolazili kasnije upravo iz razloga što manifestacije problema nisu bile hitne. Roterdam skala se izdvojila dobrom diskriminativnom sposobnošću kada se koristi kao izolovan instrument. Kao najjači prediktori izdvojili su se sledeći prediktori: nisu pokazane cisterne na CT-u, prisutan SAH, pomeranje više od 5 mm, prisutan mali subduralni hematom, prisutna velika kontuzija, primena antiagregaciona terapija. Uspešnost predviđanja na osnovu novog modela je 96%. Rezultati studije se mogu iskoristiti za bolje razumevanje TOM u smislu lakšeg rešavanja dijagnostičkih dilema i terapijskih, kreiranje efikasnijih dijagnostičkih protokola i preciznije procene ishoda nakon povređivanja. Predikcija ishoda lečenja je od velikog značaja kako bi se blagovermeno napravio algoritam lečenja i praćenja ovih pacijenata.</p> / <p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) Is defined as temporary or permanent neurological damage, functional disability or psychosocial inadaptability occurring due to effects of external mechanical force to brain and cranium. Mostly used predictors are age, Glasgow coma scale score, pupillary reactivity, time from injury to neurosurgical intervention, combined injuries, hypoxia, hypertension and computed tomography (CT) findings. Basic goal of this research was to analyse TBI and design early outcome prediction scale together with the analysis of individual factors on admission (GCS, neurological status, radiological findings). This research was both retro and prospective and included 568 patients treated for TBI at Clinical centre of Vojvodina in Novi Sad from 01.06.2018. to 31.05.2019. Sample was made out of 34,3% females and 65,7 % males aged from 18 to 96 years ( M=56,56; SD=20,17). All patients had CT diagnostics preformed upon admission, had undergone detailed general and neurological examination and patient&rsquo;s history was taken. Physical examination included: vitals (arterial blood pressure, blood oxygenation), status and injuries of other organs, signs of injury to head and neck. GCS scale was used for neurological examination Computed tomography (CT) included presence of intracranial lesions and skull fractures. Results of this research showed importance of careful observation of multiple factors (radiological and clinical) that can be present at the time of admission. Despite CT having high individual predictive power for outcome, in multiple variable model it was not significant. Patients with longer time elapsed to treatment had better outcome. It is assumed that patients who arrived shortly after injury had severe TBI thus having worse outcome, while patients suffering from mild TBI arrived later and thus had better outcome right because their symptoms of TBI were not very symptomatic. Rotterdam scale showed good disciminative power. The strongest predictors were: CT absence of cisterns, present subarachnoid haemorrhage, midline shift over 5mm, presence of small subdural haematoma, presence of large contusion, presence of antiaggregational therapy. Predictive power based on primary model was 96%. Results of this study can be used for better understanding of TBI in order to solve some diagnostic dilemma, create more efficient diagnostic protocols and facilitate more precise outcome assessment after TBI. Prediction of treatment outcome is very important in order to timely design treatment algorithm of treatment and follow up of TBI patients.</p>