Bakgrund och problemdiskussion: Hållbarhet har blivit ett växande samtalsämne och ett ökat tryck på hållbarhet har lett till att ett lagkrav har tillsatts för att företag ska redovisa hållbarhet i årsredovisningen. Bland annat har GRI tagit fram riktlinjer för en tydlig struktur för hållbarhetsredovisningen men problemet är att företaget jobbar med olika intressenter och använder sig av olika indikatorer vid redovisningen vilket i sin tur gör det svårt att jämföra olika hållbarhetsredovisningar med varandra. Syfte och frågeställning: Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka vad svenska börsnoterade företag presenterar i sina hållbarhetsrapporteringar. Vidare är syftet att bidra till en ökad förståelse kring hur olika företags hållbarhetsrapportering skiljer sig åt innehållsmässigt både över tid och mellan branscher. Studiens svarar bland annat på frågeställningen om kring hur innehållet i hållbarhetsrapporterna har förändrats mellan 2015 och 2020. Metod: För att besvara studiens frågeställning genomförs en kvantitativ innehållsanalys på totalt tjugo olika företags hållbarhetsrapporteringar. I studien valdes granskning av börsnoterade företag från fyra olika branscher, totalt fem företag från varje bransch. För innehållsanalysen används ett kodningsschema som skapats utifrån kategorierna ekonomiskt, miljömässigt och socialt. Kategorierna är tagna från Triple Bottom Line. Analysen genomförs som en kvantitativ analys enligt ordmetoden och observerar samt markerar begrepp och ord som kan kopplas till kategorierna i kodningsschemat. I studien undersöks även ifall det finns någon statistiskt signifikant korrelation mellan antalet sidor som företagen presenterar och antalet observationer som gjorts. Empiri och slutsats: Resultatet från studien tyder på att företagens fokus i redovisningen har skiftat från social hållbarhet 2015 till att den miljömässiga hållbarheten istället är den kategori som presenteras mest frekvent 2020. Innehållsmässigt i företagens redovisning är det i princip samma begrepp som används de båda åren. Det är endast inom den miljömässiga kategorin som nya begrepp eller att vissa miljömässiga delar har blivit ett större avsnitt i företagens rapportering. Från studien är den största skillnaden mellan åren omfattningen av företagens redovisning, antalet observationer och sidor ökade från 2015 till 2020. Korrelationen mellan variablerna visar även statistisk signifikans. / Background and problem discussion: Sustainability has become a growing topic of discussion and an increased pressure on sustainability has led to a legal requirement being added for companies to report sustainability in the annual report. Among other things, GRI has developed guidelines for a clear structure for sustainability reporting, but the problem is that the company works with different stakeholders and uses different indicators in the reporting, which in turn makes it difficult to compare different sustainability reports with each other.     Purpose and question: The purpose of this study is to investigate what Swedish listed companies present in their sustainability reports. Furthermore, the purpose is to contribute to an increased understanding of how different companies' sustainability reporting differs in content both over time and between industries. The purpose of the study is also to answer the questions about how the content of the sustainability reports has changed between 2015 and 2020.    Method: To answer the study's question, we carry out a quantitative content analysis of a total of twenty different companies' sustainability reporting. In the study, we have chosen to examine listed companies from four different industries, a total of five companies from each industry. For the content analysis, we will use a coding scheme that we do ourselves where we start from the categories economically, environmentally, and socially. The categories are taken from the triple bottom line. The analysis is performed as a quantitative analysis according to the word method where we observe and mark concepts and words that we link to the categories in our coding scheme. The study also examines whether there is any statistically significant correlation between the number of pages that companies present and the number of observations made.     Empirical data and conclusion: The results from the study indicate that the companies 'focus in the report has shifted from social sustainability in 2015 to that environmental sustainability is instead the category that is presented most times in 2020. In terms of content in the companies' accounts, the two concepts are used in the same way. the years. It is only in the environmental category that we find new concepts or that certain environmental parts have become a larger section in the companies' reporting. From the study, what distinguishes most between the years is the scope of companies' accounts, the number of observations and pages increased remarkably from 2015 to 2020. The correlation between the variables also shows statistical significance.

As a result of new information technology and globalization, there has never before been a time when people have had better access to information, than nowadays. The potential overload of information builds the basis for the research questions of this cumulative dissertation, which relates to the extensively discussed 'disclosure overload problem'. Special focus is put on decision-useful information in voluntary reporting of capital market-oriented companies. In this context the first manuscript investigates the quality of information in voluntary strategy reporting and formulates qualitative principles. Based thereon, the second manuscript examines determinants influencing the quality of strategy reporting. The third manuscript is focusing on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting and investigates the relation of transparency in CSR reports and external assurance. The prior discussed topics as well as financial reporting and new reporting concepts, like integrated reporting, are put into context in the fourth manuscript. In this educational case study special emphasis is placed on the determination of material information, which is of high importance for future decision leaders.

Bakgrund: CSR-redovisning skiljer sig åt mellan olika länder. Tidigare studier har funnit tvetydiga resultat huruvida kultur är en bidragande faktor till detta. Få studier har dock inkluderat ett jämställdhetsperspektiv i dessa typer av analyser. Syfte: Syftet med studien är att jämföra och förklara hur kultur och jämställdhet påverkar CSR-redovisningen i olika länder. Metod: Studien har använt en kvantitativ forskningsmetod och en deduktiv ansats. Datan består av sekundärdata från börsnoterade företag i Sverige, Norge, Kina, Indien, Tyskland och USA. Resultat: Resultatet tyder på att kulturen i landet påverkar hur företag CSRredovisar. Däremot kan vissa kulturdimensioner påverka CSRredovisningen mer än andra. Dessutom indikerar resultatet att ett lands grad av jämställdhet kan påverka CSR-redovisningen. Kunskapsbidrag: Genom att analysera vad kultur och jämställdhet har för effekt på CSR-redovisning, belyser denna studie vikten av att beakta dessa faktorer. Studien bidrar genom detta till befintlig forskning kring kultur, jämställdhet och CSR-redovisning.

Intresset för hållbarhet växer sig allt starkare och i takt med det har intressenternas krav på företag ökat. Företag kan använda hållbarhetsrapportering för att skapa legitimitet och förtroende. Genom att vara transparent kan de bemöta intressenternas behov. Välgjorda hållbarhetsrapporter som håller en hög kvalitet är därmed mer efterfrågade än rapporter av låg kvalitet. Studier om huruvida framtagandet av högkvalitativa rapporter är resurskrävande och/eller ger konkurrensfördelar genom ökad lönsamhet har visat varierade slutsatser. Denna studie genomfördes för att komplettera tidigare studier genom att analysera ifall branschtillhörighet, kvinnors inflytande, storlek på företag, rykte och image samt exponering i media påverkar lönsamheten via hållbarhetsrapporters kvalitet. Regressionsanalys, mediatoranalys och stiganalys framställdes för att testa studiens hypoteser. Resultaten indikerar att lönsamhet kan påverkas av hur och på vilket sätt företag hållbarhetsrapporterar. Studien visar ett positivt samband mellan andel kvinnor i styrelsen och hållbarhetsrapporters kvalitet samt mellan storlek på företag och lönsamhet, genom hållbarhetsrapporters kvalitet. Studien fann även ett positivt samband mellan rykte och image och lönsamhet, genom hållbarhetsrapporters kvalitet. Övriga sju hypoteser förkastades. / The interest in sustainability is growing and therefore the stakeholders’ demands on companies have increased. Companies can use sustainability reporting in order to sustain both legitimacy and trust. By being transparent, companies can fulfill the stakeholders’ needs. Sustainability reports of high quality are therefore more requested than reports of low quality. The issue of whether the use of high quality reports is expensive and/or generates a competitive advantage through increased profitability have shown varying results. This study was conducted to complement previous studies by analyzing whether industry, women on board, company size, reputation and image as well as media exposure affect profitability through the quality of sustainability reports. Regression analysis, mediation analysis and path analysis were created in order to test the study’s hypotheses. The results indicate that profitability can be affected by how and in what way companies report sustainability. The study shows a positive relationship between women on board and the sustainability reports’ quality and between company size and profitability, mediated through the sustainability reports’ quality. The study also found a positive relationship between reputation and image and profitability, mediated through the sustainability reports’ quality. The remaining seven hypotheses were rejected.

This masters's thesis deals with the characterisation of the concept of corporate social responsibility, aiming its attention on its limits and opportunities within the European Union. First part of the thesis focuses on the charactistics of the theoretical concepts and approaches to corporate responsibility, entrepreneurship and businesses, while second part adresses the possibilities of international and european support and control of business activities, especially of the european institutions and other initiatives within the european context

This diploma thesis focuses on the application of the concept of social responsibility in business practice of the companies ČSOB, a. s., Raiffeisenbank a. s. a Tesco SW, a.s. This application is based on mentioned theoretical foundations and qualitative research. The thesis also analyzes and evaluates the implementation of CSR strategy in chosen companies. The aim is to suggest activities to effective application of CSR philosophy for these companies.

Since the mid 1990s, the momentum behind Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has increased. CSR has become an important issue at political, academic and business level. Already since the beginning of the last decade, commentators have suggested that CSR seems to differ between European countries and that said differences appear to be shaped by the country context. Nevertheless, in general, so far, only few empirical cross-country studies have been conducted. In addition, said studies focused mainly on the comparison between Europe as a region and the US. The latter are biased by the selection of only few specific European countries, which are regarded as a proxy for Europe as a whole. Hence, said studies deliver partially contradictory results, since they do not consider that CRS is supposed to be Non-Pan-European. Moreover, cross-country studies of international character, going beyond that regional comparison, have been rather superficial in view of CSR issues to be investigated. And finally, only recently, cross-country research in CSR has started to establish a systematic link between CSR patterns and the country specific institutional context. Also in view of the latter, the focus has been set on the comparison between countries of Anglo American/Saxon tradition and Europe, considering again some specific European countries as a proxy for the region as a whole. <p>Given that lack in the literature, the following explicit calls for empirical cross-country research of CSR in Europe have been formulated: First, to explore differences in view of CSR; and second, to find out if country specific institutional mechanisms are influential in shaping said differences. <p><p>Hence, the dissertation aims at filling this gap and to answer said calls for research by presenting a cross-country research involving two European countries, Germany and Spain. The research aims at exploring differences in view of a variety of CSR issues and at finding out if the national institutional contexts are influential in shaping said differences. <p><p>The dissertation consists of five main parts. In part one, the introductory part, the following is pointed out: motivation, main theoretical frameworks of CSR and main CSR issues in CSR literature. Moreover, a detailed overview on the research design of the three papers, which form part two, three and four, is provided. <p><p>In part two, which is composed of one paper, differences in view of CSR concepts and CSR drivers (analytical framework) between Germany and Spain are explored. The methodology applied was a questionnaire-based postal survey among the 500 largest companies in both, Germany and Spain. <p>The results of the study suggest important differences between the two countries over the analytical framework. In comparison to Spanish companies, the German ones seem to be more attached to the "sustainability" concept of CSR, whereas the Spanish companies favour to a major extent the CSR concept, formulated by the EC and the "Triple Bottom Line" concept. In view of CSR drivers, the results imply that German corporations are to a major extent than their Spanish counterparts driven by secondary stakeholders, whereas corporations in both countries seem to be equally pressured by primary stakeholders to become engaged in CSR. In addition, the findings suggest that CSR in Spain seems to be more "voluntary", whereas, in Germany, it seems to be more "regulated". The analysis of the results with regard to "expectations on positive internal" and "positive external effects" as drivers to CSR suggests a "more competitive advantage centred" approach to CSR among Spanish companies than among German ones, where the corresponding approach is "less competitive advantage centred". And finally, the findungs further suggest, that the country context seems to be influential in shaping most of said differences. <p><p>Part three, which consists of one paper, deals with CSR reporting, which is assumed to deliver insights into the institutionalization of the leading reporting guidelines in CSR, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines, CSR agendas and the communicated rationale behind CSR. The methodology applied was quantitative contents analysis of CSR reports. As sample served companies of the utility industry, listed in the main stock indexes in Germany and Spain. <p>The findings of the study suggest that the institutionalisation of the GRI indicators is low in the corporations investigated in both countries. But, it is especially low in German firms. With regard to CSR agendas, the focus of corporate activities appears to lie among German corporations on those attached to environmental responsibilities, whereas Spanish corporations appear to have in this regard a mixed approach, related to their economic, environmental and social responsibilities. But, in contrast to their German counterparts the economic responsibilities are more emphasized. With regard to the communicated rationale behind CSR, German corporations seem to be driven by normative reasons, the Spanish to a major extent by instrumental ones. And finally, the findings imply that the country context seems to be influential in shaping most of said differences. <p><p>In part four, which contains one paper, differences in the understanding of CG in view of its links to CSR are explored. Currently, scholars discuss the link between CG and CSR and their relational models in the theoretical literature. Hence, to explore the understanding of CG and its links to CSR ,an analytical framework was elaborated, based upon said current theoretical debate. The methodology applied was qualitative contents analysis, conducted in the framework of a web site research. The sample consisted of corporations listed in the main stock indexes in both countries. <p>The findings suggest differences between the two countries with regard to the understanding of CG and its links to CSR and the corresponding relational models. In Spain the understanding of CG seems to be to a major extent linked to the "narrow view" of CG, implied by a major focus on shareholders only in view of corporate responsibilities. In contrast, among German corporations the view appears to be "broad", including other stakeholders than exclusively shareholders in this regard. In addition, the results suggest, that the relational model favoured by German corporations consists of CSR being considered as a part of CG, whereas the Spanish companies seem to relate CG to CSR or at least consider both, CG and CSR, as complementary constituents. And finally, the findings suggest that most of the exposed differences seem to be shaped by mechanisms of the traditional national CG systems. <p><p>In the final main part, part five, the overall conclusions of the dissertation have been formulated. These can be summarized as follows. From an overall perspective the three essays contribute to fill the lack in the literature as already pointed out. They constitute an original answer to the calls for research expressed in this regard. Moreover, they contribute to increase the knowledge on differences in CSR between European countries. And furthermore, through paying attention to country specific institutional mechanisms, they enhance the understanding of said differences induced by the country context or country specificity of CSR. In addition, the three essays have raised important implications for managerial practice, public policies, international and (supra) national institutions and for further research. In view of the implications for managerial practice, the findings suggest to sensitize practitioners with regard to the country specificity of CSR and to undertake corresponding measures in e.g. corporate communication, product and market strategies, employer marketing and organizational and management development terms. With regard to the implications for public policies, international and (supra) national organizations, those with regulatory power should increasingly bear in mind to handle more carefully the outsourcing of said power to private institutions, including NGOs, which play an important role in the "oluntary" regulation of CSR. In addition, those institutions, without regulatory power, which issue e.g. voluntary guidelines, should consider the country specificity of CSR and the "one size does not fit all" problem. Concerning the implications of the findings for further research these are the following: 1) to expand the CSR issues to be investigated in cross-country studies; 2) to intensify cross-country research in Europe in view of the number of countries involved; 3) to consider longitudinal approaches in cross-country research in Europe; 4) to expand said research (1-3) also to SMEs; 5) to increase the scope of institutional mechanisms to be investigated; and 6) to intensify cross-country linguistics research in view of CG and CSR. And finally, the findings of the three essays have delivered substantial contributions to enliven the debate, at academic and practitioner level, in view of the international management of CSR in terms of complexity vs. simplicity. <p> / Doctorat en Sciences économiques et de gestion / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished