Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:27:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RonaldoAS_DISSERT.pdf: 1297285 bytes, checksum: f762daa1e25aa98be1cb7dd5a019d145 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-12-15 / This paper aims to discuss the conflicts of competence in environmental matters, as well as the legitimacy of the normative acts in the exercise of jurisdiction effected environmental management. For this work, addresses the issue of federalism, North American (dual) and German (cooperative), deepening its historical and theoretical fundamentals, as well as the influences on the evolution of the ideological matrix of Brazilian federalism. Distinguishes itself around the problem the theoretical and abstract discussion involving the constitutional division of powers, and the issue of his relationship with the vicissitudes in the embracement of environmental matters that invariably leads to mistakes in the exercise of jurisdiction environmental management. Its highlight the existence of a framework environmental law, embodying the principles themselves as well as a specific object of authority, which qualifies a different interpretation of the rules of constitutional powers as well as influencing the acting agent of government in managing the public good environment. The study represents an exploratory research as it investigates the depths of the institutes are in evidence not only with satisfying its practical outcome. For this to happen, explores bibliographical sources and identified by the science of law as more important, as the search for social-political boundary which takes the issue studied in their historical and contextual materiality, whose study is essential for a complete understanding of the topic . The dialectic that arguments have been constructed throughout the monograph, attempts to pass a critical way to expose the author's ideas, which considers as essential in the arrival of new questions / Este trabalho tem o intuito de discutir os conflitos de compet?ncia em mat?ria ambiental, assim como a legitimidade dos atos normativos efetivados no exerc?cio da compet?ncia ambiental administrativa. Para tal empreitada, aborda o tema do federalismo, norte americano (dualista) e alem?o (cooperativo), aprofundando seus aspectos hist?ricos e te?ricos fundamentais, assim como as influ?ncias sobre a evolu??o da matriz ideol?gica do federalismo brasileiro. Distingue-se em torno do problema a discuss?o te?rico-abstrata que envolve a reparti??o de compet?ncias constitucionais, e a problem?tica de sua rela??o com as vicissitudes no abarcamento da mat?ria ambiental o que leva invariavelmente a equ?vocos no exerc?cio da compet?ncia ambiental administrativa. Destaca-se a exist?ncia de um regime jur?dico de direito ambiental, portador de princ?pios pr?prios assim como um objeto de tutela espec?fico, que qualifica uma diferente interpreta??o das regras de compet?ncias constitucionais assim como, agente influenciador da atua??o da administra??o p?blica na gest?o do bem p?blico ambiental. O trabalho constitui-se numa pesquisa de cunho explorat?rio, visto que investiga as profundezas dos institutos postos em evid?ncia n?o se satisfazendo apenas com o seu desenlace pr?tico. Para tal feito, explora fontes bibliogr?ficas e documentais apontadas pela Ci?ncia do Direito como mais importantes, assim como a busca pelo contorno social-pol?tico qual reveste a quest?o, estudados em sua materialidade hist?rica e contextual, cujo estudo ? fundamental para o completo entendimento do tema. A dial?tica com que os argumentos foram constru?dos ao longo do trabalho monogr?fico, tenta passar de modo cr?tico a exposi??o das id?ias do autor, qual entende como fundamental na chegada a novos questionamentos

"L’Eglise s’est toujours considérée comme un ordre infra-étatique (l’Eglise dans l’Etat avec ses paroisses et ses diocèses), tout en obéissant aux règles posées par une autorité étrangère à l’Etat, la papauté. De ce fait, l’Eglise est un ordre juridique concurrençant l’Etat, car elle exerce une domination sur le même territoire et les mêmes sujets. Le Gallicanisme se présente comme la synthèse permettant de régler juridiquement ces conflits. Il prône l’indépendance de l’Eglise de France et de l’Etat face à la papauté et suppose l’intervention du Souverain dans les affaires ecclésiastiques. Deux mécanismes juridiques essentiels servent à remplir ces fonctions. D’une part, au moyen des techniques assurant la réception des règles ecclésiastiques dans l’Etat, le Gallicanisme produit un discours technicien ancré dans une doctrine de la souveraineté, pour préserver l’existence d’une « exception française » menacée par les prétentions hégémoniques romaines. D’autre part, inventée pour résoudre les conflits de compétence opposant les autorités étatiques et ecclésiales, la procédure de l’appel comme d’abus subordonne l’Eglise de France à l’Etat par le contrôle juridictionnel de ses actes. Elle désigne l’Etat comme l’instance titulaire d’un pouvoir exclusif de déterminer l’étendue de sa propre compétence et de celle de l’ordre ecclésial. Envisagé sous l’angle des rapports entre ordres juridiques, le Gallicanisme apparaît alors comme une étape incontournable dans la construction intellectuelle de l’Etat moderne, à laquelle il fournit des supports théoriques et techniques". / By the properties that characterize it, Catholic Church is often considered, following the example of the State, as a legal system which takes place inside and outside State. Before the 1905 Act, Gallicanism struggles for independance of the Church of France and the State against papacy, encouraging Sovereign’s interventions in ecclesiastical affairs. Gallicanism can be translated in terms of relations between two legal systems, and the matter of this study is to prove this movement has been a momentum in the intellectual building of Modern State through the reflexion of french jurist from the Ancient Monarchy to the end of the 19th century. Church and State are, by many ways, concurrent systems aiming to dominate the same territory and the same subjects. Gallican thoughts present themselves like an answer to these conflicts. Canonical rules promulgated by the Pope or a Council are not self-executing, and have to be approved by the Sovereign to be Law of the State. Gallicanism build a technical discurse based on State sovereignty to preserve a french particularism against the Roman hegemonic threath. Invented to resolve conflicts of competences between ecclesiastical and State’s authorities, the procedure named « appel comme d’abus » gives exclusive power to the State to determine the extent of its competence. Furthermore this procedure subordinates Church of France to State by the judicial review of its administrative acts.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:25:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Frederico Araujo Seabra de Moura.pdf: 1669819 bytes, checksum: 70dd93ee53c67de98ef34bcabe0f5e4e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-09-18 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / The dissertation serves as a research of the function of complementary law amongst the Brazilian tax law context and it emphasizes controversial topics such as its general guidelines while it analyzes doctrinal tendencies developed - dichotomic and trichotomic views - pointing theirs theoretical bases, values and conclusions. In accordance with and utilizing Brazilian law as its main pillar, it formulates hermeneutical alternatives to the theories proposed while utilizing both perspectives partially. Still on this context, it reaches the primary and secondary functions of the tax general guidelines, bringing them before Brazilian fundamental laws and principles such as the federative, autonomy of States and Counties, equality and judicial security. Furthermore, it dissects the correlation between complementary laws, general guidelines, tax constitutional limitations and conflicts of competence. Thereupon, it infers with the towering pertinence of the influence of the general guidelines amongst tax payers, leviers and the Brazilian Federation / A dissertação objetiva pesquisar o papel desempenhado pela lei complementar no direito tributário brasileiro, com ênfase nas polêmicas normas gerais . Analisa as duas tendências doutrinárias que se formaram sobre a matéria correntes dicotômica e tricotômica , aponta suas bases teóricas, valores envolvidos e conclusões alcançadas. A partir daí, com base no direito positivo brasileiro, formula alternativa hermenêutica àquelas teorias, que aproveita parcialmente tanto uma, quanto outra perspectiva. Nesse contexto, aborda as funções primárias e secundárias das normas gerais em matéria tributária, diante de princípios intensamente prestigiados pelo direito brasileiro, como o federativo, o da autonomia dos Estados e Municípios, o da igualdade e o da segurança jurídica. Além disso, examina minuciosamente a correlação entre as leis complementares, as normas gerais, as limitações constitucionais ao poder de tributar e os conflitos de competência. Com isso, conclui pela alta relevância que aquelas normas desempenham na esfera dos contribuintes, dos entes tributantes e, em conseqüência, da própria Federação brasileira

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:29:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Douglas Mota.pdf: 698862 bytes, checksum: 234cc4213e60197298d1f6d5e543418b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-10-07 / Supported by the bibliography presented at the end of this paper, this study aims to analyze the spatial aspect contained in the tax juridical rule. Within this context, it is mandatory to examine the Constitution, in particular the distribution of tax competences, insofar as we intend to demonstrate that, by describing the materiality that may be possibly reached by the laws that create taxes, the Federal Constitution prevents conflicts between the units that form the Brazilian federation, therefore this matter is not at the mercy of rules of lower hierarchy, as there will be no room for fictions that may distort the constitutional delimitations. A different situation is that of international multiple taxation, and because it occurs in other plane, that of sovereignty of the States, it cannot be mediated by the Constitution of one of them. These requisites ─ presented in the first part of this paper, with no prior criticism of dissenting views (although put to test) ─ will suit the purpose of the final part of this study, i.e., the analysis of the rules that introduce the taxes within the authority of the Federal Government, the States and the Cities. At the end, it will be possible to find that the worries that gave rise to this study are dispelled to the extent that we conclude that the Federal Constitution limited the field of action of the taxing authorities and does not allow them to push the limits of their ruling spaces / Apoiado nos referenciais bibliográficos indicados ao final deste trabalho, o presente estudo tem como objetivo a análise do aspecto espacial contido na norma jurídico tributária. Neste contexto, se mostra mandatório debruçar-se sobre o texto constitucional, em especial a distribuição das competências tributárias, uma vez que se pretende demonstrar que ao descrever a materialidade possível de ser alcançada pelas leis instituidoras de tributos, a Constituição Federal evita conflitos entre os entes formadores da federação brasileira, não ficando, portanto, à mercê das normas de inferior hierarquia, já que não cede espaço para as ficções que possam desvirtuar as delimitações constitucionais. Situação diferente é o caso da pluritributação internacional, a qual por se dar em outro plano, o da soberania dos Estados nacionais, não aceita a mediação do texto constitucional de um deles. Estes pressupostos apresentados na primeira parte deste trabalho, sem censura prévia a visões discordantes (porém, colocadas à prova) servirão ao propósito da parte derradeira do estudo, qual seja, a análise das normas instituidoras dos tributos de competência da União, Estados e Municípios. Ao final, será possível constatar que as inquietações que originaram este estudo se desfazem, na medida em que se conclui que a Constituição Federal delimitou o campo de atuação dos entes tributantes, não permitindo que extrapolem seus respectivos espaços normativos