Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-27T14:20:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Michella Regia Enrica Costa.pdf: 775636 bytes, checksum: c950b6cf5f803fbe80f45b405e44ed0e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-03-19 / In seeking to understand the relationships that permeate the fulfillment of the alternative penalty, this study aimed to investigate the impact of justice perceptions on the attitude and subjective well-being of the convict. Therefore, the study was divided into two parts. The first explores the conceptual parameters about the theories that formed the theoretical basis of the research and the second refers to the empirical study itself and deals with the possible correlations between the variables. The subjects selected for the empirical study were doers of penalties and alternative measures monitored by Interdisciplinary Criminal Sector, linked to the sentencing stick and alternative measures of Criminal Forum of Goiânia-GO. The participants were recruited by convenience regardless of age, sex or education and invited to respond freely scales about crime, penalty and about their satisfaction with life. After the quantitative data analysis, confirmed the general hypothesis that subjective well-being of the convict is positively associated with the accurate perception of the procedures performed during the trial, however, this relationship is better explained when mediated by attitude penalty received. Thus, it was found that the attitude towards the penalty is what makes difference in subjective well-being of the one who commits a crime. It is hoped that this result enriches the scientific literature, stimulate new research, contribute to a more accurate view about the offender, and finally provide the judiciary new direction for appropriateness of the penalty. / Na busca pela compreensão das relações que permeiam o cumprimento da pena alternativa, o presente trabalho teve como objetivo principal investigar o impacto das percepções de justiça sobre a atitude e o bem-estar subjetivo do apenado. Para tanto, o estudo foi dividido em duas partes. A primeira explora os parâmetros conceituais acerca das teorias que compuseram a fundamentação teórica da pesquisa e a segunda, refere-se ao estudo empírico propriamente dito e versa sobre as possíveis relações entre as variáveis. Os sujeitos selecionados para o estudo empírico foram cumpridores de penas e medidas alternativas, monitorados pelo Setor Interdisciplinar Penal, vinculado à vara de execução de penas e medidas alternativas do Fórum Criminal de Goiânia-GO. Os participantes foram recrutados por conveniência, independentemente de idade, sexo ou escolaridade e convidados a responderem livremente escalas acerca do crime, da pena e sobre sua satisfação com a vida. Após a análise quantitativa dos dados, confirmou-se a hipótese genérica de que o bem-estar subjetivo do apenado está associado positivamente à percepção justa dos procedimentos realizados durante o julgamento, porém, esta relação é bem melhor explicada quando mediada pela atitude frente à pena recebida. Assim, foi possível constatar que a atitude frente à pena é o que faz diferença no bem-estar subjetivo daquele que comete um crime. Espera-se com este resultado enriquecer a literatura científica, estimular novas pesquisas, contribuir para um olhar mais acurado acerca do autor do crime, e, finalmente, proporcionar ao poder judiciário novo direcionamento para adequação da pena.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:27:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MonicaFerreira daSilva1.pdf: 467290 bytes, checksum: ca026a06bcf5ae3c741a0ae7ba17c9d5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-02-06 / Universidade Estadual Paulista J?lio de Mesquita Filho / The present study has got as its main goal understanding the relationship between convict parents and their children, inside the prision environment itself. The theoretical matter of the reseach has got its basis on three discussion points: the first point deals with the current social and political combination of events and the contradictions which are generated by the current economical conditions, which contribute to massive imprisionment and the prisions role in the current society ; the second point presents some theoretical basis about the human development under an ecological perspective basis of the human development; and, at last, it relates the convict's family members in the prision environment. For this study seven male parents have been interviewed, they have been aleatoricly chosen, and only their parenthood contidions have been considered. The interview, which has been previously structured, has been one of the instruments to gather the data themselves, as well as to guide the searcher to understand the working fields. In the analysing process of the collected data, the information is organized in two parts: the first one has discussed the results gotten from the interviews with the convicts' parents and the second one has dealed with the data collected along the searcher's watching over the people who took part in such a search and in the working fields. The results show, in a general way, that prision generates an impact in the relationship between parents and their children, as well as in the familiar relationship. They also show that such an institution isn't ready to deal with such a question, and that very little has been known about such a reality. / O presente estudo teve como objetivo geral compreender a rela??o entre pais presidi?rios e seus filhos, no ambiente prisional. O embasamento te?rico da pesquisa est? estruturado em tr?s eixos de discuss?o: o primeiro eixo discutese a atual conjuntura s?cio-pol?tica e as contradi??es geradas pelo atual modelo econ?mico, contribuindo dessa forma para o encarceramento massivo e o papel das pris?es no modelo atual; o segundo apresenta-se alguns fundamentos te?ricos acerca do desenvolvimento humano sob a perspectiva da abordagem ecol?gica do desenvolvimento humano; e, por ?ltimo, descreve os familiares no espa?o prisional. Foram entrevistados deste estudo sete pais presidi?rios, escolhidos aleatoriamente, levando em conta somente sua condi??o de pai. A entrevista, com roteiro semi-estruturado, foi um dos instrumentos para a coleta de dados, assim como o di?rio de campo da pesquisadora. No processo de an?lise dos dados colhidos, as informa??es s?o organizadas em duas partes: a primeira discutiu os resultados obtidos por meio das entrevistas com os pais presidi?rios e a segunda, trabalhou com os dados coletados durante as observa??es participantes e dos di?rios de campo. Os resultados indicaram, de um modo geral, que a pris?o gera impactos na rela??o pai e filho e na fam?lia, e que a institui??o n?o est? preparada para lidar com essa quest?o, conhecendo muito pouco dessa realidade.

Kaip teigiama Statistikos departamento prie Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės, Lietuvoje įkalinimo bausmę, pataisos namuose, atlieka 8000, už įvairius nusikaltimus nuteistų asmenų1. Toks pats, arba labai artimas tam skaičius buvo ir 2009 metais. Pasak, Euro stato2, kriminalinės statistikos duomenų bazės suvestinės sudaro 230 nuteistųjų, 100000 Lietuvos gyventojų. To paties šaltinio teigimu, pagal šį skaičių, Lietuva patenka į pirmą, didžiausią kalinių skaičių turinčių valstybių dešimtuką. Lietuvoje, kaip ir daugumoje postsovietinių šalių, laisvės atėmimas yra dažniausiai taikoma bausmė. Įkalinimo laikas yra pakankamai ilgas, per jį asmuo praranda ryšius su šeima, draugais. Jis nebetenka iki įkalinimo bausmės, turėtų profesinių sugebėjimų, o dažnai jų ir visai nėra turėjęs. Ryšių su artimiausia aplinka praradimas, ilgas įkalinimo bausmės laikas apsunkina šių asmenų sėkmingą integraciją, skatina kartotinį nusikalstamumą.Problema: Lietuvoje įkalinimo bausmės laikas yra ilgas. Per įkalinimo laikotarpį žmogus praranda ryšius su šeima, visuomene, praranda iki įkalinimo turėtus darbinius įgūdžius.Problema: Lietuvoje įkalinimo bausmės laikas yra ilgas. Per įkalinimo laikotarpį žmogus praranda ryšius su šeima, visuomene, praranda iki įkalinimo turėtus darbinius įgūdžius.Nagrinėjama tema yra aktuali visuomenei, kadangi pilniausiai atspindi nusikalstamumo fenomeną. Žmogus, gyvenantis visuomenėje dažniausiai dėl nepalankių aplinkybių šeimoje, artimiausioje aplinkoje, nepakankamai... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / 1. During the investigation a hypothesis has been confirmed that the repeated criminality of the persons who served imprisonment sentence is connected with the duration of the sentence and the demerit of the successful resocialiasation process of the persons who are punished with the imprisonment sentences. 2. When reviewing scientific literature it has become clear that the state defines the direction of its activity in the following way: it expresses its will through the nation’s legally selected representatives and also seeks to defend the mankind from criminal actions. This is called politics. The population defence is carried out through criminal and sentence prosecution policies. Both of them form social politics. Criminal policy defines criminal actions. Sentence prosecution policy deals with the state Criminal policy but it is being realized in the sentence prosecution and commitment sphere. The aim of these policies is population defence. The state Sentence prosecution policy being carried out through the branch of Penitentiary law is called sentence prosecution or penitentiary law. Penitentiary law deals with social relationships which appear when prosecuting or serving the sentences. As it is obvious from the sources of penitentiary law, the aim of this sentence is not only to put the criminal into prison or to restore legitimacy but also to influence him not to commit crimes in the future. Penitentiary law fulfills its function only in connection with other... [to full text]

No description available.

Cerebral lateralization was once thought to be unique to humans, but is now known to be widespread among the vertebrates. Lateralization appears to confer cognitive advantages upon those that possess it. Despite the taxonomic ubiquity and described advantages of lateralization, substantial individual variation exists in all species. Individual variation in cerebral lateralization may be tied to individual variation in behaviour and the selective forces that act to maintain variation in behaviour may also act to maintain variation in lateralization. Sex differences may also be an important source of variation in lateralization, as differences between males and females are often observed. Here, I present three papers that collectively deal with the interrelationships between sex, behaviour and cerebral lateralization in the convict cichlid. My results illustrate that lateralization is related to personality-like characteristics in the convict cichlid, and that there are important differences between the sexes in their pattern of lateralization.

<p>Предмет докторске дисертације јесте индивидуализација казне затвора, и то три њена нераздвојна аспекта &ndash; криминолошки, кривичноправни и пенолошки. Први део рада, посвећен је криминолошком аспект индивидуализације казне затвора. Кривичноправним аспектима индивидуализације казне затвора посвећен је други део рада. Предмет истраживања у трећем делу рада јесте пенолошки аспект индивидуализације казне затвора.</p><p>Разноврсни су криминогени фактори који утичу на појединца да учини кривично дело, али они пре свега могу бити субјективни и објективни. У току кривичног поступка, они се вреднују и утичу на саму индивидуализацију казне затвора. Осим тога, њихов значај је огроман и у току извршења затворске казне. Зато су криминолошки аспекти нераздвојни од кривичноправних и пенолошких аспеката.</p><p>За свако кривично дело прописана је казна у распону, тако да се кривичним законодавством Републике Србије не прописује казну која је апсолутно одређена, нити казна која је апсолутно неодређена. С обзиром на то да се казне затвора прописује у распону судија у кривичном поступку мора да је индивидуализује, на основу одређених околности. Те околности су пре свега оне које се односе на личност учиниоца кривичног дела. Овде је реч о индивидуализацији казне затвора у ужем смислу, о којој одлучује суд.</p><p><br />Казна затвора се индивидуализује и након што осуђујућа пресуда постане правноснажна, и траје све док се и сама казна не изврши. У току извршења казне затвора личност осуђеника је главни критеријум за индивидуализацију казне у самом казненом заводу, а сама индивидуализација се спроводи пре свега од стране затворских власти. Осим тога, казна затвора се индивидуализује и кад се извршава у просторијама у којима осуђени станује. Овде је реч о индивидуализацији казне затвора у ширем смислу.</p><p><br />Циљ истраживања предметне проблематике јесте да се укаже на актуелно стање у вези са индивидуализацијом казне затвора у теорији, да се анализирају прописи из ове области и предоче законска решења из појединих држава који се тичу предметне проблематика. Крајњи циљ јесте да се укаже на значај<br />индивидуалиације казне затвора како у поступку изрицања казне, тако и у поступку извршења и да се дају конкретни de lega ferenda предлози.</p> / <p>Predmet doktorske disertacije jeste individualizacija kazne zatvora, i to tri njena nerazdvojna aspekta &ndash; kriminološki, krivičnopravni i penološki. Prvi deo rada, posvećen je kriminološkom aspekt individualizacije kazne zatvora. Krivičnopravnim aspektima individualizacije kazne zatvora posvećen je drugi deo rada. Predmet istraživanja u trećem delu rada jeste penološki aspekt individualizacije kazne zatvora.</p><p>Raznovrsni su kriminogeni faktori koji utiču na pojedinca da učini krivično delo, ali oni pre svega mogu biti subjektivni i objektivni. U toku krivičnog postupka, oni se vrednuju i utiču na samu individualizaciju kazne zatvora. Osim toga, njihov značaj je ogroman i u toku izvršenja zatvorske kazne. Zato su kriminološki aspekti nerazdvojni od krivičnopravnih i penoloških aspekata.</p><p>Za svako krivično delo propisana je kazna u rasponu, tako da se krivičnim zakonodavstvom Republike Srbije ne propisuje kaznu koja je apsolutno određena, niti kazna koja je apsolutno neodređena. S obzirom na to da se kazne zatvora propisuje u rasponu sudija u krivičnom postupku mora da je individualizuje, na osnovu određenih okolnosti. Te okolnosti su pre svega one koje se odnose na ličnost učinioca krivičnog dela. Ovde je reč o individualizaciji kazne zatvora u užem smislu, o kojoj odlučuje sud.</p><p><br />Kazna zatvora se individualizuje i nakon što osuđujuća presuda postane pravnosnažna, i traje sve dok se i sama kazna ne izvrši. U toku izvršenja kazne zatvora ličnost osuđenika je glavni kriterijum za individualizaciju kazne u samom kaznenom zavodu, a sama individualizacija se sprovodi pre svega od strane zatvorskih vlasti. Osim toga, kazna zatvora se individualizuje i kad se izvršava u prostorijama u kojima osuđeni stanuje. Ovde je reč o individualizaciji kazne zatvora u širem smislu.</p><p><br />Cilj istraživanja predmetne problematike jeste da se ukaže na aktuelno stanje u vezi sa individualizacijom kazne zatvora u teoriji, da se analiziraju propisi iz ove oblasti i predoče zakonska rešenja iz pojedinih država koji se tiču predmetne problematika. Krajnji cilj jeste da se ukaže na značaj<br />individualiacije kazne zatvora kako u postupku izricanja kazne, tako i u postupku izvršenja i da se daju konkretni de lega ferenda predlozi.</p> / <p>The subject of the doctoral thesis is the individualization of incarceration and its three inseparable aspects &ndash; the criminological, criminal-law and penological aspect. The first part of the thesis deals with the criminological aspect of the individualization of incarceration. The criminal-law aspect of the individualization of the punishment of incarceration is discusses in the second part. The subject of the third part is the penological aspect of the individualization of incarceration.<br />There are various criminogenic factors which influence an individual to commit a crime, but they are, first and foremost, divided into the subjective and objective. During a criminal procedure they are evaluated and then influence the individualization of incarceration. Furthermore, they are of great importance during the execution of a prison sentence. Because of this, the criminological aspects are inseparable from the criminal-law and penological aspects.<br />Punishments are perscribed within certain ranges for every crime. The criminal law of the Republic of Serbia also does not define punishments absolutely, nor does it leave a punishment absolutely undefined. Considering the fact that the punishment of incarceration is perscribed in a certain range, the judge in a criminal procedure must individualize it based on the existing circumstances. These circumstances include, above all, those concerning the personality of the defendant. The subject here is the individualization in its narrow sense, which falls under the jurisdiction of the court.<br />The punishment of incarceration is further individualized after a sentence becomes final and produces legal effect until the complete execution of the sentence. During the execution of a prison sentence the personality of the convict is the main criteria for the individualization of the sentence within the detention center itself, first and foremost by the prison authorities themselves. Apart from this, the punishment of incarceration is also individualized when it is being executed in the place of residence of the convict. This is the individualization of the prison sentence in its broader sense.<br />The goal of the research of this subject is to highlight the current state of individualization of incarceration in theory, to analyze legislation from this field and to present legal solutions of certain countries concering the subject. The final goal is to stress<br />the importance of the individualization of incarceration in the process of sentencing as well as during the execution of a sentence and to give concrete de lega ferenda proposals.</p>

The common law right of the accused to be protected against double jeopardy recently acquired constitutional status in South Africa. Although South African courts previously applied this rule in various procedural contexts, there has been very little critical discussion of the values on which the rule is based. Nor have all contexts in which the rule should be applied been recognised. In the light of the new constitutional dispensation, it has become necessary to identify and analyse the values which determine the application of the rule. This thesis addresses the treatment of various aspects of double jeopardy in other constitutionally·grounded jurisdictions. Double jeopardy jurisprudence in the jurisdictions of England, Canada, India, Germany and the federal system of the United States of America is considered on a comparative basis. The historical origin and development of the rule are considered first. This is followed by an assessment of the current application of the rule in the various jurisdictions. The study demonstrates that South African courts have relied largely on outdated principles derived from English common law, rather than applying the rule by focusing on the values that underlie the rule. This approach has become unacceptable in the new constitutional dispensation, inter alia, because a teleological, value·orientated interpretative approach has been adopted by the Constitutional Court. This thesis indicates which of the principles that developed in foreign constitutional double jeopardy jurisprudence may be of value in developing an appropriate body of South African constitutional double jeopardy principles. Proposals are made for future implementation of the rule in various procedural contexts. These suggestions include constitutional interpretation, legislative amendment and re·evaluation of various common law principles of criminal procedure / Criminal & Procedural Law / LL.D. (Criminal & Procedural Law)

Thesis (MPhil)--Stellenbosch University, 2000. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The research problem of this study is "The use of prison labour in die Western Cape agriculture". The aim of this qualitative-historical study was to determine how this system of labour was established, functioned and eventually came to an end. To research this topic was not easy. Most of the documentary sources have been destroyed. Therefore, the main source of information were interviews with the relevant prison wardens and guards, as well as farmers who used prison labour in the past. Prison labour played only a small part in the penal system of the Cape Colony before the nineteenth century. The focus of punishment was on the body of the criminal - inflicting physical pain. Since the early 1800's prisoners were used for the maintenance of roads and on work in Governmental gardens. Prisoners were rented ' . out to farmers, on an informal basis, since 1806. A formal system of prison labour, based on the principle of rehabilitating punishment, was introduced by the Governor John Montagu in 1843. For example, prisoners were classified according to their behavior, rather than their crimes. In 1888 free prison labour was abolished and a standard wage was introduced. The use of prison labour by private persons increased systematically after the Second World War. The reason for this was a growing labour shortage in especially agriculture. The system of farm prisons or so-called "outposts" was established to address this problem. In 194 7 the Landsdown Commission accepted the principle of farm prisons. The first farm prison was opened in 1953. The establishment of these outposts had a twofold aim: firstly, it supplied farmers with a constant source of labour. Secondly, it served as a deliverance for the state, as this would relieve the overcrowding in prisons and reduce costs. Between 1953 and 1988 a_total of thirteen outposts were established in the Western Cape. Farmers' unions carried the costs of building the prisons and were also responsible for their maintenance. The Department of Prisons was responsible for the appointment of prisonguards and their remuneration. A Central Outpost Committee was established that served as a link between the various farmers' unions and the Department. South Africa's policy on prison labour was in line with the United Nations' "Standard Minimum Rules" for the treatment of prisoners, having rehabilitation as main objective. However, this system of farm prisons clashed with the international trade ethos of the time. It was seen as "slave labour" that gave South African farmers an unfair competitive advantage. In 1988 prison labour was terminated and outposts were closed, due to the threat of sanctions and boycotts of South African agricultural products. The empirical evidence of this study largely supports the Marxist interpretation of punishment in society. According to Ma.rXism, punishment systems and prison labour serve the economic interests of the dominant classes. At the same time it also gives credence to the Weberian interpretation, in which the systematic monitoring and treatment of prisoners are a manifestation of the tendency towards increasing rationalisation in Western society. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die navorsingsprobleem van hierdie studie is "Die gebruik van gevangene arbeid in die Wes-Kaapse landbou". Die doel van hierdie kwalitatief-historiese ondersoek was om vas te stel hoe hierdie sisteem van arbeid ontstaan, gefunksioneer en tot 'n einde gekom het. Navorsing van hierdie onderwerp was nie maklik nie. Die meeste dokumentere bronne was reeds vemietig. Gevolglik moes hoofsaaklik staatgemaak word op onderhoude met hoofde en bewaarders van gevangenisse, asook boere wat destyds van gevangene arbeid gebruik gemaak het. Gevangene arbeid het 'n relatief klein rol gespeel in die strafstelsel van die Kaapkolonie voor die negentiende eeu. Die klem van straf was op die liggaam van die beskuldigde - die toepassing van fisiese pyn. Vanaf die vroee 1800's 1s gevangenes egter gebruik vir die instandhouding van strate en vir werk m Regeringstuine. V anaf 1806 is gevangenes ook op informele basis aan boere uitgehuur. 'n Formele stelsel van gevangene arbeid, gebasseer op die beginsel van rehabiliterende straf, is in 1843 deur die destydse Goeweneur John Montagu ingestel. Gevangenes is byvoorbeeld geklassifiseer volgens hul optrede, eerder as hul misdaad. In 1888 is gratis gevangene arbeid afgeskaf en voorsiening is gemaak vir 'n standaard loon. Na die Tweede Wereldoorlog het die gebruik van gevangene arbeid deur privaat persone sistematies toegeneem. Die rede hiervoor was 'n groeiende arbeidstekort in veral die landbou. Laasgenoemde is hoofsaaklik aangespreek deur die stelsel van plaastronke of sogenaamde "buiteposte". In 194 7 het die Landsdown Kommissie plaastronke in beginsel goedgekeur. Die eerste plaastronk, of "buitepos" soos daarna verwys is, is in 1953 geopen. Die oprigting van buiteposte het 'n tweeledige doel gehad: eerstens, het dit vir boere'n konstante voorraad van arbeid te verskaf. Tweedens was dit vir die staat 'n uitkoms, aangesien dit die oorbevolking in stedelike tronke sou verlig en kostes sou besnoei. Daarbenewens sou hierdie nuwe stelsel hydra tot die rehabilitasie van korter-termyn gevangenes. Tussen 1953 en 1988 het daar altesame dertien buiteposte in die Wes-Kaap bestaan. Boereverenigings het die oprigtingskoste van die onderskeie tronke gedra. Hierbenewens moes hulle ook ondemeem om die tronke te onderhou, terwyl die Departement van Gevangenisse verantwoordelik was vir die beskikbaarstelling van bewaarders en hul vergoeding. 'n Sentrale Buiteposkomitee is gestig wat as skakel gedien het tussen die betrokke boereverenigings en die Departement. Suid-Afrika se beleid rakende gevangene arbeid was in pas met die Verenigde Nasies se "Standaard Minimum Reels" vir die behandeling van gevangenes, met rehabilitasie as sentrale motief. Die stelsel van plaastronke het egter ingedruis teen die intemasionale handels-etos van die tyd en is as "slawe arbeid" gesien wat vir SuidAfrikaanse boere 'n onregverdige mededingende voordeel gegee het. Uit vrese vir sanksies en boikotte van Suid-Afrikaanse landbou produkte, is gevangene arbeid gestaak en buiteposte teen die einde van 1988 gesluit. Die empiriese getuienis van hierdie ondersoek staaf in 'n groot mate die Marxistiese interpretasie van straf in die samelewing. Hiervolgens dien strafstelsels en gevangene arbeid die ekonomiese belange van die dominante klasse. Terselfdertyd steun dit die Weberiaanse interpretasie waarvolgens die sistematiese monitering en behandeling van gevangenes in tronke 'n manifestasie 1s van die tendens tot toenemende rasionalisasie in die Westerse samelewing.

This diploma thesis deals with special pedagogue role in system of treating with prisoners at the department custody and department of imprisonment. It also describes all the activities and programs, which are prepared by special pedagogue for accused and convinced. There is described the work of special pedagogue in Remand Prison Praha-Pankrác. The research was based on observations, case reports and interviews.

The common law right of the accused to be protected against double jeopardy recently acquired constitutional status in South Africa. Although South African courts previously applied this rule in various procedural contexts, there has been very little critical discussion of the values on which the rule is based. Nor have all contexts in which the rule should be applied been recognised. In the light of the new constitutional dispensation, it has become necessary to identify and analyse the values which determine the application of the rule. This thesis addresses the treatment of various aspects of double jeopardy in other constitutionally·grounded jurisdictions. Double jeopardy jurisprudence in the jurisdictions of England, Canada, India, Germany and the federal system of the United States of America is considered on a comparative basis. The historical origin and development of the rule are considered first. This is followed by an assessment of the current application of the rule in the various jurisdictions. The study demonstrates that South African courts have relied largely on outdated principles derived from English common law, rather than applying the rule by focusing on the values that underlie the rule. This approach has become unacceptable in the new constitutional dispensation, inter alia, because a teleological, value·orientated interpretative approach has been adopted by the Constitutional Court. This thesis indicates which of the principles that developed in foreign constitutional double jeopardy jurisprudence may be of value in developing an appropriate body of South African constitutional double jeopardy principles. Proposals are made for future implementation of the rule in various procedural contexts. These suggestions include constitutional interpretation, legislative amendment and re·evaluation of various common law principles of criminal procedure / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL.D. (Criminal & Procedural Law)