Spelling suggestions: "subject:"criminals."" "subject:"liminals.""
131 |
An empirical test of some leading theories of delinquencyStephens, Richard, January 1966 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1966. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.
|
132 |
Assessing an age-graded theory of informal social control : are there conditional effects of life events in the desistance process? /Doherty, Elaine Eggleston. January 2005 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 143-155). Also available on the Internet.
|
133 |
Self-concept and locus-of-control : a comparative study of first-time and repeat felons.Wunderle, Janice F. January 1981 (has links)
No description available.
|
134 |
The dangerous criminal and incapacitation policies /Gabor, Thomas January 1983 (has links)
No description available.
|
135 |
A cross-cultural analysis of the criminality level index /Cho, Sung Tai January 1967 (has links)
No description available.
|
136 |
The relationship between correctional education and training of inmates and their parole success /Broadbent, James H. January 1973 (has links)
No description available.
|
137 |
PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS OF THERAPEUTIC REHABILITATIONHodson, John D., 1948- January 1976 (has links)
No description available.
|
138 |
Working with the families of probationers: the impact of the offence on the family and the implications forsocial work intervention陳興泰, Chan, Hing-tai, Christopher. January 1977 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Social Work / Master / Master of Social Work
|
139 |
Explicating and testing a general theory of crime.Zager, Mary Ann. January 1993 (has links)
Gottfredson and Hirschi's A General Theory of Crime (1990) motivated much research on the concept of self-control and its relationship to crime, delinquency, and deviant behavior. Although researchers are aware of this theory's contribution to criminological research, some confusion about the exact nature of the relationship between self-control and criminal behavior (as specified by Gottfredson and Hirschi) remains. To clarify this relationship, the assumptions most vital to the theory are explained. One theorem derived from these assumptions regards the role of opportunity in deviant behavior. Gottfredson and Hirschi clearly posit opportunity as a necessary but not sufficient condition for criminal (and analogous non-criminal) behavior to occur. The precise role of opportunity in self-control theory, however, is somewhat unclear in Gottfredson and Hirschi's work. The present work clarifies this element of opportunity, searches for a measure of self-control that is opportunity free, and addresses the relationship between this type of measure and delinquent behavior using data from the National Youth Survey. The role of opportunity in this theory is clarified using gender differences in delinquent behavior as a tool for separating the components of opportunity. Using gender differences in several delinquent behaviors, the existence of the two components of opportunity (one inherent in the act and one inherent in the actor) is confirmed. After establishing these elements of opportunity, gender differences are used to facilitate the search for a measure of self-control that is distinct from both. This attitudinal measure raises the issue of the role of attitudes in Gottfredson and Hirschi's theory. The final analysis focuses on the relationships between attitudes (both children's and parent's) and children's delinquent behavior. Log-linear models are used to specify the structures of these relationships, which are complimentary to Gottfredson and Hirschi's assumptions regarding social norms, parental influence on children's value systems, and an individual's ability to engage in behaviors that they realize are inappropriate.
|
140 |
Lietuvos Respublikos institucijų darbuotojų neteisėta veikla emigracijos srityje 1920 – 1939 m / Illegal activities of staffers of Republic of Lithuania in emigration field, 1920 – 1939Kazlauskaitė, Asta 17 June 2011 (has links)
Lietuvos nepriklausomybės paskelbimas 1918 metais sudarė savarankiškos valstybės egzistavimo prielaidas. Greta politinių valstybės pagrindų kūrimo iškilo užduotis apsiginti nuo kaimyninių valstybių intervencijos, spręsti socialinio pobūdžio problemas bei suformuoti stabilią ekonominę sistemą, kuri padėtų tėvynėje gyvenusiems lietuviams sukurti geresnes gyvenimo perspektyvas ir sumažinti emigracijos srautus. Deja, stabilios ekonominės sistemos formavimas Lietuvoje buvo gan sudėtingas procesas, kuris tęsėsi visą Pirmosios Respublikos laikotarpį. Dauguma to meto gyventojų, tiesiogiai susidūrę su skurdaus gyvenimo realybe: darbo stoka, mažais atlyginimais, socialinės apsaugos stygiumi, rinkosi emigracijos į tolimąsias Šiaurės arba Pietų Amerikos šalis galimybę. / Upon reinstatement of independence of Lithuania in 1918, needed to solve the most popular problem – to lay the independence foundations. Upon reinstatement of political foundations Lithuania had to: protect from neighbouring countries, solve social problems, build a stable economic system. These methods helped in creation a better life of Lithuanians, reduce the prospects of emigration flows. Unfortunately, a stable economic system in Lithuania was quite complex, all of the time of extending the process. Most of the time people were directly confronted with the reality of scarce life: lack of work, social security, low wages, wchich became the reason for emigration to the North or South American countrys.
|
Page generated in 0.0279 seconds