Zugl.: Köln, Univ., Diss.

Orientador: Anna Regina Lanner de Moura / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-25T23:39:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rodrigues_AnaCeciliaMozAlves_M.pdf: 896049 bytes, checksum: 323e86d743d0d9f1eb782f65a0393e2e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 / Resumo: O presente trabalho busca problematizar, através de uma visão terapêutica Wittgensteiniana, os significados da escola, para uma comunidade caiçara localizada em uma reserva ecológica no sul do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Utilizando-se da desconstrução, proposta por Derrida, as falas dos entrevistados serão trabalhadas em narrativas que buscarão intercalar as questões trazidas pelos personagens com enxertias buscadas na bibliografia. As narrativas se propõem a desfazer paradigmas usuais buscando os rastros dos significados das palavras e expressões trazidas nas falas. O objetivo é abrir novas possibilidades e novas visões, através de uma prática terapêutica, que possam auxiliar no desdobramento das principais questões abordadas / Abstract: The present study aims to problematize, through a Wittgensteiniana therapeutic view, the meanings of school for a Caiçara comunity, located in an ecological reserve at the Southern of Rio de Janeiro state. Adopting the deconstruction, proposed by Derrida, the comments of the interviewees will be built in narrative structures, which will aim to intercalate the issues brought by the characters with graftings taken from the bibliography. The narratives are proposed to undo common paradigms, fetching the traces of the meanings of the words and expressions brought in the comments. The goal is to open possibilites and new views, through a therapeutic practice, which may help in the deployment of the main issues addressed / Mestrado / Ensino de Ciencias e Matematica / Mestra em Ensino de Ciências e Matemática

Les dix premières années de l'œuvre de Jacques Derrida, soit de la traduction et de l'introduction à L'origine de la géométrie de Husserl (1962) jusqu'à Marges de la philosophie (1972), développent progressivement la «pensée» de la différance. La visée centrale de ce mémoire consiste à décrire la genèse de la différance en insistant sur la déconstruction de l'origine. Nous posons deux questions : 1) de quelle manière Derrida analyse-t-il le concept d'origine présent dans la philosophie de la présence?; et 2) de quelle manière -à partir de cette analyse du concept d'origine- en vient-il à proposer le « concept » de différance? Nous tenterons donc de démontrer que ce n'est que par le biais de la déconstruction du concept d'origine et par sa rayure que Derrida en vient à émettre sa « philosophie » de la différance.

This study postulates the existence of a notion of transcendence in immanence in the thought of Jacques Derrida. The deconstruction of, amongst others, Husserlian phenomenology and Saussurean structuralism, affords Derrida the opportunity of presenting a thought of contamination, haunting and impurity, which is a thought of transcendence in immanence. The hypothesis of a notion of transcendence in immanence in Derrida’s thought is refined by specifying it as temporal transcendence in immanence. Accordingly, the intimation of transcendence in immanence does not amount to the ontological acceptance of a separate transcendent realm. On the contrary, what appears is a monism: the infinite finitude of temporality. In conversation with the notion of temporal transcendence in immanence intimated in Derrida’s thought, this study proposes a notion of theological transcendence in immanence. Theological transcendence in immanence is presented as an inflected interpretive performance of salient themes from the tradition of Christian theology prior to the advent of modernity. From this perspective, all being is referred to God and finite creation is deemed to be a contingent, non-necessary participation, at an unquantifiable analogical remove, in the life and being of God. The notions of space, time and meaning that emerge from such a premise are subsequently explored, and brought into conversation with the corresponding notions in Derrida’s work. The study concludes by asking whether the conversation between the notions of temporal and theological transcendence in immanence can in any way be furthered, or whether the two positions should rather be regarded as irreconcilable, that is, as lying separatively transcendent to each other. In response, it is suggested that the notion of transcendence in immanence implies the attempt to relate juxtaposed positions after the fashion of transcendence in immanence. The possibility of temporal transcendence in immanence inhabiting theological transcendence in immanence after the fashion of transcendence in immanence is firstly considered and rejected. Thereupon, the reverse option, namely that of theological transcendence in immanence making use of temporal transcendence in immanence, iii while at the same time transcending it, is considered and judged to be a suitable provisional outcome of the conversation with Derrida. / Religious Studies and Arabic / D. Litt. et Phil. (Religious Studies)

This study postulates the existence of a notion of transcendence in immanence in the thought of Jacques Derrida. The deconstruction of, amongst others, Husserlian phenomenology and Saussurean structuralism, affords Derrida the opportunity of presenting a thought of contamination, haunting and impurity, which is a thought of transcendence in immanence. The hypothesis of a notion of transcendence in immanence in Derrida’s thought is refined by specifying it as temporal transcendence in immanence. Accordingly, the intimation of transcendence in immanence does not amount to the ontological acceptance of a separate transcendent realm. On the contrary, what appears is a monism: the infinite finitude of temporality. In conversation with the notion of temporal transcendence in immanence intimated in Derrida’s thought, this study proposes a notion of theological transcendence in immanence. Theological transcendence in immanence is presented as an inflected interpretive performance of salient themes from the tradition of Christian theology prior to the advent of modernity. From this perspective, all being is referred to God and finite creation is deemed to be a contingent, non-necessary participation, at an unquantifiable analogical remove, in the life and being of God. The notions of space, time and meaning that emerge from such a premise are subsequently explored, and brought into conversation with the corresponding notions in Derrida’s work. The study concludes by asking whether the conversation between the notions of temporal and theological transcendence in immanence can in any way be furthered, or whether the two positions should rather be regarded as irreconcilable, that is, as lying separatively transcendent to each other. In response, it is suggested that the notion of transcendence in immanence implies the attempt to relate juxtaposed positions after the fashion of transcendence in immanence. The possibility of temporal transcendence in immanence inhabiting theological transcendence in immanence after the fashion of transcendence in immanence is firstly considered and rejected. Thereupon, the reverse option, namely that of theological transcendence in immanence making use of temporal transcendence in immanence, iii while at the same time transcending it, is considered and judged to be a suitable provisional outcome of the conversation with Derrida. / Religious Studies and Arabic / D. Litt. et Phil. (Religious Studies)

Qu'en est-il de l'instance théologique dans le texte de Jacques Derrida? Il s'agit de montrer, d'une part, que le texte derridien opère la déconstruction de l'économie théologique et, d'autre part, qu'il pointe vers une pensée anéconomique, dont le champ peut être investi par du théologique. En d'autres termes, la déconstruction derridienne de l'instance théologique n'est pas sans reste. Il paraît possible de dégager l'inscription de ce reste dans le texte même de Derrida: le théologique y paraît comme supplément dans la mesure où il supplée une béance qu'il dessine et laisse ouverte à la fois. À travers le passage incessant et non "relevable" (par exemple sous la forme hégélienne de la synthèse) entre une "déconstruction du théologique" et une "anéconomie théologique" se dessine le caractère athéologique de la déconstruction derridienne, interprétée ici comme discours de l'entré.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

This is a study of the relationship between the works of Giorgio Agamben and Jacques Derrida. It explains how the vantage point of Agamben's thought is achieved by rendering Derridean terminology inoperative. It is argued that this enactment of suspension with regards to Derrida is Agamben's way of undoing a theological structure of thought that philosophy has unknowingly appropriated. Agamben claims a position that is decidedly post-Derridean, and it is from this position that his sometimes baffling claims about philosophy and its tradition obtain their justification. The closure of the Derridean era and the inoperativity of Derridean terminology is sealed and traced by a messianic motif. Only Derrida can object to the naivety of Agamben's claims, as he did in his final seminar-series. For anyone else to make such objection would be to take the bait. This is because the apparently dizzying magisterial position that Agamben occupies makes sense only in a philosophical landscape wherein Derrida has become obsolete. However, this thesis will argue how Derrida's thought even in its desuetude continues to exert influence, now as a paradigm of language. As Agamben recalls in his essay “The Messiah and the Sovereign”: “[...] in the Jewish tradition the figure of the Messiah is double. Since the first century B.C.E.., the Messiah has been divided into Messiah ben Joseph and a Messiah ben David. The Messiah of the house of Joseph is a Messiah who dies, vanquished in the battle against the forces of evil; the Messiah of the house of David is the triumphant Messiah, who ultimately vanquishes Armilos and restores the kingdom” (Agamben 1999a, 173). The vanquished messianic force here represents Derrida's work that in its defeat releases its positive messianic twin, the thought of Agamben. In the first chapter of this thesis I will give an introduction to Agamben's thought specifically speaking to the motif of the messianic in its relation to infancy. In the second chapter the outline of the messianic exhaustion of the law of potentiality will be examined closely in the literary figure of Herman Melville's scribe Bartleby. In the third chapter it will be argued that in the philosophical constellation Bartleby's role as the paradigm of the self-capacity and passion of writing is fulfilled by Derrida. This is argument is presented against the background of the theme of life in philosophy. Furthermore, this chapter presents a close reading of Derrida's khōra essay as a counterpart to Agamben's text on Bartleby. Finally, in the fourth chapter, the positive gains of Agamben's thought are explored by looking at two messianic tableaus: life and writing. Life is explored the shape of a contingent “being”, a “creature” in the theological sense – yet one that has vanquished its theological condition of abandonment. In this sense, the modality of contingency is sought in a condition of being theologically disenchanted. Furthermore, passing beyond the Derridean paradigm of pharmacology, a new paradigm of writing is indicated.