Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-02T21:42:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Silvia Palmieri2.pdf: 781946 bytes, checksum: 04d34f504c722e96a227f1ea390ebf9c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-07-27 / O número de Instituições de ensino e alunos têm aumentado e a efetividade na gestão acadêmica torna-se assunto relevante. Simultaneamente ao aumento de estudantes, a tecnologia da informação tem evoluído rapidamente, o que tem propiciado novas oportunidades de ensino e profusão de informações. Infelizmente, no sentido oposto ao da qualidade de ensino, esse cenário tem propiciado o surgimento e crescimento de uma variedade de situações e oportunidades para que o comportamento academicamente desonesto se desenvolva. Uma possível associação entre desonestidade acadêmica e o comportamento antiético no ambiente de trabalho é defendida por vários autores, alertando que comportamentos éticos dos estudantes podem gerar melhores líderes de organizações no futuro e aconselhando que se estabeleçam universidades provedoras de princípios morais e íntegros. O objetivo deste trabalho é contribuir para o entendimento dos fatores antecedentes da atitude dos alunos em relação à desonestidade acadêmica, por meio da identificação das associações que possam existir entre aspectos individuais e de grupo. Fundamentado inicialmente na Theory of Planned Behavior TPB (Teoria do Comportamento Planejado) de AJZEN (1991), e com base em extensa revisão de literatura, criou-se um modelo de pesquisa instrumentalizado como um pré-teste a estudantes de uma IES particular como forma de operacionalizar os construtos, obtendo-se 116 respostas válidas. Os dados foram obtidos a partir de uma survey eletrônica e analisados por Modelagem com Equações Estruturais, em particular com base no algoritmo Partial Least Squares PLS. As estimativas de coeficientes foram feitas pela técnica Bootstrap, com 1000 reamostragens, com reposição. Com base no pré-teste os resultados indicaram que a percepção das práticas do grupo é especialmente influente no comportamento acadêmico desonesto do indivíduo (Beta = 0,39; p< 0,00), mas também que a idade do aluno é inversamente proporcional à intensidade com que essa desonestidade se manifesta (Beta = -0,24; p<0,00). Adicionalmente, a característica pessoal de idealismo mostrou ser provável um fator de contenção da atitude favorável à desonestidade (Beta =-0,25; p<0,05), mas mecanismos como o desengajamento moral indicam sua provável presença identificada (Beta = 0,25; p<0,05), desfavorecendo o processo de autorregulação do aluno, o que amplia a atitude de desonestidade acadêmica. Optou-se pela técnica de análise multivariada com Modelagem de Equações Estruturais, considerada adequada para análise simultânea de relações entre construtos, e considerada uma técnica de caráter confirmatório, utilizada para determinar a validade do modelo teórico diante dos dados observados. Com algumas reformulações no instrumento, foi aplicada uma nova survey, quanto à coleta de dados foi aplicado um questionário eletrônico operado na plataforma Surveymonkey. O link do questionário foi enviado á uma população de 2000 alunos obtendo como retorno 146 respostas válidas. Nos resultados apresentados na pesquisa final destacam-se a influência da Percepção Social no comportamento da desonestidade acadêmica com coeficiente altamente significante (0,446***), também o desengajamento Moral frente à atitude e a Intenção/Comportamento com resultados expressivos quanto a influência do fator idade, apresentando o coeficiente (-0,156***). O estudo indica a possível existência de várias implicações para o gestor e para a comunidade acadêmica, permitindo desdobramentos em pesquisas futuras

As university faculty are often required to police academic misconduct among students, their attitudes and beliefs toward misconduct warrant investigation, particularly as the failure to act may exacerbate the incidence of students’ unethical behaviors. Therefore, this descriptive study examined faculty perceptions of academic dishonesty among students, institutional support, and self-plagiarism using an electronic-mail questionnaire (N = 201) and assessed the academic environment, frequency of student misconduct, and severity of those behaviors. Female faculty were more likely than male faculty to perceive high levels of cheating on exams (pppppppppp Additionally, online faculty were more likely than campus-based faculty to perceive higher levels of plagiarism among graduate students (p p Multi-way frequency analyses revealed significant interactions between the perceptions concerning academic integrity policies, institutional support, and understanding of self-plagiarism, thereby, resulting in the rejection of the three null hypotheses of no association. Overall, faculty remain troubled by self-plagiarism; their perceptions are mediated by gender and academic rank. Consequently, additional efforts should be made to educate instructional staff about the various forms of academic dishonesty including, but not limited to, self-plagiarism, double-dipping, and recycling; increase faculty understanding and awareness of misconduct; and encourage compliance with said policies.

Historically, cheating in universities has been limited to smuggling notes into exams, unauthorized cooperation, plagiarism and using ghost writers. New improvements in natural language processing now allow students to easily generate text, that is both unique and, in many ways, indistinguishable from what a human would create. These texts can then be submitted with little to no risk of getting caught by anti-cheating software. There are currently a multitude of such text generators online, which vary in ease of use, cost and capabilities. They are capable enough to generate unique text which will evade plagiarism-tools employed by universities. If you combine relatively cheap pricing, ease of use, pressure to perform well in school and low risk of detection. It is not too difficult to imagine that students will use tools like these to cheat. This thesis mainly focuses on whether humans can differentiate AI-generated essays from human written ones and what countermeasures can be used to hinder its use. By giving teachers at Halmstad University human and AI-generated text; then asking them to guess the source of text presented. The experiment concluded that teachers' ability to differentiate AI-generated text from human written text could not be proven.  This thesis also surveys the currently available detection methods for AI-generated text and determines that they are not sufficient in their current form. Lastly, this thesis showcases alternative examination methods that could be used instead of essay-style examinations.

In today's fast-paced, instant-gratification-oriented society, everyone is looking for quick fixes. We want it all and we want it now! This mindset is in conflict with the overall process of education and learning which requires time, reflection, and practice. More and more students are entering colleges and universities with weak academic preparation and deficient life skills. This often leads them to engage in unethical practices in order to compete, get ahead and survive academically. Declining academic integrity is a significant issue on almost all college campuses. The purpose of this study was to gain deeper insight into student nurses' perceptions of the concept of instant gratification in general and in nursing education in particular. The implications of the Trinity Paradigm of Intelligence in developing a culture of integrity were also explored. The emerged data supports the notion of "academic disintegrity" as a social problem with a long history of development.

A review of literature documents that higher education faculty are likely to be the target of student harassment. A scenario in which a person of lesser power in an organization harasses a person of greater power is known as contrapower harassment. Students' acts of harassment range from mild incivilities to aggressive and threatening behaviors. The purpose of this quantitative web-based survey study is to document (a) the prevalence of contrapower harassment in a sample of U.S. pharmacy school faculty (n = 110), a previously unstudied population, (b) gender differences in faculty experiences of contrapower harassment, (c) faculty characteristics which may predict harassment, and (d) differences in the level of contrapower harassment associated with accusing a student of academic dishonesty. It was proposed that contrapower harassment is the result of the college environment in which the student is treated as an entitled consumer. Critical systems, emancipatory, and organizational theories were used to help understand the environment that fosters faculty harassment. Analysis of quantitative data employed MANOVA, chi-square, and multiple linear regression. Results confirmed 94% of pharmacy faculty have experienced at least one of the harassing behaviors. Males reported greater levels of incivility and females experienced greater distress from sexual attention. The act of confronting a student for academic dishonesty increased student harassment including incivility, bullying, and sexual attention. Positive social change may result from identifying the prevalence of contrapower harassment in pharmacy schools, leading to changes in the university environment that foster student harassment of faculty.

Academically dishonest behaviors pose a major threat to education. High rates of cheating have been reported at all levels of education, and by most accounts seem to be on the rise. Classroom environment research has demonstrated that environments created by classroom teachers have a significant impact on many aspects of education. Using a mixed methods approach, the current study investigated the relationship between cheating and the high school classroom environment. Quantitative data were collected from two surveys. The Academic Integrity Survey (AIS) asked students to self report cheating behaviors, and the Classroom Environment Scale (CES) asked students about their perceptions of the classroom environment. Qualitative data were collected from classroom observations and student interviews. The results of this study indicate that the classroom environment is significantly related to student cheating; the more positive the environment, the less students will cheat. Regression analyses indicated that 2 CES subscales, order and organization and involvement, were negatively related to student cheating and explained 40% and 23% of the variance respectively. The regression analyses also indicated that 3 other study variables, school sports participation, after school employment, and grade level were positively related to student cheating and explained 15%, 12%, and 11% of the variance, respectively. Qualitative analyses yielded 5 major findings. It was found that students cheat more in environments where students are not involved, that lack order and organization, and that lack teacher control. Students cheat more when their teachers are oblivious and are not respected, and larger systemic issues are related to student cheating behaviors. This study represents rare attempts to access the student perspective on cheating as well as to understand teachers’ role in student cheating. This study concludes that teachers can reduce the rates of cheating in their classes by improving their classroom environments, especially in the areas of order and organization and student involvement, and by increasing their use of authentic standards based assessments. However, most of these improvements will only impact students’ opportunity to cheat. Educators will have a difficult time affecting students’ desire to cheat until larger systemic problems with the current educational system are addressed.

No description available.

The purpose of this study was to examine engagement in academic dishonesty in traditional and online college courses and the perceptions of online students toward academic dishonesty. Students enrolled in the Tennessee Regents Online Degree Program (RODP) who had taken both online and traditional courses were invited to participate in the study. The study included 635 valid surveys submitted electronically for a 15% response rate. The electronic survey was designed based on previous research studies. The survey collected data concerning rates of student engagement for academic dishonesty behaviors in traditional courses and in online courses, student perceptions of deterrence of academic dishonesty, student perceptions of the seriousness of academic dishonesty, and demographic data. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical tests. Analysis of variance tests were conducted for the research questions that addressed differences in the rates of academic dishonesty in online courses and traditional courses based on the demographic factors of age, gender, academic standing (GPA), classification, and field of study. Chi-square procedures were conducted to determine differences in academic dishonesty in four types of cheating. Linear regression was conducted to determine relationships between demographic factors and rates of academic dishonesty. Findings indicate that students reported significantly higher overall rates of academic dishonesty in traditional courses than in online courses. Significant differences were not found in the rates in traditional courses based on age, gender, academic classification, or intended field of study; however, rates were higher for respondents with lower grade point averages. Students reported more frequent engagement in cheating on tests than cheating on written assignments, cheating on out-of-class assignments, or using technology to cheat. Regression tests found a weak relationship between intended field of study and rates of academic dishonesty. A personal code of integrity was perceived to be the most effective deterrent, and cheating was considered only a moderate problem in higher education. Information from this study can benefit online students, instructors, and college administrators who deal with issues related to academic dishonesty and online learning. As online learning increases, further research on academic dishonesty is recommended.

No description available.

Most prior research and scholarship views cheating as an individual failing rather than a sociological or organizational phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to identify the challenges students face in graduate education and the factors that affect ethical beliefs towards academic dishonesty. This study used a mixed method research approach including an online survey with approximately 1,250 responses from graduate students representing each of UCF's colleges and fifteen interviews with students in fourteen different disciplines. Results of the online survey indicated no significant differences between international and domestic students. Survey and interview data indicate that graduate students' perceptions of the perceived norms and expectations related to academic honesty are impacted by the culture of the academic program. Analyzing these data through three sociological theories of deviance - anomie, labeling, and rational choice - shows that graduate students' understanding of appropriate academic behavior depends on their academic socialization. The data also reveal that graduate students struggle with subtleties of cheating, such as misrepresentation or "fudging" of data. Especially for the doctoral students in the sample, their views were highly influenced by viewing themselves as teachers and independent researchers. This sociological analysis emphasizes the role of culture in graduate programs and students' socialization into those cultures. This doctoral dissertation also provides a deeper understanding of the social and organizational factors affecting graduate students and re-frames students' perspectives on appropriate academic behavior.