Abstract The etiology of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is still unknown but genetic and enviromental factors play role in the pathogenesis. The aim of the study was to detect endoscopic and immunohistological changes in the gut in JIA compared with the controls and potential correlation of mucosal immunological activation with clinical activity of JIA. JIA patients (n=26) and negative controls (n=71) suffering from gastrointestinal symptoms without significant gastrointestinal disease were recruited for the study. Positive controls were patients with cows milk protein sensitive enteropathy (n=24). The intraepithelial lymphocytes counts, cytotoxic (granzyme A, B) and gamma/delta T-cell count and HLA-DR antigens were evaluated by using immunohistochemistry and messenger RNA expression levels of important immune mediators were assessed with real time PCR (RT-PCR) from fresh frozen intestinal mucosal samples. In JIA compared with negative controls, there was increased presence of lymphonodular hyperplasia and expression of HLA-DR antigens in abnormal mucosal cites, in crypts of the ileum. These changes were correlating with activity of JIA. In JIA compared with negative controls, there were found elevated granzyme B but decreased cytoprotective heat shock protein expression. The mRNA expression levels of anti- inflammatory mediators like TGFβ, IL10 and transcriptor factor of regulatory T-cells FOXP3, inversely correlated with activity of JIA. In conclusion, patients with JIA suffering from gastrointestinal symptoms display evidence of intestinal mucosal immune activation and there is an association between levels of mucosal immune alteration and clinical activity of JIA. These findings support the hypothesis that there is a link between the intestinal immune system and pathogenesis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. In order to confirm these findings, more extensive series of JIA patients without gastrointestinal symptoms needs to be examined. / Tiivistelmä Lastenreuman tautimekanismi on tuntematon. Geneettiset ominaisuudet ja ympäristötekijät ovat yhteydessä taudin syntyyn. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli selvittää, onko suolen limakalvolla endoskooppisia tai immunohistologisia muutoksia enemmän lastenreumassa kuin kontrolleilla, ja että liittyvätkö muutokset niveltaudin aktiivisuuteen. Tutkimukseen otettiin 26 suolioireista lastenreumapotilasta, 76 verrokkia joilla ei ollut autoimmuunisairautta sekä 24 viivästynyttä maitoallergiaa sairastavaa lasta, joille tehtiin suolen tähystystutkimus. Ohutsuolinäytteistä arvioitiin immunohistologisesti solunsisäisten lymfosyyttien, gamma/delta-positiivisten lymfosyyttien sekä sytotoksisten (grantsyymi-A ja -B) lymfosyyttien määrä. Lisäksi määritettiin immunohistologisesti ohutsuolen limakalvon epiteelisolujen HLA-DR- antigeenien ja epiteelisolua suojaavien lämpöshokkiproteiinien ilmenemistä sekä käänteis-PCR-menetelmällä keskeisten välttäjäaineiden lähetti-RNA-tasoja. Tutkimuksessa lastenreumaa sairastavilla esiintyi enemmän suolen imukudoskertymää (lymfonodulaarinen hyperplasia) negatiiviseen verrokkiryhmään nähden sekä HLA-DR antigeenejä epätyypillisellä alueella ohutsuolen loppuosan limakalvon kryptassa. Nämä löydökset olivat yhteydessä lastenreuman aktiivisuuteen. Lastenreumassa oli verrokkeja enemmän sytotoksisia lymfosyyttejä ja vähemmän lämpöshokkiproteiineja. Tulehdusta suojaavat lähetti- RNA-tasot korreloivat käänteisesti lastenreumataudin aktiivisuuteen. Väitöstutkimuksen suolioireisilla lastenreumapotilailla oli suolen limakalvolla muutoksia, jotka sopivat poikkeavaan antigeenien käsittelyyn. Nämä löydökset tukevat hypoteesia, että lastenreumassa suolen limakalvon immunologinen aktivaatio on yhteydessä taudin puhkeamiseen. Jotta tulokset voisi yleistää, tarvittaisiin jatkotutkimus, joka on tehty suolioireettomilla lastenreumapotilailla ja riittävällä otoskoolla.

Background: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) often leads to recurrent pain as well as exocrine and/or endocrine pancreatic insufficiency. This study aimed to investigate the effect of pancreatic head resections on glucose metabolism in patients with CP. Methods: Patients who underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD), Whipple procedure (cPD), or duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) for CP between January 2011 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed with regard to markers of pancreatic endocrine function including steady-state beta cell function (%B), insulin resistance (IR), and insulin sensitivity (%S) according to the updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA2). Results: Out of 141 pancreatic resections for CP, 43 cases including 31 PPPD, 2 cPD and 10 DPPHR, met the inclusion criteria. Preoperatively, six patients (14%) were normoglycemic (NG), 10 patients (23.2%) had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 27 patients (62.8%) had diabetes mellitus (DM). In each subgroup, no significant changes were observed for HOMA2-%B (NG: p = 0.57; IGT: p = 0.38; DM: p = 0.1), HOMA2-IR (NG: p = 0.41; IGT: p = 0.61; DM: p = 0.18) or HOMA2-%S (NG: p = 0.44; IGT: p = 0.52; DM: p = 0.51) 3 and 12 months after surgery, respectively. Conclusion: Pancreatic head resections for CP, including DPPHR and pancreatoduodenectomies, do not significantly affect glucose metabolism within a follow-up period of 12 months.

Die Durchfallerkrankung Giardiasis wird durch den Protisten Giardia duodenalis ausgelöst. Die Infektion erfolgt fäkal-oral, meist über kontaminiertes Trinkwasser. Der Parasit kolonisiert den oberen Bereich des Dünndarms und heftt sich an das Epithel, wodurch es die Krankheitsbeschwerden auslöst. Allerdings sind Details über die Mechanismen der Pathogenese unbekannt. Dazu kommt, dass der Ausgang einer Infektion fallspezifisch starken Schwankungen unterworfen ist, von selbst-limitierend bis chronisch und asymptomatischer Kolonisierung bis hin zur schweren Enteritis. Ein möglicher Pathomechanismus ist der Wegfall der Barrierefunktion des Dünndarmepithels, z.B. durch Beeinträchtigung von tight junctions oder Zelltod. In dieser Arbeit wurden Effekte von G. duodenalis auf in vitro Modellsysteme des humanen Dünndarmepithels untersucht. Dazu wurden hauptsächlich Daten über die Barrierefunktion sowohl von der weit verbreiteten Caco-2 Zelllinie, als auch über ein neu etabliertes humanes Dünndarmorganoidsystem, erhoben. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass mehrere - mitunter in der Literatur als hochvirulent beschriebene - G. duodenalis Isolate zu keinerlei Beeinträchtigung der Barrierefunktion oder irgendeiner anderen untersuchten potenziellen Schädigung an zwei unterschiedlichen Caco-2 Zelllinien unter diversen Infektions- und Kulturbedingungen führte. Jedoch andererseits das neu entwickelte Dünndarmorganoidsystem mit pseudo-luminalem Medium TYI S 33 reproduzierbar die Zerstörung des Epithelmodells mit Zellverlust, Zelltod (apoptotisch und nicht-apoptotisch), Störung der tight junctions (Abbau und Dislokation von Claudinen und ZO-1) und den Verlust von Mikrovilli innerhalb ein bis zwei Tage nach Parasiteninfektion zeigen konnte. Zudem wurde das Auftauchen von ClCa-1-Signalen unter andauerndem Infektionsstress beobachtet, was die Differenzierung bzw. Metaplasie zu Becherzellen nahelegt, jedoch keine Wirtsreaktion auf die Gewebszerstörung zu sein scheint. / The protozoan parasite Giardia duodenalis is the etiological agent for the intestinal diarrheal disease giardiasis. Infections are acquired via the fecal-oral route, mostly via uptake of cysts from contaminated drinking water. The colonization of the hosts’ duodenum and upper jejunum and the attachment of Giardia trophozoites onto the epithelium is the cause of a variety of gastrointestinal complaints but the exact pathomechanisms are unknown. Furthermore, the outcome of Giardia infections varies greatly between individuals, ranging from self-limiting to chronic, and asymptomatic to severe enteritis. One proposed mechanism for the pathogenesis is the breakdown of intestinal barrier function, e.g. by tight junction impairment or induction of cell death. In this work, effects of G. duodenalis on in vitro models of the human small intestinal epithelium were investigated by studying mainly barrier-related properties and changes of widely used Caco-2 cells as well as newly established human small intestinal organoid-derived monolayers (ODMs). It could be shown that several isolates of G. duodenalis, some described as highly virulent, fail to induce barrier dysfunction or any other investigated pathological effect on two Caco-2 cell lines under various infection and culturing conditions. On the other side, by developing a new organoid-based model system and the use of luminal mock medium TYI-S-33, considerable epithelial disruption (including loss of cells), cell death (apoptosis and non-apoptotic), tight junction impairment (degradation and dislocation of claudins and ZO-1), and microvilli depletion reproducibly induced by G. duodenalis trophozoites between one and two days after infection could be observed. Moreover, emergence of ClCa-1 positive cells with ongoing parasite infections suggest epithelial differentiation or metaplasia towards goblet cells, which is furthermore not associated to tissue damage.

<p>The duodenal epithelium secretes bicarbonate ions and this is regarded as the primary defence mechanism against the acid discharged from the stomach. For an efficient protection, the duodenum must also function as a sensory organ identifying luminal factors. Enteroendocrine cells are well-established intestinal “taste” cells that express signaling peptides such as orexins and guanylins. Luminal factors affect the release of these peptides, which may modulate the activity of nearby epithelial and neural cells.</p><p>The present thesis considers the effects of orexins and guanylins on duodenal bicarbonate secretion. The duodenal secretory response to the peptides was examined in anaesthetised rats <i>in situ</i> and the effects of orexin-A on intracellular calcium signaling by human as well as rat duodenal enterocytes were studied <i>in vitro</i>.</p><p>Orexin-A, guanylin and uroguanylin were all stimulants of bicarbonate secretion. The stimulatory effect of orexin-A was inhibited by the OX₁-receptor selective antagonist SB-334867. The muscarinic antagonist atropine on the other hand, did not affect the orexin-A-induced secretion, excluding involvement of muscarinic receptors. Orexin-A induced calcium signaling in isolated duodenocytes suggesting a direct effect at these cells. Interestingly, orexin-induced secretion and calcium signaling as well as mucosal orexin-receptor mRNA and OX₁-receptor protein levels were all substantially downregulated in overnight fasted rats compared with animals with continuous access to food. Further, secretion induced by Orexin-A was shown to be dependent on an extended period of glucose priming.</p><p>The uroguanylin-induced bicarbonate secretion was reduced by atropine suggesting involvement of muscarinic receptors. The melatonin receptor antagonist luzindole attenuated the secretory response to intra-arterially administered guanylins but had no effect on secretion when the guanylins were given luminally. </p><p>In conclusion, the results suggest that orexin-A as well as guanylins may participate in the regulation of duodenal bicarbonate secretion. Further, the duodenal orexin system is dependent on the feeding status of the animals.</p>

INTRODUÇÃO: Obesidade é, hoje, considerada uma pandemia, com cerca de 500 milhões de obesos no mundo, com cerca de 2,8 milhões de mortes por ano. A cirurgia de bypass gástrico é um importante tratamento para obesidade, porém, não é isenta de riscos. O dispositivo temporário de exclusão duodeno jejunal - DTED (EndoBarrier Gastrointestinal Liner® GIDynamics, Inc. Lexington, MA), apresenta-se como uma nova forma de tratamento endoscópico da obesidade. Apesar dos bons resultados, os mecanismos de ação do DTED ainda não foram estudados, podendo as alterações humorais e do esvaziamento gástrico promovidas, ser os principais responsáveis pelos resultados obtidos. OBJETIVO: Estudar as alterações promovidas pelo DTED no esvaziamento gástrico, e a relação destas alterações com os resultados clínicos de perda de peso e controle do diabetes tipo 2. MÉTODOS: Vinte e cinco obesos e com diabetes tipo 2, que fizeram uso do DTED por período mínimo de 16 semanas e máximo de 24 semanas, realizaram teste de esvaziamento gástrico cintilográfico, antes, durante a 16ª semana de uso e após 4 semanas de retirada do DTED. Foram obtidas medidas de peso e hemoglobina glicada. As médias e desvio-padrão de retenção gástricas foram obtidas e comparadas entre os três exames realizados, e, após, comparados entre os pacientes que obtiveram e os que não obtiveram melhora no parâmetro clínico selecionado (perda de peso maior que 10%, e hemoglobina glicada menor que 7%). Também se avaliou subjetivamente a sensação de saciedade e quantidade de alimento ingerido durante a 16ª semana de uso do dispositivo. RESULTADOS: Quando avaliadas médias de retenção, nota-se que, na 16ª semana de uso, há maior retenção para a primeira, segunda e quarta horas quando comparados ao baseline (1ª h 74 ± 16,3 % p=0,001, 2ª h 45 ± 25% p < 0,001; 4ª 15 ± 15,8% p < 0,001). Não há diferença estatística entre as retenções na 16ª semanas entre os pacientes que atingiram e os que não atingiram o controle do diabetes (p=0,73), entre os que perderam mais de 10% de peso e os que não perderam (p=0,275). Durante a 16ª semana de uso, 23 pacientes (92%) referiram maior sensação de saciedade precoce e maior saciação, e todos referiram comer em menor volume de em relação ao período prévio à colocação do dispositivo. CONCLUSÕES: O DTED causa lentificação no esvaziamento gástrico, reversível após sua retirada, porém esta alteração no esvaziamento gástrico, mesmo sendo sintomática, com aumento de saciedade e saciação, e com diminuição do volume de alimento ingerido, não tem relação com a perda de peso e melhora do diabetes / INTRODUCTION: Obesity is now considered a pandemic, with about 500 million obese worldwide, with about 2.8 million deaths per year. The gastric bypass surgery is an important treatment for obesity, however, not without risks. The temporary duodenal jejunal exclusion device - DTED (EndoBarrier ® Gastrointestinal Liner GIDynamics, Inc. Lexington, MA), presents itself as a new form of endoscopic treatment of obesity. Despite the good results, the mechanisms of action of DTED have not been studied, and the humoral changes and changes in gastric emptying promoted by the device maybe are the main mechanisms of action of the device. OBJECTIVE: To study the changes introduced by DTED in gastric emptying, and the relationship of these changes with clinical outcomes of weight loss and control of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Twenty five obese patients with type 2 diabetes who used the DTED for a minimum of 16 weeks and maximum 24 weeks underwent a scintigraphic gastric emptying test, before, during the 16th week of treatment and after 4 weeks of withdrawal the DTED. Measurements of weight, glycated hemoglobin were obtained. The mean and standard deviation of gastric retention were obtained and compared between the three tests, and after, compared between patients who were and those who showed no improvement in selected clinical parameters (weight loss greater than 10%, and lower glycated hemoglobin 7%). Also, a subjective evaluation of the feeling of satiety and amount of food ingested during the 16 weeks of device use was done. RESULTS: When evaluated average retention , we note that in the 16th week of use there is greater retention for the first, second and fourth hour compared to baseline (1st h 74 ± 16.3 % p = 0.001, 2nd h 45 ± 25 % p < 0.001 4th 15.8 ± 15 %, p < 0.001). There is no statistical difference among patients who achieved and those who have not reached the control of diabetes (p = 0.73) or among those who lost more than 10 % by weight and not lost (p = . 0.275) during the 16th week of treatment , 23 patients (92%) reported greater sense of early satiety and satiation greater, and all reported eating less volume of food in relation to the period prior to devide placement. CONCLUSIONS: The DTED cause delay in gastric emptying, reversible after withdrawal, though this change in gastric emptying, even being symptomatic with increased satiety and satiation , decreasing the volume of food ingested , has no relation to weight loss and improved diabetes

The duodenal epithelium secretes bicarbonate ions and this is regarded as the primary defence mechanism against the acid discharged from the stomach. For an efficient protection, the duodenum must also function as a sensory organ identifying luminal factors. Enteroendocrine cells are well-established intestinal “taste” cells that express signaling peptides such as orexins and guanylins. Luminal factors affect the release of these peptides, which may modulate the activity of nearby epithelial and neural cells. The present thesis considers the effects of orexins and guanylins on duodenal bicarbonate secretion. The duodenal secretory response to the peptides was examined in anaesthetised rats in situ and the effects of orexin-A on intracellular calcium signaling by human as well as rat duodenal enterocytes were studied in vitro. Orexin-A, guanylin and uroguanylin were all stimulants of bicarbonate secretion. The stimulatory effect of orexin-A was inhibited by the OX1-receptor selective antagonist SB-334867. The muscarinic antagonist atropine on the other hand, did not affect the orexin-A-induced secretion, excluding involvement of muscarinic receptors. Orexin-A induced calcium signaling in isolated duodenocytes suggesting a direct effect at these cells. Interestingly, orexin-induced secretion and calcium signaling as well as mucosal orexin-receptor mRNA and OX1-receptor protein levels were all substantially downregulated in overnight fasted rats compared with animals with continuous access to food. Further, secretion induced by Orexin-A was shown to be dependent on an extended period of glucose priming. The uroguanylin-induced bicarbonate secretion was reduced by atropine suggesting involvement of muscarinic receptors. The melatonin receptor antagonist luzindole attenuated the secretory response to intra-arterially administered guanylins but had no effect on secretion when the guanylins were given luminally. In conclusion, the results suggest that orexin-A as well as guanylins may participate in the regulation of duodenal bicarbonate secretion. Further, the duodenal orexin system is dependent on the feeding status of the animals.

INTRODUÇÃO: Obesidade é, hoje, considerada uma pandemia, com cerca de 500 milhões de obesos no mundo, com cerca de 2,8 milhões de mortes por ano. A cirurgia de bypass gástrico é um importante tratamento para obesidade, porém, não é isenta de riscos. O dispositivo temporário de exclusão duodeno jejunal - DTED (EndoBarrier Gastrointestinal Liner® GIDynamics, Inc. Lexington, MA), apresenta-se como uma nova forma de tratamento endoscópico da obesidade. Apesar dos bons resultados, os mecanismos de ação do DTED ainda não foram estudados, podendo as alterações humorais e do esvaziamento gástrico promovidas, ser os principais responsáveis pelos resultados obtidos. OBJETIVO: Estudar as alterações promovidas pelo DTED no esvaziamento gástrico, e a relação destas alterações com os resultados clínicos de perda de peso e controle do diabetes tipo 2. MÉTODOS: Vinte e cinco obesos e com diabetes tipo 2, que fizeram uso do DTED por período mínimo de 16 semanas e máximo de 24 semanas, realizaram teste de esvaziamento gástrico cintilográfico, antes, durante a 16ª semana de uso e após 4 semanas de retirada do DTED. Foram obtidas medidas de peso e hemoglobina glicada. As médias e desvio-padrão de retenção gástricas foram obtidas e comparadas entre os três exames realizados, e, após, comparados entre os pacientes que obtiveram e os que não obtiveram melhora no parâmetro clínico selecionado (perda de peso maior que 10%, e hemoglobina glicada menor que 7%). Também se avaliou subjetivamente a sensação de saciedade e quantidade de alimento ingerido durante a 16ª semana de uso do dispositivo. RESULTADOS: Quando avaliadas médias de retenção, nota-se que, na 16ª semana de uso, há maior retenção para a primeira, segunda e quarta horas quando comparados ao baseline (1ª h 74 ± 16,3 % p=0,001, 2ª h 45 ± 25% p < 0,001; 4ª 15 ± 15,8% p < 0,001). Não há diferença estatística entre as retenções na 16ª semanas entre os pacientes que atingiram e os que não atingiram o controle do diabetes (p=0,73), entre os que perderam mais de 10% de peso e os que não perderam (p=0,275). Durante a 16ª semana de uso, 23 pacientes (92%) referiram maior sensação de saciedade precoce e maior saciação, e todos referiram comer em menor volume de em relação ao período prévio à colocação do dispositivo. CONCLUSÕES: O DTED causa lentificação no esvaziamento gástrico, reversível após sua retirada, porém esta alteração no esvaziamento gástrico, mesmo sendo sintomática, com aumento de saciedade e saciação, e com diminuição do volume de alimento ingerido, não tem relação com a perda de peso e melhora do diabetes / INTRODUCTION: Obesity is now considered a pandemic, with about 500 million obese worldwide, with about 2.8 million deaths per year. The gastric bypass surgery is an important treatment for obesity, however, not without risks. The temporary duodenal jejunal exclusion device - DTED (EndoBarrier ® Gastrointestinal Liner GIDynamics, Inc. Lexington, MA), presents itself as a new form of endoscopic treatment of obesity. Despite the good results, the mechanisms of action of DTED have not been studied, and the humoral changes and changes in gastric emptying promoted by the device maybe are the main mechanisms of action of the device. OBJECTIVE: To study the changes introduced by DTED in gastric emptying, and the relationship of these changes with clinical outcomes of weight loss and control of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Twenty five obese patients with type 2 diabetes who used the DTED for a minimum of 16 weeks and maximum 24 weeks underwent a scintigraphic gastric emptying test, before, during the 16th week of treatment and after 4 weeks of withdrawal the DTED. Measurements of weight, glycated hemoglobin were obtained. The mean and standard deviation of gastric retention were obtained and compared between the three tests, and after, compared between patients who were and those who showed no improvement in selected clinical parameters (weight loss greater than 10%, and lower glycated hemoglobin 7%). Also, a subjective evaluation of the feeling of satiety and amount of food ingested during the 16 weeks of device use was done. RESULTS: When evaluated average retention , we note that in the 16th week of use there is greater retention for the first, second and fourth hour compared to baseline (1st h 74 ± 16.3 % p = 0.001, 2nd h 45 ± 25 % p < 0.001 4th 15.8 ± 15 %, p < 0.001). There is no statistical difference among patients who achieved and those who have not reached the control of diabetes (p = 0.73) or among those who lost more than 10 % by weight and not lost (p = . 0.275) during the 16th week of treatment , 23 patients (92%) reported greater sense of early satiety and satiation greater, and all reported eating less volume of food in relation to the period prior to devide placement. CONCLUSIONS: The DTED cause delay in gastric emptying, reversible after withdrawal, though this change in gastric emptying, even being symptomatic with increased satiety and satiation , decreasing the volume of food ingested , has no relation to weight loss and improved diabetes

Abdominal surgery inhibits gastrointestinal motility, a phenomenon referred to as postoperative ileus. Since the postoperative ileus disturbs duodenal physiology it is important to minimize the side effects of this condition. Recent experiments in our laboratory show that treatment of anaesthetised rats with parecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, prevents duodenal postoperative ileus, increases duodenal mucosal bicarbonate secretion and improves other functions as well. One aim of the thesis was to investigate whether removal of luminal chloride affect the parecoxib- and the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-induced stimulation of duodenal mucosal bicarbonate secretion. The proximal duodenum of anaesthetised Dark Agouti rats was perfused with isotonic solutions containing zero or low Cl- and the effect on luminal alkalinisation determined. The basal as well as the parecoxib-induced increase in alkalinisation, but not that stimulated by VIP, were markedly reduced in the absence of luminal Cl-. One important function of the duodenum is to adjust luminal osmolality towards that in the blood. It is believed that the adjustment of osmolality in the duodenum is achieved by osmosis and diffusion of electrolytes along their concentration gradients and that these processes occur predominately paracellularly. Another aim of the thesis was to examine whether prevention of postoperative ileus affects the duodenal response to luminal hypertonicity. The proximal duodenum of anaesthetised Dark Agouti and Sprague-Dawley rats were perfused with hypertonic solutions of different composition and osmolality and the effects on duodenal motility, alkaline secretion, transepithelial fluid flux, mucosal permeability and the adjustment of luminal osmolality were determined in absence and presence of parecoxib. It is concluded that COX-2 inhibition increases duodenal mucosal bicarbonate secretion by stimulating apical Cl-/HCO3- exchange in duodenocytes. Furthermore, pretreatment of anaesthetised rats with parecoxib improves a number of duodenal functions in both rat strains that contribute to improve the ability to adjust luminal osmolality. The choice of rat strain is another important feature to consider when interpreting the results because the DA strain was more responsive to luminal hypertonicity than the SD strain. Finally, several evidences are provided to suggest that the adjustment of luminal osmolality in the rat duodenum is a regulated process.

Introdução: Os antiinflamatórios não esteróides (AINEs), incluindo a aspirina, são drogas largamente utilizadas para tratamento das doenças inflamatórias e da dor, e que podem causar efeitos colaterais sérios, causando considerável morbidade e mortalidade, relacionadas á doença ulcerosa, duodenal e gástrica, particularmente ao sangramento gastrointestinal. O risco relativo global de complicações gastroduodenais é de três a dez vezes, maior nos usuários de AINEs, quando comparado com indivíduos sadios. Cerca de 25% dos usuários crônicos dos antiinflamatórios não esteroides (AINEs) deverão desenvolver doença ulcerosa, e de 2 a 4% deverão apresentar sangramento ou perfuração. Mais de 17.000.000 de norte americanos utilizam vários tipos de drogas antiinflamatórios não esteróides (AINEs) diariamente e que provocam mais de 100.000 hospitalizações e cerca de 7000 a 10.000 mortes por ano nos Estados Unidos da América do Norte, fazendo desta família de drogas uma das mais comumente usadas em todo planeta. Cerca de 50% das lesões observadas em endoscopias de controle, ocorrem sem que o paciente tenha qualquer tipo de sintoma. Acredita-se que houve recrudescimento da prevalência de lesões digestivas pela substituição dos antiinflamatórios COX-2 pelos antiinflamatórios tradicionais, principalmente pela ausência de cuidados na prevenção deste tipo de ocorrência, em populações consideradas de risco. Objetivos: a) avaliar a prevalência de lesões e complicações digestivas secundárias ao uso de AINEs; b) qual é o perfil clínico deste paciente atendido em razão de queixas digestivas e a relação destas com os achados endoscópicos. Materiais e métodos: estudo aberto, prospectivo, multicêntrico avaliando consecutivamente 1.231 pacientes submetidos a exame de endoscopia digestiva alta em virtude de queixas digestivas, única ou associadas, como: 1) pirose; 2) dor epigástrica; 3) dor abdominal; 4) náusea; 5) vômito. Antes da realização do exame de endoscopia digestiva alta, os pacientes respondiam a questionário cujo objetivo era avaliar o início e o tipo de queixa clínica, o uso de medicamentos e possíveis complicações associadas como sangramento digestivo. Os critérios de inclusão foram: pacientes de ambos os sexos com idade mínima de 18 anos e que tivessem sintomas prévios iniciados, no máximo, há 14 dias antes da realização do exame de endoscopia digestiva alta. Os critérios de exclusão foram os de pacientes que se recusaram a participar do estudo e/ou de assinar o Termo de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido, os incapazes de responder ao questionário, os com idade inferior aos 18 anos, os pacientes que já haviam realizado cirurgia gástrica e pacientes portadores de insuficiência renal ou hepática. Resultados: Foram avaliados 1.213 pacientes de 18 a 82 anos sendo que 65% destes eram do sexo feminino, 13,1% eram fumantes e 15,6% referiam ingestão de bebidas alcoólicas. A utilização de AINEs foi mais frequente no sexo feminino, porém número de complicações foi maior nos pacientes do sexo masculino (sangramentos foi duas vezes maior; p=0,045 e a ocorrência de úlcera quase 1,5 vezes maior; p=0,041). Os principais sinais e sintomas relatados foram epigastralgia e pirose (67% e 62%, respectivamente). Os 1.213 pacientes foram alocados em dois grupos: Grupo I - AINE composto por 228 (18,8%) e o Grupo II - Não AINEs (NAINEs) por 985 (81,2%) pacientes.. O exame de endoscopia digestiva alta foi normal em 3,9% dos pacientes do grupo I e em 10,7% dos do grupo II (p< 0,001). A probabilidade de um paciente que não utiliza AINE ter endoscopia digestiva alta normal é 2,5 vezes maior quando comparado aos que utilizaram AINEs (p=0,001). As presenças de lesões erosivas ou ulceradas no estômago e duodeno também foram mais frequentes nos pacientes do Grupo I quando comparado aos do Grupo II. Observa-se que é maior a incidência de lesões, tanto erosivas quanto ulceradas no estômago quando comparadas ao duodeno (erosões: 49,12% vs 13,60 respectivamente, p=0,001; úlceras: 14,04% vs 11,84% respectivamente, p= 0,05). O risco de hemorragia digestiva, 12 vezes maior (6,14% vs 0,51%) nos pacientes que fizeram uso de AINEs sendo o estômago o sítio de maior prevalência de sangramento. Não se observou diferença estatística quando analisada a presença de esofagite erosiva nos dois grupos. Conclusões: Evidenciamos frequência maior de úlcera gástrica, úlcera duodenal e sangramento digestivo nos pacientes que utilizaram AINEs. Não foram encontradas relações entre os achados endoscópicos e os sintomas dispépticos. Não observamos influência dos AINEs no aparecimento de esofagite erosiva / Introduction: The non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), including aspirin, are drugs widely used in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and pain. This use may cause serious side-effects, leading to considerable morbidity and mortality related to ulcer, duodenal and gastric disease, especially gastrointestinal bleeding. The overall relative risk of gastroduodenal complications is three to ten times higher in users of NSAID, compared to healthy individuals. Around 25% of the chronic users of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) will develop ulcer disease, and 2 to 4% will present bleeding or perforation. More than 17,000,000 North Americans use several kinds of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) on a daily basis. This causes more than 100,000 hospitalizations and from 7,000 to 10,000 deaths every year in the USA, which makes this drug one of the most commonly used on the planet. About 50% of the lesions observed in endoscopies occur without any kind of symptom. It is believed that there was an increase in the prevalence of digestive lesions due to the replacement of COX-2 anti-inflammatory drugs with traditional anti-inflammatory drugs, especially because of the lack of preventive care of this kind of occurrence in at-risk populations. Goals: a) Evaluate the prevalence of lesions and digestive complications, secondary to the use of NSAID; b) Evaluate the clinical profile of the patient seen for digestive complaints and the relation of these complaints with the endoscopic findings. Materials and Methods: Prospective, multi-centric, open study, evaluating consecutively 1,231 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy exam due to digestive complaints in isolation or associated, such as: 1) pyrosis; 2) epigastric pain; 3) abdominal pain; 4) nausea; 5) vomiting. Before performing the exam of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, patients answered a questionnaire whose goal was to evaluate the onset and kind of clinical complaint, the use of medication and possible complications associated to digestive bleeding. The inclusion criteria were: Patients of both sexes with the minimum age of 18 and whose symptoms had begun up to 14 days before undergoing the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Exclusion criteria: patients who refused to participate in the study and/ or who refused to sign the Informed Consent Term, the ones who were unable to respond to the questionnaire, the ones who were under 18 years old, patients who had undergone a previous gastric surgery and patients with kidney or hepatic failure. Results: 1,213 patients with ages ranging from 18-82 were evaluated, 65% of which were female and 13,1% were smokers, 15,6% mentioned they ingested alcoholic beverages. The use of NSAID was more frequent among females. However, the number of complications was higher among males (bleeding occurred twice as much; p=0,045 and the occurrence of ulcer was almost 1,5 times higher; p=0,041). The main signs and symptoms reported were epigastralgia and pyrosis (67% and 62%). The 1,213 patients were divided into two groups: Group I- NSAID, made up by 228 (18,8%) and Group II- Non NSAID, made up by 985 patients (81,2%). The upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was normal in 3,9% of the patients in Group I and in 10,7% of the patients in Group II (p<0,001). A patient who does not use NSAID will be 2,5 times more likely to have normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy than the one who used NSAID (p=0,001). The presence of erosive or ulcer lesions in the stomach and duodenum was more frequent in Group I patients when compared to those of Group II. It is observed that the incidence of lesions in the stomach, both erosive and ulcer is higher when compared to the duodenum (erosions: 49,12% vs. 13,60, p=0,001; ulcers: 14,04% vs. 11,84, p= 0,05). The risk of digestive bleeding is 12 times higher (6,14% vs. 0,51%) in patients who used NSAID, and the stomach is the site with higher prevalence of bleeding. No statistic difference was observed when the presence of erosive esophagitis in both groups was analyzed. Conclusions: We observed that the frequency of gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer and digestive bleeding was higher in patients who used NSAID. Relations between the endoscopic findings and the dyspeptic symptoms were not found. The influence of NSAIDs on the appearance of erosive esophagitis was not observed

Introdução: Os antiinflamatórios não esteróides (AINEs), incluindo a aspirina, são drogas largamente utilizadas para tratamento das doenças inflamatórias e da dor, e que podem causar efeitos colaterais sérios, causando considerável morbidade e mortalidade, relacionadas á doença ulcerosa, duodenal e gástrica, particularmente ao sangramento gastrointestinal. O risco relativo global de complicações gastroduodenais é de três a dez vezes, maior nos usuários de AINEs, quando comparado com indivíduos sadios. Cerca de 25% dos usuários crônicos dos antiinflamatórios não esteroides (AINEs) deverão desenvolver doença ulcerosa, e de 2 a 4% deverão apresentar sangramento ou perfuração. Mais de 17.000.000 de norte americanos utilizam vários tipos de drogas antiinflamatórios não esteróides (AINEs) diariamente e que provocam mais de 100.000 hospitalizações e cerca de 7000 a 10.000 mortes por ano nos Estados Unidos da América do Norte, fazendo desta família de drogas uma das mais comumente usadas em todo planeta. Cerca de 50% das lesões observadas em endoscopias de controle, ocorrem sem que o paciente tenha qualquer tipo de sintoma. Acredita-se que houve recrudescimento da prevalência de lesões digestivas pela substituição dos antiinflamatórios COX-2 pelos antiinflamatórios tradicionais, principalmente pela ausência de cuidados na prevenção deste tipo de ocorrência, em populações consideradas de risco. Objetivos: a) avaliar a prevalência de lesões e complicações digestivas secundárias ao uso de AINEs; b) qual é o perfil clínico deste paciente atendido em razão de queixas digestivas e a relação destas com os achados endoscópicos. Materiais e métodos: estudo aberto, prospectivo, multicêntrico avaliando consecutivamente 1.231 pacientes submetidos a exame de endoscopia digestiva alta em virtude de queixas digestivas, única ou associadas, como: 1) pirose; 2) dor epigástrica; 3) dor abdominal; 4) náusea; 5) vômito. Antes da realização do exame de endoscopia digestiva alta, os pacientes respondiam a questionário cujo objetivo era avaliar o início e o tipo de queixa clínica, o uso de medicamentos e possíveis complicações associadas como sangramento digestivo. Os critérios de inclusão foram: pacientes de ambos os sexos com idade mínima de 18 anos e que tivessem sintomas prévios iniciados, no máximo, há 14 dias antes da realização do exame de endoscopia digestiva alta. Os critérios de exclusão foram os de pacientes que se recusaram a participar do estudo e/ou de assinar o Termo de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido, os incapazes de responder ao questionário, os com idade inferior aos 18 anos, os pacientes que já haviam realizado cirurgia gástrica e pacientes portadores de insuficiência renal ou hepática. Resultados: Foram avaliados 1.213 pacientes de 18 a 82 anos sendo que 65% destes eram do sexo feminino, 13,1% eram fumantes e 15,6% referiam ingestão de bebidas alcoólicas. A utilização de AINEs foi mais frequente no sexo feminino, porém número de complicações foi maior nos pacientes do sexo masculino (sangramentos foi duas vezes maior; p=0,045 e a ocorrência de úlcera quase 1,5 vezes maior; p=0,041). Os principais sinais e sintomas relatados foram epigastralgia e pirose (67% e 62%, respectivamente). Os 1.213 pacientes foram alocados em dois grupos: Grupo I - AINE composto por 228 (18,8%) e o Grupo II - Não AINEs (NAINEs) por 985 (81,2%) pacientes.. O exame de endoscopia digestiva alta foi normal em 3,9% dos pacientes do grupo I e em 10,7% dos do grupo II (p< 0,001). A probabilidade de um paciente que não utiliza AINE ter endoscopia digestiva alta normal é 2,5 vezes maior quando comparado aos que utilizaram AINEs (p=0,001). As presenças de lesões erosivas ou ulceradas no estômago e duodeno também foram mais frequentes nos pacientes do Grupo I quando comparado aos do Grupo II. Observa-se que é maior a incidência de lesões, tanto erosivas quanto ulceradas no estômago quando comparadas ao duodeno (erosões: 49,12% vs 13,60 respectivamente, p=0,001; úlceras: 14,04% vs 11,84% respectivamente, p= 0,05). O risco de hemorragia digestiva, 12 vezes maior (6,14% vs 0,51%) nos pacientes que fizeram uso de AINEs sendo o estômago o sítio de maior prevalência de sangramento. Não se observou diferença estatística quando analisada a presença de esofagite erosiva nos dois grupos. Conclusões: Evidenciamos frequência maior de úlcera gástrica, úlcera duodenal e sangramento digestivo nos pacientes que utilizaram AINEs. Não foram encontradas relações entre os achados endoscópicos e os sintomas dispépticos. Não observamos influência dos AINEs no aparecimento de esofagite erosiva / Introduction: The non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), including aspirin, are drugs widely used in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and pain. This use may cause serious side-effects, leading to considerable morbidity and mortality related to ulcer, duodenal and gastric disease, especially gastrointestinal bleeding. The overall relative risk of gastroduodenal complications is three to ten times higher in users of NSAID, compared to healthy individuals. Around 25% of the chronic users of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) will develop ulcer disease, and 2 to 4% will present bleeding or perforation. More than 17,000,000 North Americans use several kinds of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) on a daily basis. This causes more than 100,000 hospitalizations and from 7,000 to 10,000 deaths every year in the USA, which makes this drug one of the most commonly used on the planet. About 50% of the lesions observed in endoscopies occur without any kind of symptom. It is believed that there was an increase in the prevalence of digestive lesions due to the replacement of COX-2 anti-inflammatory drugs with traditional anti-inflammatory drugs, especially because of the lack of preventive care of this kind of occurrence in at-risk populations. Goals: a) Evaluate the prevalence of lesions and digestive complications, secondary to the use of NSAID; b) Evaluate the clinical profile of the patient seen for digestive complaints and the relation of these complaints with the endoscopic findings. Materials and Methods: Prospective, multi-centric, open study, evaluating consecutively 1,231 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy exam due to digestive complaints in isolation or associated, such as: 1) pyrosis; 2) epigastric pain; 3) abdominal pain; 4) nausea; 5) vomiting. Before performing the exam of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, patients answered a questionnaire whose goal was to evaluate the onset and kind of clinical complaint, the use of medication and possible complications associated to digestive bleeding. The inclusion criteria were: Patients of both sexes with the minimum age of 18 and whose symptoms had begun up to 14 days before undergoing the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Exclusion criteria: patients who refused to participate in the study and/ or who refused to sign the Informed Consent Term, the ones who were unable to respond to the questionnaire, the ones who were under 18 years old, patients who had undergone a previous gastric surgery and patients with kidney or hepatic failure. Results: 1,213 patients with ages ranging from 18-82 were evaluated, 65% of which were female and 13,1% were smokers, 15,6% mentioned they ingested alcoholic beverages. The use of NSAID was more frequent among females. However, the number of complications was higher among males (bleeding occurred twice as much; p=0,045 and the occurrence of ulcer was almost 1,5 times higher; p=0,041). The main signs and symptoms reported were epigastralgia and pyrosis (67% and 62%). The 1,213 patients were divided into two groups: Group I- NSAID, made up by 228 (18,8%) and Group II- Non NSAID, made up by 985 patients (81,2%). The upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was normal in 3,9% of the patients in Group I and in 10,7% of the patients in Group II (p<0,001). A patient who does not use NSAID will be 2,5 times more likely to have normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy than the one who used NSAID (p=0,001). The presence of erosive or ulcer lesions in the stomach and duodenum was more frequent in Group I patients when compared to those of Group II. It is observed that the incidence of lesions in the stomach, both erosive and ulcer is higher when compared to the duodenum (erosions: 49,12% vs. 13,60, p=0,001; ulcers: 14,04% vs. 11,84, p= 0,05). The risk of digestive bleeding is 12 times higher (6,14% vs. 0,51%) in patients who used NSAID, and the stomach is the site with higher prevalence of bleeding. No statistic difference was observed when the presence of erosive esophagitis in both groups was analyzed. Conclusions: We observed that the frequency of gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer and digestive bleeding was higher in patients who used NSAID. Relations between the endoscopic findings and the dyspeptic symptoms were not found. The influence of NSAIDs on the appearance of erosive esophagitis was not observed