Neste trabalho apresento a tese de doutorado intitulada: “Pedagogia Universitária potencializada no diálogo reflexivo sobre Educação Matemática: quando três gerações de educadores se encontram”. A questão problema que norteou a investigação foi: Em que sentido o diálogo reflexivo sobre Educação Matemática entre três gerações de professores se constitui processo potencializador da Pedagogia Universitária? Para a realização da investigação, propus e desenvolvi um Grupo de Trabalho Colaborativo (GTC) que agregou, por meio da uma formação continuada, três gerações de professores de Matemática ligadas ao Curso de Licenciatura Plena em Matemática (CLPM) da UNEMAT/Cáceres. Essa formação deu-se em nove encontros mensais e teve como tema: “A Educação Matemática na Escola e na Universidade: aproximações possíveis?”. As três gerações de professores de Matemática reunidas no GTC foram: Professores Formadores (PF); Acadêmicos Estagiários (AE), Acadêmicas Bolsistas (AB) e Professores da Escola (PE). No GTC relacionou-se o espaço Universitário com o Escolar e as pautas dos debates nortearam as próprias realidades de cada instituição educacional que influenciavam o fazer Educação Matemática. Este GTC serviu como espaço investigativo e nele efetuei uma pesquisa qualitativa com os preceitos do Estudo de Caso (YIN; ANDRÉ) e da pesquisa participante (BRANDÃO; CHIZZOTTI; BRANDÃO & STRECK). Como sujeitos pesquisados tive 42 professores colaboradores, dentre eles: 17 PF, 12 AE, 02 AB e 11 PE. Antes de iniciar os encontros da formação continuada realizei 16 entrevistas individuais com PF e durante os mesmos coletei dados através de filmagem, anotações registradas em diário reflexivo digital e questionários. Os dados foram sistematizados em um banco de dados composto por três partes: Texto de Referência (TR) – Parte 1 – Entrevistas; TR – Parte 2 – Diário Reflexivo Digital e TR – Parte 3 – Transcrições do Áudio das Filmagens dos Encontros. Para analisar os dados utilizei-me das técnicas da Análise de Conteúdo (BARDIN; FRANCO). A tese está organizada em três grandes partes e na sua exposição estabeleci um diálogo permanente entre a empiria e a teoria (FRANCO & KRAHE; SOARES & CUNHA; TARDIF, LESSARD; ZABALZA; PIMENTA & ANASTASIOU; CUNHA, entre outros). A análise da experiência de ação e investigação realizada me permite afirmar que o diálogo reflexivo sobre Educação Matemática potencializa a Pedagogia Universitária quando é possibilitado aos professores o encontro para dialogarem e a eles é permitido falar e ouvir sobre as realidades do seu dia a dia de trabalho docente, de forma horizontal, sem hierarquias e receios. Como principais aprendizados, destaco a importância do diálogo reflexivo e do trabalho colaborativo para a formação de professores; o emergente rompimento entre as distâncias que separam a escola e a Universidade e que a Pedagogia Universitária e a Educação Matemática são debates ausentes, porém urgentes de serem postos em prática nos cursos de licenciaturas. Como caminhos possíveis, a partir dos diálogos estabelecidos, evidencio que a Pedagogia Universitária na UNEMAT deve ser o centro do debate institucional e que deve ser reinventada na relação entre Escola e Universidade para os cursos de Licenciatura. / In this work I present a doctoral thesis entitled: "Higher Education pedagogy potentiated in reflective dialogue on mathematics education: when three generations of educators meet”. The question that guided the research was: In what sense the reflective dialogue on mathematics education from three generations of professors constitutes a potentiating process for higher education pedagogy? To perform the research, a collaborative working group was proposed and developed, which put together through in service training, three generations of mathematics professors related to the Mathematics Licentiate Course of Mato Grosso State University- UNEMAT/Cáceres. This in service training took place in nine monthly meetings and had as its theme: "The mathematics education at School and at the university: possible approaches?". The three generations of mathematics teachers gathered in the collaborative working group were: teacher educators (TE); student teachers (TS); assistant researchers (AR) and school teachers (ST). The collaborative working group related the academic space and the school space, with the debates and agendas that guide the particular realities of each educational institution, which influence the making of mathematics education. This collaborative working group served as an investigative space, that was produced as a qualitative research with the precepts of the case of study (YIN; ANDRÉ) and participatory research (BRANDÃO; CHIZZOTTI; BRANDÃO & STRECK). 42 members, including 17 teacher educators (TE), 12 student teachers (TS), 02 assistant researchers (AR) and 11 school teachers were surveyed. Before starting the continuing education meetings, 16 individual interviews with professors lecturers were performed, over the same event; data was collected through filming, reflective digital diary notes and questioners. The data were organized in a database composed of three parts: Text Reference (TR) - Part 1 - Interviews; TR - Part 2 - Reflective digital diary and TR - Part 3 - Transcripts of audio footage of meetings. To analyze the data I have used content analysis techniques (BARDIN, FRANCO).The thesis is organized into three parts and in its development I established a permanent dialogue between empiricism and theory (FRANCO & KRAHE; SOARES & CUNHA; TARDIF, LESSARD; ZABALZA; PIMENTA & ANASTASIOU; CUNHA, among others). The analysis of the experience of action and investigation allows me to state that a reflective dialogue on mathematics education improves the higher education pedagogy when it provides dialogue opportunities among the professors and teachers and they are allowed to speak and hear about the realities of their day to day work of teaching, horizontally, without hierarchies and fears. As the main learning of this research, I highlight the importance of reflective dialogue and collaborative work for the in service training of teachers and faculty; the emerging rift of the distances between school and university, and the university’s pedagogy and mathematics education debates are missing, however urgent to be put into practice in licentiate courses. As possible paths from the dialogues set, I evince that higher education pedagogy at Mato Grosso State University – UNEMAT, should be the center of institutional debate and the relationship between school and university for teaching programs must be reinvented.

This thesis is focused on personality of free time pedagogue and meaning of his work: The first part examines pedagogy itself and pedagogy of free time having regard to single objective, to education. Also deals with issues of free time pedagogue. The second part is focused on the importance of personality of free time pedagogue from different perspectives. Free time pedagogue is considered charismatically, creative, motivating and unique personality, coach and authority, which leads to the possibility of self-realization and self-education in free time. The third and the last part reveals more of the mission of education and direction to self-education to purpose educate adult personality in their free time through the answers to the questions of meaning and meaningful event.

Neste trabalho apresento a tese de doutorado intitulada: “Pedagogia Universitária potencializada no diálogo reflexivo sobre Educação Matemática: quando três gerações de educadores se encontram”. A questão problema que norteou a investigação foi: Em que sentido o diálogo reflexivo sobre Educação Matemática entre três gerações de professores se constitui processo potencializador da Pedagogia Universitária? Para a realização da investigação, propus e desenvolvi um Grupo de Trabalho Colaborativo (GTC) que agregou, por meio da uma formação continuada, três gerações de professores de Matemática ligadas ao Curso de Licenciatura Plena em Matemática (CLPM) da UNEMAT/Cáceres. Essa formação deu-se em nove encontros mensais e teve como tema: “A Educação Matemática na Escola e na Universidade: aproximações possíveis?”. As três gerações de professores de Matemática reunidas no GTC foram: Professores Formadores (PF); Acadêmicos Estagiários (AE), Acadêmicas Bolsistas (AB) e Professores da Escola (PE). No GTC relacionou-se o espaço Universitário com o Escolar e as pautas dos debates nortearam as próprias realidades de cada instituição educacional que influenciavam o fazer Educação Matemática. Este GTC serviu como espaço investigativo e nele efetuei uma pesquisa qualitativa com os preceitos do Estudo de Caso (YIN; ANDRÉ) e da pesquisa participante (BRANDÃO; CHIZZOTTI; BRANDÃO & STRECK). Como sujeitos pesquisados tive 42 professores colaboradores, dentre eles: 17 PF, 12 AE, 02 AB e 11 PE. Antes de iniciar os encontros da formação continuada realizei 16 entrevistas individuais com PF e durante os mesmos coletei dados através de filmagem, anotações registradas em diário reflexivo digital e questionários. Os dados foram sistematizados em um banco de dados composto por três partes: Texto de Referência (TR) – Parte 1 – Entrevistas; TR – Parte 2 – Diário Reflexivo Digital e TR – Parte 3 – Transcrições do Áudio das Filmagens dos Encontros. Para analisar os dados utilizei-me das técnicas da Análise de Conteúdo (BARDIN; FRANCO). A tese está organizada em três grandes partes e na sua exposição estabeleci um diálogo permanente entre a empiria e a teoria (FRANCO & KRAHE; SOARES & CUNHA; TARDIF, LESSARD; ZABALZA; PIMENTA & ANASTASIOU; CUNHA, entre outros). A análise da experiência de ação e investigação realizada me permite afirmar que o diálogo reflexivo sobre Educação Matemática potencializa a Pedagogia Universitária quando é possibilitado aos professores o encontro para dialogarem e a eles é permitido falar e ouvir sobre as realidades do seu dia a dia de trabalho docente, de forma horizontal, sem hierarquias e receios. Como principais aprendizados, destaco a importância do diálogo reflexivo e do trabalho colaborativo para a formação de professores; o emergente rompimento entre as distâncias que separam a escola e a Universidade e que a Pedagogia Universitária e a Educação Matemática são debates ausentes, porém urgentes de serem postos em prática nos cursos de licenciaturas. Como caminhos possíveis, a partir dos diálogos estabelecidos, evidencio que a Pedagogia Universitária na UNEMAT deve ser o centro do debate institucional e que deve ser reinventada na relação entre Escola e Universidade para os cursos de Licenciatura. / In this work I present a doctoral thesis entitled: "Higher Education pedagogy potentiated in reflective dialogue on mathematics education: when three generations of educators meet”. The question that guided the research was: In what sense the reflective dialogue on mathematics education from three generations of professors constitutes a potentiating process for higher education pedagogy? To perform the research, a collaborative working group was proposed and developed, which put together through in service training, three generations of mathematics professors related to the Mathematics Licentiate Course of Mato Grosso State University- UNEMAT/Cáceres. This in service training took place in nine monthly meetings and had as its theme: "The mathematics education at School and at the university: possible approaches?". The three generations of mathematics teachers gathered in the collaborative working group were: teacher educators (TE); student teachers (TS); assistant researchers (AR) and school teachers (ST). The collaborative working group related the academic space and the school space, with the debates and agendas that guide the particular realities of each educational institution, which influence the making of mathematics education. This collaborative working group served as an investigative space, that was produced as a qualitative research with the precepts of the case of study (YIN; ANDRÉ) and participatory research (BRANDÃO; CHIZZOTTI; BRANDÃO & STRECK). 42 members, including 17 teacher educators (TE), 12 student teachers (TS), 02 assistant researchers (AR) and 11 school teachers were surveyed. Before starting the continuing education meetings, 16 individual interviews with professors lecturers were performed, over the same event; data was collected through filming, reflective digital diary notes and questioners. The data were organized in a database composed of three parts: Text Reference (TR) - Part 1 - Interviews; TR - Part 2 - Reflective digital diary and TR - Part 3 - Transcripts of audio footage of meetings. To analyze the data I have used content analysis techniques (BARDIN, FRANCO).The thesis is organized into three parts and in its development I established a permanent dialogue between empiricism and theory (FRANCO & KRAHE; SOARES & CUNHA; TARDIF, LESSARD; ZABALZA; PIMENTA & ANASTASIOU; CUNHA, among others). The analysis of the experience of action and investigation allows me to state that a reflective dialogue on mathematics education improves the higher education pedagogy when it provides dialogue opportunities among the professors and teachers and they are allowed to speak and hear about the realities of their day to day work of teaching, horizontally, without hierarchies and fears. As the main learning of this research, I highlight the importance of reflective dialogue and collaborative work for the in service training of teachers and faculty; the emerging rift of the distances between school and university, and the university’s pedagogy and mathematics education debates are missing, however urgent to be put into practice in licentiate courses. As possible paths from the dialogues set, I evince that higher education pedagogy at Mato Grosso State University – UNEMAT, should be the center of institutional debate and the relationship between school and university for teaching programs must be reinvented.

Neste trabalho apresento a tese de doutorado intitulada: “Pedagogia Universitária potencializada no diálogo reflexivo sobre Educação Matemática: quando três gerações de educadores se encontram”. A questão problema que norteou a investigação foi: Em que sentido o diálogo reflexivo sobre Educação Matemática entre três gerações de professores se constitui processo potencializador da Pedagogia Universitária? Para a realização da investigação, propus e desenvolvi um Grupo de Trabalho Colaborativo (GTC) que agregou, por meio da uma formação continuada, três gerações de professores de Matemática ligadas ao Curso de Licenciatura Plena em Matemática (CLPM) da UNEMAT/Cáceres. Essa formação deu-se em nove encontros mensais e teve como tema: “A Educação Matemática na Escola e na Universidade: aproximações possíveis?”. As três gerações de professores de Matemática reunidas no GTC foram: Professores Formadores (PF); Acadêmicos Estagiários (AE), Acadêmicas Bolsistas (AB) e Professores da Escola (PE). No GTC relacionou-se o espaço Universitário com o Escolar e as pautas dos debates nortearam as próprias realidades de cada instituição educacional que influenciavam o fazer Educação Matemática. Este GTC serviu como espaço investigativo e nele efetuei uma pesquisa qualitativa com os preceitos do Estudo de Caso (YIN; ANDRÉ) e da pesquisa participante (BRANDÃO; CHIZZOTTI; BRANDÃO & STRECK). Como sujeitos pesquisados tive 42 professores colaboradores, dentre eles: 17 PF, 12 AE, 02 AB e 11 PE. Antes de iniciar os encontros da formação continuada realizei 16 entrevistas individuais com PF e durante os mesmos coletei dados através de filmagem, anotações registradas em diário reflexivo digital e questionários. Os dados foram sistematizados em um banco de dados composto por três partes: Texto de Referência (TR) – Parte 1 – Entrevistas; TR – Parte 2 – Diário Reflexivo Digital e TR – Parte 3 – Transcrições do Áudio das Filmagens dos Encontros. Para analisar os dados utilizei-me das técnicas da Análise de Conteúdo (BARDIN; FRANCO). A tese está organizada em três grandes partes e na sua exposição estabeleci um diálogo permanente entre a empiria e a teoria (FRANCO & KRAHE; SOARES & CUNHA; TARDIF, LESSARD; ZABALZA; PIMENTA & ANASTASIOU; CUNHA, entre outros). A análise da experiência de ação e investigação realizada me permite afirmar que o diálogo reflexivo sobre Educação Matemática potencializa a Pedagogia Universitária quando é possibilitado aos professores o encontro para dialogarem e a eles é permitido falar e ouvir sobre as realidades do seu dia a dia de trabalho docente, de forma horizontal, sem hierarquias e receios. Como principais aprendizados, destaco a importância do diálogo reflexivo e do trabalho colaborativo para a formação de professores; o emergente rompimento entre as distâncias que separam a escola e a Universidade e que a Pedagogia Universitária e a Educação Matemática são debates ausentes, porém urgentes de serem postos em prática nos cursos de licenciaturas. Como caminhos possíveis, a partir dos diálogos estabelecidos, evidencio que a Pedagogia Universitária na UNEMAT deve ser o centro do debate institucional e que deve ser reinventada na relação entre Escola e Universidade para os cursos de Licenciatura. / In this work I present a doctoral thesis entitled: "Higher Education pedagogy potentiated in reflective dialogue on mathematics education: when three generations of educators meet”. The question that guided the research was: In what sense the reflective dialogue on mathematics education from three generations of professors constitutes a potentiating process for higher education pedagogy? To perform the research, a collaborative working group was proposed and developed, which put together through in service training, three generations of mathematics professors related to the Mathematics Licentiate Course of Mato Grosso State University- UNEMAT/Cáceres. This in service training took place in nine monthly meetings and had as its theme: "The mathematics education at School and at the university: possible approaches?". The three generations of mathematics teachers gathered in the collaborative working group were: teacher educators (TE); student teachers (TS); assistant researchers (AR) and school teachers (ST). The collaborative working group related the academic space and the school space, with the debates and agendas that guide the particular realities of each educational institution, which influence the making of mathematics education. This collaborative working group served as an investigative space, that was produced as a qualitative research with the precepts of the case of study (YIN; ANDRÉ) and participatory research (BRANDÃO; CHIZZOTTI; BRANDÃO & STRECK). 42 members, including 17 teacher educators (TE), 12 student teachers (TS), 02 assistant researchers (AR) and 11 school teachers were surveyed. Before starting the continuing education meetings, 16 individual interviews with professors lecturers were performed, over the same event; data was collected through filming, reflective digital diary notes and questioners. The data were organized in a database composed of three parts: Text Reference (TR) - Part 1 - Interviews; TR - Part 2 - Reflective digital diary and TR - Part 3 - Transcripts of audio footage of meetings. To analyze the data I have used content analysis techniques (BARDIN, FRANCO).The thesis is organized into three parts and in its development I established a permanent dialogue between empiricism and theory (FRANCO & KRAHE; SOARES & CUNHA; TARDIF, LESSARD; ZABALZA; PIMENTA & ANASTASIOU; CUNHA, among others). The analysis of the experience of action and investigation allows me to state that a reflective dialogue on mathematics education improves the higher education pedagogy when it provides dialogue opportunities among the professors and teachers and they are allowed to speak and hear about the realities of their day to day work of teaching, horizontally, without hierarchies and fears. As the main learning of this research, I highlight the importance of reflective dialogue and collaborative work for the in service training of teachers and faculty; the emerging rift of the distances between school and university, and the university’s pedagogy and mathematics education debates are missing, however urgent to be put into practice in licentiate courses. As possible paths from the dialogues set, I evince that higher education pedagogy at Mato Grosso State University – UNEMAT, should be the center of institutional debate and the relationship between school and university for teaching programs must be reinvented.

The thesis deals with personality and contribution of professor L. Daniel for school music education. In the introduction is analyzed Daniel's life and activities, which as a professional in his discipline devoted after all his life. The research part of this thesis provides information on the investigation. The thesis contains findings that were obtained on the basis of qualitative research. The aim of this research was to determine the musical public awareness about Daniel's work and the application of his methods in practice. For qualitative research were elected beginning teachers and teachers from practice in the field of music or graduates of teacher training for primary schools with extended specializing in music education. The results of this research can be an inspiration for further reflection on the application of Daniel's work in practice. Keywords Ladislav Daniel, pedagogy, music education, elementary school with EEME (expanded education of music education).

Esta pesquisa de doutorado tem como objetivo principal analisar o papel da pedagogia universitária em projetos inovadores de universidades públicas brasileiras. Analisar a pedagogia universitária em propostas inovadoras no ensino superior não é uma escolha aleatória. Há uma política de expansão da universidade pública, mas há uma política de formação pedagógica dos professores para essa universidade? Determinados autores (SANTOS, 2008; CHAUÍ, 2001, 2003; BUARQUE, 2003) apontam a crise da universidade e a urgência de mudança para que essa instituição não perca sua função e significância social. Dessa maneira, será avaliado em que medida projetos que, a princípio, podem ser classificados como inovadores cooperam para a transformação do ensino superior na direção do que é esperado para o cumprimento de sua função social e de que forma interagem com as discussões no campo da pedagogia universitária, em especial no que se refere à formação pedagógica do professor universitário. Pimenta e Anastasiou (2005) ressaltam a importância da constituição da identidade docente do professor de ensino superior, que também se daria em um processo de formação continuada. As universidades selecionadas foram a USP Leste e a UFPR Litoral. Tal seleção baseou-se no critério dessas universidades afirmarem constituir propostas inovadoras. Como metodologia, em um processo qualitativo de pesquisa, foram avaliados os projetos político pedagógico da instituição ou outros documentos que possibilitavam a compreensão da proposta inovadora e foram feitas entrevistas com coordenadores de curso, professores, presidente de comissão de graduação e diretor institucional. Por meio de análise dos dados coletados, foi possível constatar que ambas as universidades estão inovando e trabalhando a pedagogia universitária. No entanto, o trabalho com a pedagogia universitária e a formação pedagógica é muito mais presente na instituição que tem no ensino sua atividade fundante, do que naquela em que este fica subsumido na atividade de pesquisador do docente. Como resultado, é possível analisar duas realidades diferentes: a instauração de uma cultura da docência capaz de promover a construção da identidade docente de seus professores, e uma cultura mais voltada à pesquisa, desvinculada do eixo ensino. Por fim, a conclusão desse estudo revela que é necessária uma aproximação da teoria/prática no que se refere à inovação proposta e, para isso, a área da pedagogia universitária pode contribuir de maneira fundamental, principalmente no tocante à formação docente para lidar com o aspecto inovador do projeto. / This doctoral research study aims at analyzing the role of university pedagogy in innovating projects in higher education in Brazilian universities. The choice to analyze innovating projects in higher education pedagogy contexts is not at random. There is a university expansion policy in Brazil, but is there a policy for teaching education in the universities? Authors such as Santos (2008), Chauí (2001, 2003) and Buarque (2003) point out to the crisis at university level and the urgent need for change so that universities do not lose their social meaning. Taking these discussions into consideration, the research will evaluate if university projects, which in an initial analysis can be classified as innovating, cooperate to change the university context so that this institution maintains its social meaning. In addition, the research will analyze how these projects interact with the discussion proposed by higher education pedagogy studies. The interaction with higher education pedagogy will be evaluated from the perspective that it is urgent to provide pedagogical qualification to university professors. Pimenta and Anastasiou (2005) emphasize the importance of the development of a teaching identity in universities, which would also happen in a process of continuing education. The universities selected for the study are USP Leste and UFPR Litoral. The selection was based on the criteria that these universities affirm to carry out innovating proposals. The methodology, which was carried out according to a qualitative research approach, evaluated the political pedagogical projects of the institution or other documents that provided the understanding of the innovative proposal. In addition interviews with the course coordinators, professors, president of the undergraduate commission and institutional director were conducted. The analysis of the data demonstrated that both institutions are innovating and working with the higher education pedagogy. Although the work with the higher education pedagogy and teaching education is much more present in the institution that has teaching as a fundamental activity than in the institution where teaching is incorporated in the research activities of its professors. As a result it is possible to analyze two different realities: the establishment of a teaching culture capable of promoting the construction of teachers identity, and a culture of research detached from teaching. Finally, this study reveals that it is necessary an approximation of theory and practice in terms of the proposal of innovation and, to this end, the higher education pedagogy area can contribute in an essential manner, mainly in relation to teacher education so that teachers can cope with the innovating aspect of the project.

This is a study of students’ meaning making in web-based higher education courses. Conditions for students meaning-making change when interaction technology is used to support educational practices. Widened Participation policy activities often use web-based programs to attract “new” groups of more experienced students. The study used a communicative approach and focused on how previous experiences influenced actions and meaning making when students encountered challenges related to course objectives. Mediated Discourse Analysis was used to analyse asynchronous communication in 10 groups during 18 weeks of a 4-year part-time distance education program, training childminders for a Bachelor of Education, specialising in early childhood.  Appearances of meaning-making were traced to changes and breaks in student communication and presented as themes of orientations of actions namely:  • participation, the manifestation of presence, engagement in course work and the creation of space for engagement  • positioning, the creation of a student identity, the organisation of work, and the construction of a group culture  • reference, the orientation actions took in a nexus of practices. Where did students go for examples and to challenge theoretical concepts? • changing experience is a collection of moments of reification, when students came to make realisations of relevance to subject and task.  This study tells an alternative story to research on web-based education stating difficulties to achieve in-depth communication. The mediated environment offered strength for meaning-making and knowledge building as time, in the opportunity to develop new perspective through thinking and in encountering concepts again and again. As numbers, in the necessary impact of other’s experiences. And as distance, provided by the shift of actions in asynchronous communication, forcing thoughts into written language and making them accessible for reflection and criticism. If we are serious about widening participation we should regard students not only as numbers but instead as a valuable resource that may contribute to change in education. In this context, the combination of new groups of students and web-based scenarios provides future avenues for an informed pedagogical approach to higher education.

Over the last decade, education-focused research/studies on young queers (or same-sex attracted young people) have highlighted the many problems or difficulties they face growing up in a homophobic, heterosexist society. Strategies to address these issues (proposed in numerous research articles and reports) have largely focused on the school setting. I argue that these strategies are limited by heterosexual norms, which regulate and contain in advance what is possible (for queers) within the formal school system. I examine the ways in which these heterosexual norms work to constrain the queer subject in education-focused research and studies on young queers. / Within this field of study, young queers have largely been characterized as victims: of homophobic abuse and harassment, and neglect by families and schools. They’re said to be lonely and isolated, at risk of attempted suicide, unsafe sex, drug and alcohol abuse, and homelessness. I argue that these representations convey a negative portrait of young queers as wounded subjects. I illustrate how the emphasis on the wounded queer subject can work against the interests of young queers. In particular, it obscures those queer perspectives involving agency: first, queer cultures and communities; second, the knowledge and experiences of those who have gained confidence in their queerness, who have queer social and sexual lives. These (agentic) queers can offer us ways of understanding how young queers move beyond isolation and loneliness. / This study highlights the importance, for many young queers, of having opportunities and spaces where they can connect with each other. Socialization and sexualization among young queers involves a certain openness being and doing queer a practice which is unintelligible within most education-focused research/studies on young queers. This is illustrated and explored through comparative analysis of queer subjectivities in two differentiated spheres: on the one hand education-focused research and studies relating to the school context, and on the other gay/lesbian/queer studies and literature relating to queer social and sexual contexts. The key contexts and themes examined here are: early sexual experience and beats, queer cultures and communities, and queer youth support and social groups.

Esta pesquisa de doutorado tem como objetivo principal analisar o papel da pedagogia universitária em projetos inovadores de universidades públicas brasileiras. Analisar a pedagogia universitária em propostas inovadoras no ensino superior não é uma escolha aleatória. Há uma política de expansão da universidade pública, mas há uma política de formação pedagógica dos professores para essa universidade? Determinados autores (SANTOS, 2008; CHAUÍ, 2001, 2003; BUARQUE, 2003) apontam a crise da universidade e a urgência de mudança para que essa instituição não perca sua função e significância social. Dessa maneira, será avaliado em que medida projetos que, a princípio, podem ser classificados como inovadores cooperam para a transformação do ensino superior na direção do que é esperado para o cumprimento de sua função social e de que forma interagem com as discussões no campo da pedagogia universitária, em especial no que se refere à formação pedagógica do professor universitário. Pimenta e Anastasiou (2005) ressaltam a importância da constituição da identidade docente do professor de ensino superior, que também se daria em um processo de formação continuada. As universidades selecionadas foram a USP Leste e a UFPR Litoral. Tal seleção baseou-se no critério dessas universidades afirmarem constituir propostas inovadoras. Como metodologia, em um processo qualitativo de pesquisa, foram avaliados os projetos político pedagógico da instituição ou outros documentos que possibilitavam a compreensão da proposta inovadora e foram feitas entrevistas com coordenadores de curso, professores, presidente de comissão de graduação e diretor institucional. Por meio de análise dos dados coletados, foi possível constatar que ambas as universidades estão inovando e trabalhando a pedagogia universitária. No entanto, o trabalho com a pedagogia universitária e a formação pedagógica é muito mais presente na instituição que tem no ensino sua atividade fundante, do que naquela em que este fica subsumido na atividade de pesquisador do docente. Como resultado, é possível analisar duas realidades diferentes: a instauração de uma cultura da docência capaz de promover a construção da identidade docente de seus professores, e uma cultura mais voltada à pesquisa, desvinculada do eixo ensino. Por fim, a conclusão desse estudo revela que é necessária uma aproximação da teoria/prática no que se refere à inovação proposta e, para isso, a área da pedagogia universitária pode contribuir de maneira fundamental, principalmente no tocante à formação docente para lidar com o aspecto inovador do projeto. / This doctoral research study aims at analyzing the role of university pedagogy in innovating projects in higher education in Brazilian universities. The choice to analyze innovating projects in higher education pedagogy contexts is not at random. There is a university expansion policy in Brazil, but is there a policy for teaching education in the universities? Authors such as Santos (2008), Chauí (2001, 2003) and Buarque (2003) point out to the crisis at university level and the urgent need for change so that universities do not lose their social meaning. Taking these discussions into consideration, the research will evaluate if university projects, which in an initial analysis can be classified as innovating, cooperate to change the university context so that this institution maintains its social meaning. In addition, the research will analyze how these projects interact with the discussion proposed by higher education pedagogy studies. The interaction with higher education pedagogy will be evaluated from the perspective that it is urgent to provide pedagogical qualification to university professors. Pimenta and Anastasiou (2005) emphasize the importance of the development of a teaching identity in universities, which would also happen in a process of continuing education. The universities selected for the study are USP Leste and UFPR Litoral. The selection was based on the criteria that these universities affirm to carry out innovating proposals. The methodology, which was carried out according to a qualitative research approach, evaluated the political pedagogical projects of the institution or other documents that provided the understanding of the innovative proposal. In addition interviews with the course coordinators, professors, president of the undergraduate commission and institutional director were conducted. The analysis of the data demonstrated that both institutions are innovating and working with the higher education pedagogy. Although the work with the higher education pedagogy and teaching education is much more present in the institution that has teaching as a fundamental activity than in the institution where teaching is incorporated in the research activities of its professors. As a result it is possible to analyze two different realities: the establishment of a teaching culture capable of promoting the construction of teachers identity, and a culture of research detached from teaching. Finally, this study reveals that it is necessary an approximation of theory and practice in terms of the proposal of innovation and, to this end, the higher education pedagogy area can contribute in an essential manner, mainly in relation to teacher education so that teachers can cope with the innovating aspect of the project.

Der Text berichtet über eine Erhebung zu Praxen des Musikunterrichts in 5 Ländern Europas. Über eine auf Englisch veröffentlichte Erhebung ‚About Different Cultures in Music Classrooms of Europe’ hinaus enthält dieser Text auch die Ergebnisse einer zweiten Erhebung. Nach der Reflexion einiger methodischer Aspekte der Arbeit mit Videos sowie des Kontexts eines europäisch geförderten ‚Intensive Programs’, gibt der Text Information über gemeinsame Inhalte und Methoden sowie unterschiedliche Praxismerkmale im Musikunterricht. Abschließend liefert der Text drei Reflexionen der Daten über (1) die Wichtigkeit von Sound und Gesten im Musikunterricht, (2) Interferenzen zwischen Kulturen der Musik und Kulturen der Pädagogik im Klassenzimmer und (3) Muster von Musikunterricht. / The article is about an exploration about practices of school music in 5 countries of Europe. Beyond an exploration ‚About Different Cultures in Music Classrooms of Europe’, which was published in English, this article includes results of a second exploration. After reflecting some methodological aspects of working with videos and the context of an Intensive Programm, the article gives information about common contents and methods and distinguishing marks of practices in music education. At last the article gives three reflections of the data about (1) the importance of sound and gestures in music education, (2) interferences between cultures of music and cultures of pedagogy in the classroom, (3) patterns of school music.