NHS research ethics committees (RECs) serve as the gatekeepers of health research involving human participants. They have the power to decide, through a regulatory 'event licensing' system, whether or not any given proposed research study is ethical and therefore appropriate to undertake. RECs have several regulatory functions. Their primary function has been to protect the interests of research participants and minimise risk of harm to them. Yet RECs, and other actors connected to them, also provide stewardship for the promotion of ethical and socially valuable research. While this latter function traditionally has been seen as secondary, the 'function hierarchy' is increasingly blurred in regulation. Regulatory bodies charged with managing RECs now emphasise that the functions of RECs are to both protect the interests of research participants, and also promote ethical research that is of potential benefit to participants, science, and society. Though the UK has held in some of its previous regulations (broadly defined) that RECs equally function to facilitate (ethical) health research, I argue that the 'research promotionist' ideology has moved 'up the ladder' in the regulation of RECs and in the regulation of health research, all the way to implementation in law, specifically in the Care Act 2014, and in the regulatory bodies charged with overseeing health research, namely the Health Research Authority. This thesis therefore asks: what impact does this ostensibly twinned regulatory objective then have on the substantive and procedural workings of RECs? I invoke a novel 'anthropology of regulation' as an original methodological contribution, which enables me to study empirically the nature of regulation and the experiences of actors within a regulatory space (or spaces), and the ways in which they themselves are affected by regulation. Anthropology of regulation structures my overall empirical inquiry to query how RECs, with a classic primary mandate to protect research participants, now interact with regulatory bodies charged with promoting health research and reducing perceived regulatory barriers. I further query what this changing environment might do to the bond of research and ethics as seen through REC processes of ethical deliberation and decision-making, by invoking the original concept of 'regulatory stewardship'. I argue that regulatory stewardship is a critical, but hitherto invisible, component of health research regulation, and requires fuller recognition and better integration into the effective functioning of regulatory oversight of research involving human participants.

Au milieu du siècle dernier, les traités relatifs aux droits de l'homme et les normes éthiques de la réglementation de la recherche n'ont pas suffi à prévenir les violations de la dignité de la personne humaine dans les expériences médicales pratiquées contre les minorités sociales. Il existe, aujourd’hui, un ensemble complexe de règles qui visent non seulement à protéger les volontaires, mais aussi à garantir un accès équitable aux résultats de la recherche. Les contradictions et les interprétations erronées de ces normes limitent toutefois la pleine réalisation de ces garanties, essentielles par rapport aux minorités sociales, face à leur manque de représentation politique dans la société. Dans ce sens, une étude exploratoire-descriptive a été réalisée en passant en revue la littérature et en appliquant un questionnaire destiné à comparer les réponses présentées par les comités d'éthique du Brésil et de la France. Il a été conclu qu'il est impératif que le principe du partage des avantages soit largement appliqué dans toutes les recherches, y compris celles qui utilisent des données personnelles et des échantillons corporels, notamment en ce qui concerne les minorités sociales, afin que les progrès scientifiques soient accessibles à tous. / In the middle of the last century, treaties of human rights and set ethical principles regarding human experimentation were not enough to prevent, in practice, violations of the dignity of the human person in medical experiments practiced in social minorities. Nowadays, there is a complex set of rules that aim not only to protect volunteers but also to ensure equitable access to research results. Contradictions and misinterpretations of these norms, however, limit the full realization of these guarantees, essential in relation to social minorities, in face of their lack of political representation in society. In this sense, an exploratory-descriptive study was carried out by reviewing the literature and applying a questionnaire designed to compare the responses presented by independent ethics committees from Brazil and France. It was concluded that it is imperative that the benefit-sharing be broadly applied in all research, including those that use personal data and body samples, especially with regard to social minorities in order to make progress increasingly accessible to all. / Em meados do século passado, tratados de direitos humanos e normas éticas de regulação da pesquisa não foram suficientes para impedir, na prática, violações à dignidade da pessoa humana em experiências médicas praticadas em minorias sociais. Hodiernamente, há um complexo de normas que objetivam não só proteger voluntários como lhes garantir equitativo acesso aos resultados das pesquisas. Contradições e interpretações equivocadas dessas normas, entretanto, limitam a plena efetivação dessas garantias, essenciais em relação às minorias sociais, diante da sua falta de representação política na sociedade. Neste sentido, um estudo exploratório-descritivo foi realizado através de revisão da literatura e aplicação de questionário elaborado para comparar as respostas apresentadas pelos comitês de revisão ética do Brasil e da França. Concluiu-se que é imprescindível que o preceito da repartição de benefícios seja aplicado, na prática, de forma ampla, em todas as pesquisas, inclusive naquelas que utilizam dados pessoais e amostras corporais, especialmente com relação às minorias sociais, para que as pesquisas oportunizem a todos a percepção do progresso científico-tecnológico.

[pt] Em meados do século passado, tratados de direitos humanos e normas éticas de regulação da pesquisa não foram suficientes para impedir, na prática, violações à dignidade da pessoa humana em experiências médicas praticadas em minorias sociais. Hodiernamente, há um complexo de normas que objetivam não só proteger voluntários como lhes garantir equitativo acesso aos resultados das pesquisas. Contradições e interpretações equivocadas dessas normas, entretanto, limitam a plena efetivação dessas garantias, essenciais em relação às minorias sociais, diante da sua falta de representação política na sociedade. Neste sentido, um estudo exploratório-descritivo foi realizado através de revisão da literatura e aplicação de questionário elaborado para comparar as respostas apresentadas pelos comitês de revisão ética do Brasil e da França. Concluiu-se que é imprescindível que o preceito da repartição de benefícios seja aplicado, na prática, de forma ampla, em todas as pesquisas, inclusive naquelas que utilizam dados pessoais e amostras corporais, especialmente com relação às minorias sociais, para que as pesquisas oportunizem a todos a percepção do progresso científico-tecnológico. / [en] In the middle of the last century, treaties of human rights and the setting of ethical principles regarding human experimentation were not enough to prevent, in practice, violations of the dignity of the human person in medical experiments practiced in social minorities. Nowadays, there is a complex set of rules that aim not only to protect volunteers but also to ensure equitable access to research results. Contradictions and misinterpretations of these norms, however, limit the full realization of these guarantees, essential in relation to social minorities, in face of their lack of political representation in society. In this sense, an exploratory-descriptive study was carried out by reviewing the literature and applying a questionnaire designed to compare the responses presented by independent ethics committees from Brazil and France. It was concluded that it is imperative that the benefit-sharing be broadly applied in all research, including those that use personal data and body samples, especially with regard to social minorities in order to make progress increasingly accessible to all. / [fr] Au milieu du siècle dernier, les traités relatifs aux droits de l homme et les normes éthiques de la réglementation de la recherche n ont pas suffi à prévenir les violations de la dignité de la personne humaine dans les expériences médicales pratiquées contre les minorités sociales. Il existe, aujourd hui, un ensemble complexe de règles qui visent non seulement à protéger les volontaires, mais aussi à garantir un accès équitable aux résultats de la recherche. Les contradictions et les interprétations erronées de ces normes limitent toutefois la pleine réalisation de ces garanties, essentielles par rapport aux minorités sociales, face à leur manque de représentation politique dans la société. Dans ce sens, une étude exploratoire-descriptive a été réalisée en passant en revue la littérature et en appliquant un questionnaire destiné à comparer les réponses présentées par les comités d éthique du Brésil et de la France. Il a été conclu qu il est impératif que le principe du partage des avantages soit largement appliqué dans toutes les recherches, y compris celles qui utilisent des données personnelles et des échantillons corporels, notamment en ce qui concerne les minorités sociales, afin que les progrès scientifiques soient accessibles à tous.