No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Ce mémoire examine, à l’appui de la théorie de rôles, l’influence de l’UE dans la construction du mécanisme de gestion de catastrophes de l’ASEAN. Contrairement à la plupart de recherches menées sur la relation UE-ASEAN, ce mémoire accorde une attention particulière aux échanges UE-ASEAN dans le domaine de sécurité non-traditionnelle, notamment dans la gestion de catastrophes. À travers nos observations, nous constatons que l’influence de l’UE dans la construction de la politique de sécurité non traditionnelle de l’ASEAN n’est ni monotone, ni constante. Son influence prend souvent forme de commanditaire et d’exemplaire, tandis que lors du lancement ou de l’exécution du projet, l’influence de l’UE cède la place à celle de l’ASEAN elle-même, qui assume constamment la responsabilité de lancer l’initiative et de mettre en place les mesures politiques. Ce mémoire contribue non seulement à remesurer l’influence de l’UE sous forme de différents rôles mais aussi à souligner l’implication des autres acteurs régionaux dans la construction de politiques régionales de l’ASEAN : ils sont tous des acteurs importants dans le développement, l’évolution et l’accomplissent des politiques régionales de l’ASEAN dans la sécurité non- traditionnelle. / Using role theory, this dissertation examines the influence of the EU in the construction of the ASEAN disaster management mechanism. Unlike most research on the EU-ASEAN relationship, this dissertation pays particular attention to EU-ASEAN exchanges in the field of non-traditional security, notably in disaster management. My observations show that the EU's influence in shaping ASEAN's non-traditional security policy is neither monotonous nor constant. Its influence often takes the form of sponsor and exemplar, while at the launch or execution of the project, the EU's influence gives way to that of ASEAN itself, which constantly assumes responsibility for launching the initiative and implementing the policy measures. This dissertation not only helps to re-measure the EU's influence in the form of different roles, but also to highlight the involvement of other regional players in the construction of ASEAN regional policies: they are all important actors in the development, evolution and achievement of ASEAN regional policies in non-traditional security.

À en croire la récente floraison de travaux et d’articles à ce sujet, la politique industrielle fait son grand retour dans les économies développées depuis une dizaine d’années. Mais cette fois-ci, contrairement à d’autres occurrences historiques de ce phénomène, les politiques industrielles mobilisées semblent sous-tendues par des considérations géopolitiques. Plus que la performance économique et la compétitivité, l’objectif de sécurité nationale apparaît de façon croissante comme motivation des mesures économiques. Dans le contexte européen, cette nouvelle approche s’incarne dans le concept d’autonomie stratégique ouverte, qui tente de réconcilier deux visions : d’une part, la reconnaissance d’un ordre mondial changeant et plus menaçant qu’avant ; d’autre part, un attachement historique de l’Europe à l’ouverture des marchés. Une des questions qui demeurent en suspens est celle de la concrétisation de ce concept dans des mesures politiques à l’échelle européenne. Le présent mémoire vise à contribuer à la réflexion sur ce point, en analysant le cas de la législation naissante sur les chaînes d’approvisionnement en matériaux critiques. Le cadre d’analyse de l’institutionnalisme discursif permet de comparer les discours sur l’autonomie stratégique et sur les matériaux critiques. Il met en lumière des complémentarités et résonances, mais également des incohérences : les cadrages, les récits et types d’arguments utilisés pour justifier les deux discours ne sont en effet pas les mêmes. / A recent spate of works and articles has identified a return of industrial policy in developed economies over the past decade. This evolution seems to be underpinned by geopolitical considerations, as national security is increasingly stated as a motivation for economic measures – more so than welfare and competitiveness. In a European context, this new approach is embodied by the concept of open strategic autonomy, which may be seen as an attempt to reconcile two visions: on the one hand, the recognition of a changing world order that is more threatening than before; on the other, Europe's historical attachment to open markets. One of the questions that remain unanswered is how this concept is translated into policy measures. This thesis aims to help answer this question by analyzing the case of emerging legislation on critical raw materials supply chains. By using the analytical framework of discursive institutionalism, this work compares discourses on strategic autonomy and critical materials. It highlights the similarities and echoes, but also inconsistencies of these two sets of ideas, as the framings, narratives and types of arguments used to justify the two discourses vary.

No description available.

No description available.

This dissertation asks how inhabitants of a sustainable village are living out Germany’s transition from nuclear to renewable energy. The sustainable village remains a locus of optimistic attachments for renewable energy advocates, who argue that a decentralized power grid will enable people to more directly participate in power production and politics as “energy citizens.” Yet while rural areas have become sites of speculation, innovation and growth, few rural-dwellers are enfranchised in (or profiting from) the technoscientific projects in their midst. I draw upon 13 months of fieldwork in a northern German village transformed by wind turbines, photovoltaics and biofuels to consider why, asking what kinds of public life flourish in the absence of democratic engagement with renewable technologies. This ethnography engages the village as multiply constituted across domains of everyday life, including transit, farming, waste management, domestic life, and social gatherings. I found that environmental policy, everyday practices, and the area’s material histories combined to produce ontologies—senses of what exists—that circumscribe citizen participation in the energy sector, affording more formal opportunities to men than to women, and privileging farmers’ interests in plans that impacted the larger community. These findings illuminate how many villagers become ambivalent toward the project of the energy transition and disenfranchised from its implementation. Yet many who were excluded from formal participation also engaged with renewable technologies as they sensed out their worlds, using tropes of sustainable energy and technoscientific materials to place themselves in this emerging energy polity. Their everyday worldmaking brimmed with what I call unruly energies, structures of feeling that registered more as affects than as discourse. In the village, these took form as sensory disturbances, disquiet among neighbors, technoscientific optimism and skepticism toward environmental policy. These affective modes of attention, investment and participation were vital aspects of public life that shaped the transition’s unfolding. They exceeded liberal models of renewable energy citizenship, which presume that socioeconomic interest and environmental commitment are universal among citizens. In this way, unruly energies compel more nuanced attention to the multiple, contingent, site-specific ways in which citizenship takes form in the making of eco-capitalist energy infrastructure. / text

Mon travail de recherche consiste à comparer les formes du merveilleux dans deux oeuvres, génériquement, culturellement et linguistiquement tout à fait distinctes et qui pourtant ne sont pas sans liens. Le roman de Jaufré est un roman arthurien écrit en occitan probablement au début du XIIIème siècle, tandis que les Narty Kaddžytæ sont le trésor dupeuple ossète, légendes recueillies aux XIXème et XXème siècles auprès des conteurs (kadæggændžytæ) et publiées notamment par des savants tels que Vs. Miller et V.I. Abaev. G. Dumézil a montré combien le cycle des Nartes, bien que rapporté par la tradition orale, s’enracinait très profondément dans le passé au-delà du peuple ossète lui-même. Dansles légendes de ce petit peuple, dernier locuteur d’une langue nord-est iranienne (la branche scythique), on retrouve maintes accointances avec les coutumes et croyances des Scythes, tels que décrits par Hérodote. [etc.] / My research concentrates on the comparison of the shapes taken by ‘merveilleux’ motives in two works truly different as far as literary genres, cultural and linguistic backgrounds are concerned, and yet not totally lacking connections.The roman de Jaufré is an Arthurian romance written in Occitan, probably from the beginning of the XIIIth century, while the Narty Kaddžytæ (Nart legends) are the treasure of Ossetian people, legends collected during the XIXth and XXth centuries from kadæggændžytæ (oral storytellers), and published by Russian, Ossetian or European scholars such as Vs. Miller, V.I. Abaev. Miller and later Dumézil proved how the Nart Legends, though coming from oral tradition, was rooted in a past far beyond the ethnogenesis of the Ossetian people. A lot of striking connections are to be found between the epic of these people - last speakers of a language from the Northeast Iranian group (or Scythian branch) - and the habits or the faith ofthe Scythian people, such as Herodote described them. [etc.]