No description available.

Während der Evolution entwickelten sich Promotorelemente von Prokaryonten, Eukaryonten und Plastiden in Sequenz und Struktur unterschiedlich. Ein Transfer von Promotorsequenzen zwischen Prokaryonten, Eukaryonten und Plastiden sollte daher zu keiner effizienten Genexpression führen. Mit dieser Arbeit sollte die Spezifität von Promotoren analysiert und ihre Funktionalität über `kingdom´-Grenzen hinaus untersucht werden. Hierfür wurden zwölf pflanzenspezifische Promotoren, welche in der Gentechnik zur Herstellung von transgenen Pflanzen eingesetzt werden, auf Genexpression in fünf Bakterienarten untersucht. Weiterhin wurden drei bakterielle und sechs Plastiden Promotoren auf Genexpression in Nicotiana tabacum untersucht. Die Frequenz, mit der die pflanzenspezifischen Promotoren (P) in den untersuchten Bakterienarten zu einer Expression führten, lag bei 50 % der getesteten Kombinationen. Für den P ST-LS1 aus Solanum tuberosum wurde eine Expression in den fünf untersuchten Bakterienarten nachgewiesen. Zwei der getesteten pflanzenspezifischen Promotoren, P RolC aus Agrobacterium rhizogenes und P 247 aus N. tabacum zeigten keine Expression in den untersuchten Bakterienarten. Die Charakterisierung der mRNA-Transkripte ausgewählter Fusionen der pflanzenspezifischen Promotoren mit den Reportergenen zeigten eindeutig, dass für die Transkriptionsinitiation durch die bakterielle RNA-Polymerase Sequenzelemente der pflanzenspezifischen Promotoren genutzt wurden. Mit einer ortsspezifischen Mutagenese des P ST-LS1 konnte die von der bakteriellen RNA-Polymerase genutzte -10-Region in Escherichia coli und Acinetobacter sp. ermittelt werden. Die `down-Mutanten´ führten in E. coli und Acinetobacter sp. zu einer Reduktion der Expression, wohingegen sie nach stabiler Integration in das Pflanzengenom von N. tabacum eine unverminderte Expression in bezug auf den Wildtyp-Promotor zeigten. Die Untersuchung der bakteriellen und Plastiden Promotoren ergab nur in einem einzigen Fall von neun getesteten Promotoren eine sehr geringe transiente Expression. / During evolution the promoter elements from prokaryotes, eukaryotes and plastids have developed differently with regard to their sequence and structure, implying that in general a transfer of promoter sequences between prokaryotes, eukaryotes and plastids will not cause an efficient gene expression. The aim of this study was to investigate the specificity of promoter sequences and their functionality in different kingdoms. Therefore 12 different plant-specific promoters, all used for the construction of genetically modified plants, were tested for their capability to direct a gene expression in various bacteria. Furthermore three bacterial and six plastid promoters were tested with respect to their ability to direct a gene expression in Nicotiana tabacum. The frequency of plant-specific promoters (P) directing gene expression in bacteria was 50 % of the combinations analysed. The promoter P ST-LS1 of Solanum tuberosum was functional in all bacteria tested. Two of the plant-specific promoters, P RolC of Agrobacterium rhizogenes and P 247 of N. tabacum, caused no gene expression in the bacteria tested. The characterisation of mRNA-transcripts of fusions between the plant-specific promoter sequences and the reporter genes proved that sequence elements of the plant-specific promoters themselves were used for transcription initiation by the bacterial RNA polymerase. By site-directed mutagenesis of the P ST-LS1 the -10 region used by the bacterial RNA polymerase of E. coli and Acinetobacter sp. was identified. The generated `down-mutants´ of the P ST-LS1 promoter showed a reduction of expression in E. coli and Acinetobacter sp. while these mutants were still fully active after stable integration in the genome of N. tabacum compared to the wildtype promoter. The investigation of the bacterial and the plastid promoters showed a very low transient expression of one out of nine promoters tested.

In the European Union an environmental risk assessment is required for the registration of new chemicals, biocides, pesticides and pharmaceuticals. In order to avoid the release of potential hazardous substances, various ecotoxicity tests are performed, including acute and chronic fish tests. As a consequence of the new program of the European Union “Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals” (REACH) the number of animal experiments for environmental risk assessment is expected to increase remarkably within the next years. On the other hand there is a strong societal demand for reducing the number of animal tests by using alternative in vitro models. According to EU directives, investigations using non-human vertebrate embryos are considered pain free in vitro methods and are therefore accepted as alternatives to animal experiments. For the acute fish test, the Danio rerio embryo test (DarT) has been established as a replacement method and included in national regulations at least for waste water (German Waste Water Dues Law). However, no alternatives for chronic fish tests are currently available. The overall goal of this thesis was to work towards such a replacement by extending DarT zu Gene-DarT. Toxicants will initially interact at the molecular level with consequences for physiology, fitness and survival. The analysis of gene expression patterns may unravel elements of these molecular events before any phenotypic changes are visible. The hypothesis of this thesis therefore was that chemical-sensitive genes in embryos exposed in a conventional DarT may indicate toxic impact of substances at sub-acute concentrations and thus enhance the sensitivity of the embryo toxicity test. Furthermore, unlike the conventional DarT-endpoints, gene expression analysis will provide insights into mechanistic processes underlying toxicity. The 3,4-dichloroaniline (3,4-DCA), which is used as a reference compound in the DarT, was selected as model chemical in this thesis. In a first step, differentially expressed genes in embryos exposed to 3,4-DCA were identified by microarray technology and RT-PCR techniques. Six dose-dependent significant differentially expressed genes were identified. These genes were involved in biotransformation pathways (cyp1a, ahr2), stress response (nrf2, maft, ho-1) and cell cycle control (fzr1). Differential expression upon 3,4-DCA exposure was detected below the LOEC (lowest observed effect concentration = 6.2 µM) of survival or developmental disorders of the embryo test (0.78 µM and above). For the validation of stage specific sensitivity, genes were also analysed in post-hatched stages. Extension of exposure to post-hatched stages resulted in a differential expression at lower concentrations as for the embryonic stages, indicating an improved sensitivity due to stage-specific sensitivity or exposure time. To confirm the adaptive function of the 3,4-DCA-sensitive genes, embryonic mRNA abundance was experimentally manipulated by knock down and overexpression. By injection of sense (mRNA) or antisense (siRNA) RNA in one-cell-stages of embryos, the transcript levels of genes were transiently enhanced or repressed in embryos exposed to 3,4-DCA. mRNA injection of the genes cyp1a, ho-1 and nrf2 reduced the number of embryos with 3,4-DCA-induced malformations. In contrast, siRNA injections for the same genes led to an increase in the severity and frequency of developmental disorders. The results clearly indicate the adaptive functions of the investigated genes or their corresponding proteins. This study demonstrates that the analysis of chemical-sensitive gene expression shows the potential to increase the sensitivity of conventional toxicity tests. The analysis of gene expression also provides additional mechanistic information for toxic action, e.g. in the presented study, the involvement of Ah-receptor regulated pathways as an adaptive response. Furthermore, the presented data indicate that functional manipulations, using mRNA and siRNA-injection, are suitable to evaluate the role of differentially expressed genes for toxicity.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.