Thesis (LLM.) -- University of Limpopo, 2017. / The introduction of the King reports on corporate governance in South Africa introduced good corporate governance principles to be applied by companies and entities; public, private and state-owned companies. The lxxvpurpose of King I, II, III and draft King IV on corporate governance is to provide and promote a good transitional process in companies in order for them to showcase the principles of accountability, sustainability and transparency; which are the fundamental aspects of which every company has to adhere to in order for it to be a good corporate citizen of the state. Ethics as mostly dealt with in draft King IV being the founding principles of good corporate governance. The trends across the domains show a lack of good corporate governance between the shareholder, board and management with displacement of the controlling and managing abilities between the parties. Despite continued upheavals, repeated disappointment and financial shortcomings the government continues to bail state-owned airlines from a state of insolvency. This study aims to analyze the application of the corporate governance principles in the aviation sector looking closely into state-owned airlines.

The study critically examines developing and sustaining effective governance of universities in Uganda and the extent to which effective governance has contributed to university management. The specific objectives of the study were to; identify obstacles met in implementing measures of effective governance, identify and describe the steps taken in developing and sustaining effective governance in Ugandan universities, and to develop a governance model suitable for Ugandan universities. A mixed research methodology utilising both quantitative and qualitative research paradigms was employed to gather data for this study. The study covered five purposely selected universities in Uganda. Survey questionnaires were administered to vice-chancellors, board members, registrar, deans, heads of department, academic staff and students. Semi-structured interviews also were conducted. The quantitative data was analysed using SPSS while qualitative data was organised into different categories. The following salient findings emerged from the study; the findings presuppose that the universities are governed by boards that are competent and the governance environment was conducive. The governance structures indicate good university governance and the response showed that there were good structures of management in university governance Other findings indicated that Ugandan universities are faced with many obstacles which are limiting the effective governance. It was also indicated that the quality of risk management and internal controls in universities were high. The conclusion indicated that universities were continuously given more pressure by the government, public employers, politicians, and interested organisations. As a benchmark, university performance was seen as an important factor to justify the relevant functions performed by both public and private universities. It was recommended that Ugandan higher education needs improvement in the governance of universities to reduce the challenges faced. This could be initiated not through incremental change but more importantly through the governance renaissance where by the universities can be provided with a greater leeway in their functions to sustain effective governance. / Educational Leadership and Management / D. Ed. (Educational Management)

Drawing upon the concept of governance, this dissertation refers to the two most commonly employed mechanisms that ensure high quality knowledge in electronic repositories as expert-governance and community-governance. In three related but distinct essays, the dissertation examines the governance concept, and investigates contributing knowledge to and using knowledge from electronic repositories governed by these two mechanisms. The first essay sets the conceptual foundations of knowledge governance in repositories, and examines the salient aspects of expert- and community-governance that contribute to knowledge quality. The essay adopts an interpretive research methodology and analyzes empirical data collected from a range of organizations using interviews and online questionnaires. Findings suggest that executing governance functions thoroughly, experts' credibility, and experts' ownership of content contribute to knowledge quality in expert-governed repositories; and executing governance functions continuously and by a diverse set of members, and members' involvement in governance contribute to knowledge quality in community-governed repositories. The second essay investigates the factors that influence individuals to make voluntary contributions to expert- and community-governed repositories. This essay employs the same research methodology used in Essay I and suggests that personal benefits is a stronger motivator for contributing to expert-governed, and reciprocity is a stronger motivator for contributing to community-governed repositories when these two repositories are implemented on an individual basis in organizational settings. When the two repositories are implemented simultaneously, two sets of factors influence contribution behaviors: knowledge-based factors include the type, formality, and sensitivity of knowledge; and need-based factors include the need for collaboration, expert validation, and recognition. The third essay investigates knowledge use from expert- and communitygoverned repositories using a positivist perspective. It conducts a controlled experiment drawing upon elaboration likelihood model, and finds that the credibility of a governance mechanism positively affects subjects’ perceptions of knowledge quality as well as their intentions to use knowledge, which in turn affect their actual knowledge use. This essay also conducts within-subject comparisons using repeated measures ANOVA to shed light on subjects’ perceptions of expert- and community-governed knowledge assets.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is making significant progress in recent times and is gaining a strong foothold in business. Currently, there is no generally accepted scholarly framework for the governance of AI-based information technologies within corporate environments. Boards of directors who have the responsibility of overseeing corporate operations need to know how best to govern AI technologies within their companies. In response, this dissertation aims to understand the key elements that can assist boards in the governance of AI-based information technologies. Further, it attempts to understand how AI governance elements dynamically interact within a holistic system. As AI governance is a novel phenomenon, an exploratory investigation was conducted via a qualitative approach. Specifically, the study adopted a grounded theory methodology, within the constructivist paradigm, with the intent of generating theory instead of validating existing theory. Data collection included in-depth interviews with key experts in AI research, development, management, and governance processes in corporate and academic settings. Data were further supplemented with data received from conference presentations given by AI experts. Findings from this dissertation elicited a theoretical model of AI governance that shows various AI governance areas and constituting elements, their dynamic interaction, as well as the impact of these elements in enhancing the organizational performance of AI-based projects and reducing the risks associated with those projects. This dissertation provides a scholarly contribution by comparing governance elements within the IT governance domain and the new AI governance domain. In addition to theoretical contributions, this study provides practical contributions for the benefit of the boards of directors. These include a holistic AI governance framework that pictorially represents twenty-two AI governance elements that boards can use to build their own custom AI governance frameworks. In addition, recommendations are provided to assist boards in starting or enhancing their AI governance journeys. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to a set of technologies that seek to perform cognitive functions associated with human minds, such as learning, planning, and problem-solving. AI brings abundant opportunities as well as substantial risks. Major companies are trying to figure out how best to benefit from AI technologies. Boards of directors, with the responsibility of overseeing company operations, need to know how best to govern such technologies. In response, this study was conducted to uncover key AI governance elements that can assist boards in the governance of AI. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with AI experts and by attending AI conference presentations. Findings yield a theoretical model of AI governance that can assist scholars in enhancing their understanding of this emerging governance area. Findings also provide a holistic framework of AI governance that boards can use as a practical tool to enhance their effectiveness of the AI governance process.

No description available.

Yes / This study develops a 'comply or explain' index which captures compliance and quality of explanations given for non-compliance with the corporate governance codes in UK and Germany. In particular, we explain, how compliance and quality of explanations provided in non-compliance disclosures, and various other internal corporate governance mechanisms, affect the market valuation of firms in the two countries. A dynamic generalised method of moments (GMM) estimator is employed as the research technique for our analysis, which enabled us to control for the potential effects of endogeneity in our models. The findings of our content analysis suggest that firms exhibit significant differences in compliance, board independence and ownership structure in both countries. The 'comply or explain' index is positively associated with the market valuation of UK firms suggesting that compliance and quality governance disclosure is value relevant in the UK. Institutional blockholders' ownership is however, negatively associated with the market value of firms, which raises questions about the monitoring role of institutional shareholders in both countries. We argue that both compliance and explanations given for non-compliance are equally important, as long as valid reasons and justifications for non-compliance are provided by the reporting companies. These findings thus imply that the 'comply or explain' principle is working well and that UK and German companies could benefit from the flexibility offered by this principle. With respect to the role of board size, board independence, ownership structure, and institutional ownership of firms, this study offers policy implications.

This dissertation examines the association between independent governance structure and various measures of good governance. The evaluation draws on observations of a dataset of 101 Texas public charities, in particular the organization's self-disclosed governance-related activities as reflected in the transparency, monitoring, and strategic tools available to the public. The study reveals that two measures of good governance are associated with an identified independent governance structure at the organizational level. In managing the governance of the organization, the study finds evidence that less emphasis is placed on the constituted strategic direction clauses listed in the articles of incorporation of the organization. The research suggests that each of the fiduciary stewardship concerns need to be addressed by the legal governing body in order to fulfill good governance as an outcome quality measure.

<p>Bakgrund: Styrelseskandaler som orsakat oroligheter i affärsvärlden har skapat ett behov av ett tydligt regelverk för bolagsstyrning, den skulle förstärka svenska noterade bolags och svenska börsplatsers konkurrenskraft på den internationella kapitalmarknaden. Den svenska koden för bolagsstyrning har kommit att bli en viktig del av regelsystemet på den svenska kapitalmarknaden. Den kräver att svenska börsnoterade bolag skall presentera bolagsstyrningsrapporter. Rapporternas kvalité är viktig för intressenterna som använder sig av bolagsstyrningsinformation.</p><p>Syfte: Syftet med uppsatsen är att analysera utvecklingen av tillämpningen av den svenska koden för bolagsstyrningen. Författarna vill undersöka rapporternas kvalité och se hur den har förändrats mellan åren. Författarna vill vidare utreda om informationen som presenteras i bolagsstyrningsrapporter har blivit mer användbar för intressenterna som nyttjar den.</p><p>Teori: Den teoretiska referensramen utgår ifrån Corporate Governance, agent-teorin, den svenska koden för bolagsstyrning och värderingskriterier som används för att bedöma bolagsstyrningsrapporternas kvalité.</p><p>Metod: Författarna använder sig av den kvantitativa metoden där 36 bolagsstyrningsrapporter jämförs mellan åren 2005 och 2006. Rapporterna granskas med hjälp av de tre värderingskriterierna. Resultatet presenteras i löpande text, tabeller och diagram.</p><p>Analys: Resultatet av granskade rapporter visar att de flesta bolag har utformat sin bolagsstyrningsrapportering enligt Kodens föreskrifter. De analyserade bolagen har generellt förbättrat sina bolagsstyrningsrapporter. Detta påvisar bolagsledningens vilja att ge en ärlig bild av bolaget och skapa en transparens gentemot aktieägare och övriga intressenter. Författarna tror att det leder till ökat förtroende mellan bolaget och deras intressenter.</p> / <p>Background: Board scandals that caused disturbances in the business world created a need for a clear regulation system for corporate governance. This system was created to reinforce Swedish-listed companies and their ability to compete on the international capital market. The Swedish Code for Corporate Governance is an important part of the regulation system on the Swedish capital market. It prescribes that Swedish-listed companies should present reports of corporate governance. The quality of the reports is important for stakeholders who use this information.</p><p>Purpose: The purpose of this essay is to analyse the development of the companies’ applications of the Swedish Code for Corporate Governance. The writers want to examine the quality of the reports and observe how it has changed over the years. Furthermore, the writers want to investigate if the information which is presented in the reports of corporate governance has become more applicable for stakeholders who use it.</p><p>Theory: The theoretical frame of reference is corporate governance, agent theory, the Swedish Code for Corporate Governance, and valuation standards, which are used to evaluate the quality of the reports for corporate governance.</p><p>Method: The writers use the quantitative scientific method to evaluate 36 reports of corporate governance between the years 2005 and 2006. The reports are studied on the basis of the three valuation standards. The results are presented in the text, and in tables and diagrams.</p><p>Analysis: The results of the studied reports show that most of the companies have shaped their reports of corporate governance according to the regulations of the Swedish Code for Corporate Governance. The analysed companies have generally improved their reports of corporate governance. This shows the willingness of the boards to give an honest image of the corporations in order to create a transparency towards shareholders and stakeholders. The writers believe that this will lead to a higher level of trust between the corporations and their stakeholders.</p>

Bakgrund: Styrelseskandaler som orsakat oroligheter i affärsvärlden har skapat ett behov av ett tydligt regelverk för bolagsstyrning, den skulle förstärka svenska noterade bolags och svenska börsplatsers konkurrenskraft på den internationella kapitalmarknaden. Den svenska koden för bolagsstyrning har kommit att bli en viktig del av regelsystemet på den svenska kapitalmarknaden. Den kräver att svenska börsnoterade bolag skall presentera bolagsstyrningsrapporter. Rapporternas kvalité är viktig för intressenterna som använder sig av bolagsstyrningsinformation. Syfte: Syftet med uppsatsen är att analysera utvecklingen av tillämpningen av den svenska koden för bolagsstyrningen. Författarna vill undersöka rapporternas kvalité och se hur den har förändrats mellan åren. Författarna vill vidare utreda om informationen som presenteras i bolagsstyrningsrapporter har blivit mer användbar för intressenterna som nyttjar den. Teori: Den teoretiska referensramen utgår ifrån Corporate Governance, agent-teorin, den svenska koden för bolagsstyrning och värderingskriterier som används för att bedöma bolagsstyrningsrapporternas kvalité. Metod: Författarna använder sig av den kvantitativa metoden där 36 bolagsstyrningsrapporter jämförs mellan åren 2005 och 2006. Rapporterna granskas med hjälp av de tre värderingskriterierna. Resultatet presenteras i löpande text, tabeller och diagram. Analys: Resultatet av granskade rapporter visar att de flesta bolag har utformat sin bolagsstyrningsrapportering enligt Kodens föreskrifter. De analyserade bolagen har generellt förbättrat sina bolagsstyrningsrapporter. Detta påvisar bolagsledningens vilja att ge en ärlig bild av bolaget och skapa en transparens gentemot aktieägare och övriga intressenter. Författarna tror att det leder till ökat förtroende mellan bolaget och deras intressenter. / Background: Board scandals that caused disturbances in the business world created a need for a clear regulation system for corporate governance. This system was created to reinforce Swedish-listed companies and their ability to compete on the international capital market. The Swedish Code for Corporate Governance is an important part of the regulation system on the Swedish capital market. It prescribes that Swedish-listed companies should present reports of corporate governance. The quality of the reports is important for stakeholders who use this information. Purpose: The purpose of this essay is to analyse the development of the companies’ applications of the Swedish Code for Corporate Governance. The writers want to examine the quality of the reports and observe how it has changed over the years. Furthermore, the writers want to investigate if the information which is presented in the reports of corporate governance has become more applicable for stakeholders who use it. Theory: The theoretical frame of reference is corporate governance, agent theory, the Swedish Code for Corporate Governance, and valuation standards, which are used to evaluate the quality of the reports for corporate governance. Method: The writers use the quantitative scientific method to evaluate 36 reports of corporate governance between the years 2005 and 2006. The reports are studied on the basis of the three valuation standards. The results are presented in the text, and in tables and diagrams. Analysis: The results of the studied reports show that most of the companies have shaped their reports of corporate governance according to the regulations of the Swedish Code for Corporate Governance. The analysed companies have generally improved their reports of corporate governance. This shows the willingness of the boards to give an honest image of the corporations in order to create a transparency towards shareholders and stakeholders. The writers believe that this will lead to a higher level of trust between the corporations and their stakeholders.

The thesis is focused on the area of Business Intelligence Governance that seeks to management BI as a complex environment in an organization. The goal of this thesis is to create comprehensive BIG framework that will help to understand and lead BI, to support business strategy execution. The fist part of this thesis is introduction to the area of BIG. It contains definition of the term BI, description of trends in BI, definition of the term BIG and the answer on question Why do we need to governance BI. The second part focuses on description and evaluation of existing BIG instruments. The third part handles about new BIG framework and authorities. It describes particular building blocks of the framework and discovers structure of BIG authorities.