Spelling suggestions: "subject:"governmental institution"" "subject:"overnmental institution""
1 |
Specialistų motyvavimas dirbti socialines - edukacines paslaugas jaunimui teikiančiose nevyrausybinėse organizacijoje / Motivating Professionals to Work in Non-governmental Organizations in the Field of Social-Educational Services for YouthUktverytė, Lina 09 May 2014 (has links)
Su jaunimu dirbančiose nevyriausybinėse organizacijose (NVO) dirba įvairūs specialistai, kuriuos svarbu tinkamai motyvuoti. Jų motyvavimas yra vienas svarbiausių organizacijos uždavinių, nes nuo darbuotojų darbo efektyvumo, produktyvumo ir elgsenos priklauso visos organizacijos tikslų įgyvendinimas. Tyrimo objektas: specialistų motyvavimas dirbti socialines – edukacines paslaugas jaunimui teikiančiose nevyriausybinėse organizacijose. Tyrimo tikslas: atskleisti specialistų motyvavimo dirbti socialines – edukacines paslaugas jaunimui teikiančiose nevyriausybinėse organizacijose galimybes. / There are different professionals who work with youth in non-governmental organizations (NGO) and it is important to motivate them properly. Their motivation is one of the most important tasks to organization, because goal achievement of the whole organization depends on the effectiveness of employees’ activity, efficiency and behavior. Research object: motivating professionals to work in non-governmental organizations in the field of social-educational services for youth. Research goal: to identify opportunities of motivating professionals to work in non-governmental organizations in the field of social-educational services for youth.
|
2 |
The meaning of 'Organ of State` in South African lawMdumbe, Moses Fanyana 30 June 2003 (has links)
`Organ of state' as a constitutional concept was first introduced by the 1993 Constitution, in which it was defined as including any statutory body or functionary. In their interpretation of this notion, the courts and academic writers invoked the tests developed at common law in order to determine its meaning. The commentators, on the one hand, used a variety of tests. The courts, on the other hand, subscribed to what has come to be known as the `control test'. The 1996 Constitution followed with a comprehensive definition of `organ of state'. This notion is also employed in other laws by direct reference or incorporation of the definition in section 239 with slight adjustments. Regrettably, the limited approach developed by the court in their interpretation of the notion of `organ of state' for the purposes of the 1993 Constitution has spilled over to the interpretation of the concept under the 1996 Constitution. The question is whether this is justifiable. The constitutional definition of `organ of state' makes it clear that other institutions and functionaries are organs of state on the basis of what they are and others by virtue of the functions they are engaged in. Therefore strict adherence to the control test or any other test could unjustifiably limit the application of the Constitution. / Jurisprudence / LL.M.
|
3 |
The meaning of 'Organ of State` in South African lawMdumbe, Moses Fanyana 30 June 2003 (has links)
`Organ of state' as a constitutional concept was first introduced by the 1993 Constitution, in which it was defined as including any statutory body or functionary. In their interpretation of this notion, the courts and academic writers invoked the tests developed at common law in order to determine its meaning. The commentators, on the one hand, used a variety of tests. The courts, on the other hand, subscribed to what has come to be known as the `control test'. The 1996 Constitution followed with a comprehensive definition of `organ of state'. This notion is also employed in other laws by direct reference or incorporation of the definition in section 239 with slight adjustments. Regrettably, the limited approach developed by the court in their interpretation of the notion of `organ of state' for the purposes of the 1993 Constitution has spilled over to the interpretation of the concept under the 1996 Constitution. The question is whether this is justifiable. The constitutional definition of `organ of state' makes it clear that other institutions and functionaries are organs of state on the basis of what they are and others by virtue of the functions they are engaged in. Therefore strict adherence to the control test or any other test could unjustifiably limit the application of the Constitution. / Jurisprudence / LL.M.
|
Page generated in 0.1016 seconds