This master's thesis focuses on the problem area of option pricing under stochastic volatility. The theoretical part includes terms that are essential for understanding the problem area of option pricing and explains particular models for both option pricing under stochastic volatility and those under constant volatility. The application of described models is performed in the practical part of the thesis. After that particular models are compared to the real data.

The thesis focuses on methods of option prices calculations using two different pricing models which are Heston and Black-Scholes models. The first part describes theory of these two models and conlcudes with a comparison of the risk-neutral measures of these two models. In the second part, the relations between input parameters and the option price generated by these models are clarified. This part ends up with an analysis of the market data and it answers the question which model predicts better.

In this thesis, we consider the pricing problem of an American put option. We introduce a new market model for the evolution of the underlying asset price. Our model adds a new parameter to the well known Heston model. Hence we name our model the extended Heston model. To solve the American put pricing problem we adapt the idea developed by Fouque et al. (2000) to derive the asymptotic formula. We then connect the idea developed by Medvedev and Scaillet (2010) to provide an asymptotic solution for the leading order term P0. We do numerical analysis to gain insight into the accuracy and validity of our asymptotic approximation formula.

Pricing American options has always been problematic due to its early exercise characteristic. As no closed-form analytical solution for any of the widely used models exists, many numerical approximation methods have been proposed and studied. In this thesis, we investigate the Least-Square Monte Carlo Simulation (LSMC) method of Longstaff & Schwartz for pricing American options under the two-dimensional Heston model. By conducting extensive numerical experimentation, we put the LSMC to test and investigate four different continuation functions for the LSMC. In addition, we consider investigating seven different combination of Heston model parameters. We analyse the results and select the optimal continuation function according to our criteria. Then we uncover and study the early exercise boundary foran American put option upon changing initial volatility and other parameters of the Heston model.

The calibration of model parameters is a crucial step in the process of valuation of complex derivatives. It consists of choosing the model parameters that correspond to the implied market data especially the call and put prices. We discuss in this thesis the calibration strategy for the Heston model, one of the most used stochastic volatility models for pricing complex derivatives. The main problem with this model is that the asset price does not have a known probability distribution function. Thus we use either Fourier expansions through its characteristic function or Monte Carlo simulations to have access to it. We hence discuss the approximation induced by these methods and elaborate a calibration strategy with a focus on the choice of the objective function and the choice of inputs for the calibration. We assess that the put option prices are a better input than the call prices for the optimization function. Then through a set of experiments on simulated put prices, we find that the sum of squared error performs better choice of the objective function for the differential evolution optimization. We also establish that the put option prices where the Black Scholes delta is equal to 10\%, 25\%, 50\% 75\% and 90\% gives enough in formations on the implied volatility surface for the calibration of the Heston model. We then implement this calibration strategy on real market data of Eurostoxx50 Index and observe the same distribution of errors as in the set of experiments. / Kalibreringen av modellparametrar är ett viktigt steg i värderingen av komplexa derivat. Den består av att välja modellparametrar som motsvarar de implicita marknadsdata, särskilt köp- och säljpriserna. I denna avhandling diskuterar vi kalibreringsstrategin för Hestonmodellen, en av de mest använda modellerna för stokastisk volatilitet för prissättning av komplexa derivat. Huvudproblemet med denna modell är att tillgångspriset inte har en känd sannolikhetsfördelningsfunktion. Därför använder vi antingen Fourier-expansioner genom dess karakteristiska funktion eller Monte Carlo-simuleringar för att få tillgång till den. Vi diskuterar därför den approximation som dessa genereras av dessa metoder och utarbetar en kalibreringsstrategi med fokus på valet av målfunktion och valet av indata för kalibreringen. Vi bedömer att säljoptionspriserna är en bättre input än samtalspriserna för differentialutvecklingsoptimeringsfunktionen. Genom flera experiment med simulerade säljpriser finner vi sedan att summan av kvadratfel ger bättre val av objektivfunktionen för differentialutvecklingsoptimering. Vi konstaterar också att säljoptionspriserna där Black Scholes deltat är lika med 10\%, 25\%, 50\%, 75\% och 90\% ger tillräcklig information om den implicita volatilitetsytan för kalibrering av Hestonmodellen. Vi tillämpar sedan denna kalibreringsstrategi på verkliga marknadsdata för Eurostoxx50-indexet och observerar samma felfördelning som i experimenten.

In the presented thesis we study three methods of pricing European currency barrier options. With help of these methods we value selected barrier options with underlying asset EUR/CZK. In the first chapter we introduce the basic definitions from the world of financial derivatives and we describe our data. In the second chapter we deal with the classical model based on geometric Brownian motion of underlying asset and we prove a theorem of valuating Up-In-barrier option in this model. In the third chapter we introduce a model with stochastic volatility, the Heston model. We calibrate this model to market data and we use it to value our barrier options. In the last chapter we describe a jump diffusion model. Again we calibrate this jump diffusion model to market data and price our barrier options. The aim of this thesis is to decribe and to compare different methods of valuating barrier options. 1

The aim of this diploma thesis is to analyze and implement selected option pricing models using statistical software. The first chapter introduces theoretical basics of options as financial instruments ideal for hedging and speculation. The second chapter constitutes the core part of this thesis since it unveils theoretical concepts of risk-neutral pricing and at the same time analyze some basic, as well as highly sophisticated option pricing models. In addition, each model is accompanied by a practical example of their effective implementation. The final chapter characterize the most widely used option trading strategies and defines the ideal expected market development linked to each strategy.

The purpose of this thesis is to compare option pricing models. We have investigated the constant volatility models Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) and Merton’s Jump Diffusion (MJD) as well as the stochastic volatility models Heston and Bates. The data used were option prices from Microsoft, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, Walt Disney Company, and the S&P 500 index. The data was then divided into training and testing sets, where the training data was used for parameter calibration for each model, and the testing data was used for testing the model prices against prices observed on the market. Calibration of the parameters for each model were carried out using the nonlinear least-squares method. By using the calibrated parameters the price was calculated using the method of Carr and Madan. Generally it was found that the stochastic volatility models, Heston and Bates, replicated the market option prices better than both the constant volatility models, MJD and BSM for most data sets. The mean average relative percentage error for Heston and Bates was found to be 2.26% and 2.17%, respectively. Merton and BSM had a mean average relative percentage error of 6.90% and 5.45%, respectively. We therefore suggest that a stochastic volatility model is to be preferred over a constant volatility model for pricing options. / Syftet med denna tes är att jämföra prissättningsmodeller för optioner. Vi har undersökt de konstanta volatilitetsmodellerna Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) och Merton’s Jump Diffusion (MJD) samt de stokastiska volatilitetsmodellerna Heston och Bates. Datat vi använt är optionspriser från Microsoft, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, Walt Disney Company och S&P 500 indexet. Datat delades upp i en träningsmängd och en test- mängd. Träningsdatat användes för parameterkalibrering med hänsyn till varje modell. Testdatat användes för att jämföra modellpriser med priser som observerats på mark- naden. Parameterkalibreringen för varje modell utfördes genom att använda den icke- linjära minsta-kvadratmetoden. Med hjälp av de kalibrerade parametrarna kunde priset räknas ut genom att använda Carr och Madan-metoden. Vi kunde se att de stokastiska volatilitetsmodellerna, Heston och Bates, replikerade marknadens optionspriser bättre än båda de konstanta volatilitetsmodellerna, MJD och BSM för de flesta dataseten. Medelvärdet av det relativa medelvärdesfelet i procent för Heston och Bates beräknades till 2.26% respektive 2.17%. För Merton och BSM beräknades medelvärdet av det relativa medelvärdesfelet i procent till 6.90% respektive 5.45%. Vi anser därför att en stokastisk volatilitetsmodell är att föredra framför en konstant volatilitetsmodell för att prissätta optioner.

This thesis investigated Stochastic Runge–Kutta Lawson (SRKL) schemes and their application to the Heston model. Two distinct SRKL discretization methods were used to simulate a single asset’s dynamics under the Heston model, notably the Euler–Maruyama and Midpoint schemes. Additionally, standard Monte Carlo and variance reduction techniques were implemented. European and Asian option prices were estimated and compared with a benchmark value regarding accuracy, effectiveness, and computational complexity. Findings showed that the SRKL Euler–Maruyama schemes exhibited promise in enhancing the price for simple and path-dependent options. Consequently, integrating SRKL numerical methods into option valuation provides notable advantages by addressing challenges posed by the Heston model’s SDEs. Given the limited scope of this research topic, it is imperative to conduct further studies to understand the use of SRKL schemes within other models.

資本市場之系統性風險加劇時，對於利率變動型人壽保險所持有之區隔資產將出現大幅波動，進而影響保險公司之清償能力，本研究透過建立區隔資產負債表之隨機模型，檢視系統性風險下對於人壽保險業違約風險之變化，並透過敏感度分析找出對違約風險影響最大的因子。 本研究依據利率變動型壽險之現金流量建立公司之資產負債模型，預期建立Heston (1993)模型描述標的資產的隨機波動過程，相較於以往Black-Scholes (1973)模型更能反映真實的市場波動。本研究藉由資產與負債的變化，衡量保險公司違約風險，同時分析影響違約風險之各項因子，包含解約、死亡與資產配置策略之關聯性。本研究結果顯示，宣告利率、評價時間長度及資產配置策略等皆會影響保險公司之違約風險及其破產幅度。 / When systemic risk of capital markets exacerbates, the segment assets that held by interest sensitive life insurance policies will fluctuate widely and affect insurer's solvency. This paper considers the problem of valuating the default risk of the life insurers under systematic risk, by constructing a stochastic model of segment balance sheet. In this paper, we establish insurer's asset-liability model on the basis of interest sensitive life insurance policies' cash flow.In particular, we use Heston(1993) model to simulate stochastic process of assets, which is better reflect market volatility than Black-Scholes(1973) model in reality. And moreover, by means of the variation on asset and liability, this study evaluating the default risk of life insurers and analyze the factors affect default risk, like the correlation between surrender, death and asset allocation. And using the result of sensitivity analysis to determine which factor is more important, like guaranteed rate, time period of valuation and so on.