No description available.

Ce mémoire porte sur la réception de Heidegger par Corbin et comprend trois parties : l’appropriation spirituelle que fait Corbin de l’analyse heideggérienne de la phénoménologie herméneutique élaborée dans l’introduction et la première partie de Être et Temps ; son appropriation spirituelle de l’analyse heideggérienne de la temporalité et de l’historialité du Dasein traitée dans la deuxième partie de Être et Temps ; enfin, nous nous pencherons sur le problème de l’imagination qui amène Corbin à prendre un chemin différent que celui de Heidegger dans Kant et le problème de la métaphysique et qui mène Corbin à la dimension où un monde spirituel s’ouvre et qu’il comprend à partir de la pensée des grands mystiques irano-islamiques. La réception de Heidegger par Corbin concerne ainsi davantage la manière dont Heidegger élabore la phénoménologie herméneutique et la temporalité et l’historialité du Dasein que l’ensemble du projet heideggérien et sa propre vision du monde, avec laquelle Corbin prend ses distances. La question reste alors de savoir si l’appropriation par Corbin de la pensée irano-islamique est vraiment compatible avec l’analyse heideggérienne. / Among several sources of Henry Corbin's thought, this master thesis concentrates upon his reception of Heidegger and contains three parts: 1/ Corbin’s spiritual appropriation of heideggerian analysis of hermeneutical phenomenology, elaborated in the introduction and the first part of Being and Time ; 2/ his spiritual appropriation of Heidegger’s analysis of the temporality and historicality of Dasein which is dealt with in the second part of Being and Time ; 3/ finally, we will focus on the question of Imagination which leads Corbin to take a different route than Heidegger’s and that brings him to a level where a spiritual world opens up. The reception of Heidegger by Corbin thus concerns more the way Heidegger elaborates his analyse of hermeneutical phenomenology, temporality, and historicality than on the totality of the heideggerian project. The question therefore remains if Corbin’s appropriation of the heideggerian analysis is compatible with his reading of irano-islamic thought.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-27T17:27:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 FIL - Silvia Cristina S Strake.pdf: 674639 bytes, checksum: 502bc5379adce8d3e5650852bd62eb34 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006-11-10 / This study intends to present historicity [or historicality] as discussed in the work Being and Time by Martin Heidegger. We understand that this author presents an original discussion about the meaning of history in opposition to the conceptions developed by the Historicism. In order to do so we described the considerations presented in Heidegger s thoughts in 1927, which reinforce his overcoming the epistemological approach and proposing the ontological understanding of history. According to him, the comprehension of what history means should not be defined by the attempts to establish it as a science, but an ontological comprehension of history is revealed by describing the fundamental human condition as Dasein. Based upon daily human existence Heidegger inquiries the significance of history, namely the mode-of-being of history - called historicity [historicality]. We tried to accomplish the exposition of the mode-of-being of history by means of the fundamental elements description as inserted in the Analytics of Dasein, because these elements (being-with-others, temporality, understanding, care, being-towards-death, state-of-mind, etc), along with the description of the phenomenologic-hermeneutical methodology, bring into light the original ontological perspective by Heidegger s thoughts to discuss the problem of history / O presente estudo pretende explicitar a historicidade discutida na obra Ser e Tempo de Martin Heidegger. Entendemos que o autor apresenta uma discussão original do sentido da história, contrapondo-se às concepções desenvolvidas pela Escola Histórica [Historicismo]. Para tanto, descrevemos as considerações presentes no pensamento de Heidegger de 1927 que corroboram para a superação da abordagem epistemológica propondo, assim, uma compreensão ontológica da história. A compreensão do que seja a história, segundo o autor, não se caracteriza pela tentativa de estabelecê-la como ciência, mas a compreensão ontológica da história se revela na explicitação da condição fundamental do homem como Dasein. É a partir da existência humana cotidiana que Heidegger problematiza o sentido da história, ou seja, o modo de ser da história denominado de historicidade. Para realizar a exposição do modo de ser da história, utilizamos a descrição dos elementos fundamentais contidos na Analítica do Dasein, pois estes elementos (ser-com-os-outros, temporalidade, compreensão, cuidado, ser-para-a-morte, disposição, etc), juntamente com a descrição do método fenomenológico-hermenêutico, evidenciam a perspectiva ontológica original do pensamento de Heidegger para discutir o problema da história