Inspiré par une croyance fondée sur l’inégalité des parties, le droit del’exécution poursuit le dessein d’un recouvrement rapide, sûr et peu coûteux descréances. Afin de relever ce défi, le droit OHADA a fait de la sécurité juridique uneexigence fondamentale devant démontrer son aptitude à répondre aux attentes desdifférentes parties. Cependant, la pratique du recouvrement permet d’identifier dessources d’insécurité juridique préjudiciable au climat de confiance voulu par lelégilateur communautaire. Ainsi, le caractère quasi-informel du recouvrementamiable, la résistance des juridictions nationales ou l’ineffectivité de certainesdécisions judiciaires perturbent la prévisibilité inhérente à l’exigence de sécuritéjuridique. Conçu comme un système cohérent, le droit de l’exécution OHADA offredes ressources interprétatives propices à la correction des lacunes observées. Dansces conditions, le juge occupe un rôle central dans la promotion de la sécuritéjuridique. D’une part, il assure le contrôle des prérogatives individuelles des partiesdans le sens de réguler les conflits d’intérêts induits par des attentes souventcontradictoires. Dans cette optique, l’une des finalités de l’intervention du juge estd’assurer le respect du recours à la contrainte dans l’exécution. D’autre part,l’exigence de sécurité juridique servira au juge à établir une meilleure corrélationentre toutes les techniques garantissant le paiement du créancier dans un souciconstant d’efficacité. En l’absence d’une consécration explicite de la sécuritéjuridique, la proposition d’une relecture de la théorie de l’exécution en droit privé offrel’opportunité de voir tous les mécanismes de son intégration dans le recouvrementdes créances en tenant compte de la réalité juridico-économique de la créance. / Inspired by the belief grounded on inequalities between parties, theenforcement law continues to design a fast, safe and inexpensive debt recovery. Tomeet this challenge, the OHADA law made legal certainty requirement which mustshow its ability to live up to the expectations of the different parties. However, therecovery practice identifies sources of legal uncertainty detrimental to the climate oftrust advocated by the Community legislature. Thus, the quasi-informal nature of debtcollection, the resistance of national courts or the ineffectiveness of certain judicialdecisions disrupt the predictability pertaining to the requirement of legal certainty.Designed as a coherent system, The OHADA enforcement law affords interpretativeresources conducive to the rectification of the flaws spotted. In these circumstances,the judge plays a central role in promoting legal certainty. On the one hand, hemonitors the individual prerogatives of the parties in the direction of regulatingconflicts of interest arising from the often conflicting expectations. In this context, oneof the purposes of the intervention of the judge is to ensure compliance of coercion inthe execution. On the other hand, the demand of legal certainty will allow the judge toestablish a better correlation between all techniques guaranteeing the payment of thecreditor for the constant sake of efficacy. In the absence of an explicit consecration oflegal certainty, the proposal for a reinterpretation of the theory of enforcement lawprovides the opportunity to see all the mechanisms of its integration in debt recovery,taking into account the legal and economic substance of the claim.

Submitted by Patrícia Brasil Claudino (leitechocolate@msn.com) on 2016-10-10T19:50:43Z No. of bitstreams: 1 II Patricia Brasil Claudino - Mestrado Profissional - Orientador André Corrêa final pos banca 121016.pdf: 880180 bytes, checksum: 441764687fc53007b349076cc1f18603 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Renata de Souza Nascimento (renata.souza@fgv.br) on 2016-10-10T19:52:24Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 II Patricia Brasil Claudino - Mestrado Profissional - Orientador André Corrêa final pos banca 121016.pdf: 880180 bytes, checksum: 441764687fc53007b349076cc1f18603 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Renata de Souza Nascimento (renata.souza@fgv.br) on 2016-10-10T19:53:14Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 II Patricia Brasil Claudino - Mestrado Profissional - Orientador André Corrêa final pos banca 121016.pdf: 880180 bytes, checksum: 441764687fc53007b349076cc1f18603 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-11T12:20:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 II Patricia Brasil Claudino - Mestrado Profissional - Orientador André Corrêa final pos banca 121016.pdf: 880180 bytes, checksum: 441764687fc53007b349076cc1f18603 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-09-15 / The research has aimed at identifying the procedure of mortgage execution and the difficulty faced by mortgage creditors, both in what concerns running the administrative process as anticipated by Lei nº 9514/97, as well as the lawsuit, provided for in the Civil Procedures Code. The work presents an introduction that nominates the legislative framework from Lei nº 9.514/97 and it points out the problems identified from the application of the mentioned law. After that, the questions regarding the mortgage execution were presented in two chapters, the second one being dedicated to the administrative process and the third to the actual lawsuit or judicial execution. To conclude, the work analyzes the application of the theory of substantial compliance and in its conclusion brings an analysis of all questions pointed and suggestions towards the improvement of procedures related to collateral issues. / A pesquisa buscou identificar o procedimento de execução da garantia real de alienação fiduciária e as dificuldades enfrentadas, tanto no âmbito da execução extrajudicial conforme prevista na Lei nº 9514/97, quanto no âmbito da execução judicial, prevista no Código de Processo Civil. O trabalho apresenta uma introdução que indica o marco legislativo da Lei nº 9.514/97, os problemas identificados a partir da aplicação da lei. Em seguida, foram apresentadas as questões relevantes da execução da alienação fiduciária de imóvel em dois capítulos, o segundo dedicado à execução extrajudicial e o terceiro capítulo dedicado à execução judicial. Para finalizar foram realizadas análises sobre a aplicação da teoria do adimplemento substancial do contrato e uma breve análise sobre as questões apontadas, indicando sugestões para melhoria dos procedimentos relacionados à garantia real, bem como, sugerindo temas para novos estudos e debates.