Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2016-08-02T16:12:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Cristine Emily Santos Nascimento.pdf: 1319755 bytes, checksum: d91e3db35f24a91a4dc97b0f7b722524 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-02T16:12:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Cristine Emily Santos Nascimento.pdf: 1319755 bytes, checksum: d91e3db35f24a91a4dc97b0f7b722524 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-01 / This work aims to verify the material truth principle in the administrative procedure for granting disability benefit (sickness and disability retirement pension both) as well as checking the principle of real truth in the judicial process for the same benefits. The intention is to note that the Administrative sphere the process for granting benefits, follows own principles, whose forecast is in the Law of Administrative Procedure. Upon completion of the medical report issued the decision is yet to be taken into consideration characteristics and principles of public administration to better consider the application of the principle of real truth. Already in judicial headquarters for the granting of sickness or disability retirement under the principle of real truth can possibly be interpreted more broadly by the judge, taking into account that apply to judicial proceedings, not only constitutional procedural principles, but strictly procedural principles applicable to pension harvest. After medical-legal experts, the court issues a move that meshes the interpretive act, multidimensional effects, with expert verification, which conceives better application of the principle of real truth. At the end we observe the effects of the application of the principle of real truth in the judicial process, and jurisprudential that is generated due to the interpretation of the judge tract / A presente dissertação tem por objetivo verificar o princípio da verdade material no processo administrativo para concessão de benefício por incapacidade (auxílio-doença e aposentadoria por invalidez, ambos previdenciários); e verificar o princípio da verdade real no processo judicial para os mesmos benefícios. A intenção é observar que, na esfera administrativa, o processo para concessão de benefícios segue princípios próprios, cuja previsão encontra-se na Lei de Processo Administrativo. Após a realização da perícia médica, a decisão é emitida; contudo, devem ser levados em consideração características e princípios próprios da administração pública que melhor consideram a aplicação do princípio da verdade real. Já em sede judicial, a concessão de auxílio-doença ou aposentadoria por invalidez, à luz do princípio da verdade real, tem possibilidade de ser interpretada de forma mais ampla pelo juiz, levando em consideração que são aplicáveis ao processo judicial princípios não somente processuais constitucionais, mas também processuais, estritamente aplicáveis à seara previdenciária. Após a perícia médica judicial, o juiz emite decisão em que se coaduna o ato interpretativo e os efeitos multidimensionais com a verificação pericial, o que concebe melhor aplicação do princípio da verdade real. Ao final, observam-se os efeitos da aplicação do princípio da verdade real no processo judicial e a jurisprudencialização, que é gerada por conta do trato interpretativo do juiz

Brazilians judicial labor procedure is ineffective. It often doesnt realize the complainants rights (at least, not entirely), and when it does, it takes so much time and causes so many privations to the complainant, that much of its utility is lost. This is due to the way in which the system is read by its operators, in a conservative and restrictive way, which still takes into account only the text of the law and ignores the values and principles that inform the system. This leads to the non achievement of the fundamental rights of the workers and the denial of access to justice. Thus, this study is an attempt of insurgency against the way in which the labor procedure law is applied and against the logic of our legal system, a perverse logic, which seems to always favor the debtor and discourage the compliance of the labor law. Our goal is to look for new ways to apply the procedural technique, in order to extract better results from the system, which is especially necessary regarding labor procedure law, because of the nature and importance of the rights that it protects - fundamental rights, thus defined by the Constitution. This is, in fact, an important subject in our study: the demonstration of the fundamentality of the labor rights, in the hope that, once recognized like that, they will be respected, as occurs with the rights recognized as fundamental. The fundamentality of the labor rights and of the right to access the justice (which we designate as the fundamental right to effective judicial protection - subject that also received special emphasis, as well as the vision of the process as a public service provided by the State, as well as its meaning and consequences) generate the necessity of a rapid and effective judicial process, one that, in a short time, offers the employee the full restoration of his violated labor rights. Thats what we tried to build, analyzing institutes such as the provisory injunction, the definitive and provisory execution, the abuse in the use of the process and many more, trying to present new ways to read them and use them, in order to increase the effectiveness of the process. What we tried to show, finally, was how a new vision of the procedural law generates a different application of its institutes, one that fulfills its objectives and protects the worker. What we tried, in other words, was to see how the judicial labor process can help the effectiveness of the labor law, whose restoration is the reason of the judicial system and an obligation of the State. / Brazilians judicial labor procedure is ineffective. It often doesnt realize the complainants rights (at least, not entirely), and when it does, it takes so much time and causes so many privations to the complainant, that much of its utility is lost. This is due to the way in which the system is read by its operators, in a conservative and restrictive way, which still takes into account only the text of the law and ignores the values and principles that inform the system. This leads to the non achievement of the fundamental rights of the workers and the denial of access to justice. Thus, this study is an attempt of insurgency against the way in which the labor procedure law is applied and against the logic of our legal system, a perverse logic, which seems to always favor the debtor and discourage the compliance of the labor law. Our goal is to look for new ways to apply the procedural technique, in order to extract better results from the system, which is especially necessary regarding labor procedure law, because of the nature and importance of the rights that it protects - fundamental rights, thus defined by the Constitution. This is, in fact, an important subject in our study: the demonstration of the fundamentality of the labor rights, in the hope that, once recognized like that, they will be respected, as occurs with the rights recognized as fundamental. The fundamentality of the labor rights and of the right to access the justice (which we designate as the fundamental right to effective judicial protection - subject that also received special emphasis, as well as the vision of the process as a public service provided by the State, as well as its meaning and consequences) generate the necessity of a rapid and effective judicial process, one that, in a short time, offers the employee the full restoration of his violated labor rights. Thats what we tried to build, analyzing institutes such as the provisory injunction, the definitive and provisory execution, the abuse in the use of the process and many more, trying to present new ways to read them and use them, in order to increase the effectiveness of the process. What we tried to show, finally, was how a new vision of the procedural law generates a different application of its institutes, one that fulfills its objectives and protects the worker. What we tried, in other words, was to see how the judicial labor process can help the effectiveness of the labor law, whose restoration is the reason of the judicial system and an obligation of the State.

No description available.

This thesis examines the valuation of transitional justice. It argues the need for and advances a more theoretically expansive set of ideal standards that can be used to assess the process and substantive outcomes of transitional justice decision-making. In so doing, it advocates a victim-inclusive and sustainable model of justice. Effective decision-making is understood in ideal terms as being :(l) politically and publicly inclusive; (2) methodically planned; (3) politically purposive; and (4) legally comprehensive in the sense of equally recognising state obligations and victim rights.

In the face of a conflict, citizens can follow different ways to solve it. But, how justice is configurated in the conclusion of a specific conflict? what guarantee that the procedure of the mechanism is fair? We can think here in the due process of law; nevertheless, due process of law does not reach all mechanisms of conflict resolution.This paper, therefore, focuses in the study of the role of justice in (i) the procedural scope of judicial process and ADR mechanisms; and in (ii) the conflict resolution generated by them. / Ante un conflicto, los ciudadanos pueden seguir diversas vías para dar solución al mismo. Pero, ¿cómo se configura la justicia en la conclusión de un conflicto en específico? ¿qué garantiza que el procedimiento del mecanismo sea uno justo?. Podemos pensar aquí en el debido proceso; no obstante, éste no alcanza a todos los mecanismos de resolución de conflictos.Este artículo, por consiguiente, se enfoca en estudiar cuál es el rol de la justicia en (i) el ámbito procedimental del proceso judicial y de los MARCs; así como en (ii) la resolución al conflicto generada por aquéllos.

Brazilians judicial labor procedure is ineffective. It often doesnt realize the complainants rights (at least, not entirely), and when it does, it takes so much time and causes so many privations to the complainant, that much of its utility is lost. This is due to the way in which the system is read by its operators, in a conservative and restrictive way, which still takes into account only the text of the law and ignores the values and principles that inform the system. This leads to the non achievement of the fundamental rights of the workers and the denial of access to justice. Thus, this study is an attempt of insurgency against the way in which the labor procedure law is applied and against the logic of our legal system, a perverse logic, which seems to always favor the debtor and discourage the compliance of the labor law. Our goal is to look for new ways to apply the procedural technique, in order to extract better results from the system, which is especially necessary regarding labor procedure law, because of the nature and importance of the rights that it protects - fundamental rights, thus defined by the Constitution. This is, in fact, an important subject in our study: the demonstration of the fundamentality of the labor rights, in the hope that, once recognized like that, they will be respected, as occurs with the rights recognized as fundamental. The fundamentality of the labor rights and of the right to access the justice (which we designate as the fundamental right to effective judicial protection - subject that also received special emphasis, as well as the vision of the process as a public service provided by the State, as well as its meaning and consequences) generate the necessity of a rapid and effective judicial process, one that, in a short time, offers the employee the full restoration of his violated labor rights. Thats what we tried to build, analyzing institutes such as the provisory injunction, the definitive and provisory execution, the abuse in the use of the process and many more, trying to present new ways to read them and use them, in order to increase the effectiveness of the process. What we tried to show, finally, was how a new vision of the procedural law generates a different application of its institutes, one that fulfills its objectives and protects the worker. What we tried, in other words, was to see how the judicial labor process can help the effectiveness of the labor law, whose restoration is the reason of the judicial system and an obligation of the State. / Brazilians judicial labor procedure is ineffective. It often doesnt realize the complainants rights (at least, not entirely), and when it does, it takes so much time and causes so many privations to the complainant, that much of its utility is lost. This is due to the way in which the system is read by its operators, in a conservative and restrictive way, which still takes into account only the text of the law and ignores the values and principles that inform the system. This leads to the non achievement of the fundamental rights of the workers and the denial of access to justice. Thus, this study is an attempt of insurgency against the way in which the labor procedure law is applied and against the logic of our legal system, a perverse logic, which seems to always favor the debtor and discourage the compliance of the labor law. Our goal is to look for new ways to apply the procedural technique, in order to extract better results from the system, which is especially necessary regarding labor procedure law, because of the nature and importance of the rights that it protects - fundamental rights, thus defined by the Constitution. This is, in fact, an important subject in our study: the demonstration of the fundamentality of the labor rights, in the hope that, once recognized like that, they will be respected, as occurs with the rights recognized as fundamental. The fundamentality of the labor rights and of the right to access the justice (which we designate as the fundamental right to effective judicial protection - subject that also received special emphasis, as well as the vision of the process as a public service provided by the State, as well as its meaning and consequences) generate the necessity of a rapid and effective judicial process, one that, in a short time, offers the employee the full restoration of his violated labor rights. Thats what we tried to build, analyzing institutes such as the provisory injunction, the definitive and provisory execution, the abuse in the use of the process and many more, trying to present new ways to read them and use them, in order to increase the effectiveness of the process. What we tried to show, finally, was how a new vision of the procedural law generates a different application of its institutes, one that fulfills its objectives and protects the worker. What we tried, in other words, was to see how the judicial labor process can help the effectiveness of the labor law, whose restoration is the reason of the judicial system and an obligation of the State.

Orientador: Aparecida Mari Iguti / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-18T12:07:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rodrigues_EduardoMartinho_M.pdf: 5575234 bytes, checksum: 702fa38a4318596af16627c6107218a3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 / Resumo: INTRODUÇÃO: O termo insalubridade aparece inicialmente na legislação brasileira em 1932 ligada à proibição do trabalho feminino, e em 1943 aos menores de idade. Em 1938, através do decreto _ 399 surge o direito ao adicional de insalubridade, vinculado à implantação do salário mínimo, determinando-se a elaboração de uma listagem das atividades em indústrias insalubres e em 1939 uma portaria foi publicada legalizando os referidos quadros. A partir de 1965 as condições insalubres de trabalho foram regulamentadas pela Portaria _ 491 modificada com pequenas alterações em 1967 e consolidada pela Norma Regulamentadora _ 15 (NR 15) "Atividades e Operações Insalubres" instituída, por sua vez, pela Portaria _ 3.214/78 que se mantêm praticamente inalterada até os dias de hoje. Muitos processos são abertos com o pedido do adicional de insalubridade, e, neste contexto este estudo será realizado. OBJETIVOS: Caracterizar processos judiciais de pedido de adicional de insalubridade quanto ao perfil dos litigantes, aos agentes insalubres, aos aspectos periciais e a sentença proferida. Realizar alguns estudos de caso para compreender a dinâmica de uma solicitação de adicional de insalubridade. MÉTODOS: Estudo documental exploratório de processos judiciais procedentes do Fórum Trabalhista de Campinas - 15a Região, contendo a instrução processual. Assim, foram levantados trinta processos em cinco das doze Varas do Trabalho existentes em Campinas, contemplando a análise documental da petição inicial, da contestação, do laudo pericial, da impugnação, dos pareceres de assistentes técnicos, dos quesitos das partes litigantes e a sentença. Em sequência, foram selecionadas qualitativamente as variáveis do estudo, às quais foram ordenadas, tabuladas e estruturadas sendo dispostas em formulários para a petição inicial, laudo, impugnação e sentença. Para casos singulares, dos trinta processos estudados, foram realizados três estudos de casos, com o histórico da demanda, os resultados da perícia e a sentença do juiz. RESULTADOS E DISCUSSÃO: A respeito dos processos estudados, algumas divergências foram apontadas nos laudos. Os peritos e assistentes técnicos apresentam diferentes dados, indicando distintas abordagens. A sentença do juiz sofre influências em função da qualidade destes laudos o que poderia determinar um julgamento favorável ou não ao trabalhador. Em relação à qualidade dos laudos, destaca-se a expertise, onde a formação, experiência e certa cultura de origem devem ser apontadas; outro fator se relaciona ao próprio contexto do processo, onde a implicação dos diferentes atores sociais afeta a qualidade das informações obtidas. Neste contexto, tem-se a considerar a decalagem entre o momento das atividades exercidas pelo trabalhador e o momento da realização da perícia, período no qual podem ter ocorrido alterações substanciais das situações de trabalho. Em relação às sentenças, entre as variáveis, uma importante refere-se ao laudo pericial; entretanto no seu julgamento (qualidade avaliada pelo juiz), outros meios de prova são considerados, como a oitiva de testemunhas. CONCLUSÕES: Observa-se que os julgamentos tendem a aceitar os argumentos periciais constatando-se a presença de agentes insalubres, confirmando assim, o adicional de insalubridade, e de forma geral, o baixo controle sobre as condições de trabalho, com a persistência da exposição aos agentes de risco à saúde / Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The term insalubrity first appears in Brazilian legislation in 1932 related to the prohibition of female labor, and in 1943 related to children labour. In 1938, by the decree _ 399, it was created the right to the "hazard pay" linked to the implementation of the minimum wage. This act determined the establishment of a listing of activities in insalubrious industries and in 1939, a regulation was published legalizing the mentioned listing. Since 1965, the insalubrious working conditions have been regulated by the decree _ 491 which was modified with minor changes in 1967 and consolidated by the Regulatory Norm nº 15, "Insalubrious Activities and Operations", established by the Act _ 3.214/78, unchanged to nowadays. Many civil actions demand the application of the insalubrity premium. It is in this context that this study is conducted. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to characterize the mentioned actions according to: the profile of the litigants, the insalubrious agents, the expertise aspects and the sentence given. Carry out some case studies in order to better understand the dynamics of a request for the additional by insalubrity. METHODS: A documentary exploration of lawsuits coming from the Labor Forum of Campinas - 15th Region, containing procedural instructions. Thus, thirty cases were selected in five of the twelve Labor Courts in the region, contemplating the documentary analysis of the application, the defense, the expert report, the impugnation, the technical assistant's opinions, the litigant's questions and the sentence. Following, we selected the qualitative variables which were sorted, tabulated and structured. Quantitative data was arranged in initial petition, report, appeal and sentencing forms. For singular cases, three were conducted concerning the historical demand, the results of the expertise and the judge's sentence. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Concerning the studied litigations, some discrepancies in the expertise reports were pointed out. The experts and technical assistants have presented different data in the reports, thus, indicating distinctive approaches. The judge's sentence is influenced by the quality of these reports which could determine whether a positive verdict or not for the employee. In relation to the quality of the reports, the expertise training, experience and background culture must be pointed out; another factor relates to the context of the lawsuit itself, where the involvement of different social actors affects the quality of the information obtained. We still have to consider the gap between the activities performed by the worker and the moment the technical report was carried out, when substantial changes could have occurred in the work place. Regarding the judicial sentences, an important variable refers to the expert report; however, during its assessment (quality carried out by the judge), other evidences are also considered, such as the hearing of witnesses. CONCLUSIONS: It has been observed that the judgments tend to consider the expert arguments noting the presence of insalubrious agents, thus, confirming the right to the hazard pay, and generally, the low control over working conditions with the persistent exposure to health risk agents / Mestrado / Política, Planejamento e Gestão em Saúde / Mestre em Saude Coletiva

Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-01T18:17:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Angela Araujo_Diss pdf.pdf: 911288 bytes, checksum: a88b04cc55d80ac5996d24de0eadf005 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-12-21 / Under the fundamentation of decreasing the existent barriers of access to justice, and to apply the constitutional principle of the reasonable process duration, reforms are being made to the Civil Process Code (Código de Processo Civil), being this instrument of great relevance for the operators of law and the common citizen, since it governs the processual relationships in the judiciary scope. Such reforms strengthened the control accomplished by STF and STJ enormously. In these alterations were inserted § 1st of art. 518 of the CPC, making it possible for the first degree judge not to receive the appeal resource when his decision is in agreement with the STJ and the STF compendiums. Such device can bring several juridical consequences and advantages to the judiciary that will save time and such precious financial and human resources in the judiciary system, as well as for the citizen that will have preserved the processual guaranties of the due legal process, action right and defense, who will have previsibility of the degree of his right before the uniformization, as well as participating in a process governed with basis in the principles of equality, juridical safety, reasonable duration of the process. Thus, this work confirmed the supposition that such juridical consequences brought by the application of the 1st§ of art. 518 of the CPC, known as an impeditive compendium resource, impeditive sentence resource, or still "impeditive effectiveness resource´, legitimate to the adoption of the device in the light of the constitutional principles. The research was of the descriptive type with qualitative inclination for the upraising of data obtained through interviews with judges, chief judges, Ministers of STJ and STF, which made known the development of the ´power to decide´ process, as well as verified the understanding of these magistrates on the consequences that the compendium that gives the bases to the sentence which effect is to impede the resource, on the imposition in the citizen's life, partly in the processual relation, before the principles constitutionally guaranteed. / Sob a fundamentação de diminuir as barreiras existentes de acesso à justiça, e aplicar o princípio constitucional da duração razoável do processo, estão sendo operadas reformas ao Código de Processo Civil, sendo este instrumento de grande relevância para os operadores do direito e o cidadão comum, vez que rege as relações processuais no âmbito do judiciário. Tais reformas fortaleceram sobremaneira o controle realizado pelo STF e STJ. No bojo dessas alterações foi inserido o § 1º do art. 518 do CPC, possibilitando ao juiz de primeiro grau não receber recurso de apelação quando sua decisão estiver de acordo com súmula do STJ e do STF. Tal dispositivo poderá trazer várias conseqüências jurídicas e vantagens ao judiciário que economizará tempo e recursos financeiros e humanos tão preciosos no sistema judiciário, bem como para o cidadão que terá preservado as garantias processuais do devido processo legal, direito de ação e defesa, terá previsibilidade do grau de seu direito em face da uniformização, bem como participará de um processo regido com base nos princípios da igualdade, segurança jurídica, duração razoável do processo. Assim, esse trabalho confirmou a suposição de que tais conseqüências jurídicas trazidas pela aplicação § 1º do art. 518 do CPC, conhecido como súmula impeditiva de recurso, sentença impeditiva de recurso, ou ainda eficácia impeditiva de recurso, legitima a adoção do dispositivo à luz dos princípios constitucionais. A pesquisa foi do tipo descritiva com viés qualitativo para o levantamento dos dados obtidos através de entrevista a juízes, desembargadores, Ministros do STJ e STF, que proporcionou conhecer o desenvolvimento de seu processo decisório, bem como verificar o entendimento desses magistrados sobre as conseqüências que a súmula que fundamenta a sentença cujo efeito impede recurso impõe na vida do cidadão, parte na relação processual, à luz dos princípios garantidos constitucionalmente

Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-01T18:18:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 paloma_mendes_saldanha.pdf: 16266745 bytes, checksum: 80405938181e167002987eb04b3013ef (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-12-21 / This research aim is deconstructing the concept of juridical security from the Jacques Derrida deconstruction theory and the ideas of Wittgenstein II about designation of a meaning from a term use in specific situations, considering cyberculture and the technical risks associated with information society. For that, this study was based on literature review to define a juridical security concept to be deconstructed, and an empirical research with qualitative approach and exploratory objective aiming to know others electronic systems that is part of the brazilian judicial system, and to know security failures cases relating with brazilian electronic process standard system (Pje). The technology quality use was considered more important than the technology itself after observing negative behaviors, referring how man interact with technology. This interaction was placed as a social phenomenon that cannot be denied at the deconstruction moment. As a possible result, this work brings a perception about the real need of deconstructing juridical security concept in order to make these negative behaviors arising from "cracker" culture be faced and absorbed by Brazilian legal system and juridical culture, making juridical security to be seen as a synonymous of information security. / O presente trabalho propõe-se a desconstruir o conceito do princípio da segurança jurídica a partir da teoria da desconstrução de Jacques Derrida e das ideias de Wittgenstein II sobre a designação de um significado a partir do uso de um termo em situações específicas, levando em consideração o contexto da cibercultura e os riscos técnicos atinentes à sociedade da informação. Para tanto, o estudo foi realizado a partir de uma revisão de literatura para definir o conceito de segurança jurídica que seria desconstruído, acrescido de uma pesquisa empírica com abordagem qualitativa e objetivo exploratório com pesquisa de campo para conhecimento de outros sistemas eletrônicos que faz parte do Judiciário brasileiro, bem como para conhecimento de casos de falhas de segurança dentro do sistema padrão de processo eletrônico brasileiro - PJe. Assim, a qualidade de uso da tecnologia foi considerada mais importante que a tecnologia propriamente dita quando da observação quanto ao comportamento negativo, referente a interação do homem com a tecnologia, foi colocado como fenômeno de comportamento social que não pode ser negado no momento da desconstrução. Dessa forma, como resultado, a pesquisa traz a percepção quanto à real necessidade de desconstrução do conceito do princípio da segurança jurídica para que esses comportamentos negativos advindos da cultura cracker sejam absorvidos pelo ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, fazendo com que a segurança jurídica seja vista como sinônimo da segurança da informação tendo em vista a realidade de um Judiciário virtualizado.

This study analyses judicial approaches to sentencing offenders under the age of 18 convicted of serious crimes and their adult counterparts. It traces sentencing patterns, trends and shifts from 1950 to 2009 with reference to key moments. The study seeks to identify factors that determine the choice of sentence. Indeed, competing penal theories appear to be behind judicial decisions. In this regard it is claimed that although it is difficult to identify the extent of factors considered in sentencing decisions, seriousness of crime seems to carry more weight than the prior record and age factor in the selection of a sentence. The study applied both quantitative and qualitative methodologies, using primary or historical and secondary sources of data collection. This involved studying real court cases, the observation of trials and interviews with Wynberg regional court magistrates, Mitchells Plain regional court magistrates and Cape High Court Judges as part of primary-historical data collected. Penal statistics and data gathered included law reports, penological literature was analysed and computerised, and philosophical interpretation of findings was used. The study concludes that sentencing approaches are still marked by inconsistency and vagueness, which require to be improved by ongoing assessment within the courts in pursuit of balanced sentencing that meets various goals. It is pointed out that there are variations between the courts, and among different regional magistrates and judges, which require to be justified in the light of the divergences in crime seriousness and offenders alike. The study claims that sentencing is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, involving history, law and sociology. It further recommends that persons under the age of 18 convicted of serious crime should be accorded less culpability compared to adults with regard to sentence severity. / Criminology / D. Litt. et Phil. (Penology)