<p dir="ltr">Sexual harassment is regarded as a serious issue in society, with a particularly negative impact on young children and adolescents. Online sexual harassment has recently gained prominence as a significant number of communications have taken place online. Online sexual harassment can happen anywhere in the world because of the global nature of the internet, which transcends geographical barriers and allows people to communicate electronically. Online sexual harassment can occur in a wide variety of environments such as through work mail or chat apps in the workplace, on social media, in online communities, and in games (Chawki & El Shazly, 2013).<br>However, especially for non-native English speakers, due to cultural differences and language barriers, may vary in their understanding or interpretation of text-based sexual harassment (Welsh, Carr, MacQuarrie, & Huntley, 2006). To bridge this gap, previous studies have proposed large language models to detect and classify online sexual harassment, prompting a need to explore how language models comprehend the nuanced aspects of sexual harassment data. Prior to exploring the role of language models, it is critical to recognize the current gaps in knowledge that these models could potentially address in order to comprehend and interpret the complex nature of sexual harassment.</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">The Large Language Model (LLM) has attracted significant attention recently due to its exceptional performance on a broad spectrum of tasks. However, these models are characterized by being very sensitive to input data (Fujita et al., 2022; Wei, Wang, et al., 2022). Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine how various LLMs interpret data that falls under the domain of sexual harassment and how they comprehend it after replacing Out-of-Vocabulary words.</p><p dir="ltr"><br>This research examines the impact of Out-of-Vocabulary words on the performance of LLMs in classifying sexual harassment behaviors in text. The study compares the story classification abilities of cutting-edge LLM, before and after the replacement of Out-of-Vocabulary words. Through this investigation, the study provides insights into the flexibility and contextual awareness of LLMs when managing delicate narratives in the context of sexual harassment stories as well as raises awareness of sensitive social issues.</p>

<p dir="ltr">This research explores the application of large language models (LLMs) to comprehension of puns. Leveraging the expansive capabilities of LLMs, this study delves into the domain of pun classification by examining it through the prism of two humor theories: the Computational Model of Humor and the Benign Violation theory, which is an extension of the N+V Theory. The computational model posits that for a phrase to qualify as a pun, it must possess both ambiguity and distinctiveness, characterized by a word that can be interpreted in two plausible ways, each interpretation being supported by at least one unique word. On the other hand, the Benign Violation theory posits that puns work by breaching one linguistic rule while conforming to another, thereby creating a "benign violation." By leveraging the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), this research endeavors to scrutinize a curated collection of English language puns. Our aim is to assess the validity and effectiveness of the use of these theoretical frameworks in accurately classifying puns. We undertake controlled experiments on the dataset, selectively removing a condition specific to one theory and then evaluating the puns based on the criteria of the other theory to see how well it classifies the altered inputs. This approach allows us to uncover deeper insights into the processes that facilitate the recognition of puns and to explore the practical implications of applying humor theories. The findings of our experiments, detailed in the subsequent sections, sheds light on how the alteration of specific conditions impacts the ability of the LLMs to accurately classify puns, according to each theory, where each component of the theory does not influence the result to the same extent, thereby contributing to our understanding of humor mechanics through the eyes of LLMs.</p>

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionised the way we interact with technology and each other, both in society and in professional careers. Although they come with great potential for productivity and automation, AI systems have been found to exhibit biases that reflect and perpetuate existing societal inequalities. With the recent rise of artificial intelligence tools exploiting the large language model (LLM) technology, such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat and Bard AI, this research project aims to investigate the extent of AI bias in said tools and explore its ethical implications. By reviewing and analysing responses to carefully crafted prompts generated by three different AI chatbot tools, the author will intend to determine whether the content generated by these tools indeed exhibits patterns of bias related to various social identities, as well as compare the extent to which such bias is present across all three tools. This study will contribute to the growing body of literature on AI ethics and inform efforts to develop more equitable and inclusive AI systems. By exploring the ethical dimensions of AI bias in selected LLMs, this research will shed light on the broader societal implications of AI and the role of technology in shaping our future.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become ever larger in recent years, typically demonstrating improved performance as the number of parameters increases. This thesis investigates how the probability distributions output by language models differ depending on the size of the model. For this purpose, three features for capturing the differences between the distributions are defined, namely the difference in entropy, the difference in probability mass in different slices of the distribution, and the difference in the number of tokens covering the top-p probability mass. The distributions are then put into different distribution classes based on how they differ from the distributions of the differently-sized model. Finally, the distributions are transformed to be more similar to the distributions of the other model. The results suggest that classifying distributions before transforming them, and adapting the transformations based on which class a distribution is in, improves the transformation results. It is also shown that letting a classifier choose the class label for each distribution yields better results than using random labels. Furthermore, the findings indicate that transforming the distributions using entropy and the number of tokens in the top-p probability mass makes the distributions more similar to the targets, while transforming them based on the probability mass of individual slices of the distributions makes the distributions more dissimilar.