The seventeenth century represents formankind the creation of great literary works that narrate the events that occurred in the reality of that time flawlessly. This article wants to analyze the implications and reviews of some literary texts by renowned authors of that time like Miguel de Cervantes and William Shakespeare with modern legal institutions. Also, to think about how literature enriches the science of law. / El siglo XVII representa para la humanidad la creación de grandes obras literarias que narran los sucesos acontecidos en la realidad de aquella época de manera impecable. El presente artículo busca analizar las implicancias y críticas de algunos textos literarios de renombrados autores de aquella época como Miguel de Cervantes y William Shakespeare con instituciones jurídicas modernas. Asimismo, reflexionar acerca de la manera en que la Literatura enriquece la ciencia del Derecho.

A presente dissertação apresenta uma leitura de Dom Casmurro voltada à compreensão da abordagem das relações conjugais apresentada no romance, publicado em 1900. Nesse momento, o Brasil dava os primeiros passos na construção do direito de família, principalmente através da publicação do Decreto 181/90 que dispunha, principalmente, a respeito do casamento civil. A história de Bento Santiago e Capitu, narrada por Dom Casmurro, apesar de se passar alguns anos antes desse momento histórico, nitidamente, dá conta do movimento social, do qual faz parte a feição normativa citada. Literatura e Direito, sob essa perspectiva, acabam adquirindo feições muito próximas, eis que estão impregnadas dessa matéria social. A observação da forma como se apresenta o casamento e as relações daí decorrentes, sob a pena do narrador que se propõe, em Dom Casmurro, a contar a sua própria história, servirá como instrumento compreensão do romance e da possível contextualização das noções jurídicas nele colocadas. / This work presents a reading of Dom Casmurro focused on understanding the approach of conjugal relationships presented in the novel , published in 1900 . In that period, Brazil took its first steps in the construction of family law , particularly through the publication of Decree No. 181/90 , which had mainly about civil marriage. The story of Bento Santiago and Capitu, narrated by Dom Casmurro , despite spending a few years before that historic moment , clearly , gives an account of the social movement , which is part of the normative aspect mentioned. Literature and Law, from this perspective , end up getting very close to the features as they develop and are impregnated this social issue. The observation of the way it presents marriage and relationships arising therefrom , under the penalty of the narrator proposes that , in Dom Casmurro , tell their own story , will serve as a tool for understanding the novel and the possible context of legal concepts placed in it.

No description available.

Mémoire en recherche-création / Notre recherche s’intéresse aux moyens par lesquels la fictionnalisation du vécu, dans le roman autofictionnel Le Voyage dans l’Est de Christine Angot, permet d’approcher le réel et de dire l’indicible. La métatextualité apparaît comme un moyen important, mettant en évidence la fidélité à l’expérience revendiquée – et donc l’écart vis-à-vis du témoignage littéraire et judiciaire. En outre, l’éthos de l’écrivaine oscille entre l’apparente authenticité et l’incertitude délibérée, une stratégie alternant entre la révélation et la dissimulation du trauma. Enfin, la répétition représente une stratégie narrative et stylistique structurante pour l’ensemble du texte. Au bout du compte, l’expérience de la répétition – avec les nombreuses variations (ou stratégies) étudiées dans notre essai – des événements que constitue fondamentalement la narration du Voyage dans l’Est mène à leur resignification autant qu’à l’agentivité de l’auteure. C’est cette idée de la répétition, à la fois comme moyen d’écrire le trauma (puisque composante essentielle de ce dernier) et comme moyen de le dépasser, qu’explore particulièrement notre création. S’éloignant de l’autofiction, le roman s’ancre néanmoins dans le réel par un intertexte juridique dialoguant avec l’histoire de la protagoniste (elle-même avocate). Deux relations symétriques, séparées par dix ans – et un processus judiciaire –, sont développées : la première – qui a entraîné le dépôt d’accusations –, à l’adolescence, avec un professeur; la seconde, avec l’avocat qui a agi comme poursuivant dans le dossier. L’usage combiné du « je » (narratrice autodiégétique) et des pronoms « tu » et « il » (désignant respectivement l’enseignant et le procureur) évoque, en le subvertissant, le triangle amoureux. Sous forme de fragments, les événements traumatiques sont progressivement reconstitués, à travers la seconde relation, qui s’écarte de la première par des différences croissantes, et qui permet ultimement à la protagoniste de s’en détacher. / Our research focuses on the means by which the fictionalization of lived experience, in Christine Angot's autofictional novel Le Voyage dans l’Est, makes it possible to approach reality and to say the unspeakable. Metatextuality appears as an important means, highlighting the claimed fidelity to experience – and therefore the deviation from literary and court testimony. Furthermore, the author's ethos oscillates between apparent authenticity and deliberate uncertainty, a strategy that alternates between revealing and concealing trauma. Lastly, repetition represents a structuring narrative and stylistic strategy for the entire text. Ultimately, the experience of repetition – with the many variations (or strategies) explored in our essay – of the events that the narration of Le Voyage dans l’Est fundamentally constitutes leads to their resignification as well as to the agency of the author. It is this idea of repetition, both as a means of writing trauma (since it is an essential component) and as a means of going beyond it, that our creation particularly explores. Moving away from autofiction, the novel nevertheless grounds itself in reality through a legal intertext dialoguing with the story of the protagonist (herself a lawyer). Two symmetrical relationships, separated by ten years – and a judicial process – are developed : the first – which led to the laying of charges –, in adolescence, with a teacher; the second, with the lawyer who acted as prosecutor in the case. The combined use of the "I" (autodiegetic narrator) and the pronouns "you" and "he" (respectively designating the teacher and the prosecutor) evokes, while subverting it, the love triangle. In the form of fragments, the traumatic events are gradually reconstituted, through the second relationship, which diverges from the first through increasing differences, and which ultimately allows the protagonist to detach herself from it.