Urbanization of watersheds leads to the degradation of watershed health, as increased areas of imperviousness produce alterations in the flow regime of receiving water bodies. While centralized infrastructure improvements, such as detention ponds, are typically implemented to manage excess runoff, a more decentralized approach that utilizes Low Impact Development (LID) design principles may better preserve the predevelopment flow regime. Peak flow is traditionally used to design both of these types of infrastructure, but this does not capture the changes in the flow regime, nor does it convey the importance of stormwater sustainability to the general public. To further the general public's understanding about stormwater sustainability, an educational tool was used to take a complicated issue and make it easier to understand by a layperson. The first purpose of this work was to explore the effectiveness of educational tools that may be developed to increase public awareness about issues of watershed sustainability and encourage adoption of sustainable stormwater controls. To increase knowledge about stormwater sustainability and encourage more sustainable practices, a new stormwater sustainability metric, the hydrologic footprint residence (HFR), was recently introduced to measure more holistically the impacts of urbanization on the downstream residence. HFR measures changes to the flow regime as the area of land inundated for one unit of time in response to one rainfall event, which is a more relatable metric than peak flow for the general public. It was the second purpose of this work is to explore the effectiveness of HFR in communicating the impacts of urbanization on watershed health, as compared to traditional stormwater metrics, such as peak flow. To test these different objectives, collaboration with the Communication and the Computer Engineering Departments at Texas A&M University was needed to create a survey, which helped evaluate the effectiveness of the educational tool in educating the general public about stormwater sustainability, and encouraging more sustainable practices. The survey was also used to evaluate and compare the use of HFR and peak flow within the quiz for communicating to the general public about stormwater sustainability. Results indicated the quiz was useful for educating the public about stormwater sustainability, encouraging more sustainable practices. In addition, results indicated the HFR was more effective than peak flow in educating the public about LIDs.

This research estimates nitrogen removal from stormwater runoff using a denitrifying bioretention system using the USEPA Storm Water Management Model Version 5 (SWMM-5). SWMM-5 has been used to help planners make better decisions since its development in 1971. A conventional bioretention system is a type of Low Impact Development (LID) technology, which designed without a media layer specifically for achieving nitrogen removal. More recently studies have showed that high TN removal efficiencies are possible when incorporating a denitrification media layer. These systems are known as denitrifying bioretention systems, or alternative bioretention systems. LID projects are currently being designed and developed in Sarasota County, Florida. These projects include a bioretention cell retrofit project on Venice East Blvd., in Venice, FL where thirteen bioretention cells will be developed. Although implementation of LID has already begun in southwest Florida, little research exists on whether these systems are effective at reducing non-point sources of nutrients. Therefore, the overall goal of this research project was to investigate the performance of a proposed bioretention system in Venice, FL to treat non-point sources of nitrogen from stormwater runoff. An alternative bioretention cell (ABC) model was designed to conceptually address water routing through a layered bioretention cell by separating the model into treatment layers- the layers where the nitrification and denitrification reactions are expected to occur within an alternative bioretention system (i.e., nitrification is assumed to occur in the sand media layer, and denitrification in the wood chip media layer). The bioretention cell configuration was based largely on the development plans provided by Sarasota County; however, the configuration incorporated the same electron donor media for denitrification that was used in a prior study (i.e., wood chips). Site-specific input parameters needed to calibrate the ABC model were obtained from laboratory analyses, the literature, and the US Geological website (websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov). Using a mass balance approach, and the hydraulic residence time (HRT) values from the results of a previous study, first-order loss rate coefficients for both nitrification and denitrification (k1 and k2, respectively) were estimated. The rate coefficients were then used to develop treatment expression for nitrification and denitrification reactions. The treatment expressions were used to estimate the annual load reductions for TKN, NO3--N, and TN at the Venice East Blvd. bioretention retrofit site. Six storm events were simulated using a range of nitrogen concentrations. The simulation results showed minimal nitrification removal rates for storm events exceeding 1 inch, due to the planned bioretention system area being only 1% of the subcatchment area. A new ABC model was created (based on EPA bioretention cell sizing guidelines), to be 6% of the subcatchment area. Both systems were used to estimate TN removal efficiencies. The larger sized ABC model results showed average TKN, NO3--N and TN reductions of 84%, 96%; and 87%, respectively; these are comparable to results from similar studies. Results indicate that adequate nitrogen attenuation is achievable in the alternative bioretention system, if it is sized according to EPA sizing guidelines (5-7%).

Preliminary reconnaissance undertaken in summer 2013 identified the scale of stormwater management issues in Xiamen, having frequent storm events that overwhelm the stormwater and sewer infrastructure resulting in widespread flooding. This research explored the role that green facilities play in addressing stormwater issues through the inquiry of Low Impact Development strategies and techniques. From a long-term perspective, green infrastructure planning and implementation is inevitably linked with strong education programs, rational stormwater codes and regulations, a variety of financing and incentives, as well as an integrated and competent administration system. This research presents a design proposal for green infrastructure retrofit for a selected study block in the central area of Xiamen to help guide water sensitive urban design and development in the future. Seven recommendations based on the synthesis of the literature review, key-informant interviews, built-project studies and the retrofit design proposal are proposed. This document will be submitted to Xiamen Urban Planning & Design Institute for considerations to be integrated in city master planning policy and zoning codes and standards as needed and to inform a demonstration project to help advance long-term strategies and recommendations. / October 2015

Stormwater management is an essential aspect of urban hydrology. Urbanized areas have large amounts of impervious surface cover (ISC) and well developed sewer and drainage networks which rapidly channel water and pollutants off of streets and into local streams. This research evaluates the use of vegetated roofs as mechanisms to reduce ISC and stormwater runoff in downtown Atlanta. A 3-D model of the study site was created so that runoff rates could be measured for various rooftop scenarios under different size storm events. The results revealed a reduction in peak runoff and an increase in both the lag time and duration of response time. The results were most significant for the smallest storm event with 2/3 of the rooftops vegetated. As these experiments use a scale model for a section of downtown Atlanta, results are likely to be applicable to similar urban environments and may provide guidance for stormwater engineers.

Bioretention gardens are stormwater management practices that offer numerous water quantity and quality benefits. However, previous studies have reported inconsistent removal of nitrogen and phosphorous in these systems. The first phase of this research involved the construction and monitoring of ten vegetated, mesoscale, bioretention cells in a field setting to provide a comparison of the performance of five alternative designs intended to provide nutrient removal. Results indicated that concentrations of total nitrogen and total phosphorous may be reduced by up to 53 and 79%, respectively, in specially designed bioretention gardens. In the second phase of the research, a GIS-based site selection tool was used to identify areas suitable for bioretention implementation based on physical site requirements. Applying this tool to selected urban catchments demonstrated that bioretention gardens may be integrated into existing urban landscapes on a scale large enough to accommodate runoff and associated nutrient loads from small (<15mm) storms.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Wyoming, 2008. / Title from PDF title page (viewed on June 24, 2009). Includes bibliographical references (p. 109-117).

Master of Landscape Architecture / Department of Landscape Architecture/Regional and Community Planning / Richard H. Forsyth / Low Impact Development (LID) is an emerging ecological method for planning and designing stormwater management. The main goal of LID is that post development hydrology mimic predevelopment hydrology or that of the natural land pattern. The difference between LID and conventional end of pipe engineering is that LID is designed for on-site infiltration. LID was developed in Maryland and has since been adapted to other ecoregions. The introduction and background offer a review of the importance of ecological stormwater management and the basic principles and techniques of LID. Ecological stormwater management involves understanding and applying ecoregion factors such as: climate, physiography/ landform, geology, soils, and plant associations. This thesis begins with a brief overview of the ecoregional factors associated with the Topeka, Kansas (KS) area. Two case studies of LID type stormwater structures are investigated. The case studies, Jackson Street and Hillcrest, are projects of the City of Topeka Water Pollution Control Division (Topeka, KS). The primary topics investigated include: background, political approval process, condition of site before implementation, general project design, stormwater design, soil, plants, LID principles and techniques used, lessons learned, and a critique of each project. Investigation methods include: personal communication with key individuals involved, and a review of site visits, drawings, specifications, and other projects documents.

A urbanização acelerada das últimas décadas aliada à ocupação desordenada e intensa impermeabilização do solo, têm agravado as cheias nas cidades brasileiras. Na cidade de São Paulo, recentemente, os períodos chuvosos, entre os meses de outubro e março, de 2009-2010 e 2010-2011 foram especialmente relevantes, quando ocorreram precipitações intensas e de longa duração que causaram grandes inundações e alagamentos por toda a cidade. Outro agravante é a continuidade da utilização única e exclusivamente de técnicas clássicas com enfoque higienista para a solução dos problemas de drenagem urbana, como é o caso das canalizações dos córregos e rios. Diante dessa problemática surge uma nova abordagem do tema que envolve o manejo sustentável das águas pluviais por meio da utilização de um conjunto de medidas de controle da fonte, que podem ser integradas aos sistemas de drenagem existentes. Essas medidas se baseiam na retenção e infiltração das águas pluviais e na retenção de poluentes, reduzindo a probabilidade de inundações e contribuindo para a melhoria da qualidade da água dos sistemas hídricos urbanos. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar, por meio da modelagem matemática, o efeito que a implantação de medidas controle na fonte pode proporcionar no abatimento dos picos de cheia em áreas urbanas densamente ocupadas. Para tanto foi selecionada a bacia do córrego da Luz localizada no centro da cidade de São Paulo que apresenta altas taxas de impermeabilização do solo. As análises foram feitas com o PCSWMM, que é um sistema de suporte a decisão espacial desenvolvido pela CHI para o SWMM5 da EPA. Foram selecionadas medidas de controle na fonte que possam se adequar em locais onde a disponibilidade de espaço é pequena, como é o caso dos pavimentos permeáveis, telhados verdes e jardins de chuva. Os cenários analisados consideraram a situação atual sem implantação de medidas de controle e a implantação individual e combinada das medidas de controle na fonte. São avaliados eventos de precipitações, considerando diferentes períodos de retorno e durações de chuva e a porcentagem de área impermeável contribuinte para as medidas de controle. Uma análise geral dos resultados da modelagem permite apontar que o amortecimento dos picos de cheia foi verificado em todos os cenários, em maior ou menor intensidade, e o melhor desempenho no abatimento do pico de cheia foi verificado nos cenários que consideraram a implantação de pavimentos permeáveis. Os resultados da modelagem e os baixos custos de implantação dos pavimentos permeáveis sugerem que esta medida, dentre as três analisadas, é a que apresenta melhor custo-benefício. Contudo sabe-se que a implantação de pavimento asfáltico permeável em 100% da área disponível pode não ser viável. Logo a implantação conjunta com outras medidas de controle pode melhorar o desempenho de um sistema de controle de cheias. / The accelerated urban growth in the last decades associated with a disordered occupation and excessive impervious surfaces has worsened the floods in Brazilian cities. In the City of São Paulo, lately, the rainy season between October and March, in 2009-2010 and in 2010-2011, were especially relevant. There were intense and long-lasting rainfalls that caused flooding all over the city. Another aggravating factor is the single and exclusive use of traditional stormwater management methods for solving urban drainage problems, which is the case of stream and river canalizations. When faced with these problems, a new approach that involves the sustainable management of rainwater starts growing. These techniques include a set of low impact development practices that should be incorporated to the existing drainage systems. They are based on the detention and infiltration of stormwater, also the retention of pollutants. They also contribute to decreasing flood probability and to improving water quality of urban water systems. The goal is to evaluate, through a mathematical modeling, the low-impact development practices effect on reducing the peak runoff rates in highly urbanized areas. To this end, a subcatchment located in the center of São Paulo city, called Córrego da Luz, was chosen. This subcatchment has high rates of soil imperviousness. The analysis will be made with the PCSWMM, which is a spatial decision support system for the SWMM5 from EPA. The PCSWMM was developed by CHI. The low-impact development techniques selected for this study are permeable pavements, green roofs and rain gardens. These techniques can be implemented in places where space is no longer available. The scenarios must consider the current situation without the implementation of control measures, the individual and combined implementation of these practices. Various rainfall events were evaluated considering different durations. Also evaluated were the different percentages of impervious areas treated by low-impact development techniques. An overview of modeling results allows stating that the reduction of peak runoff was observed in all the scenarios, at greater or lower intensity. But the best performance was observed in scenarios that considered the implementation of permeable pavements. Modeling results and low-cost implementation of permeable pavements suggest that it is the most cost-effective measure, among the three analyzed. However, it is known that the implementation of permeable pavement in 100% of the available area may not be feasible. Hence, the combined implementation with other low-impact developments might improve the performance of a flood control system.

Low impact developments (LID) have been used to mitigate the effects of urbanization on the hydrological cycle. However, there is a lack of studies on LID performance in subtropical climates and under potential impacts of climate change scenarios. This dissertation evaluated the impacts of two climate change scenarios (RCP 4.5 and 8.5) on urban drainage with pollutants and their effect on LID practice efficiency located in a subtropical climate, with Cfa classification according to Köppen and Geiger. First, the inlet quantity and quality parameters were calibrated. The buildup/washoff model was evaluated, comparing load calibration and concentration of pollutants: chemical oxygen demand (COD), total organic carbon (TOC), phosphate (PO4) (NH3), iron (Fe), cadmium (Cd) and zinc (Zn). Pollutant washing was studied in the area of the bioretention catchment using historical rainfall data between 2013 and 2017, analyzing the influence of the buildup/washoff parameters of each pollutant in the input mass. Afterwards, Eta5x5km (INPE) climate change scenarios were disaggregated to 5-minute intervals by the modified Bartlett-Lewis method. The disaggregated series was used to estimate the impacts of climate change on urban drainage into the bioretention. Therefore, a simple model, developed specifically for the study bioretention cell, was used to estimate the qualitative-quantitative efficiencies of each period of the climate change scenarios. According to the data acquired from INPE, climate change will result in a fall in the volume of rainfall in São Carlos, resulting in lower volumes of surface runoff. The impacts on pollutant washing, however, vary according to the buildup/washoff parameters, explained by a sensitivity analysis. Climate change does not affect the bioretention quantitative efficiency very much: 81.7% from 1980 to 1999 to 81.4% and 81.3% from 2080 to 2099 for CPR scenarios 4.5 and 8.5. The pollutant removal efficiencies, as well as the washing, depend on buildup/washoff characteristics. One of the main consequences of climate change is a drop in the runoff quality. However, even with quantitative efficiency being maintained, bioretention is capable of mitigating this increase in the concentration of pollutants in urban drainage. Thus, the LID will help preserve the quality of downstream rivers, whose volumes will already have diminished by the decrease in rainfall volume. / Técnicas compensatórias de drenagem (TC) vêm sido utilizadas para mitigar efeitos da urbanização no ciclo hidrológico. Entretanto faltam estudos sobre a performance destas TCs em clima subtropical e sob potenciais impactos de cenários de mudanças climáticas. Esta dissertação avaliou os impactos de dois cenários de mudanças climáticas (RCP 4.5 e 8.5) sobre o escoamento superficial urbano com poluentes e sua afetação na eficiência da TC localizada em clima subtropical, classificação Cfa segundo Köppen e Geiger. Primeiro se calibrou os parâmetros de quantidade e qualidade do escoamento superficial na entrada da biorretenção. O modelo buildup/washoff foi avaliado, comparando-se calibração da carga e concentração de poluentes: demanda química de oxigênio (DQO), carbono orgânico total (TOC), fosfato (PO4), nitrato (NO3), nitrito (NO2) amônia (NH3), ferro (Fe), cadmio (Cd) e zinco (Zn). Então se estudou a lavagem de poluentes na área de contribuição da biorretenção com histórico de precipitação entre 2013 e 2017 e analisando a influência dos parâmetros buildup/washoff de cada poluente na entrada de massa. Em seguida, cenários de mudanças climáticas Eta-5x5km (INPE) foram desagregados em intervalos de 5 minutos, pelo método de Bartlett-Lewis modificado. A série desagregada foi utilizada para se estimar os impactos das mudanças climáticas na drenagem urbana, a incidir na biorretenção. Então um modelo simples desenvolvido especificamente para a biorretenção em estudo foi usado para se estimar as eficiências quali-quantitativas de cada período dos cenários de mudanças climáticas. Os dados adquiridos do Inpe mostram que as mudanças climáticas resultarão em uma queda no volume de chuvas em São Carlos, resultando em menores volumes de escoamento superficial. Os impactos na lavagem de poluentes, entretanto, variam de acordo com os parâmetros buildup/washoff, explicados por uma análise de sensibilidade. As mudanças climáticas pouco afetam a eficiência quantitativa da biorretenção, 81.7% no período 1980-1999 para 81.4% e 81.3% no período 2080-2099 para cenários RCP 4.5 e 8.5. Já as eficiências de remoção de poluentes, assim como a lavagem destes, dependem das características buildup/washoff de lavagem. Uma das principais consequências observadas das mudanças climáticas é uma queda na qualidade do escoamento. Porém, mesmo com eficiência quantitativa sendo mantida, a biorretenção é capaz de amenizar essa o aumento na concentração de poluentes na drenagem urbana. Assim, a técnica ajudará a preservar a qualidade dos rios à jusante, que já terão seus volumes diminuídos pela queda no volume de chuva.

No description available.